Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unconventional Passive Enhancement of Transdermal Drug Delivery: toward a Mechanistic Understanding of Penetration Enhancers Releasing from Acrylic Pressure-Sensitive Adhesive of Patches

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Penetration enhancers (PEs) enhancing efficacy depends on two processes: PEs release from patches and action on skin. Compared with their action on skin, PEs release process was poorly understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to make a mechanistic understanding of PEs release from acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive of patches and propose an unconventional enhancement of PEs efficacy.

Methods

PEs efficacy was evaluated both in drug permeation study and drug pharmacokinetic study. Confocal Raman spectroscopy was employed to observe PEs release behavior by mapping PEs dynamic distribution in skin. The mechanism of PEs release behavior was provided from molecular interaction and rheology using FT-IR, molecular docking, molecular dynamic simulation and rheometer, separately.

Results

The release behavior of PEs themselves greatly restricted their efficacy. By using PEG 400, an improvement of oleic acid (OA) release behavior was achieved, and the efficacy of OA was significantly enhanced with enhancing ratio (ER) from 2.69 to 4.10 and AUClast from 1574 ± 87 to 2664 ± 249 ng·h/mL, separately. The improvement of OA release behavior was primarily resulted from reduction of the interaction between OA and adhesive, which was caused by other small molecules with a strong ability in forming hydrogen bonds with adhesive. Also, the rigidity of adhesive was a factor in affecting PEs release behavior.

Conclusions

An unconventional passive enhancement of transdermal drug delivery was achieved via improving PEs themselves releasing from acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive.

Influence of PEs release behavior on drug permeation through skin and molecular mechanism

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AUC :

The area under concentration-time curve

CED:

Cohesive energy density

D′ :

Diffusion coefficient

EO:

Ethyl oleate

ER :

Enhancing ratio

IPM:

Isopropyl myristate

LA:

Lauric acid

LOA:

Linoleic acid

MA:

Myristic acid

MD:

Molecular dynamic

ML:

Methyl laurate

MRT :

The mean residence time

MSD:

Mean squared displacement

OA:

Oleic acid

PEs:

Penetration enhancers

SC:

Stratum corneum

TEWL:

Transepidermal water loss

References

  1. Li N, Jia W, Zhang Y, Tan F, Zhang J. Synergistic effect of 1, 4-cyclohexanediol and 1, 2-hexanediol on percutaneous absorption and penetration of metronidazole. Int J Pharm. 2011;415(1–2):169–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zorec B, Preat V, Miklavcic D, Pavselj N. Active enhancement methods for intra- and transdermal drug delivery: a review. Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal. 2013;82(5):339–56.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Williams AC, Barry BW. Penetration enhancers. Adv Drug Del Rev. 2012;64:128–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Simons EJ, Bellas E, Lawlor MW, Kohane DS. Effect of chemical permeation enhancers on nerve blockade. Mol Pharm. 2009;6(1):265–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rambharose S, Kalhapure RS, Akamanchi KG, Govender T. Novel dendritic derivatives of unsaturated fatty acids as promising transdermal permeation enhancers for tenofovir. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;3(32):6662–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Balázs B, Csizmazia E, Berkó S, Budai-Szűcs M, Szabó-Révész P, Csányi E. New approach of sucrose myristate as a promising penetration enhancer in dermal preparations. Tenside Surfactants Detergents. 2015;52(5):375–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Zyl L, Du Preez J, Gerber M, Du Plessis J, Viljoen J. Essential fatty acids as transdermal penetration enhancers. J Pharm Sci. 2016;105(1):188–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Qvist MH, Hoeck U, Kreilgaard B, Madsen F, Frokjaer S. Release of chemical permeation enhancers from drug-in-adhesive transdermal patches. Int J Pharm. 2002;231(2):253–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Santoyo S, Ygartua P. Effect of skin pretreatment with fatty acids on percutaneous absorption and skin retention of piroxicam after its topical application. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2000;50(2):245–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Song W, Quan P, Li S, Liu C, Lv S, Zhao Y, et al. Probing the role of chemical enhancers in facilitating drug release from patches: mechanistic insights based on FT-IR spectroscopy, molecular modeling and thermal analysis. J Control Release. 2016;227:13–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Agrawala P, Ritschel WA. Influence of 1-dodecylhexahydro-2H-azepin-2-one (Azone) on the in vitro permeation of verapamil hydrochloride across rat, hairless mouse, and human cadaver skin. J Pharm Sci. 1988;77(9):776–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu X, Quan P, Li S, Liu C, Zhao Y, Zhao Y, et al. Time dependence of the enhancement effect of chemical enhancers: molecular mechanisms of enhancing kinetics. J Control Release. 2017;248:33–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miloudi L, Bonnier F, Tfayli A, Yvergnaux F, Byrne HJ, Chourpa I, et al. Confocal Raman spectroscopic imaging for in vitro monitoring of active ingredient penetration and distribution in reconstructed human epidermis model. J Biophotonics. 2018;11(4):e201700221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang J, Shi Q, Tao J, Peng Y, Cai T. Impact of polymer enrichment at the crystal-liquid Interface on crystallization kinetics of amorphous solid dispersions. Mol Pharm. 2019;16(3):1385–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Song Y, Xiao C, Mendelsohn R, Zheng T, Strekowski L, Michniak B. Investigation of iminosulfuranes as novel transdermal penetration enhancers: enhancement activity and cytotoxicity. Pharm Res. 2005;22(11):1918–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Slark A, Hadgett P. The effect of polymer structure on specific interactions between dye solutes and polymers. Polymer. 1999;40(5):1325–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao H, Liu C, Yang D, Wan X, Shang R, Quan P, et al. Molecular mechanism of ion-pair releasing from acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive containing carboxyl group: roles of doubly ionic hydrogen bond in the controlled release process of bisoprolol ion-pair. J Control Release. 2018;289:146–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Adeleke OA, Monama NO, Tsai PC, Sithole HM, Michniak-Kohn BB. Combined atomistic molecular calculations and experimental investigations for the architecture, screening, optimization, and characterization of pyrazinamide containing Oral film formulations for tuberculosis management. Mol Pharm. 2016;13(2):456–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang W, Liu C, Luo Z, Wan X, Fang L. Investigation of molecular mobility of pressure-sensitive-adhesive in oxybutynin patch in vitro and in vivo: effect of sorbitan monooleate on drug release and patch mechanical property. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;122:116–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haile JM. Molecular dynamics simulation: elementary methods: Wiley new York; 1992.

  21. Yang D, Wan X, Quan P, Liu C, Fang L. The role of carboxyl group of pressure sensitive adhesive in controlled release of propranolol in transdermal patch: quantitative determination of ionic interaction and molecular mechanism characterization. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;115:330–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Michaelis M, Brummer R, Leopold C. Plasticization and antiplasticization of an acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive by ibuprofen and their effect on the adhesion properties. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014;86(2):234–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin S-Y, Lee C-J, Lin Y-Y. Drug-polymer interaction affecting the mechanical properties, adhesion strength and release kinetics of piroxicam-loaded Eudragit E films plasticized with different plasticizers. J Control Release. 1995;33(3):375–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruan J, Wan X, Quan P, Liu C, Fang L. Investigation of effect of isopropyl Palmitate on drug release from transdermal patch and molecular dynamics study. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019;20(5):174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maskova E, Kubova K, Vyslouzil J, Pavlokova S, Vetchy D. Influence of pH modulation on dynamic behavior of gel layer and release of weakly basic drug from HPMC/wax matrices, controlled by acidic modifiers evaluated by multivariate data analysis. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017;18(4):1242–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Čižinauskas V, Elie N, Brunelle A, Briedis V. Fatty acids penetration into human skin ex vivo: a TOF-SIMS analysis approach. Biointerphases. 2017;12(1):011003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alexander A, Dwivedi S, Giri TK, Saraf S, Saraf S, Tripathi DK. Approaches for breaking the barriers of drug permeation through transdermal drug delivery. J Control Release. 2012;164(1):26–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang D, Liu C, Quan P, Fang L. A systematic approach to determination of permeation enhancer action efficacy and sites: molecular mechanism investigated by quantitative structure-activity relationship. J Control Release. 2020;322:1–12.

  29. Pham QD, Björklund S, Engblom J, Topgaard D, Sparr E. Chemical penetration enhancers in stratum corneum—relation between molecular effects and barrier function. J Control Release. 2016;232:175–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tuntiyasawasdikul S, Limpongsa E, Jaipakdee N, Sripanidkulchai B. Transdermal permeation of Kaempferia parviflora Methoxyflavones from isopropyl Myristate-based vehicles. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2014;15(4):947–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Baek J-S, Lim J-H, Kang J-S, Shin S-C, Jung S-H, Cho C-W. Enhanced transdermal drug delivery of zaltoprofen using a novel formulation. Int J Pharm. 2013;453(2):358–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin SY, Duan KJ, Lin TC. Simultaneous determination of the protein conversion process in porcine stratum corneum after pretreatment with skin enhancers by a combined microscopic FT-IR/DSC system. Spectrochimica Acta Part a-Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 1996;52(12):1671–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Simonetti O, Hoogstraate AJ, Bialik W, Kempenaar JA, Schrijvers A, Bodde HE, et al. Visualization of diffusion pathways across the stratum-corneum of native and in-vitro-reconstructed epidermis by confocal laser-scanning microscopy. Arch Dermatol Res. 1995;287(5):465–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Puttipipatkhachorn S, Nunthanid J, Yamamoto K, Peck G. Drug physical state and drug–polymer interaction on drug release from chitosan matrix films. J Control Release. 2001;75(1–2):143–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu C, Quan P, Li S, Zhao Y, Fang L. A systemic evaluation of drug in acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive patch in vitro and in vivo: the roles of intermolecular interaction and adhesive mobility variation in drug controlled release. J Control Release. 2017;252:83–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Katiyar RS, Jha PK. Mimicking the dissolution mechanisms of pH-responsive drug release formulations in atomistic MD simulations. Advanced Theory and Simulations. 2019;2(8):1900053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cilurzo F, Gennari CG, Minghetti P. Adhesive properties: a critical issue in transdermal patch development. Except Opin Drug Deliv. 2012;9(1):33–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bao X, Lee NC, Raj RB, Rangan K, Maria A. Engineering solder paste performance through controlled stress rheology analysis. Soldering & Surface Mount Technology. 1998.

  39. Lin WY, Murugesh MG, Sudhakar S, Yang HC, Tai HC, Chang CS, et al. On the rigidity of polynorbornenes with dipolar pendant groups. Chem Eur J. 2006;12(1):324–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenting Song, Danyi Quan or Jianping Liu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lijuan Zeng and Wenting Song are co-first authors

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 89 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeng, L., Song, W., He, W. et al. Unconventional Passive Enhancement of Transdermal Drug Delivery: toward a Mechanistic Understanding of Penetration Enhancers Releasing from Acrylic Pressure-Sensitive Adhesive of Patches. Pharm Res 37, 169 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-020-02901-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-020-02901-0

Key Words

Navigation