Skip to main content
Log in

Composite Manufacturing Cost Model Targeting on Design Optimization

  • Published:
Applied Composite Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As applications of composite material increasingly increase in the aviation sector, its manufacturing cost is now identified as a bottle neck, which limits the market competitiveness in terms of cost-performance efficiency. To estimate the manufacturing cost of composite structures at the early design stage, this research proposes a manufacturing cost model based on process simulation and represents the cost in the form of “Equivalent Working Hour” (EWH). The research also introduces the “Structural Complexity Element” (SCE) and “Hourly Rate Factor” (HRF) to ensure and improve the accuracy of the model. Then, the model is applied on a composite wing structure to calculate and analyze the manufacturing costs of two structure designs to be manufactured through manual lay-up, automated tape lay-up/fiber placement, autoclave or out-of-autoclave curing, mechanical assembly, and co-cure or adhesive bonding. The results verified the effectiveness of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feng, Y., Ma, B., Cui, R., An, T., He, Y., Jiao, S.: Effects of hygrothermal environment on the buckling and postbuckling performances of stiffened composite panels under axial compression. Compos. Struct. 242, 112132 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fiorina, M., Seman, A., Castanie, B., Ali, K.M., Schwob, C., Mezeix, L.: Spring-in prediction for carbon/epoxy aerospace composite structure. Compos. Struct. 168, 739–745 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cepin, M., Bris, R.: Safety and Reliability. Theory and Applications. CRC Press, London (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Boeing: Commercial market outlook 2019–2038. The Boeing Company. http://www.boeing.com/cmo/ (2020).Accessed 10 Feb 2020

  5. Airbus: Global market forecast: cities, airports and aircraft 2019–2038. Airbus. www.airbus.com/aircraft/market/global-market-forecast.html (2020). Accessed 10 Feb 2020

  6. Baur, J.W., Hartl, D.J., Frank, G.J., Huff, G., Slinker, K.A., Kondash, C., Joshua Kennedy, W., Ehlert, G.J.: Experimental mechanics for multifunctional composites and next generation UAVs. In: Thakre, P.R., Singh, R., and Slipher, G. (eds.) Mechanics of Composite and Multi-Functional Materials, Volume 6. pp. 215–221. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018)

  7. Shama, Rao, N., Simha, T.G.A., Rao, K.P., Ravi, Kumar, G.V.V.: Carbon Composites Are Becoming Competitive and Cost Effective. Infosys Ltd. 1–12 (2018)

  8. Tong, R., Hoa, S. V., Chen, M.: Cost analysis on L-shape composite component manufacturing. ICCM Int. Conf. Compos. Mater. 1–5 (2011)

  9. Ben-Arieh, D., Qian, L.: Activity-based cost management for design and development stage. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 83, 169–183 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00323-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hueber, C., Horejsi, K., Schledjewski, R.: Review of Cost Estimation: Methods and Models for Aerospace Composite Manufacturing, (2016)

  11. Curran, R., Raghunathan, S., Price, M.: Review of Aerospace Engineering Cost Modelling: the Genetic Causal Approach, (2004)

  12. R.W. Hess, H.P. Romanoff.: Aircraft airframe cost estimating relationships: all mission types. The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica (1987). Report No.: N-2283/1-AF

  13. Pricesystems.com.: PRICE H / HL. PRICE Systems, LLC. https://www.pricesystems.com/price-h-hl/ (2020). Accessed 30 Apr 2020

  14. Chen, X., Huang, J., Yi, M.: Cost estimation for general aviation aircrafts using regression models and variable importance in projection analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 256, 120648 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Friz, P.D., Hosder, S., Leser, B.B., Towle, B.C.: Blind validation study of parametric cost estimation tool SEER-H for NASA space missions. Acta Astronautica. 166(358–368), 358–368 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. NASA.: NASA cost estimating handbook version 4.0. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington D.C. (2015). Report No.: NASA CEH v.4.0

  17. Northrop corporation aircraft division.: Advanced composite cost estimation manual. Northrop corporation, aircraft division, Hawthorne (1976). Report No.: AFFDL-TR-76-87

  18. Edwards, D.A., Williams, F.W., Kennedy, D.: Cost optimization of stiffened panels using VICONOPT. AIAA J. 36, 267–272 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.7511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou, L., Zhang, D., Zhao, L., Zhou, X., Zhang, J., Liu, F.: Design and analysis of a novel bolted composite π joint under bending load. Mater. Des. 98, 201–208 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hagnell, M.K., Åkermo, M.: A composite cost model for the aeronautical industry: methodology and case study. Compos. Part B. 79, 254–261 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hagnell, M.K., Langbeck, B., Åkermo, M.: Cost efficiency, integration and assembly of a generic composite aeronautical wing box. Compos. Struct. 152, 1014–1023 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin, H., Yu, X.: Integration of manufacturing cost into structural optimization of composite wings. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 23, 670–676 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(09)60269-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Man, Z., Wenbin, S., Xiaoyong, L.: Study on multi-level manufacturing cost model of civil aircraft wing structure. Aeronaut. Manufact. Technol. 19, 83–87 (2020) [Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  24. Qiang, Y., Puhui, C., Yanan, C.: Cost modeling for composite structure fabrication and its code development. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica. 25(4), 161–167 (2008) [Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ye, J., Zhang, B., Qi, H.: Cost estimates to guide manufacturing of composite waved beam. Mater. Des. 30, 452–458 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gutowski, T., Hoult, D., Dillon, G., Neoh, E.-T., Muter, S., Kim, E., Tse, M.: Development of a theoretical cost model for advanced composite fabrication. Compos. Manuf. 5(4), 231–239 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Haffner, S.M.: Cost Modeling and Design for Manufacturing Guidelines for Advanced Composite Fabrication. Massachusetts Institutes of Technology, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nill, S.T.: Aerospace Composite Manufacturing Cost Models as Geometric Programs. Massachusetts Institutes of Technology, Boston (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vogt, C.: An Experimental Cost Model for Composite Parts Using Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Moulding (VARTM). University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lukaszewicz, D.H.J.A., Ward, C., Potter, K.D.: The engineering aspects of automated prepreg layup: history, present and future. Compos. Part B. 43, 997–1009 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.12.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Elhajjar, R.: High Speed Tow Placement System for Complex Surfaces with Cut / Clamp / Restart Capabilities at 85 m/min (3350 IPM) (2006-01-3138). In: Additive Manufacturing of Aerospace Composite Structures: Fabrication and Reliability. pp. 1–6. SAE (2017)

  32. Zhang Xuan, Shen Zhen.: Progress in manufacturing technology of composite materials in the aerospace field. China Textile Leader. special issue, 73–79 (2018) [Chinese]

  33. OECD: Average annual wages. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=AV_AN_WAGE (2020). Accessed 10 Jul 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shize Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, S., Li, D., Xiang, J. et al. Composite Manufacturing Cost Model Targeting on Design Optimization. Appl Compos Mater 27, 673–691 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-020-09828-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-020-09828-0

Keywords

Navigation