Abstract
Heat–cool (H–C) cycle is a serious natural weathering mechanism for rock engineering in temperate desert climate; meanwhile, engineering rocks usually involve responses to impact loads arising from blasting operation, mechanized construction, and seismic oscillation. Considering the universality and destructiveness of rock failure caused by H–C cycle weathering coupled with dynamic loading, split Hopkinson pressure bar tests were conducted for sandstone with various H–C cycles. Additionally, hydrothermal coupled damage (D) was defined based on variation of total import strain energy. Energy evolution, damage, and microscopic characteristics of sandstone after diffierent H–C cycles were studied. Finally, the microcosmic structure changes of sandstone after various H–C cycles are compared by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) technology. Results show that decreasing rate of total import strain energy in high temperature group is significantly larger compared with that in low temperature group and moderate temperature groups. Repeated H–C cycles produce the thermal stress at the mineral boundary constantly and fracture along the boundary of the mineral particle according to the SEM and EDS results.
1 Introduction
Diurnal temperature difference and annual temperature difference is enormous in temperate desert climate. Meteorological records indicate that rock materials will experience a typical repeated heat–cool process, which is attributed to the high low temperature cycling in summer and winter. Rock materials degradation is a typical process of rock fracture and mineral metamorphism under the combined effects of radiation, biology, and geology [1,2,3,4]. Rock materials are commonly applied building materials in construction engineering, which always suffers from repeated heat–cool (H–C) cycles weathering. Additionally, engineering rock typically involves responses to dynamic impact loads arising from blasting excavation, mechanized construction, and seismic oscillation [5]. The study of mechanical properties of rock materials under harsh weathering conditions has engineering significance to the design, construction, and application of rock materials in temperate desert climate regions. Previous investigation demonstrated that water content and freezing temperature significantly affect the damage degree of rock weathering in H–C cycles. Rock is a heterogeneous composite porous material, which contains joints, cracks, and natural flaws [6,7,8]. Rock is repeatedly eroded by water and the clay mineral in rock is hydrophilic, which weakens the cohesion and slip each other, leading to the weakening of the cementation between mineral particles inside rock materials [9,10]. Hence, water inside rock undergoes water phase transition of solid (ice)–liquid (liquid water)–gas (steam) with temperature changing coupled with water [11]. When temperature is below freezing point, 9% volume expansion for pore water occurs inside rock with solid–liquid phase change, resulting in the damage of pore structure inside rock; in contrast, when temperature is above freezing point, the freezing water thaws and migrates between pores inducing reduced cohesion between rock particles. The frequent freeze–thaw (F–T) of water expands the original fissures and voids inside the rock and induces new microcracks, which causes great damage to rock engineering [12,13,14]. Temperature increment during H–C cycles leads to secondary thermal stress in rock due to various coefficients for different mineral particles. The main mechanism of H–C cycles on rock is the loss of water and inner structure damage caused by thermal reactions [15,16,17]. By summarizing previous theoretical and experimental investigations it can be observed that recent developments in the field of strength and deformation characteristics of rock after F–T and thermal shock (TS) cycles have led to an increased interest. The main representative study results are as follows: Yavuz [18] performed 10 F–T cycles and 50 TS cycles on andesites, and test results found that with the increase of cycle numbers, the velocity of P-wave, compressive strength, and hardness of andesites specimen decrease, while both the porosity and water absorption increase. Demirdag [19] compared the physical and mechanical properties of filled and unfilled travertine after different F–T and TS cycles (e.g., 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 cycles). Investigation results showed that both F–T and TS cycles affect the rock weathering degree on the mechanical resistance properties. Ghobadi and Babazadeh [20] studied the differences in the accelerated weathering processes of sandstone among F–T, salt crystallization (SC), H–C, and heating, cooling, and wetting (H–C–W) cycles. Wang and Xu [6] tested the quasi-static and dynamic splitting tensile of red sandstone after 10, 20, 30, and 40 TS cycles. Test results demonstrated that the antigrain fracture increased with the increase of strain rate based on the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results, and TS cycle reduced the adhesion of cement and the bond between particles, reducing the splitting tensile strength of red sandstone after TS cycle. The mechanical response of marble under coupled high temperature and dynamic loads was investigated using SHPB device, and the temperature threshold was observed based on the changes of stress–strain curves, peak stress, peak strain, and failure mode of marble [21], in addition, the effects of impact load rate and high temperature on strain rate were also analyzed [22,23], and test results indicated that under the same load rate, the strain rate of rock showed an obvious increase trend with the increase of high temperature.
