Abstract
The allocation of carbon emission rights via auctioning has gradually become an irreplaceable part of the emissions trading system. However, the efficiency of allocations suffers due to low and volatile auction-clearing prices, which cannot account for price discovery. Furthermore, the fixed cap lacks flexibility in emission trading systems. Therefore, this study proposes a multi-round auction model with a floating cap for carbon allocation, integrating firms’ bidding strategies during the auction cycle and the impact of governmental regulations. The results show that (1) compared with static auctions, multi-round auctions can achieve a higher and more stable clearing price. (2) The mechanism provides flexibility for the distribution of profits and may encourage firms to participate in auctions. (3) Among all factors, the total supply of carbon emission permits and the economic environment more significantly influence the mechanism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anatolitis V, Welisch M (2017) Putting renewable energy auctions into action – an agent-based model of onshore wind power auctions in Germany. Energy Policy 110:394–402
Anderson E, Holmberg P (2018) Price instability in multi-unit auctions. J Econ Theory 175:318–341
Anderson EJ, Philpott AB (2002) Using supply functions for offering generation into an electricity market. Oper Res 50:477–489
Baisa B, Burkett J (2018) Large multi-unit auctions with a large bidder. J Econ Theory 174:1–15
Burtraw D, Goeree J, Holt CA, Myers E, Palmer K, Shobe W (2009) Collusion in auctions for emission permits: an experimental analysis. J Policy Anal Manage 28:672–691
Cadogan JB, Eisenberg L (1977) Sulfur oxide emissions management for electric power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 96:393–401
Campo S, Guerre E, Perrigne I, Vuong Q (2011) Semiparametric estimation of first-price auctions with risk-averse bidders. Rev Econ Stud 78:112–147
Chaturvedi A (2015) Procurement auctions with capacity constrained suppliers. Eur J Oper Res 247:987–995
Cong R-G, Wei Y-M (2012) Experimental comparison of impact of auction format on carbon allowance market. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:4148–4156
Cox JC, Roberson B, Smith VL (1982) Theory and behavior of single object auctions. Res Exp Econ 2:1–43
Cramton P, Kerr S (2002) Tradeable carbon permit auctions - how and why to auction not grandfather. Energy Policy 30:333–345
Cripps M, Ireland N (1994) The design of auctions and tenders with quality thresholds: the symmetric case. Econ J 104:316–326
Dewees DN (2008) Pollution and the price of power. Energy J 29:81–100
Dormady NC (2013) Market power in cap-and-trade auctions: a Monte Carlo approach. Energy Policy 62:788–797
Dormady NC (2014) Carbon auctions, energy markets & market power: an experimental analysis. Energy Econ 44:468–482
Egenhofer C (2007) The making of the EU emissions trading scheme. Eur Manag J 25:453–463
Ellerman AD, Convery FJ, De Perthuis C (2010) Pricing carbon: the European Union emissions trading scheme. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fang H, Tang X (2014) Inference of bidders’ risk attitudes in ascending auctions with endogenous entry. J Econ 180:198–216
Garratt R, Tröger T (2006) Speculation in standard auctions with resale. Econometrica 74:753–769
Goeree JK, Palmer K, Holt CA, Shobe W, Burtraw D (2010) An experimental study of auctions versus grandfathering to assign pollution permits. J Eur Econ Assoc 8:514–525
Grosjean G, Acworth W, Flachsland C, Marschinski R (2016) After monetary policy, climate policy: is delegation the key to EU ETS reform? Clim Pol 16:1–25
Guerre E, Perrigne I, Vuong Q (2009) Nonparametric identification of risk aversion in first-price auctions under exclusion restrictions. Econometrica 77:1193–1227
Hailu A, Thoyer S (2007) Designing multi-unit multiple bid auctions: an agent-based computational model of uniform, discriminatory and generalised Vickrey auctions. Econ Rec 83:S57–S72
Hepburn C, Neuhoff K, Acworth W, Burtraw D, Jotzo F (2016) The economics of the EU ETS market stability reserve. J Environ Econ Manag 80:1–5
Ho DTK (2018) Climate change in Malaysia: trends, contributors, impacts, mitigation and adaptations. Sci Total Environ 650:1858–1871
Jeitschko TD (1998) Learning in sequential auctions. South Econ J 65:98–112
Kollenberg S, Taschini L (2016) Emissions trading systems with cap adjustments. J Environ Econ Manag 80:20–36
Krishna V (2009) Auction theory. Academic press, Cambridge
Lewis DJ, Polasky S (2018) An auction mechanism for the optimal provision of ecosystem services under climate change. J Environ Econ Manag 92:20–34
Liu Z, Yan J, Shi Y, Zhu K, Pu G (2012) Multi-agent based experimental analysis on bidding mechanism in electricity auction markets. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 43:696–702
Lorentziadis PL (2012) Optimal bidding in auctions of mixed populations of bidders. Eur J Oper Res 217:653–663
McAfee RP, McMillan J (1987) Auctions and bidding. J Econ Lit 25:699–738
Pal P, Gupta H, Kapur D (2016) Carbon mitigation potential of Indian steel industry. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 21(3):391–402
Pasimeni MR, Valente D, Zurlini G, Petrosillo I (2019) The interplay between urban mitigation and adaptation strategies to face climate change in two European countries. Environ Sci Pol 95:20–27
Perino G, Willner M (2017) EU-ETS phase IV: allowance prices, design choices and the market stability reserve. Clim Pol 17:936–946
Puranam KS, Katehakis MN (2014) On optimal bidding and inventory control in sequential procurement auctions: the multi period case. Ann Oper Res 217:447–462
Shao C, Ding Y, Wang J (2019) A low-carbon economic dispatch model incorporated with consumption-side emission penalty scheme. Appl Energy 238:1084–1092
Tang L, Wu JQ, Yu L, Bao Q (2015) Carbon emissions trading scheme exploration in China: a multi-agent-based model. Energy Policy 81:152–169
Wang M, Zhou P (2017) Does emission permit allocation affect CO2 cost pass-through? A theoretical analysis. Energy Econ 66:140–146
Wang Q, Hang Y, Su B, Zhou P (2018) Contributions to sector-level carbon intensity change: an integrated decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 70:12–25
Welisch M (2019) Multi-unit renewables auctions for small markets - designing the Danish multi-technology auction scheme. Renew Energy 131:372–380
Zetterberg L (2014) Benchmarking in the European Union emissions trading system: abatement incentives. Energy Econ 43:218–224
Zhang YJ, Hao JF (2017) Carbon emission quota allocation among China's industrial sectors based on the equity and efficiency principles. Ann Oper Res 255:117–140
Zhang Y-J, Wang A-D, Tan W (2015) The impact of China's carbon allowance allocation rules on the product prices and emission reduction behaviors of ETS-covered enterprises. Energy Policy 86:176–185
Zheng C (2002) Optimal auction with resale. Econometrica 70:2197–2224
Zhou X, Zhou D, Wang Q, Su B (2019) How information and communication technology drives carbon emissions: a sector-level analysis for China. Energy Econ 81:380–392
Funding
The authors are grateful to the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 71922013 and 71834003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Q., Cheng, C. & Zhou, D. Multi-round auctions in an emissions trading system considering firm bidding strategies and government regulations. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 25, 1403–1421 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-020-09928-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-020-09928-z