Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spurring competitiveness, financial and environmental performance of SMEs through government financial and non-financial support

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research evaluates the importance of government support in the financial and environmental performance of SMEs with the mediating role of differentiation and cost leadership strategy. For testing the model, data were collected from 315 owners/managers of Pakistani SMEs through a survey. The results of the structural equation modeling spectacle that both financial and non-financial incentives of government have a significant positive influence on financial performance, environmental performance, differentiation and cost leadership strategy. Differentiation strategy partially mediates the paths between government incentives (financial and non-financial) and firms’ performance (financial and environmental). However, cost leadership strategy fully mediates the relationship between government financial incentives and environmental performance, while it partially mediates the connection between government non-financial support and environmental performance. In addition, the cost leadership strategy partially mediates the path between government incentives (financial and non-financial) and financial performance. This research recommends the government and policymakers to provide financial and non-financial incentives to the industrial sector that can configure their competitive advantage and performance. In turn, these firms will able to contribute to environmental and economic growth. Additionally, firms need to build ties with the government to get valuable resources that are beneficial for competitiveness as well as environment and financial performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes Ii, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5–6), 447–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, M. (2018). Business model innovation and SMEs performance—Does competitive advantage mediate? International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(07), 1850057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, M., & Ali Shah, S. Z. (2020). Managerial networking and business model innovation: Empirical study of new ventures in an emerging economy. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32(3), 265–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, M., Khan, S. Z., & Khan, N. U. (2018a). Intellectual capital, entrepreneurial strategy and new ventures performance: Mediating role of competitive advantage. Business and Economic Review, 10(1), 63–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, M., Rehman, A. U., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2018b). Networking and new venture’s performance: Mediating role of competitive advantage. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 13(5), 998–1025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragón-Correa, J. A., Marcus, A., & Hurtado-Torres, N. (2016). The natural environmental strategies of international firms: Old controversies and new evidence on performance and disclosure. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1101–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragdon, J. H., & Marlin, J. (1972). Is pollution profitable. Risk Management, 19(4), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., & Oikonomou, I. (2018). The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2009). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Tang, G., Jin, J., Li, J., & Paillé, P. (2015). Linking market orientation and environmental performance: The influence of environmental strategy, employee’s environmental involvement, and environmental product quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 479–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, K., & Hansen, M. (2003). Financial incentives to improve environmental performance: A review of Nordic public sector support for SMEs. European Environment, 13(1), 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., Roper, S., & Wylie, P. (2003). The golden thread of innovation and northern Ireland’s evolving regional innovation system. Regional Studies, 37(4), 365–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degong, M., Ullah, F., Khattak, M., & Anwar, M. (2018). Do international capabilities and resources configure firm’s sustainable competitive performance? Research within Pakistani SMEs. Sustainability, 10(11), 4298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doh, S., & Kim, B. (2014). Government support for SME innovations in the regional industries: The case of government financial support program in South Korea. Research Policy, 43(9), 1557–1569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajnzylber, P., Maloney, W. F., & Montes-Rojas, G. V. (2009). Releasing constraints to growth or pushing on a string? Policies and performance of Mexican micro-firms. The Journal of Development Studies, 45(7), 1027–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. P., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In W. C. Zimmerli, K. Richter, & M. Holzinger (Eds.), Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173–178). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, D. (2011). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update, 10/e. Chennai: Pearson Education India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosal, V. (2015). Business strategy and firm reorganization: Role of changing environmental standards, sustainable business initiatives and global market conditions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(2), 123–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gölgeci, I., Gligor, D. M., Tatoglu, E., & Arda, O. A. (2019). A relational view of environmental performance: What role do environmental collaboration and cross-functional alignment play? Journal of Business Research, 96, 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., & Yam, R. C. (2015). Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s. Research Policy, 44(1), 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J. C., Richard, C. M., Tang, E. P., & Lau, A. K. (2009). Innovation strategy and performance during economic transition: Evidences in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 38(5), 802–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, S., You, W., & Nan, S. (2019). Zombie firms, external support and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 1499–1517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H., Rand, J., & Tarp, F. (2009). Enterprise growth and survival in Vietnam: Does government support matter? The Journal of Development Studies, 45(7), 1048–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorge, M. L., Madueño, J. H., Martínez-Martínez, D., & Sancho, M. P. L. (2015). Competitiveness and environmental performance in Spanish small and medium enterprises: Is there a direct link? Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junquera, B., & Barba-Sánchez, V. (2018). Environmental proactivity and firms’ performance: Mediation effect of competitive advantages in Spanish wineries. Sustainability, 10(7), 2155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laari, S., Töyli, J., & Ojala, L. (2018). The effect of a competitive strategy and green supply chain management on the financial and environmental performance of logistics service providers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 872–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., & Wright, P. (1992). A competency-based model of sustainable competitive advantage: Toward a conceptual integration. Journal of Management, 18(1), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, C., & Gudmundsson, S. V. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation, firm strategy and small firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 32(1), 36–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. H., Ooi, K. B., Chong, A. Y. L., & Lin, B. (2015). A structural analysis of greening the supplier, environmental performance and competitive advantage. Production Planning & Control, 26(2), 116–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., & Zhou, H. (2015). Political connections and access to IPO markets in China. China Economic Review, 33, 76–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, J., & Langbein, L. (2015). Performance management, high-powered incentives, and environmental policies in China. International Public Management Journal, 18(3), 346–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longoni, A., & Cagliano, R. (2015). Environmental and social sustainability priorities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(2), 216–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, C., & Gao, C. (1997). Technical innovation and economics. Science and Technology Review, 4, 18–22. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Palacios-Manzano, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and firm performance: An empirical research in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2374–2383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Tapia, I., Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Senise-Barrio, M. E. (2008). Being green and export intensity of SMEs: The moderating influence of perceived uncertainty. Ecological Economics, 68(1–2), 56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffat, A., & Auer, A. (2006). Corporate environmental innovation (CEI): A government initiative to support corporate sustainability leadership. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(6–7), 589–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P., & Larédo, P. (2002). Innovation and research policy in France (1980–2000) or the disappearance of the Colbertist state. Research Policy, 31(1), 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business and Society, 50(1), 6–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pergelova, A., & Angulo-Ruiz, F. (2014). The impact of government financial support on the performance of new firms: the role of competitive advantage as an intermediate outcome. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(9–10), 663–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petts, J. (2003). Barriers to deliberative participation in EIA: Learning from waste policies, plans and projects. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 5(03), 269–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects’. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy-techniques for analysis industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ran, R. (2013). Perverse incentive structure and policy implementation gap in China’s local environmental politics. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15(1), 17–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samad, S. (2018). Examining the effects of environmental strategy and competitive advantage on business performance. Management Science Letters, 8(9), 891–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Board attributes, corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental and social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 569–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2011). The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, H., Peng, S. Z., Liu, Y., & Zhong, P. (2008). Barriers to the implementation of cleaner production in Chinese SMEs: Government, industry and expert stakeholders’ perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(7), 842–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Songling, Y., Ishtiaq, M., Anwar, M., & Ahmed, H. (2018). The role of government support in sustainable competitive position and firm performance. Sustainability, 10(10), 3495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. J., & Tether, B. S. (1998). Public policy measures to support new technology-based firms in the European Union. Research Policy, 26(9), 1037–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talaja, A., & Ercegović, J. (2013, January). Competitive advantage and company’s performance: Exploring the differences and relationship. In Advanced research in scientific areas.