By summarizing the theoretical and experimental studies achievements of predecessors, it can be found that researches, in terms of the physical and mechanical changes of rock materials after F–T and TS cycles, mainly concentrate on changes in physical and mechanical properties. However, research has consistently shown that its energy dissipation and damage mechanism have not attained an adequate understanding. Moreover, study on the influence of cycle temperature on the dynamic mechanical property of rock materials after H–C cycles is still insufficient. In this research, the influence of treatment temperature and cycle number on physical property (i.e., P-wave velocity, density, and porosity), dynamic energy evolution, damage, and microscopic properties of rock during the weathering process. SEM and energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) technique were used to detect microscopic damage of sandstone, and the damage is defined according to the variation of total import strain energy. Finally, the relationships between energy characteristic index and cycling number are also discussed.
2 Test materials and methods
2.1 Sample preparation
The fine-grained sandstone was collected in the Zhujidong coalmine located in Huainan city, Anhui Province, China. Samples with similar P-wave velocity were selected and cylindrical specimens with diameters of 50 mm and heights of 25 mm were obtained by boring, cutting, and polishing the slate chunks according to the suggested methods and standard requirements of ISRM [24].
According to the treatment temperature in H–C cycles, the test sandstone samples were divided into four groups: high temperature (H-T) group from −20°C to 400°C, moderate temperature (M-T) group from −20°C to 100°C, low temperature (L-T) group from −20°C to 50°C, and the control group. For L-T group or M-T group, four experimented sets are prepared according to 10, 20, 30, and 40 H–C cycles. Because of the fast deterioration rate of the high temperature group, three experimented H–C cycles (4, 8, and 12) were set. Figure 1 is the scheme of the testing procedure. There are five specimens in each experimented set to fulfill the repeatability conditions.
Scheme of the testing procedure.
2.2 H–C cycling and testing equipment
In this test, SX-5-12 box-type resistance furnace, which could heat rock specimen to 1,200°C, was adopted as the heating device, which was composed of control box and electric furnace. Sandstone specimens were heated at a rate of 6°C/min to desired temperature. The low temperature adopted the freezing temperature test box. The temperature of test chambers drop from 20°C to −20°C need 40 min.
The experiment samples were immersed in water for 12 h, and then put into freezing temperature test box at −20°C for 6 h, after that, put samples in a high temperature box at a predetermined temperature heating for 6 h. The above test process was treated as one H–C cycle and lasts for 24 h. The basic physical properties (mass, volume, and ultrasonic P-wave velocity) of sandstone specimens before and after cycling were tested and shown in Table 1.
Test results on the basic physical properties of sandstone after H–C cycles
| Test number | Number of sample group | Cycling number | Average P-wave velocity (m/s) | Average density (g/cm3) | Average porosity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Room temperature | 0 | 2974.78 | 2.53 | 2.23 |
| 2 | Low temperature (L-T) group | 10 | 2835.83 | 2.53 | 2.53 |
| 3 | 20 | 2739.13 | 2.50 | 3.12 | |
| 4 | 30 | 2726.04 | 2.50 | 3.33 | |
| 5 | 40 | 2686.87 | 2.49 | 3.44 | |
| 6 | Moderate temperature (M-T) group | 10 | 2841.87 | 2.51 | 2.93 |
| 7 | 20 | 2631.97 | 2.48 | 4.31 | |
| 8 | 30 | 2554.25 | 2.48 | 4.56 | |
| 9 | 40 | 2515.61 | 2.48 | 5.12 | |
| 10 | High temperature (H-T) group | 4 | 1752.51 | 2.47 | 5.29 |
| 11 | 8 | 1484.20 | 2.45 | 6.70 | |
| 12 | 12 | 1412.15 | 2.45 | 7.34 |
Dynamic impact loading tests of sandstone were carried out involving the SHPB system with a diameter of 50 mm under 0.4 MPa impact air pressure. In SHPB test, sandstone specimens after different H–C cycle conditions are placed between incident and transmitted bars, and two strain gauges are mounted on incident and transmitted bar to collect the stress waves, respectively. Strain acquisition instrument is adopted to collect the origin strain signals. Moreover, the calculation method of dynamic stress, strain, and strain rate has been reported in the previous investigation [5]. The stress equilibrium of sandstone specimen after H–C cycle is checked and shown in Figure 2. It can be clearly noticed that sandstone specimen is basically satisfied stress equilibrium during impact process.
