Vibro-acoustic analysis of parallel barriers integrated with flexible panels

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115653Get rights and content

Abstract

In urban communities, parallel barriers are commonly erected for controlling environmental noise such as traffic and construction noise. However, owing to the multiple reflections between the parallel barriers, their performance may be worse than that of a single barrier. To improve the performance of parallel barriers, a small piece of flush-mounted panel backed by a slender cavity in an otherwise rigid wall of barriers is proposed. With the excitation of the incident wave from a sound source inside the parallel barriers, the flexible panel vibrates, and sound is radiated out to undergo acoustic interference with the sound field bounded by the parallel barriers. Consequently, the sound energy in this space and diffraction at the barrier top edge are reduced over a broad band in the low-frequency regime. A theoretical model for tackling the vibro-acoustic coupling between the sound field of the open cavity and the vibrating panel is established to investigate the noise reduction mechanism in the shadow zone. With optimal structural properties of the panel, an additional averaged insertion loss of approximately 5 dB can be achieved at 80–1000 Hz. The theorical results, which are experimentally validated, pave the way for the potential applications of the flexible panel devices (FPDs) for improving the noise reduction of parallel barriers.

Introduction

The mitigation of environmental noise with acoustic barriers is common in highly populated cities. These barriers are installed close to sound sources to reflect and block sound waves, thereby the direct propagation of the sound wave to the receiving zone can be intercepted. To reduce the noise on both roadsides, generally one more barrier is erected along the roadsides to form parallel barriers. However, their performance deteriorates when they are close to each other owing to multiple reflection, which forms a reverberant sound field in the space bounded by the parallel barriers and the intervening ground [1], [2], [3]. To deal with this deterioration, absorption layers have been added on the inner surfaces of parallel barriers [4,5]. However, the conventional porous absorptive materials cannot perform well at low frequencies and cause environmental problems such as the accumulation of dust and bacteria. Alternatively, barriers with acoustic soft top or different top profiles such as circular, T-shaped, and branched profiles have been proposed, and their performances have been evaluated [4], [5], [6], [7]. However, the top edges of the barriers are too bulky for low frequencies. To reduce multiple reflections, Monazzam and Fard designed a median barrier with inclined angle to redirect the incident sound upwards, thereby reducing the diffraction at the barrier top edge [8]. In addition, a wave trapping barrier was proposed by Pan et al. [9] and investigated theoretically by Yang et al. [2], in which the barrier inner wall is mounted with multiple trapezoid or triangular wedges. They pointed out that the wedges redirected the sound waves downward to the ground, and as a result, the sound was trapped within the space confined by the parallel barriers and the ground. Wang et al. [10] introduced the use of the inhomogeneous impedance accomplished by an array of slender tubes of varied depths on barrier wall surfaces. The acoustic trapped modes between the barriers are altered, which improves the noise reduction at the receiver.

Recently, the Helmholtz resonator (HR) was used to reduce the noise radiation from the parallel barriers [11]. The HR was mounted on the inner surface, and significant noise reduction was achieved around the resonator's natural frequency in the shadow zones. However, the noise reduction frequency range of the HR remains narrow although the array of resonators improves the reduction of multiple peak frequencies. To widen the working frequency range, this paper proposes to mount the inner surfaces of the parallel barriers with a flexible panel device (FPD) which is composed of a flexible panel and a compact backing cavity. The configuration of the FPD is similar to the panel silencer which was proposed by Huang [12] to attenuate the duct noise. To simplify the practical implementation, Wang et al. [13] replaced the simply supported boundary condition of the panel by the clamped-clamped one. The transmission loss was attractive from low to medium frequency range [14]. To further broaden the noise reduction band, the micro-perforations was introduced for the flexible panel by Wang et al. [15] and Xi et al.[16]. The micro-perforations was to compensate for the deficiency in the pass-band caused by the insufficient sound reflection due to the panel by absorbing sound through micro-perforations. Besides above studies, the use of flexible panel to influence the sound field inside or outside cavity has been found in many literatures [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. For instance, Dowell and Voss [17] investigated a cavity-backed panel, and Pretlove [18] derived an expression for the vibration of cavity-backed panels using in-vacuum modes. Guy [19], Pan and Bies [20], and Tanaka et. al [21] investigated the influence of the flexible panel on the sound field of a confined cavity. Moreover, some researchers studied the structural–acoustic coupling between the sound field in the open space and a baffled cavity covered partially by a flexible structure [22], [23], [24]. These studies provide useful insight into the vibro–acoustic interaction and acoustic coupling of baffled open cavities. However, little attention has been paid to the noise control of open cavities formed by parallel barriers with flexible panel. Moreover, the mechanism of sound suppression in the open cavity system is different from that of a panel silencer in the duct. In this study, the flexible panel vibrates due to the incident sound and sound wave is subsequently radiated out to undergo acoustic interference with the original sound waves confined by the parallel barriers. This leads to the distortion of the sound field between the parallel barriers. With a proper design of the FPD, the sound intensity at the barrier top edge decreases, which improves the noise reduction in the shadow zone. Besides, the FPD is mounted on the inner surfaces of the barrier walls and can cooperate with the top treatments, such as the soft tops, thereby further increasing the noise reduction performance of the parallel barriers.

To analyze the performance of parallel barriers, diffraction theories [25,26] are conventionally used to predict the wave propagation into the shadow zone. However, these analytical methods are not capable of dealing with barriers with complex profiles, neither with the vibro-acoustic coupling and sound interference between the sound waves in the open cavity and the sound waves radiated from the vibrating panel of the FPD. For these cases, the finite element method (FEM) [2,10] or the boundary element method (BEM) [27,28] are a good option. In addition, a hybrid BEM–FEM coupling approach has been developed to study the acoustic performance when the acoustic barriers are considered acoustically elastic walls [29]. However, these numerical methods are insufficient in revealing the sound abatement mechanisms. The Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) approach, which is based on numerical integration of the linearized Euler equations in the time domain, has also been developed and applied in the simulation of sound propagation over barriers [30,31]. However, the huge computer times and memory consumption limit the wide application of FDTD in large scale problem [31]. Recently, the non-Hermitian Hamilton principle [32], [33], [34], which also called technically coupled mode theory, was applied by Tong et al.[35] and Wang et al.[11] to predict the acoustic performance of parallel barriers. In this method, the acoustic space of the parallel barriers is decoupled into two subspaces: a confined cavity space and a semi-infinite space. The sound field of the parallel barriers is represented by the coupled modal variables corresponding to these two sub-domains. In this study, the non-Hermitian Hamilton principle is adopted and further extended to deal with the vibro-acoustic coupling in acoustical open space.

The objectives of this study are: (1) establishing a theoretical model to deal with the vibro-acoustic behavior between the open cavity and vibrating panel; (2) conducting a systematic analysis of the structural-acoustic interaction of the parallel barriers with the flexible panel and backing cavity. (3) revealing the noise control mechanism of the FPD.

Section snippets

Theoretical model for structural-acoustic interaction

In this section, a theoretical model is presented that includes the structural-acoustic interaction and acoustic interference between the confined cavity space and semi-infinite open space.

Model validation

The theoretical method is verified by comparing the calculated results with those obtained from the commercial finite element solver, COMSOL Multiphysics. The parallel barriers have a size of Lx = 1.83 m, Ly = 1 m, and the barrier wall thickness is 0.1 m, which are consistent with the configurations in Ref. [10]. A point source is placed at (0.1, -0.9) m, with the source strength Qs = 0.0001 kg s−2. The performance of the FPD depends on the panel property, backing cavity geometry and mounting

Parametric studies of FPD

Although the FPD is a very simple device for constructions, it does have a lot of variables that substantially influence the noise abatement performance. These variables include geometrical variables such as the length, depth and location of the backing cavity and structural properties such as the bending stiffness and the mass. By considering the practical implementation, the cavity depth is 0.1 m, which is equal to the wall thickness of the barriers, and the lengths of the panel as well as

Experimental validation

The experimental study was conducted in the anechoic chamber. The height and distance of the parallel barriers were consist with those in the theoretical calculations and their length were 4.8 m. The point sound source is stimulated by a special design of speaker, which is consist of a loudspeaker mounted in a brass pipe of diameter 0.025 m and length of 1 m. The distances of the aperture of the pipe to the ground and the nearest barrier are both 0.1 m. One B&K 4189 microphone, located at 1 m

Conclusions

The performance of the parallel barrier integrated with a FPD via vibro-acoustic coupling was studied theoretically and experimentally. The benefit provided by the vibrating panel is the suppression of the sound level for a wide frequency range, in particular the resonant frequencies of the open cavity system, through the interaction between the sound radiation from the vibrating panel and sound field inside the barrier space. The following conclusions are made:

  • 1

    A theoretical model which can

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zhibo Wang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft. Yat Sze Choy: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing - review & editing, Funding acquisition. Chunqi Wang: Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the funding support from Innovation and Technology Fund (UIM381) and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (G-YBN2), (G-YBYA) and (G-YBL0).

