Variability of enriched environment does not enhance the enrichment effect on food neophobia in rats (Rattus norvegicus)
Introduction
Numerous studies show that animals living in a complex and stimulating environment perform better in behavioural tasks e.g. learning tests (see Gardner et al., 1975; Hebb, 1946; Mohammed et al., 1990; Schrijver et al., 2002), engage in exploration more often and demonstrate a lower level of anxiety (e.g., Gardner et al., 1975; Genaro and Schmidek, 2001; Huck and Price, 1975). What is more, the complexity of the environment is related to an increased intensity of novelty-seeking behaviour (Fernandez-Teruel et al., 1997) and increased activity, while the level of anxiety is reduced (Benaroya‐Milshtein et al., 2004). The changes observed in behaviour are also linked to numerous changes in the brain (e.g., Baroncelli et al., 2010; Kolb and Whishaw, 1998; Lewis, 2004; Rosenzweig and Bennett, 1996) which occur not only in young individuals but in adults as well (e.g., Frick and Fernandez, 2003). These stimulating properties of the environment may contribute to the reversal of cognitive and emotional impairments (e.g., Dahlqvist et al., 2004; Francis et al., 2002; Jankowsky et al., 2005).
In laboratory settings, a stimulating and complex environment is created by enriching the living space with additional objects (wooden blocks, spinning wheels, houses, variable bedding) and more opportunities for social contact (e.g., Bloomsmith et al., 1991; Newberry, 1995). This kind of environmental enrichment results in a larger scope of affordances of the environment (for affordances, see Gibson, 2014; Rietveld and Kiverstein, 2014) by providing the animal with cognitive, physical and social stimuli enabling spontaneous exploration (Baroncelli et al., 2010). The higher the number of objects, the more affordances are available. It is also reasonable to expect that the same object may create new affordances when rearranged spatially or modified in terms of their properties.
In a typical experiment, the configuration of enriching objects remains relatively constant. There is a possibility for changes resulting from an animal’s activity, such as gnawing, carrying objects, exploiting the running wheels, etc. However, this kind of environmental changeability is not imposed by the experimental design or procedure. It should be noted that this kind of manipulation has relatively low ecological validity, as wild animals inhabit environments of different degrees of variability and encounter a wider range of environmental stimuli. It may therefore be hypothesized that environmental variability has a significant impact on the development of the nervous system and animal behaviour.
The impact of environmental variability on animal behaviour is also observed in the context of food-related behaviour, in particular food neophobia. Food neophobia (caution when encountering unfamiliar food – Barnett, 1958, 2009; Pliner and Hobden, 1992) is present in many species (for example, see Addessi et al., 2004; Barnett, 1958; Bryan, 1987; Launchbaugh et al., 1997; Pliner and Hobden, 1992). It occurs mainly in omnivores, which need to distinguish between edible novel food and inedible novel food (generalist’s dilemma - Rozin, 2000). Food neophobia manifests itself in the initial avoidance of novel food, followed by progressive food sampling (Barnett, 2009). If the new food does not evoke adverse bodily symptoms, its intake increases (Barnett, 2009; Mitchell, 1976). Contact with novel food elicits caution, but also an exploratory reaction towards the unfamiliar object (Hebb, 1946). One may discern two components of the reaction to food novelty, which comprises two steps: first, the animal has to overcome the hesitancy towards the novelty of the specific object (general neophobia) and then assess the quality and safety of the new food (Modlinska and Stryjek, 2016; Modlinska et al., 2015).
However, it is assumed that rats inhabiting highly variable environments often exhibit lower general neophobia and a relative absence of food neophobia (Boice, 1971; Barnett, 2005). For example, food neophobia seems to be absent in rats inhabiting landfill sites – an environment subject to frequent changes and frequent occurrence of novelty (Barnett, 2005; Boice, 1971). It may be hypothesised that inhabiting, from an early age, an environment which is not only rich in stimuli but also subject to frequent change (including change of the types of food available) will lower an animal’s neophobia threshold and allow it to consume foods with unknown properties (cf. Modlinska and Stryjek, 2016). In laboratory settings, researchers can simulate these ‘landfill site’ conditions by introducing the rats to a highly enriched and variable environment. This makes it possible to examine whether the anticipated decrease in food neophobia results from the complexity of the environment (which has a significant impact on behaviour in general) or whether it is also due to the variability of that environment.
Although a large number of studies show that living in a complex environment reduces state anxiety and attenuates stress responses in different contexts (e.g. Benaroya‐Milshtein et al., 2004; Goes et al., 2015; Harris et al., 2009; Klein et al., 1994; Ravenelle et al., 2013), the significance of environmental variability in this process is yet to be determined. However, we can hypothesise that if the beneficial effect of environmental enrichment is achieved by means of a complex stimulation of different regions of the brain, the variability of an enriched environment may trigger an even stronger positive response. On the other hand, the unpredictability of these changes and the lack of control over the surroundings may trigger a stress response (LaDage, 2015) and, in the long term, lead to an increase in general anxiety. It is also possible that constant presence of stimuli resulting from environmental variability may moderate emotional reactivity to novelty (Staddon, 2016, p. 204; Tarou and Bashaw, 2007).
The impact of environmental enrichment and its variability on emotional reactivity is also relevant in the context of food neophobia. Some studies suggest that there is a correlation between food neophobia and state anxiety, with individuals with higher state anxiety being more food neophobic (Galloway et al., 2003; Pliner and Hobden, 1992; Pliner and Salvy, 2006). These findings are supported by studies on animals involving the use of anxiolytic drugs (e.g. Cooper and McClelland, 1980; Johnson, 1978; Shephard and Estall, 1984). Therefore, the possible impact of the environment on food neophobia may be mediated by a reduction in anxiety levels.
In view of the above, we would like to put forward the following hypotheses. The first hypothesis is that environmental enrichment will reduce neophobic reactions to novel food in all groups of animals, as it generally has a beneficial effect on anxiety-like behaviour and reduction in stress response (e.g. Benaroya‐Milshtein et al., 2004). We expect that the animals from enriched conditions will limit food intake and will increase eating latency to lesser extent than the animals form standard conditions. The second hypothesis states that the variability of the environment will have a deeper, positive impact on food neophobia, as predicted by Boice (1971) and Barnett (2005), as well as stems from our previous observations (Modlinska and Stryjek, 2016). We predict that rats from the variable enriched environment will express fewer neophobic symptoms than the animals from the stable enriched environment. To test these hypotheses, we conducted food neophobia tests (Modlinska et al., 2015) on rat groups kept in three types of rearing conditions. The first group was reared in an enriched stable environment. Enrichment was ensured by providing the animals with a spacious pen, complex social opportunities and various objects placed inside the pen. The second group in an enriched but constantly changing environment. The changeability of the environment was implemented by changing the location and configuration of the objects inside the pen as well as by introducing small amounts of variable foods. The third group was reared under standard laboratory conditions (control group).
Section snippets
Subjects
The study group comprised 30 male Lister Hooded rats. The animals were born and kept in the animal house of the Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland. However, the mothers of study subjects were were sourced from Charles River, Germany, via AnimaLab Sp. z o.o., Poland.
Housing conditions
The housing conditions used in this study correspond to the housing conditions described in Modlinska et al. (2019). The rats were kept in three different housing setups. The first group was reared in
Amount of food eaten
The amount of food eaten was measured as the difference between the weight of the food given to the rat at the onset of the experimental trial and the weight of the food after the end of that trial. The semi-liquid consistency of the food made it impossible for the rat to transport it around the experimental arena. The amount of food eaten was measured in grams (Fig. 2).
