Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Changes in soil-pores and wheat root geometry due to strategic tillage in a no-tillage cropping system

Promil Mehra https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7073-4507 A B H , Pankaj Kumar C , Nanthi Bolan D E , Jack Desbiolles F , Susan Orgill https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1928-2821 A and Matthew D. Denton G
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute,Menangle, NSW 2568, Australia.

B Future Industry Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia.

C Dhirubhai Ambani Institute of Information and Communication Technology, Gujarat 382007, India.

D Global Centre for Environmental Remediation, University of Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia.

E CRC for High Performance Soils, University of Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia.

F Agricultural Machinery Research and Design Centre, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia.

G School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.

H Corresponding author. Email: Promil.Mehra@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Soil Research 59(1) 83-96 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR20010
Submitted: 11 January 2020  Accepted: 18 July 2020   Published: 21 August 2020

Abstract

Tillage management can influence soil physical properties such as soil strength, moisture content, temperature, nutrient and oxygen availability, which in turn can affect crop growth during the early establishment phase. However, a short-term ‘strategic’ conventional tillage (CT) shift in tillage practice in a continuous no-tillage (NT) cropping system may change the soil-pore and root geometry. This study identifies the impact of a tillage regime shift on the belowground soil-pore and root geometry. Micro X-ray computed tomography (µXCT) was used to quantify, measure and compare the soil-pore and root architecture associated with the impact of tillage shift across different plant growth stages. Soil porosity was 12.2% higher under CT in the top 0–100 mm and 7.4% in the bottom 100–200 mm of the soil core compared with NT. Soil-pore distribution, i.e. macroporosity (>75 μm), was 13.4% higher under CT, but mesoporosity (30–75 μm) was 9.6% higher under NT. The vertical distributions of root biomass and root architecture measurements (i.e. root length density) in undisturbed soil cores were 9.6% higher under the NT and 8.7% higher under the CT system respectively. These results suggest that low soil disturbance under the continuous NT system may have encouraged accumulation of more root biomass in the top 100 mm depth, thus developing better soil structure. Overall, µXCT image analyses of soil cores indicated that this tillage shift affected the soil total carbon, due to the significantly higher soil-pore (i.e. pore surface area, porosity and average pore size area) and root architecture (i.e. root length density, root surface density and root biomass) measurements under the CT system.

Additional keywords: micro X-ray computed tomography (µXCT), root length density, root surface area, soil carbon, soil-pore characteristics.


References

Adu MO, Chatot A, Wiesel L, Bennett MJ, Broadley MR, White PJ, Dupuy LX (2014) A scanner system for high-resolution quantification of variation in root growth dynamics of Brassica rapa genotypes. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 2039–2048.
A scanner system for high-resolution quantification of variation in root growth dynamics of Brassica rapa genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24604732PubMed |

Alaoui A, Helbling A (2006) Evaluation of soil compaction using hydrodynamic water content variation: comparison between compacted and non-compacted soil. Geoderma 134, 97–108.
Evaluation of soil compaction using hydrodynamic water content variation: comparison between compacted and non-compacted soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Asare S, Rudra R, Dickinson W, Fenster A (1999) Quantification of soil macroporosity and its relationship with soil properties. Canadian Agricultural Engineering 41, 23–34.

Atkinson BS, Sparkes DL, Mooney SJ (2009) Effect of seedbed cultivation and soil macrostructure on the establishment of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Soil & Tillage Research 103, 291–301.
Effect of seedbed cultivation and soil macrostructure on the establishment of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baker JM, Ochsner TE, Venterea RT, Griffis TJ (2007) Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—What do we really know? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 118, 1–5.
Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—What do we really know?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ball BC, Scott A, Parker JP (1999) Field N2O, CO2 and CH4 fluxes in relation to tillage, compaction and soil quality in Scotland. Soil & Tillage Research 53, 29–39.
Field N2O, CO2 and CH4 fluxes in relation to tillage, compaction and soil quality in Scotland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Benjamin J, Nielsen D (2004) A method to separate plant roots from soil and analyze root surface area. Plant and Soil 267, 225–234.
A method to separate plant roots from soil and analyze root surface area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bertrand M, Barot S, Blouin M, Whalen J, De Oliveira T, Roger-Estrade J (2015) Earthworm services for cropping systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35, 553–567.
Earthworm services for cropping systems. A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blevins RL, Frye WW (1993) Conservation tillage: an ecological approach to soil management. In ‘Advances in Agronomy’. (Ed. LS Donald) 51, 33–78. (Academic Press). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60590-810.1016/S0065-2113(08)60590-8

Brown B, Nuberg I, Llewellyn R (2017) Stepwise frameworks for understanding the utilisation of conservation agriculture in Africa. Agricultural Systems 153, 11–22.
Stepwise frameworks for understanding the utilisation of conservation agriculture in Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cameron K, Buchan G (2006) Porosity and pore size distribution. In ‘Encyclopedia of soil science 2 edn’. (Ed. R. Lal) pp. 1350–1353. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.) 2001.

Cardoso EG, Zotarelli L, Piccinin JL, Torres E, Saraiva OF, Guimarães MdF (2006) Root system of soybean as a function of soil compaction in no-tillage system. Research Agropec. Bras 41, 493–501.
Root system of soybean as a function of soil compaction in no-tillage system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cavalieri KMV, da Silva AP, Tormena CA, Leão TP, Dexter AR, Håkansson I (2009) Long-term effects of no-tillage on dynamic soil physical properties in a Rhodic Ferrasol in Paraná, Brazil. Soil & Tillage Research 103, 158–164.
Long-term effects of no-tillage on dynamic soil physical properties in a Rhodic Ferrasol in Paraná, Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chassot A, Richner W (2002) Root characteristics and phosphorus uptake of maize seedlings in a bilayered soil. Agronomy Journal 94, 118–127.
Root characteristics and phosphorus uptake of maize seedlings in a bilayered soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cheema HS, Bawa BS 1990. ‘A computer program package for analysis of commonly used experimental designs (Statistical package CPCS1).’ (Punjab Agric. Univ.: Ludhiana, Punjab, India)

Chowdhury S, Farrell M, Butler G, Bolan N (2015) Assessing the effect of crop residue removal on soil organic carbon storage and microbial activity in a no-till cropping system. Soil Use and Management 31, 450–460.
Assessing the effect of crop residue removal on soil organic carbon storage and microbial activity in a no-till cropping system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Conyers M, van der Rijt V, Oates A, Poile G, Kirkegaard J, Kirkby C (2019) The strategic use of minimum tillage within conservation agriculture in southern New South Wales, Australia. Soil & Tillage Research 193, 17–26.
The strategic use of minimum tillage within conservation agriculture in southern New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cook A, Marriott CA, Seel W, Mullins CE (1996) Effects of soil mechanical impedance on root and shoot growth of Lolium perenne L., Agrostis capillaris and Trifolium repens L. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 1075–1084.
Effects of soil mechanical impedance on root and shoot growth of Lolium perenne L., Agrostis capillaris and Trifolium repens L.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

D’Emden F, Llewellyn R (2006) No-tillage adoption decisions in southern Australian cropping and the role of weed management. Animal Production Science 46, 563–569.
No-tillage adoption decisions in southern Australian cropping and the role of weed management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

D’Emden FH, Llewellyn RS, Burton MP (2008) Factors influencing adoption of conservation tillage in Australian cropping regions. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 52, 169–182.
Factors influencing adoption of conservation tillage in Australian cropping regions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ehlers W, Claupein W (1994) Approaches toward conservation tillage in Germany. In ‘Conservation tillage in temperate agroecosystems; development and adaption to soil, climatic, and biological constraints’. (Ed. MR Carter) pp. 141–165. (Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, USA)10.4324/9781315150529-6

Gantzer CJ, Anderson SH (2002) Computed tomographic measurement of macroporosity in chisel-disk and no-tillage seedbeds. Soil & Tillage Research 64, 101–111.
Computed tomographic measurement of macroporosity in chisel-disk and no-tillage seedbeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gardner CM, Laryea KB, Unger PW (1999) ‘Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production.’ (Land and Water Development Division, FAO: Rome)

Haling R, Tighe M, Flavel R, Young I (2013) Application of X-ray computed tomography to quantify fresh root decomposition in situ. Plant and Soil 372, 619–627.
Application of X-ray computed tomography to quantify fresh root decomposition in situ.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Heeraman DA, Hopmans JW, Clausnitzer V (1997) Three dimensional imaging of plant roots in situ with X-ray computed tomography. Plant and Soil 189, 167–179.
Three dimensional imaging of plant roots in situ with X-ray computed tomography.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Helliwell JR, Miller AJ, Whalley WR, Mooney SJ, Sturrock CJ (2014) Quantifying the impact of microbes on soil structural development and behaviour in wet soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 74, 138–147.
Quantifying the impact of microbes on soil structural development and behaviour in wet soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Isbell R (2002) ‘The Australian soil classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Vic.)

IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference base for soil resources 2006. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, Rome. Available at http://www.fao.org/3/a-a0510e.pdf [verified 13 August 2020].

Jassogne L, McNeill A, Chittleborough D (2007) 3D‐visualization and analysis of macro‐and meso‐porosity of the upper horizons of a sodic, texture‐contrast soil. European Journal of Soil Science 58, 589–598.
3D‐visualization and analysis of macro‐and meso‐porosity of the upper horizons of a sodic, texture‐contrast soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jones BJ (2001) ‘Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis.’ (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)

Karunatilake U, Van Es H, Schindelbeck R (2000) Soil and maize response to plow and no-tillage after alfalfa-to-maize conversion on a clay loam soil in New York. Soil and Tillage Research 55, 31–42.
Soil and maize response to plow and no-tillage after alfalfa-to-maize conversion on a clay loam soil in New York.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F (2006) World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift (Berlin) 15, 259–263.
World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kravchenko AN, Negassa WC, Guber AK, Rivers ML (2015) Protection of soil carbon within macro-aggregates depends on intra-aggregate pore characteristics. Scientific Reports 5, 16261
Protection of soil carbon within macro-aggregates depends on intra-aggregate pore characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26541265PubMed |

Krull E, Baldock J, Skjemstad J (2001) Soil texture effects on decomposition and soil carbon storage. In ‘Net Ecosystem Exchange CRC Workshop Proceedings’ 18–20 April 2001. (Eds MUF Kirschbaum, R Mueller) pp. 103–110. (Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting: Canberra)

Kumar P, Huang C, Cai J, Miklavcic SJ (2014) Root phenotyping by root tip detection and classification through statistical learning. Plant and Soil 380, 193–209.
Root phenotyping by root tip detection and classification through statistical learning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kuzyakov Y (2002) Separating microbial respiration of exudates from root respiration in non-sterile soils: a comparison of four methods. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 34, 1621–1631.
Separating microbial respiration of exudates from root respiration in non-sterile soils: a comparison of four methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lynch JP, Brown KM (2012) New roots for agriculture: exploiting the root phenome. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 367, 1598–1604.
New roots for agriculture: exploiting the root phenome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22527403PubMed |

Mairhofer S, Sturrock CJ, Bennett MJ, Mooney SJ, Pridmore TP (2015) Extracting multiple interacting root systems using X-ray microcomputed tomography. The Plant Journal 84, 1034–1043.
Extracting multiple interacting root systems using X-ray microcomputed tomography.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26461469PubMed |

Mangalassery S, Sjögersten S, Sparkes DL, Sturrock CJ, Craigon J, Mooney SJ (2015) To what extent can zero tillage lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from temperate soils? Scientific Reports 4, 4586
To what extent can zero tillage lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from temperate soils?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marsili A, Servadio P, Pagliai M, Vignozzi N (1998) Changes of some physical properties of a clay soil following passage of rubber-and metal-tracked tractors. Soil & Tillage Research 49, 185–199.
Changes of some physical properties of a clay soil following passage of rubber-and metal-tracked tractors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mehra P, Baker J, Sojka RE, Bolan N, Desbiolles J, Kirkham MB, Ross C, Gupta R (2018) A review of tillage practices and their potential to impact the soil carbon dynamics. Advances in Agronomy 150, 185–230.
A review of tillage practices and their potential to impact the soil carbon dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Merrill S, Black A, Bauer A (1996) Conservation tillage affects root growth of dryland spring wheat under drought. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60, 575–583.
Conservation tillage affects root growth of dryland spring wheat under drought.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mori Y, Suetsugu A, Matsumoto Y, Fujihara A, Suyama K (2013) Enhancing bioremediation of oil-contaminated soils by controlling nutrient dispersion using dual characteristics of soil pore structure. Ecological Engineering 51, 237–243.
Enhancing bioremediation of oil-contaminated soils by controlling nutrient dispersion using dual characteristics of soil pore structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mosaddeghi M, Mahboubi A, Safadoust A (2009) Short-term effects of tillage and manure on some soil physical properties and maize root growth in a sandy loam soil in western Iran. Soil & Tillage Research 104, 173–179.
Short-term effects of tillage and manure on some soil physical properties and maize root growth in a sandy loam soil in western Iran.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Munkholm LJ, Hansen EM, Olesen JE (2008) The effect of tillage intensity on soil structure and winter wheat root/shoot growth. Soil Use and Management 24, 392–400.
The effect of tillage intensity on soil structure and winter wheat root/shoot growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Park EJ, Smucker AJ (2005) Saturated hydraulic conductivity and porosity within macroaggregates modified by tillage. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69, 38–45.
Saturated hydraulic conductivity and porosity within macroaggregates modified by tillage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Petersen SO, Schjønning P, Thomsen IK, Christensen BT (2008) Nitrous oxide evolution from structurally intact soil as influenced by tillage and soil water content. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 40, 967–977.
Nitrous oxide evolution from structurally intact soil as influenced by tillage and soil water content.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pierret A, Capowiez Y, Belzunces L, Moran C (2002) 3D reconstruction and quantification of macropores using X-ray computed tomography and image analysis. Geoderma 106, 247–271.
3D reconstruction and quantification of macropores using X-ray computed tomography and image analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pietola LM (2005) Root growth dynamics of spring cereals with discontinuation of mouldboard ploughing. Soil & Tillage Research 80, 103–114.
Root growth dynamics of spring cereals with discontinuation of mouldboard ploughing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Qin R, Stamp P, Richner W (2006) Impact of tillage on maize rooting in a Cambisol and Luvisol in Switzerland. Soil & Tillage Research 85, 50–61.
Impact of tillage on maize rooting in a Cambisol and Luvisol in Switzerland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rasband WS (2012) ImageJ (Version IJ 1.46r). Bethesda: National Institutes of Health, United States Department of Health and Human Services. Available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/ [verified 28 March 2019].