References (41)

  • D. Hutchins et al.

    Studies of parallel barrier performance by acoustical modeling

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1985)
  • C. Yang et al.

    A mechanism study of sound wave-trapping barriers

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (2013)
  • G. Watts

    Acoustic performance of parallel traffic noise barriers

    Appl. Acoust.

    (1996)
  • T. Ishizuka et al.

    Performance of noise barriers with various edge shapes and acoustical conditions

    Appl. Acoust.

    (2004)
  • D. Crombie et al.

    The performance of multiple noise barriers

    J. Sound Vib.

    (1994)
  • D.N. May et al.

    Highway noise barriers: new shapes

    J. Sound Vib.

    (1980)
  • T. Okubo et al.

    Efficiency of a noise barrier on the ground with an acoustically soft cylindrical edge

    J. Sound Vib.

    (1998)
  • M.R. Monazzam et al.

    Impacts of different median barrier shapes on a roadside environmental noise screen

    Environ. Eng. Sci.

    (2011)
  • J. Pan et al.

    Wave trapping barriers

  • X. Wang et al.

    Sound barriers from materials of inhomogeneous impedance

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (2015)
  • Z. Wang et al.

    Tunable parallel barriers using Helmholtz resonator

    J. Sound Vib.

    (2019)
  • L. Huang

    Broadband sound reflection by plates covering side-branch cavities in a duct

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (2006)
  • C. Wang et al.

    Optimization of a clamped plate silencer

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (2007)
  • C. Wang et al.

    Time-domain simulation of acoustic wave propagation and interaction with flexible structures using Chebyshev collocation method

    J. Sound Vib.

    (2012)
  • X.N. Wang et al.

    Hybrid noise control in a duct using a light micro-perforated plate

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (2012)
  • Q. Xi et al.

    Noise control of dipole source by using micro-perforated panel housing

    J. Sound Vib.

    (2016)
  • E. Dowell et al.

    The effect of a cavity on panel vibration

    AIAA. J.

    (1963)
  • A. Pretlove

    Free vibrations of a rectangular panel backed by a closed rectangular cavity by a closed rectangular cavity

    J. Sound Vib.

    (1965)
  • R. Guy

    The steady state transmission of sound at normal and oblique incidence through a thin panel backed by a rectangular room–a multi-modal analysis

    Acta Acust. United Acust.

    (1979)
  • J. Pan et al.

    The effect of fluid–structural coupling on sound waves in an enclosure—theoretical part

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1990)
  • Cited by (3)

    • Sound radiation and suppression of an unbaffled long enclosure using Helmholtz resonators

      2022, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
      Citation Excerpt :

      For detailed analysis, near-field solutions are needed which can be obtained by evaluating Eq. (48). Alternatively, FEM-based hybrid methods introduced in Refs. [22–24,36] can be used to attain the near-field results. Before calculating any result using the theoretical model, the wavenumbers and truncated modal numbers should be determined first, as elaborated in Ref. [7].

    • Development of a prediction model for the proportion of buildings exposed to construction noise in excess of the construction noise regulation at urban construction sites

      2021, Automation in Construction
      Citation Excerpt :

      Construction site factors: The geometric relationship between the construction noise sources, barriers, and reception points (i.e., buildings), which is determined by the geometric elements (the area and radius) of the construction site, affects construction noise propagation [22]. In addition, the noise exposure of surrounding buildings varies depending on the height and shape of a barrier, which serves as the first obstacle to the construction noise propagation [23,24]. Therefore, the geometric elements of the construction site and the quantitative elements of the barrier were defined as influencing factors, which were largely divided into four types: (i) the site area, which is the total area of the construction site surrounded by barriers; (ii) the maximum site radius, which is the maximum distance from the center of the construction site to the barriers; (iii) the minimum site radius, which is the minimum distance from the center of the construction site to the barriers; and (iv) the average barrier height, which is the average height of the barrier surrounding the construction site.

    View full text