  • Testa, F., Gusmerottia, N. M., Corsini, F., Passetti, E., & Iraldo, F. (2016). Factors affecting environmental management by small and micro firms: The importance of entrepreneurs’ attitudes and environmental investment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(6), 373–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumpp, C., & Guenther, T. (2017). Too little or too much? Exploring U-shaped relationships between corporate environmental performance and corporate financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, S. C. (1975). Are socially responsible corporations good investment risks. Management Review, 64(8), 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Reader in Business and the Environment, 36, 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, J., & Liu, Y. (2015). Government support and firm innovation performance. Chinese Management Studies, 9(1), 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., Ishtiaq, M., & Anwar, M. (2018). Enterprise risk management practices and firm performance, the mediating role of competitive advantage and the moderating role of financial literacy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 11(3), 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ying, Q., Hassan, H., & Ahmad, H. (2019). The role of a manager’s intangible capabilities in resource acquisition and sustainable competitive performance. Sustainability, 11(2), 527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R., Guttman, D., Qi, Y., Bachus, K., Belis, D., Cheng, H., et al. (2015). Institutionalized governance processes: Comparing environmental problem solving in China and the United States. Global Environmental Change, 31, 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Li, L., Zhou, D., & Zhou, P. (2014). Political connections, government subsidies and firm financial performance: Evidence from renewable energy manufacturing in China. Renewable Energy, 63, 330–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Khan, U., Lee, S., & Salik, M. (2019). The influence of management innovation and technological innovation on organization performance. A mediating role of sustainability. Sustainability, 11(2), 495.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Economic and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China

    Muhammad Anwar & Shuangjie Li

Authors
  1. Muhammad Anwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuangjie Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Anwar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anwar, M., Li, S. Spurring competitiveness, financial and environmental performance of SMEs through government financial and non-financial support. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 7860–7882 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00951-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00951-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation