Skip to main content
Log in

Circumferential Rosette Design for Extended Depth Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Measurements

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The radial design for strain gauge rosettes used for hole-drilling residual stress measurements was established over 50 years ago and has remained almost unchanged since then. The design was developed to promote strain sensitivity, but was made without regard for ability to identify interior stresses. Consequently, only near-surface residual stresses can be identified.

Objective

The aim of this study is to investigate rosette geometric features that may be refined to enable a significant increase in ability to identify interior stresses without significant loss of strain sensitivity.

Methods

A finite element analysis was undertaken to model the influence of various geometrical factors on the depth response of a strain gauge rosette.

Results

It was found that that circumferentially oriented strain gauges allow residual stress measurements to be made to twice the depth of traditional radial strain gauges, with only minor loss in strain sensitivity.

Conclusions

A new circumferential strain gauge rosette design based on the presented analysis is proposed for use where extended depth measurements are desired.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASTM (2013) Determining residual stresses by the hole-drilling strain-gage method. Standard test method E837-13a. American Society for Testing and Materials, west Conshohocken, PA

  2. Schajer GS, Whitehead PS (2018) Hole-drilling method for measuring residual stress. Morgan & Claypool, Williston

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grant PV, Lord JD, Whitehead PS (2002) The measurement of residual stresses by the incremental hole drilling technique. Measurement Good Practice Guide No.53, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK

  4. Vishay Measurements Group, Inc. (1993) Measurement of Residual Stresses by the Hole-Drilling Strain-Gage Method. Tech Note TN-503-6. Vishay Measurements Group, Inc., Raleigh, NC. 16pp

  5. Mathar J (1934) Determination of initial stresses by measuring the deformation around drilled holes. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng 56(4):249–254

    Google Scholar 

  6. Soete W, Vancrombrugge R (1950) An industrial method for the determination of residual stresses. Proceedings SESA 8(1):17–28

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boiten RG, ten Cate W (1952) A routine method for the measurement of residual stresses in plates. Appl Sci Res A3(5):317–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelsey RA (1956) Measuring non-uniform residual stresses by the hole drilling method. Proceedings SESA 14(1):181–194

    Google Scholar 

  9. Riparbelli C (1950) A method for the determination of initial stresses, Proceedings SESA, 8:173-196

  10. Rendler NJ, Vigness I (1966) Hole-drilling strain-gage method of measuring residual stresses. Exp Mech 6(12):577–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bijak-Zochowski M (1978) A Semidestructive method of measuring residual stresses. VDI-Berichte 313:469–476

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schajer GS (1988) Measurement of non-uniform residual stresses using the hole-drilling method. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology 110(4) Part I:338-343, Part II:344-349

  13. Love AEH (1927) A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Schajer GS, Prime MB (2006) Use of inverse solutions for residual stress measurements. J Eng Mater Technol 128(3):375–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schajer GS (2020) Compact calibration data for hole-drilling residual stress measurements in finite-thickness specimens. Exp Mech 60:665–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schajer GS (1993) Use of displacement data to calculate strain gauge response in non-uniform strain fields. Strain 29(1):9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schajer GS, Tootoonian M (1997) A new rosette design for more reliable hole-drilling residual stress measurements. Exp Mech 37(3):299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Beghini M, Bertini L, Giri A, Santus C, Valentini E (2019) Measuring residual stress in finite thickness plates using the hole-drilling method. J Strain Anal Eng Des 54(1):65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Philip Whitehead, Stresscraft, UK, gave much encouragement and advice. Prof. R. L. Taylor kindly provided the PCFeap software used for the finite element calculations.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. S. Schajer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schajer, G.S. Circumferential Rosette Design for Extended Depth Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Measurements. Exp Mech 60, 1265–1274 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-020-00660-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-020-00660-y

Keywords

Navigation