The analysis showed a significant trial by housing setup interaction (Wilks' Lambda; F(6,81) = 4.519; p ≤ 0.001;
Discussion
Differences in reactions to novel food were also observed between the groups maintained in enriched housing conditions (both stable and variable), on the one hand, and the control group, on the other. In rats from the standard conditions, we observed a typical reaction to novel food, characterised by an increase in the amount of food eaten during the habituation trials, followed by a marked decrease after new food was introduced (see e.g. Barnett, 1958, 2009; Modlinska et al., 2015). In rats
Conclusions
In conclusion, it may be suggested that environmental enrichment linked to changes in the size and complexity of available living space has a significant impact on animal behaviour, while environmental variability does not significantly enhance environmental impact, at least as regards reducing the level of food neophobia. It seems, therefore, that the very presence of environmental affordances is sufficient to ensure enrichment, as animals rely on their own activity to obtain diverse
Funding
This work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland [grant numberUMO-2015/19/D/HS6/00781].
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Klaudia Modlinska: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Anna Chrzanowska: Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Wojciech Pisula: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing.
References (56)
- et al.
Effects of chlordiazepoxide, food familiarization, and prior shock experience on food choice in rats
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(1980) - et al.
Enrichment enhances spatial memory and increases synaptophysin levels in aged female mice
Neurobiol. Aging
(2003) - et al.
Predictors and consequences of food neophobia and pickiness in young girls
J. Am. Diet. Assoc.
(2003) - et al.
Environmental enrichment and deprivation: effects on learning, memory and exploration
Physiol. Behav.
(1975) - et al.
Environmental enrichment for adult rats: effects on trait and state anxiety
Neurosci. Lett.
(2015) - et al.
Environmental enrichment enhances spatial cognition in rats by reducing thigmotaxis (wall hugging) during testing
Anim. Behav.
(2009) - et al.
Influence of environmental enrichment and sex on predator stress response in rats
Physiol. Behav.
(1994) - et al.
Overcoming foodneophobia in domestic ruminants through addition of a familiar flavor and repeated exposure to novel foods
Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
(1997) - et al.
Food neophobia in wild and laboratory rats (multi-strain comparison)
Behav. Processes
(2015) - et al.
The impact of changeability of enriched environment on exploration in rats
Behav. Processes
(2019)
Environmental influence on behaviour and nerve growth factor in the brain
Brain Res.
Environmental enrichment: increasing the biological relevance of captive environments
Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans
Appetite
Environmental enrichment effects on the neurobehavioral profile of selective outbred trait anxiety rats
Behav. Brain Res.
Psychobiology of plasticity: effects of training and experience on brain and behavior
Behav. Brain Res.
Dissociable effects of isolation rearing and environmental enrichment on exploration, spatial learning and HPA activity in adult rats
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
Maximizing the effectiveness of environmental enrichment: suggestions from the experimental analysis of behavior
Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
Effect of environmental stressors on time course, variability and form of self-grooming in the rat: handling, social contact, defeat, novelty, restraint and fur moistening
Behav. Brain Res.
Taste perception and food choices in capuchin monkeys and human children
Primatologie
Experiments on “neophobia” in wild and laboratory rats
Br. J. Psychol.
Ecology
The Rat. A Study in Behavior
Nurturing brain plasticity: impact of environmental enrichment
Cell Death Differ.
Diet sampling by wild Norway rats offered several unfamiliar foods
Anim. Learn. Behav.
Environmental enrichment in mice decreases anxiety, attenuates stress responses and enhances natural killer cell activity
Eur. J. Neurosci.
Guidelines for developing and managing an environmental enrichment program for nonhuman primates
Lab. Anim. Sci.
Laboratorizing the wild rat (Rattus norvegiens)
Behav. Res. Methods Instrum.
Food neophobia and olfaction in domestic chicks
Bird Behav.
Cited by (2)
Cognitive asymmetry in rats in response to emergent vs. disappearing affordances
2023, Research SquareContext properties modulate flavor neophobia habituation
2021, Psicothema