Abstract
We study conformal properties of local terms such as contact terms and semi-local terms in correlation functions of a conformal field theory. Not all of them are universal observables, but they do appear in physically important correlation functions such as (anomalous) Ward–Takahashi identities or Schwinger–Dyson equations. We develop some tools such as embedding space delta functions and effective action to examine conformal invariance of these local terms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Conformal invariant integration in the embedding space formalism was studied in [14].
The introduction of s integration to represent the delta functions on the projective space can be found in the twistor literature (e.g. [20]). We need an extra integration over \(R^2\) to restrict the delta functions on the light-cone.
As a distribution, \(\delta ^{(d)}_{k}(X,Y)\) can be integrated against the weight \(-k\) function \(f^{(-k)}(X)\) with the measure \(D^dX\) introduced [14] over the projective light-cone, which gives \(\int D^d X \delta _{k}^{(d)}(X,Y)f^{(-k)}(X) = f^{(-k)}(Y)\). Note that the freedom to choose different k is essential here.
More precisely, with more careful distributional analysis, it is not impossible to make sense of such singular terms as \( \delta (x) \mathrm {P}\frac{1}{x} = -\frac{1}{2}\delta '(x) \), where \(\mathrm {P}\) represents the principal value, a la Sato [21], but they typically fail to be associative. In this case, the products of x, \(\delta (x)\) and \(\mathrm {P}\frac{1}{x}\) can be 0, \(\frac{1}{2}\delta (x)\), \(\delta (x)\) depending on the order. We will not study such terms in this paper.
The transverse condition demands \(X^M \partial _M\) must annihilate the delta functions automatically, but \(X^M\partial _M\) precisely counts the projective weight and vanishes (only) if it acts on functions (or distributions) with zero projective weight.
An interesting question arises if these conformal invariant contact terms can be compatible with the Weyl invariance. [24, 25] showed that it is not necessarily possible with higher orders of derivatives as one can see that the higher powers of Laplacians are not always Weyl invariant (in even dimensions).
In the Hamiltonian picture, this delta function originates from the T-product and the canonical commutation relation.
It is curious to observe that only when \(\Delta _1 = \frac{d}{2}+1\) (or \(\Delta _2 = \frac{d}{2}+1\)) one can construct the simple effective action \(\int d^dx \left( \Phi _3 J^2 \partial _\mu \partial ^\mu J^1 + J^3 \Phi _3 \right) \).
For example, \(x\partial _x \delta (x-y)\) is different from \(y\partial _x \delta (x-y)\) as a distribution, which we can easily see by multiplying f(x) and integrating it over x.
References
Poland, D., Rychkov, S., Vichi, A.: The conformal bootstrap: theory, numericaltechniques, and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91(1), 15002 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015002
Komargodski, Z., Schwimmer, A.: On Renormalization groupflows in four dimensions. JHEP 1112, 099 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2011)099
Bzowski, A., Skenderis, K.: Comments on scale and conformal invariance. JHEP 1408, 027 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2014)027
Dymarsky, A., Farnsworth, K., Komargodski, Z., Luty, M.A., Prilepina, V.: Scale invariance, conformality, and generalized free fields. JHEP 1602, 099 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2016)099
Bzowski, A., McFadden, P., Skenderis, K.: Renormalised 3-point functionsof stress tensors and conserved currents in CFT. JHEP 1811, 153 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2018)153
Gomis, J., Hsin, P.S., Komargodski, Z., Schwimmer, A., Seiberg, N., Theisen, S.: Anomalies, conformal manifolds, and spheres. JHEP 1603, 022 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2016)022
Gomis, J., Komargodski, Z., Ooguri, H., Seiberg, N., Wang, Y.: ShorteningAnomalies in supersymmetric theories. JHEP 1701, 067 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2017)067
Schwimmer, A., Theisen, S.: Moduli Anomalies and local terms in the operator product expansion. JHEP 1807, 110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2018)110
Cordova, C., Freed, D.S., Lam, H.T., Seiberg, N.: Anomalies in the Space of Coupling Constants and Their Dynamical Applications I. arXiv:1905.09315 [hep-th]
Maldacena, J.M., Pimentel, G.L.: On graviton non-gaussianities during ination. JHEP 1109, 045 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2011)045
Closset, C., Dumitrescu, T.T., Festuccia, G., Komargodski, Z., Seiberg, N.: Contact terms, unitarity, and F-maximization in three-dimensional superconformal theories. JHEP 1210, 053 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2012)053
Closset, C., Dumitrescu, T.T., Festuccia, G., Komargodski, Z., Seiberg, N.: Comments on Chern-Simons contact terms in three dimensions. JHEP 1209, 091 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2012)091
Costa, M.S., Penedones, J., Poland, D., Rychkov, S.: Spinning conformal correlators. JHEP 1111, 071 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2011)071
Simmons-Duffin, D.: Projectors, shadows, and conformal blocks. JHEP 1404, 146 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2014)146
Kravchuk, P., Simmons-Duffin, D.: Counting conformal correlators. JHEP 1802, 096 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2018)096
Cuomo, G.F., Karateev, D., Kravchuk, P.: General bootstrap equations in 4DCFTs. JHEP 1801, 130 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2018)130
Isono, H.: On conformal correlators and blocks with spinors in general dimensions. Phys. Rev. D 96(6), 065011 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.065011
Karateev, D., Kravchuk, P., Serone, M., Vichi, A.: Fermion conformal bootstrap in 4d. JHEP 2019(6), 88 (2019)
Fortin, J.F., Skiba, W.: New methods for conformal correlation functions. JHEP 2020, 1–87 (2020)
Mason, L.J., Reid-Edwards, R.A., Taghavi-Chabert, A.: Conformal field theories in six-dimensional twistor space. J. Geom. Phys. 62, 2353 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2012.08.001
Sato, M.: Theory of hyperfunctions I, II. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. 1 , 8 pp. 139-193; 387-437(1959-1960)
Penedones, J., Trevisani, E., Yamazaki, M.: Recursion relations for conformal blocks. JHEP 1609, 070 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2016)070
Osborn, H., Petkou, A.C.: Implications of conformal invariance ineld theories for general dimensions. Annals Phys 231, 311–362 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1006/aphy.1994.1045
Schwimmer, A., Theisen, S.: Osborn equation and irrelevant operators. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2019(8), 084011 (2019)
Nakayama, Y.: Conformal equations that are not Virasoro or Weyl invariant. Lett. Math. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-019-01186-8
Nakayama, Y.: Realization of impossible anomalies. Phys. Rev. D 98(8), 085002 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.085002
Zhiboedov, A.:A note on three-point functions of conserved currents . arXiv:1206.6370 [hep-th]
Nakayama, Y.: CP-violating CFT and trace anomaly. Nucl. Phys. B 859, 288 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.02.006
Bonora, L., Giaccari, S., Lima de Souza, B.: Trace anomalies in chiral theories revisited. JHEP 1407, 117 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2014)117
Bonora, L., Cvitan, M., Dominis Prester, P., Duarte Pereira, A., Giaccari, S., Stemberga, T.: Axial gravity, massless fermions and trace anomalies. Eur. Phys. J. C 77(8), 511 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5071-7
Bonora, L., Cvitan, M., Dominis Prester, P., Giaccari, S., Paulisic, M., Stemberga, T.: Axial gravity: a non-perturbative approach to split anomalies. Eur. Phys. J. C 78(8), 652 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6141-1
Bastianelli, F., Broccoli, M.: On the trace anomaly of a Weyl fermion in a gauge background. Eur. Phys. J. C 79(4), 292 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6799-z
Frob, M.B., Zahn, J.: Trace anomaly for chiral fermions via Hadamard subtraction. JHEP 10, 223 (2019)
Nakagawa, K., Nakayama, Y.: CP-violating super Weyl anomaly. Phys. Rev. D 101(10), 105013 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.105013
Papadimitriou, I.: Supercurrent anomalies in 4d SCFTs. JHEP 1707, 38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2017)038
An, O.S.: Anomaly-corrected supersymmetry algebra and supersymmetric holographic renormalization. JHEP 1712, 107 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2017)107
An, O.S., Kang, J.U., Kim, J.C., Ko, Y.H.: Quantum consistency in supersymmetric theories with R-symmetry in curved space. JHEP 1905, 146 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2019)146
Katsianis, G., Papadimitriou, I., Skenderis, K., Taylor, M.: Anomalous Supersymmetry. arXiv:1902.06715 [hep-th]
Papadimitriou, I.: Supersymmetry anomalies in N = 1 conformal supergravity. JHEP 1904, 40 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2019)040
Papadimitriou, I.: Supersymmetry anomalies in new minimal supergravity. JHEP 2019(9), 39 (2019)
Acknowledgements
This work is in part supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 17K14301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Katrin Wendland.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
A Check of Special Conformal Invariance in Coordinate Space
A Check of Special Conformal Invariance in Coordinate Space
In this appendix, we perform a check of the special conformal invariance of some two-point functions directly in the coordinate space for \(d=1\). The generalization to higher dimension should be straightforward.
Let us begin with the usual non-local two-point functions
Assuming that \(O_{\Delta _1}\) and \(O_{\Delta _2}\) are primary operators, the left-hand side transforms under the special conformal transformation \(x \rightarrow x + \epsilon x^2\) as
On the other hand, the right-hand side transforms as
The equality holds only if \(\Delta _1 = \Delta _2\), which is the well-known constraint on the two-point functions.
The constraint is weaker in the contact term without derivatives on the delta function. Let us consider
with \(\Delta _1 + \Delta _2 = 1\) from the scale invariance. Assuming that \(O_{\Delta _1}\) and \(O_{\Delta _2}\) are primary operators, the left-hand side transforms under the special conformal transformation \(x \rightarrow x + \epsilon x^2\) as
On the other hand, the right-hand side transforms as
The equality between (48) and (49) holds as long as \(\Delta _1 + \Delta _2 = 1\) and there is no further constraint such as \(\Delta _1 = \Delta _2\).
Let us finally consider the contact term with a derivative acting on the delta function.
with \(\Delta _1 + \Delta _2 = 2\) from the scale invariance. Assuming that \(O_{\Delta _1}\) and \(O_{\Delta _2}\) are primary operators, the left-hand side transforms under the special conformal transformation \(x \rightarrow x + \epsilon x^2\) as
Note that unlike the case above, we cannot set \(x_1=x_2\) in front of the derivative of the delta function.Footnote 9 On the other hand, the right-hand side transforms as
The equality between (51) and (52) holds only if \(\Delta _1 = 1\) and \(\Delta _2=1\). This is consistent with our embedding space formalism.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakayama, Y. Conformal Contact Terms and Semi-local Terms. Ann. Henri Poincaré 21, 3201–3216 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-020-00951-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-020-00951-z