Schjønning P, Rasmussen KJ (2000) Soil strength and soil pore characteristics for direct drilled and ploughed soils. Soil & Tillage Research 57, 69–82.
Soil strength and soil pore characteristics for direct drilled and ploughed soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thien SJ, Graveel JG (1997) ‘Laboratory manual for soil science: agricultural & environmental principles.’ (McGraw-Hill Inc)

Tracy S, Black C, Roberts J, McNeill A, Davidson R, Tester M, Samec M, Korošak D, Sturrock C, Mooney S (2012) Quantifying the effect of soil compaction on three varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using X-ray micro computed tomography (CT). Plant and Soil 353, 195–208.
Quantifying the effect of soil compaction on three varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using X-ray micro computed tomography (CT).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Unger PW, Kaspar TC (1994) Soil compaction and root growth: a review. Agronomy Journal 86, 759–766.
Soil compaction and root growth: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Venzke Filho SP, Feigl BJ, Piccolo MC, Fante Jr L, Siqueira Neto M, Cerri CC (2004) Root systems and soil microbial biomass under no-tillage system. Scientia Agrícola 61, 529–537.
Root systems and soil microbial biomass under no-tillage system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wang W, Kravchenko A, Smucker A, Rivers M (2011) Comparison of image segmentation methods in simulated 2D and 3D microtomographic images of soil aggregates. Geoderma 162, 231–241.
Comparison of image segmentation methods in simulated 2D and 3D microtomographic images of soil aggregates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wang Y, Hu W, Zhang X, Li L, Kang G, Feng W, Zhu Y, Wang C, Guo T (2014) Effects of cultivation patterns on winter wheat root growth parameters and grain yield. Field Crops Research 156, 208–218.
Effects of cultivation patterns on winter wheat root growth parameters and grain yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

White RG, Kirkegaard JA (2010) The distribution and abundance of wheat roots in a dense, structured subsoil–implications for water uptake. Plant, Cell & Environment 33, 133–148.
The distribution and abundance of wheat roots in a dense, structured subsoil–implications for water uptake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yiqi L, Zhou X (2010) Process of CO2 production in soil. In ‘Soil respiration and the environment’. (Eds L Yiqi, X Zhou) pp. 35–59. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA)

Zappala S, Mairhofer S, Tracy S, Sturrock C, Bennett M, Pridmore T, Mooney S (2013) Quantifying the effect of soil moisture content on segmenting root system architecture in X-ray computed tomography images. Plant and Soil 370, 35–45.
Quantifying the effect of soil moisture content on segmenting root system architecture in X-ray computed tomography images.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhang Z, Peng X, Zhou H, Lin H, Sun H (2015) Characterizing preferential flow in cracked paddy soils using computed tomography and breakthrough curve. Soil & Tillage Research 146, 53–65.
Characterizing preferential flow in cracked paddy soils using computed tomography and breakthrough curve.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhou Y, Coventry DR, Denton MD (2016) A quantitative analysis of root distortion from contrasting wheat cropping systems Plant and Soil 404, 173–192.
A quantitative analysis of root distortion from contrasting wheat cropping systemsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhou Y, Coventry DR, Gupta VVSR, Fuentes D, Merchant A, Kaiser BN, Li J, Wei Y, Liu H, Wang Y, Gan S, Denton MD (2020) The preceding root system drives the composition and function of the rhizosphere microbiome. Genome Biology 21, 89
The preceding root system drives the composition and function of the rhizosphere microbiome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32252812PubMed |