Stress equilibrium of sandstone specimen after H–C cycle.
3 Test results and analysis
Thermodynamics laws indicate that the transmission and transformation of energy is combined with the entire failure process of material. Notably, energy dissipation reflects the evolution of the microcracks inside rock, which leads to strength weakening and failure of rock materials. Hence, investigation on the rock damage from energy perspective can denote the whole failure process under external load [25,26]. As an open system, rock specimen continuously transfers and transforms energy to the environment during the loading failure process. Environment works on the rock system, and the import energy is absorbed by rock system. As shown in Figure 3, the process of management transfer and transformation of loaded rock system can be divided into four main forms: energy import, energy accumulation, energy dissipation, and energy liberation.
Four main forms of energy transfer and transformation during rock impact failure.
3.1 Energy evolution of rock after H–C cycles
3.1.1 Computational formula
Previous theory reveals that there is no heat exchange between rock and environment during SHPB test. Considering the deformation of one rock element under external load, the total input energy, dissipated energy, and the releasable elastic strain energy of a rock unit can be calculated based on the first law of thermodynamics [27].
where U is the total import strain energy of one rock unit generated by the external load, Ud and Ue are the dissipated energy and the releasable elastic strain energy of a rock unit, respectively. The units of U, Ud, and Ue are all MJ/m3, equivalent to the stress unit, MPa. The calculation scope of them is from initial point to residual point, in addition, the value of them under different stages is calculated from initial point to the end of the stage point.
Taking axial stress and strain into consideration [27], energy evolution equation of a rock unit in principle stress space can be expressed as
where σ, ε, and εe are the axial stress, strain, and elastic strain of the rock unit, respectively.
3.1.2 Variation in total import strain energy with cycling number
The energy evolution curves of sandstone specimens after H–C cycles are obtained by calculation. The representative stress–strain curve and energy evolution curve without cycle are adopted for description, as shown in Figure 4. It is obviously noticed that the whole process of energy evolution can be divided into four stages: compression stage, linear deformation stage, yield stage, and failure stage. In addition, Figure 4 also illustrates that the energy evolution curve for H–C cycles damaged sandstone specimen under impact compression process shows obvious stage characteristics. In compaction stage, with the increase of strain, the total import strain energy, both the releasable elastic strain energy and dissipation energy increases, and the rise rate increase gradually. At linear elastic deformation stage, the rise rates of total import strain energy and releasable elastic strain energy are relatively fast, while the dissipative energy is relatively slow. In yield stage, the rise rate of the released elastic strain energy begins to slow down gradually and reaches the peak value, while both dissipation energy and total import strain energy are continuously increasing. In the failure stage, both the total import strain and dissipative energy increase continuously, while released elastic strain energy decreases. The dissipation energy increases continuously and approaches the total import strain energy.
Dynamic energy curves of sandstone specimens after H–C cycles: (a) diagram of the staged stress–strain curves; (b) energy evolution curve of sandstone (room temperature).
The results show that the total import strain energy decreases with increasing cycling number for L-T, M-T, and H-T groups. The total import strain energy (U) under different test conditions is shown in Table 2.
The total import strain energy (U) under different test conditions
| Test number | Number of sample group | Cycling number | Total import strain energy (U/MJ/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Room temperature | 0 | 2.043 |
| 2 | Low temperature (L-T) group | 10 | 1.985 |
| 3 | 20 | 1.649 | |
| 4 | 30 | 1.525 | |
| 5 | 40 | 1.371 | |
| 6 | Moderate temperature (M-T) group | 10 | 1.664 |
| 7 | 20 | 1.555 | |
| 8 | 30 | 1.244 | |
| 9 | 40 | 1.160 | |
| 10 | High temperature (H-T) group | 4 | 0.924 |
| 11 | 8 | 0.697 | |
| 12 | 12 | 0.599 |
Table 2 reveals that the total import strain energy of L-T group decreases gradually with the increase of cycling number, and values of the total import strain energy are 2.04, 1.99, 1.65, 1.53, and 1.37 MJ/m3, respectively, which are corresponding to 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 H–C cycles. The decreased values of total import strain energy are 2.84%, 19.29%, 25.36%, and 32.89% compared with that of 0 H–C cycles, respectively. The values of total import strain energy are 2.04, 1.66, 1.56, 1.24, and 1.16 MJ/m3, decreased by 18.55%, 23.89%, 39.11%, and 43.22%, respectively, for M-T group. From the data of three groups it is found that under the same H–C cycles, the decrease rate of rock for H-T group is larger than that of other two groups, specifically, the value of U for H-T group decreases to 0.60 MJ/m3 after 12 H-T cycles. Finally, from the comparative analysis it can be noticed that with the increase of cycling number, both the total import strain energy and total dissipation energy of sandstone in the whole impact compression and failure process gradually reduce.
3.2 Relationship between energy characteristic index and cycling number in different stages
The above analysis illustrates that energy evolution process of rock under dynamic loading can be divided into four stages: compression, linear deformation, yield, and failure. Moreover, energy characteristic indexes (i.e., U, Ue, and Ud) are different with various dynamic compression deformation and failure stages of rock. Energy distribution characteristic and damage degree are varied corresponding to four stages [26,27]. According to equation (2) the energy characteristic indexes for L-T, M-T, and H-T groups are obtained and shown in Figure 5.
Relationship between energy characteristic index and cycling number in different stages: (a) L-T group. (b) M-T group. (c) H-T group.
Figure 5 illustrates that: (1) three energy characteristic indexes (i.e., U, Ue, and Ud) are affected by cycling number, deformation and failure stage, and treatment temperature. Additionally, similar effects of treatment temperature on energy characteristic index for three cycle groups are observed. (2) With increasing cycle numbers, energy characteristic index (i.e., U, Ue, and Ud) gradually decreases. For example, the Ud at yield stage in M-T group decreases from 1.264 to 0.695 MJ/m3 with cycle number increasing from 0 to 40. (3) Furthermore, the decrease degree is quite different under different deformation and failure stages, the decrease degree for U and Ud at failure stage exhibited the maximum value compared with the other three stages. However, the decrease degree for Ue at failure stage shows the minimum value. (4) Additionally, the treatment temperature also has significant effect on the energy characteristic index (i.e., U, Ue, and Ud) at the same deformation and failure stage.
The energy characteristic index is constantly changing and transforming into each other at different deformation and failure stages. In compaction stage, test results indicate that U ˃ Ue ˃Ud, and the total import strain energy in this stage is converted into elastic energy. The elastic energy and dissipation energy of each specimen exist simultaneously in linear elastic deformation stage, while the total import strain energy is converted into elastic energy and dissipated. Meanwhile, the total import strain energy of sandstone begins to dissipate in this process and a small percentage is converted into elastic energy in yield stage. At failure state, dissipation energy in this stage is larger than the total import strain energy, while the elastic energy is approximately zero, indicating the elastic energy stored in pre-peak stage is released.
3.3 Hydrothermal coupling damage caused by H–C cycles
With the increase of H–C cycles number, the damage degree of sandstone gradually increases, which shows more easily failure under the same conditions. From the above analysis it can also be noticed that the total import strain energy gradually reduces with the increasing cycling numbers. To further describe the hydrothermal coupling damage of rock caused by H–C cycles, the hydrothermal coupled damage (D) is defined and calculated based on the variation of total import strain energy required for the compression deformation process after different H–C cycles [27] and the function can be expressed as:
where D is the hydrothermal coupled damage value of sandstone after H–C cycles; Un and U0 are the total import strain energy of sandstone samples subjected to n and 0 H–C cycles, respectively.
According to above calculation method, fitting curves between damage of rock and cycling number are shown in Figure 6. The variation of H–C cycle damage with cycling numbers of sandstone can be found in formulas (4)–(6):
Relationship between damage and cycling number in H–C cycles.
L-T group:
M-T group:
H-T group:
Figure 6 and formulas (4)–(6) reveal that damage of rock specimen caused by H–C cycles gradually increase with the increase of cycling number. Under the same cycle number, rock damage for H-T group became more serious compared with that for M-T and L-T groups. After 10 H–C cycles, the damage value for H-T group is 0.69, which is much higher than that of 0.16 and 0.07 for M-T and L-T groups.
3.4 Effect of H–C cycle on microstructure changes of rock
The microstructural changes have significant effect on the variations of physical and mechanical properties of rock materials after different H–C cycles, which is beneficial to better understand the H–C damage mechanism for rock materials. H–C cycle is a complex three-field coupling damage process of the interaction of water (ice and steam), heat (temperature), and force (temperature force) in rock media. To further investigate the mechanical damage of H–C cycles on dynamic strength and energy dissipation of rock, SEM and EDS tests are conducted in this section to observe the microstructural damage of rock.
3.4.1 Thermal-water coupling damage mechanism
3.4.1.1 Water–rock interaction mechanism
Physical mechanism. Sandstone is composed of different kinds of minerals (such as albite, quartz, and calcite) [28,29,30]. Figure 7 shows expansion process of clay mineral. In this test, sandstone belongs to sedimentary rock, the whole structure of which is mainly clastic structure. The clay minerals, such as kaolinite, which has small particle size and high cohesion force can bond with each other and on the surface of other minerals, such as quartz, albite, and calcite. Hence, clay minerals act as binder mediums to stabilize rock structure. Additionally, kaolinite accounts for the main part of clay minerals in sandstone specimen, which shows better hydrophilic ability, and it shows hydration and expansion characteristics because of the effect by capillary force, surface hydration, and osmotic hydration [31].
Diagram of expansion process of clay mineral polymer.
It can be seen from Figure 7 that clay mineral polymer absorbs water giving rise to the expansion of volume, which produces stress on mineral particles and affects the direction of clay mineral, resulting in original equilibrium state being broken. Water molecules and hydrated ions fill the clay mineral aggregates, which weakens the cohesion and slip each other, leading to the weakening of the cementation between sandstone mineral particles [32], resulting in the macroscopic damage of rock after water–rock reactions.
Chemistry mechanism. According to the mineral composition of sandstone, the chemical changes that occur between sandstone and water are mainly albite hydrolysis, calcite weight carbonation, and colloidal dispersion of quartz insoluble minerals [9]. The chemical reaction formulas are calculated and shown in (7)–(10).
The above reaction formulas illustrate that the materials exchange between aqueous solution and rock minerals occur continuously. Specially, the ion concentration close to the mineral particles is much larger than that in free water. Hence, large thermodynamic potential energy is generated between them, which promotes the chemical reaction.
Formulas (7)–(10) also illustrate that the chemical reaction products are easier to dissolve or decompose in water compared with chemical reactants. Hence, with the increase of H–C cycles, more and more chemical reaction product generates, which makes rock minerals become looser and more fragile.
3.4.1.2 Thermal damage mechanism
Rock is a typical multimineral complex material; the thermal damage mechanism in H–C cycle process is shown in Figure 8. From the above figure it is noticed that in saturated process, all the pores and cracks inside rock are filled with water, and there is no thermal damage in this process. In cooling process, part of water freezes and expands about 9% of the original volume, and this expansion induces tensile stress concentration and damages the micropores. In heat process, mineral particles generate uncoordinated deformation caused by the difference in thermal-expansion coefficient [33,34], leading to the thermal force, which will damage the rock structure. Recurrent H–C cycles gradually lead to the accumulation of damage inside rock and further weaken its mechanical properties.
Diagram of thermal damage mechanism in H–C cycle process.
3.4.2 Microstructure characteristic of rock after H–C cycle
During SEM observation, the most crucial issue is how to distinguish the cracks and pores between mineral particles. Hence, EDS technology is adopted to further study the damage characteristics (i.e., cracks and pores). Typical microstructure characteristics of sandstone specimen after different H–C cycles are displayed in Figure 9.
Microstructure of sandstone: (a) 20°C (×2,000), SEM results. (b) 20°C, EDS results. (c) After 12 cycles in H-T group (×2,000), SEM results. (d) After 12 cycles in H-T group, EDS results. (e) After 10 cycles in L-T group (×2,000), SEM results. (f) After 10 cycles in L-T group, EDS results. (g) After 40 cycles in L-T group (×2,000), SEM results. (h) After 40 cycles in L-T group, EDS results. (i) After 10 cycles in M-T group (×2,000), SEM results. (j) After 10 cycles in M-T group, EDS results. (k) After 40 cycles in M-T group (×2,000), SEM results. (l) After 40 cycles in M-T group, EDS results.
