Elsevier

Livestock Science

Volume 240, October 2020, 104224
Livestock Science

Economic values for index improvement of dual-purpose Simmental cattle

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104224Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Economic index allowed having genetic and economic progress simultaneously.

  • Ignoring reproductive traits decrease genetic improvement in breeding programs.

  • Economic values can be used for farmers to make decisions on genetic selection.

  • Selection index should be update with available new phenotypic information.

Abstract

The selection index methodology is the best approach to increase profit in animal production by genetic selection due to the use of economic values for breeding goals. The aim of this study was to derive economic values through a deterministic bio-economic model in order to construct an economic selection index for dual-purpose Simmental cattle. Phenotypic, genetic and economic information from the Colombian Simmental genetic evaluation were used in this investigation to design a base production system. The economic values for weight at eight months of age, age at first calving, first lactation milk yield and first calving interval were obtained by calculating the partial derivatives of farm profit with respect to each trait, the relative economic importance for each trait was 43.45, 15.29, 5.33 and 35.93%, respectively. By increasing the selection index by one dollar, the milk yield contributed the most to genetic gain with an increase of 10.36 L, while the lowest genetic gain was found for the weight at eight months of age with an increase of 0.088 kg. The milk yield had the greatest economic contribution worth 0.642 dollar for each USD of increase in the index. The economic values and the final selection index provided favorable genetic and economic progress for milk, beef and reproductive traits in Simmental cattle under tropical conditions. Likewise, estimated economic values can be used to make decisions on the selection of foreign bulls to similar Simmental production systems.

Introduction

Greater economic efficiency comes about from genetic improvement, which is most effective when selection is based on net genetic merit of selection candidates accounting for merit in all the economically relevant traits. Selection indexes are considered the most efficient methodology to estimate net merit due to its incorporation of economic values (EVs) for the breeding goal (Smith, 1937; Hazel, 1943). Those EVs can be defined through profit functions, partial budgets or bio-economic models and their use in cattle has been widely reported (Wolfová et al., 2005; Pravia et al., 2014; Costa et al., 2017; Fernandes et al., 2018).

Breeding goals should account for inputs, such as feed, husbandry and marketing costs, as well as for outputs, such as income from sale of products and surplus animals (Kahi and Nitter, 2004; Aby et al., 2012; Campos et al., 2013). Quantifying level of outputs is usually straightforward, but inputs are more difficult to quantify, especially if there is heterogeneity in production practices and lack of economic and productive records. Bio-economic models are a good tool for deriving EVs by taking account of the biological, economic and management variables for a specific situation (Jones et al., 2004; Wolfová et al., 2005; Ali et al., 2018). Those variables are important because they influence the relative importance of different traits that affect the profitability of commercial farms (Byrne et al., 2010).

The EVs of the selection criteria can directly affect response to selection (Hazel and Lush, 1942; Ali et al., 2019). For example, Spelman and Garrick (1997) showed that varying the EV for live weight affected the responses to selection for milk fat and protein in a selection index. In Colombia, selection indexes have been constructed weighting each trait according to its phenotypic variance or using empirical EVs (Vergara and Iriarte, 2002; Montes et al., 2008; Betancur-Zambrano et al., 2012; Agudelo-Gómez et al., 2016). Combined with selection, that approach leads to genetic changes, but may not result in genetic improvement because phenotypic variance is not the same as EV and profitability for commercial breeders could be lower than expected.

Traits to include in a selection index should be identified by their influence on animal profitability (López-Paredes et al., 2017). Golden et al. (2000) proposed deriving economic contributions only for economically relevant traits (ERT), which they defined as traits that directly affect profitability by being associated with a specific cost of production or an income stream. The weight at any age, the age at first calving, the milk yield and the calving intervals can be ERTs as they have direct effect on costs and income (Albera et al., 2004; Kluyts et al., 2007a; Byrne et al., 2016; Ochsner et al., 2017).

In Colombia, farmers benefit from income arising from the sale of milk as well as from the sale of animals for beef. In such dual-purpose systems, selection indexes should simultaneously account for the values of the genetic changes in milk, beef and reproductive traits. The aim of this study was to derive EVs through a deterministic bio-economic model in order to construct an economic selection index (ESI) for dual-purpose Simmental cattle in Colombia. The ESI considered the weight in kilograms at eight months of age (W8M), age at first calving in days (AFC), first lactation (305-days) milk yield in liters (MY), and first calving interval in days (FCI).

Section snippets

Base production system

A production system was defined as a dual-purpose enterprise comprising an average size Colombian Simmental farm of 42 milking cows. For specification of the base production system, biological input parameters (Table 1) were taken from results obtained by Amaya et al., 2019, Amaya et al., 2020 and the Colombian Simmental Breeders Association (Asosimmental). The economic information (veterinary prices, supplementary feed, pasture maintenance, beef and milk prices) was obtained from 20 farms

Results

In the base system, milking cows constituted 53.2% of the animals in the herd at any one time, replacement heifers constituted 10.1% and animals for sale (surplus bulls and heifers) formed the remaining 36.7%. The highest cost was related to feed, representing 83.3% of the total costs included in the analysis. The highest income resulted from milk production, contributing 86.1% of total income. Regarding beef production, surplus bulls-heifers and culled cows accounted for 13.1 and 0.8% of total

Economic values

Comparison of EVs is difficult between studies because biological parameters and economic information are often different according to production systems and economic circumstances. Some authors consider that comparisons through the REI can be still made (Aby et al., 2012; Pravia et al., 2014; Krupová et al., 2016; Costa et al., 2017; Fernandes et al., 2018). However, such comparisons could also be complicated because REI variation can be high depending on the number and type of traits. In this

Conclusions

The losses from ignoring reproductive traits in the selection criteria can be considerable and the phenotypic improvement of W8M could not be the best strategy to increase economic contributions for W8M and for FCI in dual-purpose Simmental cattle in Colombia. Simmental national genetic evaluation in Colombia includes W8M, AFC, MY and FCI due to the available phenotypic data. However, other traits such as milk fat and protein can be more economically important according to the current Colombian

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Alejandro Amaya: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Software, Data curation, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft. Dorian Garrick: Methodology, Formal analysis, Software, Supervision, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Rodrigo Martínez: Writing - review & editing, Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Mario Cerón-Muñoz: Writing - review & editing, Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Declaration Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank ASOSIMMENTAL, AGROSAVIA, Massey University, Universidad de Antioquia and GAMMA research group. Additionally, the first author thanks Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales U.D.C.A and Colciencias (Scholarship No 727 of 2015) for financing his studies in the doctoral program in Animal Science of Universidad de Antioquia.

References (44)

  • M.I. Pravia et al.

    Identification of breeding objectives using a bioeconomic model for a beef cattle production system in Uruguay

    Livest Sci

    (2014)
  • R.J. Spelman et al.

    Effect of live weight and differing economic values on responses to selection for milk fat, protein, volume, and live weight

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1997)
  • M. Wolfová et al.

    Breeding objectives for beef cattle used in different production systems: 1

    Model dev. Livest. Prod. Sci.

    (2005)
  • M. Wolfová et al.

    Selection for profit in cattle: i. economic weights for purebred dairy cattle in the czech republic

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (2007)
  • A. Albera et al.

    Definition of a breeding goal for the Piemontese breed: economic and biological values and their sensitivity to production circumstances

    Livest. Prod. Sci.

    (2004)
  • B.M. Ali et al.

    Effects of incorporating environmental cost and risk aversion on economic values of pig breeding goal traits

    J. Anim. Breed. Genet.

    (2018)
  • B.M. Ali et al.

    Response to a selection index including environmental costs and risk preferences of producers

    J. Anim. Sci.

    (2019)
  • A. Amaya et al.

    Genetic parameter estimates for milk traits in Simmental cattle using genomic and polygenic models

    Rev. Med. Vet. Zoot.

    (2019)
  • A. Amaya et al.

    Genetic parameter estimates for growth and reproductive traits in Simmental cattle from pedigree and genomic relationship

    Rev.MVZ Córdoba.

    (2020)
  • M. Betancur-Zambrano et al.

    Construcción de índices de selección para ganado Holstein en el trópico alto de Nariño

    Revista Investigación Pecuaria.

    (2012)
  • T.C.C. Bittencourt et al.

    Objetivos de seleção para sistemas de produção de gado de corte em pasto: ponderadores económicos

    Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec.

    (2006)
  • G.S. Campos et al.

    Bioeconomic model and selection indices in Aberdeen Angus cattle

    J. Anim. Breed. Genet.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text