Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Seismic Waves in Water Level Changes in a Well: Empirical Data and Models

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high-precision water level measurements with a sampling interval of 5–10 min were carried out in 1996–2017 in the YuZ-5 well, Kamchatka. In the obtained time series, water level variations caused by the passage of seismic waves (hydrogeoseismic variations—HGSV) during 19 earthquakes with Мw = 6.8–9.1 which occurred at epicentral distances of 80–14.6 thousand km are revealed. Based on the HGSV morphological features, four main types of these variations are distinguished: oscillations (I); short (up to tens of hours) water level rises superimposed on oscillations (II); short rises (III); and long (1.5–3 months) drawdowns (IV). The dependence of the occurrence of the revealed GHSV types on earthquake parameters (magnitude and distance), specific energy density and maximum seismic wave velocity, and the amplitude-frequency content of ground motion is analyzed based on the records at a nearest seismic station. Based on several case studies, hydrogeodynamic processes of HGSV formation are investigated using numerical modeling. It is shown that the forced and free amplitude fluctuations in the water level (types I and II) can arise due to the enhancement of groundwater pressure variations in the well–water-bearing rock system during the passage of surface seismic waves with periods corresponding to the resonant frequency of the well (τ = 44.6 s). The rise in the water level in well lasting for tens minutes to hours (types II and III of HGSV variation) is caused by the short increase in pressure under violation of the steady water flow in the direct vicinity of the well; strong local earthquakes accompanied by ground shaking with intensity Imsk-64 ≥ 5 cause sustained drawdowns (type IV) due to pressure drop with the amplitudes up to 0.1 bar within a radius of up to a few hundred meters from the well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Adushkin, V.V. and Spivak, A.A., Fizicheskie polya v pripoverkhnostnoi geofizike (Physical Fields in Near-Surface Geophysics), Moscow: GEOS, 2014.

  2. Besedina, A., Vinogradov, E., Gorbunova, E., and Svintsov, I., Chilean earthquakes: Aquifer responses at the Russian platform, Pure Appl. Geophys., 2016, vol. 173, pp. 1039–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-016-1256-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boldina, S.V., Effekty zemletryasenii v sisteme “skvazhina–vodovmeshchayushchaya poroda” (The Effects of Earthquakes in the System “Well–Reservoir Rock”), Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Acad. Publishing, 2017.

  4. Boldina, S.V. and Kopylova, G.N., Modeling hydrogeoseismic water level variations in a well, Trudy Vtoroi regional’noi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii “Problemy kompleksnogo geofizicheskogo monitoringa Dal’nego Vostoka Rossii” (Proc. 2nd Regional Scientific and Technical Conference “Problems of Integrated Geophysical Monitoring of the Russian Far East”), Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskii, 2009, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskii: GS RAN, 2010, pp. 166–170.

  5. Boldina, S.V. and Kopylova, G.N., Modeling of water level variations in the YuZ-5 well, Kamchatka, caused by the earthquake of February 28, 2013, M = 6.8, Trudy Chetvertoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii “Problemy kompleksnogo geofizicheskogo monitoringa Dal’nego Vostoka Rossii” (Proc. 4th Scientific and Technical Conference “Problems of Integrated Geophysical Monitoring of the Russian Far East”), Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskii, 2013, Obninsk: GS RAN, 2013, pp. 435–439.

  6. Boldina, S.V. and Kopylova, G.N., Effects of the January 30, 2016, Mw = 7.2 Zhupanovsky earthquake on the water level variations in wells YuZ-5 and E-1 in Kamchatka, Geodinam.Tektonofiz, 2017, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 863–880. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2017-8-4-0321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bower, D. and Heaton, K., Response of an aquifer near Ottawa to tidal forcing and the Alaskan earthquake of 1964, Can. J. Earth Sci., 1978, vol. 15, pp. 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brodsky, E.E., Roeloffs, E., Woodcock, D., Gall, I., and Manga, M.A., A mechanism for sustained groundwater pressure changes induced by distant earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 2003, vol. 108, pp. 2390–2400. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chelidze, T., Melikadze, G., Kobzev, G., Shengelia, I., Jorjiashvili, N., and Mepharidze, E., Hydrodynamic and seismic response to teleseismic waves of strong remote earthquakes in Caucasus, Acta Geophys., 2019, vol. 67, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-00241-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chia, Y., Chiu, J.-J., Chiang, Y.-H., Lee, T.-P., Wu, Y.-M., and Horng, M.-J., Implications of coseismic groundwater level changes observed at multiple-well monitoring stations, Geophys. J. Int., 2008, vol. 172, pp. 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03628.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper, H.H., Bredehoeft, J.D., Papadopulos, I.S., and Bennet, R.R., The response of well-aquifer system to seismic waves, J. Geophys. Res., 1965, vol. 70, pp. 3915–3926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Droznin, D.V. and Droznina, S.Ya., Program for seismic signal processing DIMAS, Seism.Prib., 2010, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gomberg, J., Felzer, K., and Brodsky, E., Earthquake dynamic triggering and ground motion scaling, Proc. 4th Int. Workshop on Statistical Seismology, Kanagawa, Japan, 2006, pp. 45–51.

  14. Kanamori, H. and Brodsky, E.E., The physics of earthquakes, Rep. Prog. Phys., 2004, vol. 67. pp. 1429–1496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kasimova, V.A. and Kopylova, G.N., On the dependence of water level variations during severe earthquakes on the amplitude-frequency composition of the maximum phases of soil movements (using the example of YuZ-5, Kamchatka), Materialy Sed’moi Mezhdunar. seismol. shkoly “Sovremennye metody obrabotki i interpretatsii seismologicheskikh dannykh” (Proc. 7th Int. Seismol. School “Modern Methods of Processing and Interpretation of Seismological Data”), Naroch, Belarus, 2012, Obninsk: GS RAN, 2012, pp. 143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kissin, I.G., Hydrogeological monitoring of the Earth’s crust, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk,Fiz. Zemli, 1993, no. 8, pp. 58–69.

  17. Kocharyan, G.G., Markov, V.K., Markov, D.V., and Pernik, L.M., On the mechanism of variations in the fluid dynamics of underground reservoirs under the influence of weak perturbations, in Fizicheskie polya i dinamika vzaimodeistvuyushchikh geosfer: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov IDG RAN (Physical Fields and Dynamics of Interacting Geospheres: Collection of Papers of the IDG RAS), Moscow: GEOS, 2007, pp. 56–65.

  18. Kocharyan, G.G., Vinogradov, E.A., Gorbunova, E.M., Markov, V.K., Markov, D.V., and Pernik, L.M., Hydrologic response of underground reservoirs to seismic vibrations, Izv. Phys. Solid Earth, 2011, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 1071–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kopylova, G.N., Variations of water level in Elizovskava-l well, Kamchatka due to large earthquakes: 1987 -1998 observation, Vulkanol. Seismol., 2001, no. 2, pp. 39–52.

  20. Kopylova, G.N., Earthquake-induced water level changes in the YuZ-5 well, Kamchatka, Vulkanol. Seismol., 2006, no. 6, pp. 52–64.

  21. Kopylova, G.N., The application of water level observations in wells for searching earthquakes precursors (on the example of Kamchatka), Geofiz. Issled., 2009, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kopylova, G.N. and Boldina, S.V., Estimation of pore-elastic parameters for a reservoir of ground water (based on water level observations at YuZ-5 well, Kamchatka), Vulkanol. Seismol., 2006, no. 2, pp. 17–28.

  23. Kopylova, G.N. and Boldina, S.V., The response of water level in the YuZ-5 well, Kamchatka to the magnitude 9.3, Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of December 26, 2004, J. Volcanol. Seismol., 2007, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kopylova, G.N. and Boldina, S.V., Hydrogeoseismological research in Kamchatka: 1977–2017, J. Volcanol. Seismol., 2019, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kopylova, G.N., Kulikov, G.V., and Timofeev, V.M., Assessment of the status and development prospects of hydrogeodeformational monitoring of seismically active regions of Russia, Razved. Okhr. Nedr, 2007, no. 11, pp. 75–83.

  26. Kopylova G.N., Ivanov, V.Yu., and Kasimova V.A., The implementation of information system elements for interpreting integrated geophysical observations in Kamchatka, Russ. J. Earth Sci., 2009, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2205/2009ES000329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kopylova, G.N., Boldina, S.V., Steblov, G.M., and Sdel’nikova, I.A., The possibility of estimating the coseismic deformation from water level observations in wells, Izv. Phys. Solid Earth, 2010, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351310010040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kopylova, G.N., Boldina, S.V., Smolina, N.N., Sizova, E.G., and Kasimova, V.A., Hydrogeoseismic variations in water level in the piezometric wells of Kamchatka (according to observations from 1987–2011), in Seismologicheskie i geofizicheskie issledovaniya na Kamchatke: K 50-letiyu detal’nykh seismologicheskikh nablyudenii (Seismological and Geophysical Surveys in Kamchatka: On the 50th Anniversary of Detailed Seismological Observations), Gordeev, E.I. and Chebrov, V.N., Eds., Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskii: Novaya kniga, 2012, pp. 236–269.

  29. Kopylova, G.N., Boldina, S.V., Smirnov, A.A., and Chubarova, E.G., An experience in registration of water level and physical and chemical parameters of ground waters in the wells due to strong earthquakes (on the example of Kamchatka), Seism.Prib., 2016, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 43–56. https://doi.org/10.21455/si2016.4-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kopylova, G.N., Boldina, S.V., and Kasimova, V.A., The effects of strong earthquakes, Mw = 6.8–9.1, in changes in water level in the YuZ-5 well, Kamchatka, Trudy Shestoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii “Problemy kompleksnogo geofizicheskogo monitoringa Dal’nego Vostoka Rossii” (Proc. 6th Scientific and Technical Conference “Problems of Integrated Geophysical Monitoring of the Russian Far East”), Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskii, 2017, Obninsk: GS RAN, 2017, pp. 276–280.

  31. Kopylova, G.N., Boldina, S.V., Smirnov, A.A., and Chubarova, E.G., Experience in registration of variations caused by strong earthquakes in the level and physicochemical parameters of ground waters in the piezometric wells: the case of Kamchatka, Seism. Instrum., 2017, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 286–295. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923917040065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Levina, V.I., Gusev, A.A., Pavlov, V.M., at al., Kronotsky earthquake on December 5, 1997 with Mw = 7.8, I0 = 8 (Kamchatka), in Zemletryaseniya Severnoi Evrazii v 1997 godu: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov (Earthquakes of Northern Eurasia in 1997: Collection of Papers), Obninsk: GS RAN, 2003, pp. 251–271.

  33. Matsumoto, N. and Roeloffs, E.A., Hydrological response to earthquakes in the Haibara well, Central Japan: II. Possible mechanism inferred from time-varying hydraulic properties, Geophys. J. Int., 2003, vol. 155, pp 899–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Riznichenko, Yu.V., The source size of a crustal earthquake and seismic moment, in Issledovaniya po fizike zemletryasenii (Studies in Physics of Earthquakes), Moscow: Nauka, 1976, pp. 9–27.

  35. Roeloffs, E.A., Persistent water level changes in a well near Parkfield, California, due to local and distant arthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 1998, vol. 103, no. B1, pp. 869–889.

  36. Shalev, E., Kurzon, I., Doan, M.-L., and Lyakhovsky, V., Sustained water-level changes caused by damage and compaction induced by teleseismic earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 2016b, vol. 121, pp. 4943–4954. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shalev, E., Kurzon, I., Doan, M.-L., and Lyakhovsky, V., Water-level oscillations caused by volumetric and deviatoric dynamic strains, Geophys. J. Int., 2016a, vol. 204, pp. 841–851. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shi, Zh., Wang, G., and Liu, C., Co-seismic groundwater level changes induced by the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in the near field, Pure Appl. Geophys., 2013, vol. 170, pp. 1773–1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0606-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shi, Zh., Wang, G., Manga, M., and Wang, C.-Y. Mechanism of co-seismic water level change following four great earthquakes—insights from co-seismic responses throughout the Chinese mainland, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2015, vol. 430, pp. 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sun, X. and Liu, Y., Changes in groundwater level and temperature induced by distant earthquakes, Geosci. J., 2012, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-012-0022-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sun, X., Wang, G., and Yang, X., Coseismic response of water level in Changping well, China, to the Mw 9.0 Tohoku earthquake, J. Hydrol., 2015, vol. 531, pp. 1028–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Theoretical Basis and Observation Techniques of Seismic Underground Fluids, The Monitoring and Forecasting Department of China Earthquake Administration, Beijing: Seismology Press, 2007, pp. 98–110.

  43. Wakita, H., Water wells as possible indicators of tectonic strain, Science, 1975, vol. 189, pp. 553–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, C.-Y. and Manga, M., Earthquakes and Water, Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, vol. 114, Berlin: Springer, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00810-8

  45. Wang, C., Cheng, L.H., Chin, C.V., and Yu, S.B., Coseismic hydrologic response of an alluvial fan to the 1999 Chi–Chi earthquake, Taiwan, Geology, 2001, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 831–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Weingarten, M. and Ge, S., Insights into water level response to seismic waves: a 24-year high-fidelity record of global seismicity at Devils Hole, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2014, vol. 41, pp. 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang, Sh., Shi, Zh., Wang, G., and Zhang, Zh., Quantitative assessment of the mechanisms of earthquake-induced groundwater-level change in the MP well, Three Gorges Area, Pure Appl. Geophys., 2018, vol. 175, no. 7, pp. 2475–2484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1643-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the Geological Survey of Israel (GSI) and personally to director Rivka Amit, head of the department of water and natural resources Eyal Shalev, senior researcher Vladimir Lyakhovsky and field technician Halel Lutsky for providing equipment for high-frequency water level recording in YuZ-5 well and useful consulting on its installation and operation.

Funding

The work was supported by the Russian Foundation for basic Research under project 18-05-00337 “Typification and models of hydrogeoseismic effects of the earthquakes from water level measurements in wells: case study of Kamchatka region.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to G. N. Kopylova or S. V. Boldina.

Additional information

Translated by M. Nazarenko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kopylova, G.N., Boldina, S.V. Effects of Seismic Waves in Water Level Changes in a Well: Empirical Data and Models. Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 56, 530–549 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351320030039

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351320030039

Keywords:

Navigation