Figure 9 illustrates that at 20℃ (room temperature), only very few initial pores and microcracks can be observed in the rock (Figure 9(a) and (b)). In the L-T group, when sandstone specimen experiences 10 H–C cycles, some initial microcracks and pores propagation are induced by the freezing expansion and thermal expansion of mineral particles which improves the microstructure of sandstone, as shown in Figure 9(e) and (f); after 40 H–C cycles, due to the disharmony of thermal deformation between minerals particles, the thermal stress concentrates at the edge of the mineral particle (Figure 9(g) and (h)); after repeated H–C cycles, the thermal stress at the mineral boundary is constantly produced, leading to the fatigue rupture along the boundary of the mineral particle, which indicates that the microstructure inside rock is weakened by the thermal stress. The variation of microstructure of rock after H–C cycles in M-T group is similar to that in L-T group, the cracks propagate and pores expand with increasing H–C cycles. Additionally, new pores and cracks between the mineral particles begin to be concentrated and interlinked (Figure 9(i)–(l)). In contrast, by observation and comparison of EDS results under room temperature of L-T group, M-T group, and H-T group, a large number of cracks and pores appear inside rock after 12 H–C cycles in H-T group (Figure 9(c) and (d)); study results show that the presence of clay minerals, such as kaolinite, may lose water with hydroxyl groups and change the structure of rock after 400°C treatment [35,36,37,38].
With increasing cycling number, thermal expansion of sand particles inside the crystal increases the volume of sandstone specimen. The internal free water and organic matter in the sandstone gradually evaporate, which leads to decrease in the P-wave velocity, density (Table 1), and total import strain energy (Table 2) and increase in the porosity (Table 1) and damage (Figure 6).
4 Conclusions
The whole energy evolution process of sandstone after H–C cycle treatment can be divided into four stages. With the increase of cycle times, the total import strain energy decreased. The decreasing rate of total import strain energy in H-T group was significantly larger compared with that in L-T group and M-T groups.
In the dynamic compression deformation and failure process of sandstone, the total input of strain energy, dissipation energy, and the characteristics of releasing projectile are different at different stages, the decrease degree for U and Ud at failure stage exhibited the maximum value compared with other three stages. However, the decrease degree for Ue at failure stage shows the minimum value.
Under the same cycle number, rock damage for H-T group became more serious compared with that for M-T and L-T groups. After repeated H–C cycles, the thermal stress at the mineral boundary is constantly produced, leading to the fatigue rupture along the boundary of the mineral particle.
Acknowledgments
This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51774011), Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. 2008085QE220, 1908085QE212, 1808085ME134), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2019M652162), and Doctoral Fund Project of Anhui University of Science & Technology (No. 13190025, 11695).
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Data availability: The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
[1] Xu, C. C., Q. Sun, X. H. Pan, W. Q. Zhang, and Y.B. Wang. Variation on thermal damage rate of granite specimen with thermal cycle treatment. High Temperature Materials and Processes, Vol. 38, 2019, pp. 849–855.10.1515/htmp-2019-0046Search in Google Scholar
[2] Yu, J., G. Y. Liu, Y. Y. Cai, J. F. Zhou, S. Y. Liu, and B. X. Tu. Time-dependent deformation mechanism for swelling soft-rock tunnels in coal mines and its mathematical deduction. International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2020, id. 04019186.10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001594Search in Google Scholar
[3] Xu, P., Y. M. Wu, Z. J. Wang, and L. Huang. Distribution laws of freeze-thaw cycles and unsaturated concrete experiments in cold-region tunnels. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 172, 2020, id. 102985.10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102985Search in Google Scholar
[4] Shen, Y., Y. Wang, Y. Yang, Q. Sun, T. Luo, and H. Zhang. Influence of surface roughness and hydrophilicity on bonding strength of concrete-rock interface. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 213, 2019, pp. 156–166.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.078Search in Google Scholar
[5] Wang, P., J. Y. Xu, S. Liu , H. Y. Wang, and S. H. Liu. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of sedimentary rock after freeze-thaw or thermal shock weathering. Engineering Geology, Vol. 210, 2016, pp. 148–157.10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.06.017Search in Google Scholar
[6] Wang, P., J. Y. Xu, X. Y. Fang, P. X. Wang, G. H. Zheng, and M. Wen. Temperature damage and constitutive model of frozen soil under dynamic loading. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 143, 2017, pp. 13–22.10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.07.002Search in Google Scholar
[7] Gong, F. Q., J. Y. Yan, S. Luo, and X. B. Li. Investigation on the linear energy storage and dissipation laws of rock materials under uniaxial compression. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 52, No. 11, 2019, pp. 4237–4255.10.1007/s00603-019-01842-4Search in Google Scholar
[8] Gong, F. Q., X. F. Si, X. B. Li, and S. Y. Wang. Dynamic triaxial compression tests on sandstone at high strain rate and low confining pressures with spilt Hopkinson pressure bar. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, Vol. 113, 2019, pp. 211–219.10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.12.005Search in Google Scholar
[9] Zhou, Z. L., X. Cai, Y. D. Ma, L. Chen, S. F. Wang, and L. H. Tan. Dynamic tensile properties of sandstone subjected to wetting and drying cycles. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 182, 2018, pp. 215–232.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.056Search in Google Scholar
[10] Hu, M., Y. X. Liu, L. B. Song, and Y. Zhang. Constitutive model and damage evolution of mudstone under the action of dry-wet cycles. Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2018, 2018, id. 9787429.10.1155/2018/9787429Search in Google Scholar
[11] Hillert, M. Phase equilibria, phase diagrams and phase transformations: Their thermodynamic basis, Cambridge University Press, London, 2008.10.1017/CBO9780511812781Search in Google Scholar
[12] Yin, T. B., Y. Wu, Q. Li, C. Wang, and B. Q. Wu. Determination of double-K fracture toughness parameters of thermally treated granite using notched semi-circular bending specimen. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. Vol. 226, 2020, id. 106865.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106865Search in Google Scholar
[13] Huang, S. B., Q. S. Liu, A. P. Cheng, and Y. Z. Liu. A statistical damage constitutive model under freeze-thaw and loading for rock and its engineering application. Cold Regions Science and Technologyl, Vol. 145, 2018, pp. 142–150.10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.10.015Search in Google Scholar
[14] Fu, H. L., J. B. Zhang, Z. Huang, Y. Shi, and W. Chen. A statistical model for predicting the triaxial compressive strength of transversely isotropic rocks subjected to freeze-thaw cycling. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 145, 2018, pp. 237–248.10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.11.003Search in Google Scholar
[15] Qin, Y., H. Tian, N. X. Xu, Y. Chen, Physical and mechanical properties of granite after high-temperature treatment. Rock Mechanics Rock Engineering, Vol. 53, 2020, pp. 305–322.10.1007/s00603-019-01919-0Search in Google Scholar
[16] Zhang, W. Q., Q. Sun, S. Q. Hao, J. S. Geng, and C. Lv. Experimental study on the variation of physical and mechanical properties of rock after high temperature treatment. Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 98, 2016, pp. 1297–1304.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.01.010Search in Google Scholar
[17] Zhou, C. B., Z. J. Wan, Y. Zhang, and B. Gu. Experimental study on hydraulic fracturing of granite under thermal shock. Geothermics, Vol. 71, 2018, pp. 146–155.10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.09.006Search in Google Scholar
[18] Yavuz, H. Effect of freeze-thaw and thermal shock weathering on the physical and mechanical properties of an andesite stone. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, Vol. 70, 2011, pp. 187–192.10.1007/s10064-010-0302-2Search in Google Scholar
[19] Demirdag, S. Effects of freezing-thawing and thermal shock cycles on physical and mechanical properties of filled and unfilled travertines. Construction and Building Materials. Mater, Vol. 47, 2013, pp. 1395–1401.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.045Search in Google Scholar
[20] Ghobadi, M. H., and R. Babazadeh. Experimental studies on the effects of cyclic freezing-thawing, salt crystallization, and thermal shock on the physical and mechanical characteristics of selected sandstone. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2015, pp. 1001–1016.10.1007/s00603-014-0609-6Search in Google Scholar
[21] Liu, S., and J. Y. Xu. Study on dynamic characteristics of marble under impact loading and high temperature. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, Vol. 62, 2013, pp. 51–58.10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.03.014Search in Google Scholar
[22] Liu, S., and J. Y. Xu. An experimental study on the physico-mechanical properties of two post-high-temperature rocks. Engineering Geology, Vol. 185, 2015, pp. 63–70.10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.11.013Search in Google Scholar
[23] Liu, S., and J. Y. Xu. Effect of strain rate on the dynamic compressive mechanical behaviors of rock material subjected to high temperatures. Mechanics of Materials, Vol. 82, 2015, pp. 28–38.10.1016/j.mechmat.2014.12.006Search in Google Scholar
[24] Ulusay, R., and J. Hudson, Eds. The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring. In International Society forRock Mechanics, ISRM, 2007, pp. 1974–2006.Search in Google Scholar
[25] Chen, J., S. Ren, C. H. Yang, D. Y. Jiang, and L. Li . Self-healing characteristics of damaged rock salt under different healing conditions. Materials, Vol. 6, 2013, pp. 3438–3450.10.3390/ma6083438Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[26] Yin, T. B., K. Peng, L. Wang, P. Wang, X. Y. Yin, and Y. L. Zhang. Study on impact damage and energy dissipation of coal rock exposed to high temperatures. Shock and Vibration, Vol. 2016, 2016, id. 5121932.10.1155/2016/5121932Search in Google Scholar
[27] Wang, P., J. Y. Xu, X. Y. Fang, and P. X. Wang. Energy dissipation and damage evolution analyses for the dynamic compression failure process of red-sandstone after freeze-thaw cycles. Engineering Geology, Vol. 221, 2017, pp. 104–113.10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.02.025Search in Google Scholar
[28] Sun, Q., C. Lü, L. W. Cao, W. C. Li, J. S. Geng, and W. Q. Zhang. Thermal properties of sandstone after treatment at high temperature. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 85, 2016, pp. 60–66.10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.03.006Search in Google Scholar
[29] Liu, X. F., S. Y. Yuan, Y. Sieffert, S. Fityus, and O. Buzzi. Changes in mineralogy, microstructure, compressive strength and intrinsic permeability of two sedimentary rocks subjected to high-temperature heating. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 49, No. 8, 2016, pp. 2985–2998.10.1007/s00603-016-0950-zSearch in Google Scholar
[30] Ding, Q. L., F. Ju, X. B. Mao, D. Ma, B. Y. Yu, and S. B. Song. Experimental investigation of the mechanical behavior in unloading conditions of sandstone after high-temperature treatment. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 49, No. 7, 2016, pp. 2641–2653.10.1007/s00603-016-0944-xSearch in Google Scholar
[31] Fang, X. Y., J. Y. Xu, S. Liu, and H.Y. Wang. Influence of heating on tensile physical-mechanical properties of granite. High Temperature Materials and Processes, Vol. 38, 2019, pp. 505–515.10.1515/htmp-2017-0093Search in Google Scholar
[32] Czapik, P. Degradation of glaukonite sandstone as a result of alkali-silica reactions in cement mortar. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), Vol. 11, No. 6, 2018, PMCID: PMC6025000.10.3390/ma11060924Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[33] Tvergaard, V., and J. M. Hutchinson. Microcracking in ceramics induced by thermal expansion or elastic anisotropy. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 71, No. 3, 1988, pp. 157–166.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb05022.xSearch in Google Scholar
[34] Liu, S., and J. Y. Xu. Investigation of impact compressive mechanical properties of sandstone after as well as under high temperature. High Temperature Materials and Processes, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2014, pp. 585–591.10.1515/htmp-2013-0125Search in Google Scholar
[35] Li, M., X. B. Mao, H. Pu, Y. L. Chen, Y. Wu, and L. Y. Zhang. Effects of heating rate on the dynamic tensile mechanical properties of coal sandstone during thermal treatment. Shock and Vibration, Vol. 2017, 2017, id. 4137805.10.1155/2017/4137805Search in Google Scholar
[36] Chen, S., C. Yang, and G. Wang. Evolution of thermal damage and permeability of Beishan granite. Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 110, 2017, pp. 1533–1542.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.075Search in Google Scholar
[37] Zhang, R. R., L. W. Jing, and Q. Y. Ma. Experimental study on thermal damage and energy evolution of sandstone after high temperature treatment. Shock and Vibration, Vol. 2018, 2018, id. 3845353.10.1155/2018/3845353Search in Google Scholar
[38] Zhao, X. G., Z. Zhao, Z. Guo, M. Cai, X. Li, P. F. Li, et al. Influence of thermal treatment on the thermal conductivity of Beishan granite. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 51, No. 7, 2018, pp. 2055–2074.10.1007/s00603-018-1479-0Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Zhang Rongrong et al., published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
