Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An investigation into polymer blending, plasticization and cross-linking effect on the performance of chitosan-based composite proton exchange membranes for microbial fuel cell applications

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymer Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chitosan (Cs) is one of the biopolymers increasingly employed to prepare proton exchange membranes (PEMs) in microbial fuel cells (MFCs). In this work, Cs is blended with three other natural or synthetic biopolymers including alginate (Alg), carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) followed by cross-linking/ plasticization with phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, 3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate (TMSPM), and glycerol (Gly), techniques have been examined as enhancement to neat Cs PEM in MFC system. The obtained membranes were characterized by FTIR, XRD, FESEM, mechanical properties, sorption study, and cation exchange capacity studies. The performance of the cross-linked and plasticized blended Cs membranes was evaluated in bio-power production and COD removal with municipal wastewater as an anolyte in the typical 2-chambered MFCs. The performance of MFC attached Cs PEM with the power density of 237 mW/m3 was increased up to 365 mW/m3 when it installed Cs/Alg. Therefore, after plasticization, power densities were decreased; however, COD removal of 23% for Cs/Alg membrane was increased up to 88% for phosphoric acid cross-linked Cs/Alg. The results confirm that this material could be a promising enhanced alternative to neat Cs, as a PEM in MFCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Behera M, Jana PS, Ghangrekar MM (2010) Performance evaluation of low cost microbial fuel cell fabricated using earthen pot with biotic and abiotic cathode. Bioresour Technol 101:1183–1189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghasemi M, Ismail M, Kamarudin SK, Saeedfar K, Daud WRW, Hassan SH, Lee YH, Alam J, Oh SE (2013) Carbon nanotube as an alternative cathode support and catalyst for microbial fuel cells. Appl Energy 102:1050–1056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tian Y, Li H, Li L, Lu Y, Zuo W, Zhang J (2015) In-situ integration of microbial fuel cell with hollow-fiber membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment and membrane fouling mitigation. Biosens Bioelectron 64:189–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harewood AJ, Popuri SR, Cadogan EI, Lee CH, Wang CC (2017) Bioelectricity generation from brewery wastewater in a microbial fuel cell using chitosan/biodegradable copolymer membrane. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:1535–1550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee CH, Terbish N, Holder SL, Popuri SR, Nalluri LP (2019) A study on development of alternative biopolymers based proton exchange membrane for microbial fuel cells and effect of blending ratio and ionic crosslinking on bioenergy generation and COD removal. J Polym Res 26:285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Holder SL, Lee CH, Popuri SR (2017) Simultaneous wastewater treatment and bioelectricity production in microbial fuel cells using cross-linked chitosan-graphene oxide mixed-matrix membranes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:13782–13796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Behling NH (2012) Fuel cells: current technology challenges and future research needs. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ghasemi M, Daud WRW, Hassan SH, Oh SE, Ismail M, Rahimnejad M, Jahim JM (2013) Nano-structured carbon as electrode material in microbial fuel cells: a comprehensive review. J Alloys Compd 580:245–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vane LM, Alvarez FR (2015) Effect of membrane and process characteristics on cost and energy usage for separating alcohol–water mixtures using a hybrid vapor stripping–vapor permeation process. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 90:1380–1390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chae KJ, Choi M, Ajayi FF, Park W, Chang IS, Kim IS (2008) Mass transport through a proton exchange membrane (Nafion) in microbial fuel cells. Energy Fuel 22:169–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Intaraprasit N, Kongkachuichay P (2011) Preparation and properties of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/Analcime composite membrane for a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 4:190–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Logan BE, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, Schröder U, Keller J, Freguia S, Aelterman P, Verstraete W, Rabaey K (2006) Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol 40:5181–5192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohy Eldin MS, Hashem AE, Tamer TM, Omer AM, Yossuf ME, Sabet MM (2017) Development of cross linked chitosan/alginate polyelectrolyte proton exchanger membranes for fuel cell applications. Int J Electrochem Sci 12:3840–3858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thakur VK, Voicu SI (2016) Recent advances in cellulose and chitosan based membranes for water purification: a concise review. Carbohydr Polym 146:148–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wong CY, Wong WY, Walvekar R, Loh KS, Khalid M, Lim KL (2018) Effect of deep eutectic solvent in proton conduction and thermal behaviour of chitosan-based membrane. J Mol Liq 269:674–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wong CY, Wong WY, Loh KS, Daud WRW, Lim KL, Khalid M, Walvekar R (2020) Development of poly(vinyl alcohol)-based polymers as proton exchange membranes and challenges in fuel cell application: a review. Polym Rev 60:171–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ziani K, Oses J, Coma V, Maté JI (2008) Effect of the presence of glycerol and tween 20 on the chemical and physical properties of films based on chitosan with different degree of deacetylation. LWT-Food Sci Technol 41:2159–2165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohanapria S, Bhat SD, Bahu AK, Manokaran A, Vijayakumar R, Pitchumani S, Sridhar P, Shukla AK (2010) Sodium-alginate-based proton-exchange membranes as electrolytes for DMFCs. Energy Environ Sci 3:1746–1756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ye YS, Rick J, Hwang BJ (2012) Water soluble polymers as proton exchange membranes for fuel cells. Polym 4:913–963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hasani-Sadrabadi MM, Dashtimoghadam E, Mokarram N, Majedi FS, Jacob KI (2012) Triple-layer proton exchange membranes based on chitosan biopolymer with reduced methanol crossover for high-performance direct methanol fuel cells application. Polym 53:2643–2651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Berger J, Reist M, Mayer JM, Felt O, Gurny R (2004) Structure and interactions in chitosan hydrogels formed by complexation or aggregation for biomedical applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 57:35–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Krayukhina MA, Samoilova NA, Yamskov IA (2008) Polyelectrolyte complexes of chitosan: formation, properties and applications. Russ Chem Rev 77:799–813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamman JH (2010) Chitosan based polyelectrolyte complexes as potential carrier materials in drug delivery systems. Mar Drugs 8:1305–1132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kulig D, Zimoch-Korzycka A, Jarmoluk A, Marycz K (2016) Study on alginate–chitosan complex formed with different polymers ratio. Polymers 8:166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shaari N, Kamarudin SK (2015) Chitosan and alginate types of bio-membrane in fuel cell application: an overview. J Power Sourc 289:71–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chávez EL, Oviedo-Roa R, Contreras-Pérez G, Martínez-Magadán JM, Castillo-Alvarado FL (2010) Theoretical studies of ionic conductivity of crosslinked chitosan membranes. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:12141–12146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tahtat D, Mahlous M, Benamer S, Khodja AN, Oussedik-Oumehdi H, Laraba-Djebari F (2013) Oral delivery of insulin from alginate/chitosan crosslinked by glutaraldehyde. Int J Biol Macromol 58:160–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Holder SL, Lee CH, Popuri SR, Zhuang MX (2016) Enhanced surface functionality and microbial fuel cell performance of chitosan membranes through phosphorylation. Carbohydr Polym 149:251–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Clerscerl LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (1999) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. America Public Health Accosiation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  30. Xu YX, Kim KM, Hanna MA, Nag D (2005) Chitosan–starch composite film: preparation and characterization. Ind Crop Prod 21:185–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee WF, Chen CY (2015) Graft copolymerization of 3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate onto styrene-butadiene-styrene triblock copolymer. J Elastomers Plast 47:103–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Li X, Xie H, Lin J, Xie W, Ma X (2009) Characterization and biodegradation of chitosan–alginate polyelectrolyte complexes. Polym Degrad Stab 94:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pradhan DK, Samantaray BK, Choudhary RN, Karan NK, Thomas R, Katiyar RS (2011) Effect of plasticizer on structural and electrical properties of Nanocompsoite solid polymer electrolytes. Ionics 17:127–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Goa C, Pollet E, Avérous L (2017) Properties of glycerol-plasticized alginate films obtained by thermo-mechanical mixing. Food Hydrocoll 63:414–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Changhua, 51591, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Narangarav Terbish, Ching-Hwa Lee & Lakshmi P. Nalluri

  2. Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, 11000, Barbados

    Srinivasa R. Popuri

Authors
  1. Narangarav Terbish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ching-Hwa Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Srinivasa R. Popuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lakshmi P. Nalluri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed significantly in this research.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ching-Hwa Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/ competing interests

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Content to participate

Not applicable.

Content for publication

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Terbish, N., Lee, CH., Popuri, S.R. et al. An investigation into polymer blending, plasticization and cross-linking effect on the performance of chitosan-based composite proton exchange membranes for microbial fuel cell applications. J Polym Res 27, 280 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-020-02259-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-020-02259-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation