Skip to main content
Download PDF

Profiling of miRNAs in porcine Sertoli cells

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology volume 11, Article number: 85 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Sertoli cells (SCs) create a specialized environment to support and dictate spermatogenesis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a kind of ~ 22 nt small noncoding RNAs, have been reported to be highly abundant in mouse SCs and play critical roles in spermatogenesis. However, the miRNAs of porcine SCs remain largely unknown.

Methods

We isolated porcine SCs and conducted small RNA sequencing. By comparing miRNAs in germ cells, we systematically analyzed the miRNA expression pattern of porcine SCs. We screened the highly enriched SC miRNAs and predicted their functions by Gene Ontology analysis. The dual luciferase assay was used to elucidate the regulation of tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor 3 (TRAF3) by ssc-miR-149.

Results

The analysis showed that 18 miRNAs were highly expressed in SCs and 15 miRNAs were highly expressed in germ cells. These miRNAs were predicted to mediate SC and germ cell functions. In addition, ssc-miR-149 played critical roles in SCs by targeting TRAF3.

Conclusion

Our findings provide novel insights into the miRNA expression pattern and their regulatory roles of porcine SCs.

Background

Male fertility depends on continuous spermatogenesis throughout the reproductive lifetime of males. Spermatogenesis is an orchestrated process that includes self-renewal and differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs), meiosis of spermatocytes and spermiogenesis [1,2,3,4]. The processes of spermatogenesis are regulated precisely by the microenvironment or niche in the seminiferous tubules [5, 6]. Sertoli cells (SCs) are arguably the most important contributor of the niche to mediate self-renewal and differentiation of SSCs [7]. As for the meiosis and spermiogenesis, SCs play a central role in creation of a unique immune privilege environment [8]. Historically, the acquisition of immune privileged germ cells is attributed to the blood-testis barrier (BTB) that is composed of Sertoli cell-Sertoli cell junctions and Sertoli cell body [9]. SCs also express immuno-regulatory factors that actively suppress innate, humoral and cell-mediated immune regulation to maintain the immune privileged environment for spermatocytes and spermatids [10]. In the final stage of spermatogenesis, through processes of nuclear concentration, acrosome formation and tail formation, the round spermatid is transformed to the tadpole-like spermatozoa. Thus, SCs facilitate spermatozoa to release from SC surface and phagocytose the germ cell residual bodies [11]. Treatment of testis with benzalkonium chloride leads to depletion of SCs and further abnormal spermatogenesis [12]. The deficiencies of spermatogenesis can be rescued by the transplantation of healthy SCs, indicating the indispensable roles of SCs for spermatogenesis [12]. The function of SCs in supporting and dictating germ cell development triggers the question that how SCs maintain their own functions.

Two proliferation phases are taken place in porcine SCs. The first proliferation phase is from birth to one month of age, and the second phase is near puberty [13]. The roles of SCs switch from the regulation of testis formation to the maintenance of spermatogenesis during the puberty, which is termed maturation or differentiation of SCs [14]. The SC maturation that is mediated by follicle stimulating hormone, androgens, estrogens, thyroid hormones, retinoic acid, and growth factors [15] involves the loss of proliferative ability and formation of inter-Sertoli cell tight junctions [14]. The final number of Sertoli cells in adulthood is determined by proliferation of immature Sertoli cells. However, the regulatory mechanisms of porcine SC proliferation and maturation are not fully understood.

Recent studies have highlighted that microRNAs (miRNAs), a type of ~ 22 nt small noncoding RNA, are involved in the proliferation, maturation, apoptosis, autophagy, and pathogenesis of SCs in patients with Sertoli-cell-only syndrome [16]. The miRNAs that are abundant in human [17] and mouse [18] SCs are produced by Drosha and Dicer processing. In mouse SCs, the conditional depletion of Dicer 1 resulted in the defects of SC maturation and formation of cell junctions, suggesting that miRNAs play the critical roles in regulating SC functions [18,19,20]. In pigs, ssc-miR-762 and ssc-miR-1285 stimulated SC proliferation through distinct pathways in the cell cycle [21, 22]. In contrast, ssc-miR-26a and ssc-miR-683 inhibited SC proliferation through targeting sperm associated antigen 1 (SPAG1) and p21 activated kinase 2 (PAK2), respectively [23, 24]. Although various function of miRNAs in SCs have been uncovered [16], the expression pattern and regulatory roles of miRNAs in porcine SCs remain unclear.

Pigs are not only as a livestock species that provide food source, but also as an ideal model bridges the gap between the rodents and humans in biomedicine. The proliferation and maturation of SCs are similar between pigs and humans [13]. Therefore, it would provide reference for biomedicine by analysis of porcine SCs miRNAs.

In this study, we isolated porcine SCs and established a comprehensive miRNA expression profile via small RNA-Seq. By comparing miRNA expression profiles from porcine SCs and germ cells that were reported previously, we identified the highly expressed miRNAs in SCs and predicted their potential roles. Our findings would provide novel insights into the regulatory mechanism of miRNAs in SCs and the correlations between SCs and spermatogenesis, which further provide potential insights into porcine reproduction and male infertility.

Methods

Animals

All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Northwest A&F University and performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations (NWAFU Experimental Procedures 2018 No.318). The testes from 7 days old pigs were castrated under general anesthesia in the Bensun farm, Yangling. Three 5-month-old pigs were castrated under general anesthesia in the animal hospital of Northwest A&F University. After castration, the wounds were disinfected. Testes were stored in cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) added with 2% of penicillin and streptomycin and brought to the laboratory immediately.

Collection of SCs

The testes tissue from seven-day-old and five-month-old pigs was used for the isolation of immature and mature SCs, respectively. SCs were isolated as described previously with minor differences [25]. In brief, the testes were decapsulated and minced followed by 30 min digestion by collagenase Type IV (0.2% w/v; Invitrogen, USA) at 37 °C to collect seminiferous tubules. Then, 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Hyclone, USA) was used to digest the seminiferous tubules to acquire single cell suspension. After removing of germ cells by differential plating, the SCs were cultured with DMEM/F12 containing 5% FBS and 1% penicillin and streptomycin at 37 °C. After three passages, SCs were harvested for the purity determination.

Immunocytochemistry

To identify the purity of immature and mature SCs, cells were fixed with 0.4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 30 min at room temperature and washed with cold PBS for three times. Following permeabilizing using 0.4% triton-X 100, the cells were incubated with 1% BSA for 30 min to block the nonspecific reaction. Then, the mature SCs were incubated with rabbit anti-SOX9 (Abcam, Catologo numberi: ab76997) at a dilution with 1:400 and the immature SCs were incubated with rabbit anti-SOX9 at a dilution with 1:400 and mouse anti-AMH (Santa Cruz, Catologo numberi: sc-377,140) at a dilution with 1:200 overnight at 4 °C. Next day, the cells were washed with DPBS for three times and incubated with Alexa flour 488/594 conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG or Alexa flour 488 conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG at 1:400 for 1 h at room temperature. After washed with DPBS, cell nucleus was labeled by DAPI (CWBIO, China) at a dilution with 1:400. The cell fluorescence was observed and photographed by a fluorescence microscope (Leica, Germany).

Small RNA-Seq and analysis

Small RNA-Seq and analysis were performed as previous report [26]. Briefly, total RNA was used for adaptor ligation, first strand cDNA synthesis and PCR amplification to construct small RNA libraries. After sequencing of small RNA libraries by Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencer, the acquired data were processed and mapped to reference sequence (Sus_scrofa.Sscrofa10.2). The differential expressed miRNAs between SCs and germ cells were analyzed with R DEGseq package [27].

The prediction of miRNA targets was conducted by miRanda and RNA hybrid. For miRanda, the alignment score of 160 or greater and an energy threshold of − 20.0 kcal/mol or less were consider as potential targets. For RNA hybrid, an energy threshold of − 20.0 kcal/mol or less were consider as potential targets. The gene ontology of miRNA targets was conducted by DAVID [28].

Luciferase reporter assay

The dual-luciferase reporter vector psiCHECK2 was inserted with TRAF3 3’UTR at the site between NotI and XhoI. TRAF3 mutant 3’UTR was amplified and cloned by homologous recombination according to the NovoRec® Plus PCR kit. Primers are listed in the Additional file 1.

PsiCHECK2 with targeted 3’UTR or mutant 3’UTR were co-transfected with miRNA mimics/NC into Hela cells using Lipofectamin2000 (Life technologies) according to the manufacturing protocols. The cells were collected for target validation assays using Dual Luciferase Assay System (Promega, USA) after 48-h culture.

Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA of SCs was extracted with Trizol. First strand cDNA was synthesized by using Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The specific stem-looped primers were used for reverse transcription of specific miRNAs. qRT-PCR was performed with FastStart Essential DNA Green Master (Roche) using an IQ-5 (Bio-Rad). For the comparative Ct method (2 –ΔΔCT), the relative expression level of genes and miRNAs was normalized to GAPDH and 5S RNA, respectively. Primers are listed in the Additional file 1.

SCs cultures and challenges with lipopolysaccharide

After isolation, SCs were cultured with DMEM/F12 containing 5% FBS and 1% penicillin and streptomycin at 37 °C. SCs were counted and seeded in a six-well plate at a density of 100,000 cells/well. After 12 h culture, the cells were treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Escherichia coli O111:B4 (Sigma) for 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h. The cells were washed by DPBS and re-suspended in Trizol for further analysis.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted by SPSS V23.0. All values were presented as mean ± SEM, and P value less than 0.05 (*), 0.001 (**) was consider as significant difference.

Results

The composition of small RNAs in SCs

To determine the purity of the isolated SCs, the expression of SC marker SOX9 was examined by the immunostaining. The 87.4% of the isolated mature SCs was positive for SOX9 (Fig. 1A). The expression level of SOX9 in SCs was around 300 times higher than that in spermatogonia, pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids (Fig. 1B), indicating that the purity of isolated SCs satisfied the requirements for small RNA-Seq. In Fig. 1C, the length distribution of small RNAs presented as two peaks. The first peak was mainly from 18 to 25 nt, which was higher than the second peak ranging from 26 to 35 nt (Fig. 1C). In 18 to 25 nt peak, miRNAs showed highest RPM level reflected by the height. Notably, miRNAs dominated (51.6%) the composition of small RNAs (Fig. 1D), suggesting the significance of miRNAs in SCs. In addition, the small RNAs derived from tRNA and rRNA distributed from 26 to 35 nt peak (Fig. 1C), indicating the potential roles of these two small RNAs in SCs.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Identification of isolated Sertoli cells (SCs). (A) Immunocytochemistry analysis of SOX9 expression in SCs. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of SOX9 expression in SC compared with spermatogonia (SG), pachytene spermatocytes (PS) and round spermatids (RS). (C) Categories and length distribution of small RNAs in three SCs. (D) The percentage of miRNAs in small RNAs of SCs. Data were presented as the mean ± SEM, ** P < 0.01

Full size image

Analysis of miRNA expression in SCs and germ cells

To further analyze the expression pattern of miRNAs in SCs, we compared SC seq dada with small RNA data from germ cells (GSE124099) that was reported previously [26]. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that three SC samples clustered together (Fig. 2A), suggesting the reproducibility of the seq data. Notably, miRNA expression in SCs was different from that in germ cells (Fig. 2A and B, Additional file 2). Specifically, 27 miRNAs were high abundance in SCs and 47 miRNAs were abundant in spermatogonia (Fig. 2C, Additional file 2). The 26 and 35 miRNAs were identified specifically in SCs and pachytene spermatocytes, separately (Fig. 2D, Additional file 2). In addition, 28 miRNAs were enriched in SCs and 34 miRNAs were enriched in round spermatids (Fig. 2E, Additional file 2). Compared with ejaculated spermatozoa, 88 miRNAs were specifically in SCs and 71 miRNAs were specifically in spermatozoa (Fig. 2F, Additional file 2). That differentially enriched miRNAs between SCs and germ cells indicates the unique role of specific miRNAs in SCs and spermatogenesis.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Analysis of miRNAs expression in SC, SG, PS, RS and sperm (SP). (A) Principal components explain the correlation among SC, SG, PS, RS, SP. (B) Heatmap comparing miRNAs’ expression among SC, SG, PS, RS and SP. (C) Scatter plot between SG and SC. (D) Scatter plot between PS and SC. (E) Scatter plot between RS and SC. (F) Scatter plot between RS and SC. Standard selection criteria to identify differentially expressed genes was established at Padj < 0.01; the log2 fold change > 2 were expressed as up genes (red dots), log2 fold change < − 2 were expressed as down genes (green dots)

Full size image

Prediction of the miRNA function

To obtain miRNA expression pattern in SCs and germ cells, we turn to identify the miRNAs enriched in SCs and germ cells. The Venn diagrams showed that 18 miRNAs were enriched in SCs compared with germ cells (Fig. 3A), indicating the high expression of these miRNAs in SCs (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, we found that 15 miRNAs were enriched in germ cells compared with SCs (Fig. 3A), which was considered as highly expressed in germ cells (Fig. 3B). miRNAs have been extensively reported to execute the functions through binding to their targets. To elucidate the biological function of miRNAs in SCs and spermatogenesis, miRNA targets were predicted by miRanda and RNAhybrid, respectively, which were considered as potential miRNA targets. The 899 miRNA targets for germ cells (Fig. 3C, Additional file 3) and 690 miRNA targets for Sertoli cells (Fig. 3D, Additional file 3) were used for gene ontology analysis. The results showed that germ cell enriched miRNAs were mainly involved in transcription, intracellular protein transport, cell adhesion (Fig. 3E). Interestingly, SC highly expressed miRNAs were related to cell shape, protein autophosphorylation, proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process, intracellular signal transduction, cell surface receptor signaling pathway, and positive regulation of cell proliferation (Fig. 3F).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The function of MSC and germ cell enriched miRNAs. (A) Venn diagram of upregulated miRNAs in MSC (left) and downregulated miRNAs in SC (right). (B) List of highly expressed miRNAs in SC and germ cells. (C) Venn diagram of RNAhybrid predicted target genes and miRanda predicted target genes of germ cells enriched miRNA targets. (D) Venn diagram of RNAhybrid predicted target genes and miRanda predicted target genes of SC enriched miRNA targets. (E) GO analysis (biological process) of germ cells enriched miRNA targets. (F) GO analysis (biological process) of SC enriched miRNA targets

Full size image

The potential roles of SC enriched miRNAs

To identify the function of the SC enriched miRNAs, we conducted gene ontology analysis for each miRNA. Analysis revealed that there were 5 miRNAs exhibiting important functions. Ssc-miR-7173-3p participates in the epigenetic modification including histone acetyltransferase activity of H3K16, H3K8 and H3K5 (Fig. 4A), and ssc-miR-202-3p plays roles in regulation of protein kinase C signaling (Fig. 4B). In addition, ssc-miR-217 negatively regulates G1/S transition in mitotic cell cycle (Fig. 4C), and ssc-miR-362 functions in regulating cell-cell junctions (Fig. 4D).

Fig. 4
figure 4

GO analysis of SC enriched miRNAs. (A) ssc-miR-7173-3p targets. (B) ssc-miR-202-3p targets. (C) ssc-miR-217 targets. (D) ssc-miR-362 targets

Full size image

Specifically, a net plot generated by cytoscape revealed that ssc-miR-149 possessed most miRNA targets compared with other miRNAs enriched in SCs, suggesting the vital role of ssc-miR-149 in mediating SC functions (Fig. 5A, Additional file 4). Gene ontology analysis showed that ssc-miR-149 participated in the biological processes of innate immune response, apoptotic process, and signaling pathway (I-kappa B knase/NF-kappaB signaling, toll-like receptor signaling and tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling), and was located in the transcription factor complex and endomembrane system. Molecular function analysis revealed that ssc-miR-149 mediated signal transducer activity, GTPase activator activity, and FMN binding (Fig. 5B). Importantly, the expression level of ssc-miR-149 in SCs was 15-fold higher than that in other cell types (Fig. 5C). Hence, we supposed ssc-miR-149 as an important miRNA in porcine SCs.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Function and expression pattern of ssc-miR-149. (A) Net plot of MSC enriched miRNA targets. The targets of ssc-miR-149 were marked by yellow dot and showed in the lower panel. (B) GO analysis of ssc-miR-149 targets. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of ssc-miR-149 expression in SC, SG, PS, RS and SP. Data were presented as the mean ± SEM, ** P < 0.01

Full size image

ssc-miR-149 targets tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor 3 (TRAF3)

To determine whether ssc-miR-149 expression changes during SC maturation, we isolated immature Sertoli cells (ISCs) that purity was determined and showed in Fig. 6A. Over 90% of the isolated immature SCs were positive for AMH and SOX9. qRT-PCR revealed that ssc-miR-149 was consistently expressed during SC maturation (Fig. 6B). Therefore, we used immature SCs for further analysis. Transfection of ssc-miR-149 mimics could significantly up-regulate ssc-miR-149 expression (Fig. 6C). Interestingly, transfection of ssc-miR-149 inhibitors also increased ssc-miR-149 expression, suggesting the potential compensatory mechanism and the indispensable role of ssc-miR-149 in SCs (Fig. 6C). Therefore, we focused on the regulatory roles of ssc-miR-149. Transfection of ssc-miR-149 mimics had no effect on the expression level of mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS, Fig. 6D) and nitric oxide synthase 3 (NOS3, Fig. 6E), but significantly down-regulated the expression level of TRAF3 (Fig. 6F). In addition, transfection of ssc-miR-149 inhibitors had no effect on the expression level of MAVS, NOS3 and TRAF3 (Fig. 6D to 6F), which might be due to the upregulation of ssc-miR-149.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Analysis of the potential targets of ssc-miR-149. (A) Immunocytochemistry analysis of the isolated immature Sertoli cells (IMSC). (B) The expression pattern of ssc-miR-149 in mature Sertoli cells (MSC) and immature Sertoli cells (ISC). (C) The expression level of ssc-miR-149 in different treatments. (D) The expression level of MAVS in different treatments. (E) The expression level of NOS3 in different treatments. (F) The expression level of TRAF3 in different treatments. Data were presented as the mean ± SEM, ** P < 0.01

Full size image

Next, we determined the potential relation between ssc-miR-149 and TRAF3. ssc-miR-149 mimics suppressed the luciferase activity of TRAF3 3’UTR (Fig. 7A). However, no effect was detected when the 2, 4, 6 sites of seed region in the targeting site of ssc-miR-149 were mutated (Fig. 7C to 7D). Taken together, we demonstrated that TRAF3 was a target of ssc-miR-149.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Validation of the target of ssc-miR-149 by using dual luciferase assay. The validation of ssc-miR-149 targets to wild type sequence of 3’UTR of TRAF3 mRNA (A), with 2 mutation sites (B), 4 mutation sites (C), and 6 mutation sites (D). Data were presented as the mean ± SEM, ** P < 0.01

Full size image

ssc-miR-149 disturbs the TRAF3 downstream signaling pathway

It has been reported that TRAF3 controlled lymphotoxin beta receptor (LTBR)-dependent activation of both the canonical and non-canonical nuclear factor kappa B (NFKB) pathways, and that knock-down of TRAF3 increased nuclear factor kappa B subunit 2 (NFKB2), RelB proto-oncogene (RelB) and NF-kappa-B-inducing kinase (NIK) expression [29]. We further analyzed whether overexpression of ssc-miR-149 could disturb TRAF3 downstream gene expression. Analysis revealed that transfection of ssc-miR-149 did not affect the expression of nuclear factor kappa B subunit 1 (NFKB1) (Fig. 8A), but significantly up-regulated NFKB2 expression (Fig. 8B). In addition, NIK expression remained in the regular level (Fig. 8C), and RelB expression was up-regulated (Fig. 8D). Again, transfection of ssc-miR-149 inhibitor did not affect the expression of NFKB1, NFKB2, NIK, and RelB (Fig. 8A to 8D). Together, ssc-miR-149 could mediate NFKB2 and RelB expression through targeting TRAF3.

Fig. 8
figure 8

The expression of TRAF3 downstream signaling pathway genes. The expression level of NFKB1 (A), NFKB2 (B), NIK (C), RelB (D) among different treatments. The expression level of ssc-miR-149 and TRAF3 in SCs after LPS challenges (E)

Full size image

Time course effects of LPS treatment on ssc-miR-149 and TRAF3 expression

LPS that is known to induce the inflammatory response was reported to reduce the growth of SCs [30]. To determine the effect of LPS treatment on expression of ssc-miR-149 and TRAF3, the SCs were treated with 10 μg/mL LPS as previously reported [30]. The result showed that LPS could induce ssc-miR-149 expression in a time dependent manner (Fig. 8E). Meanwhile, the expression level of TRAF3 exhibited high association with ssc-miR-149 expression (Fig. 8E), indicating that ssc-miR-149 targets TRAF3 and mediates SC immune response.

Discussion

Previous studies have demonstrated the crucial functions of SC miRNAs including control of proliferation, maturation, BTB, and the stage of seminiferous epithelium cycle [16]. In the present study, we found that half of the small RNAs in porcine SCs were miRNAs, suggesting the potential roles of miRNAs in regulation of SC functions. miRNAs act as a powerful regulator to control a wide range of biological processes, and are highly, exclusively and preferentially expressed in testicular cell types [31]. Previous studies have identified a series of differentially expressed miRNAs in mature and immature testis, or in different testicular cell population via high throughput sequencing [32]. Although miRNAs profiles of the SCs were assessed through sequencing, microarray and qPCR, systematical analysis of SC miRNAs is required. Therefore, we profiled miRNAs expression by comparing the miRNAs in testicular germ cells and in SCs. Analysis revealed that 18 miRNAs were abundant in SCs and 15 miRNAs were testicular germ cell specific. Because expression of androgen receptor is not shut down after 48 h culture of Sertoli cells [33], the screened miRNAs were little or no associated with androgen receptor, and the relationship between miRNAs expression and androgen receptor expression is worthy for future determination. Interestingly, miR-202-5p/3p was reported to be expressed in a sexually dimorphic pattern as the primordial XY gonad differentiates into a testis, with strong expression in SCs, suggesting a potential role in early testis development [34]. Moreover, miR-202-5p/3p also participate in pathogenesis of azoospermia or Sertoli-cell-only syndrome [35]. In addition, miR-34c that was highly enriched in porcine germ cells has been demonstrated to function in spermatogenesis and early embryo development [36]. Hence, we aimed the highly enriched miRNAs in SCs versus in germ cells. It makes sense that future study needs to explore the other miRNAs that highly enriched in germ cells versus in SCs.

MiRNAs function as a guide by base pairing with their target mRNA to mediate the binding of AGO proteins, inducing translational repression, mRNA de-adenylation and mRNA decay [37]. Particularly, the base 2–8 at the 5’end of miRNAs, known as seed region, is crucial for target recognition of mRNA in the 3’UTR [37]. Therefore, it is not surprising that a single miRNA has hundreds of targets and a mRNA target possess multiple binding sites for the same or different miRNAs. Here, 899 mRNAs and 690 mRNAs were predicted as germ cell enriched miRNA targets and SC enriched miRNA targets, respectively. Gene ontology analysis revealed that germ cells enriched miRNAs regulate transcription, intracellular protein transport, cell adhesion. Normal progression of spermatogenesis requires accurate and spatiotemporal regulation of gene expression [38]. The regulation at the transcriptional level indicates the sequential and coordinated regulatory roles of miRNAs in spermatogenesis [39]. The progressive transformation of SSCs into highly specialized spermatozoa is controlled by intrinsic or extrinsic signals [40]. The intrinsic factor (e.g., transcriptional factors) movement between the cytoplasm and nucleus dictates germline cell differentiation [41], suggesting that miRNAs could mediate the germ cell differentiation through controlling the intracellular protein transport. Furthermore, the spermatozoa appropriately releasing from SCs is dependent on cell adhesion [42]. The findings implied the potential roles of miRNAs in controlling the release of spermatozoa.

Notably, analysis revealed that the highly expressed miRNAs in SCs participated in cell shape, protein autophosphorylation, proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process, intracellular signal transduction, cell surface receptor signaling pathway, and positive regulation of cell proliferation. SCs are one of the most complicated, three-dimensional structures in cell biology [5]. They own the long cytoplasmic arms to form cup-like areas to hold and nurture the germ cells [5]. On account of their large plasma membrane (16,000 μm2), SCs are involved in the translocation of numerous organelles, the metabolization of hundreds of different classes of proteins for specific functions, the transport of protein to specific region throughout the cycle of seminiferous epithelium [5, 43,44,45]. The complicated functions of SCs need coordinated regulation of multiple regulatory pathways. SCs serve as the target of hormone (FSH and testosterone) to transduce the endocrine signals and other cellular cues into germ cells [46]. However, the response of SC to hormone stimulation varies with testis development and with the stage of seminiferous epithelia [5]. Considering that SC maturation is regulated by androgen and FSH [15], it is worth of further analyzing miRNA dynamics during porcine SC maturation. The findings of miRNA function in biological processes would provide references for comprehending the numerous functional interactions and regulatory networks in SCs.

To explore the important miRNAs, the miRNA targets were analyzed by cytoscape. Analysis revealed that ssc-miR-149 possesses the most potential target genes, suggesting the crucial roles of ssc-miR-149 in SCs. The further analysis showed that ssc-miR-149 mediates innate immune response, immunology signaling pathway, and apoptotic processes. The BTB formed by SCs provides the unique immunoregulatory environment for germ cells [9]. In addition to immune privilege environment, SCs could also express apoptosis inhibitors, complement inhibitors, immunomodulatory factors, anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines to mediate the immune response and protection of germ cells [10, 47, 48]. The roles of ssc-miR-149 provide the evidence that miRNAs might regulate the SC mediated immune privilege.

We found that ssc-miR-149 targeted TRAF3. TRAF3, a member of TRAF family, is one of the most multi-functional TRAF molecules [49]. Accumulating data have demonstrated that TRAF family not only participates in the signaling of TNFR family, but also participates in the innate immune receptors, the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family, nucleotide binding-oligomerization domain-like receptors (NLR) and the retinoic acid-inducible gene (RIG)-I-like receptor family [50,51,52]. It has been reported that SCs play roles in the testicular antiviral defense system and bactericidal testicular defense mechanism mediated by panels of TLRs and RIG-I [53, 54], indicating the potential roles of TRAF3 in mediating immune response in SCs. TRAF3 negatively regulates LTBR signaling via both canonical and non-canonical NFKB pathways, and inhibits the expressions of NFKB3, RelB, and NIK [35]. Downregulation of TRAF3 by ssc-miR-149 induced the upregulation of NFKB2 and RelB, which further demonstrated the roles of ssc-miR-149 in the immune system. Hence, future studies are needed to identify ssc-miR-149 function in mediating the initiation of immune response in SCs.

In addition to miRNAs, we found that there were small proportion of tsRNAs and rsRNA in SCs. The tsRNAs has been demonstrated to regulate the cellular response to the environmental stress [55]. Also, tsRNAs act as acquired epigenetic factors in mouse spermatozoa to reflect the low protein diet and high fat diet stress, which mediate intergenerational inheritance [56, 57]. Interestingly, we found that semen-derived exosomes delivered tsRNAs to porcine spermatozoa. By microinjection of antisense sequences into in vitro fertilized oocytes and subsequent single-cell RNA-seq, we identified a specific functional tsRNA group that participate in the early cleavage of porcine preimplantation embryos, probably by regulating cell cycle-associated genes and retrotransposons (unpublished data). Thus, specific tsRNAs presented in porcine spermatozoa play significant roles in preimplantation embryo development. In addition, rsRNAs were involved in the acute phase of mouse body inflammation [58]. Therefore, the existence of tsRNAs and rsRNAs in porcine SCs would provide a new field to study small RNA functions in supporting spermatogenesis.

Conclusion

We identified a subset of SC highly enriched miRNAs and revealed their potential roles in SCs. Further analysis found that ssc-miR-149 mediated immune response through targeting TRAF3. The findings of this study would facilitate the study on SC functions.

Availability of data and materials

All data supporting our findings are included in the manuscript.

Abbreviations

BMP4:

Bone morphogenetic protein 4

BTB:

Blood-testis barrier

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

LTBR:

Lymphotoxin beta receptor

MAVS:

Mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein

miRNAs:

MicroRNAs

NFKB1:

Nuclear factor kappa B subunit 1

NFKB2:

Nuclear factor kappa B subunit 2

NIK:

NF-kappa-B-inducing kinase

NLR:

Nucleotide binding-oligomerization domain-like receptors

NOS3:

Nitric oxide synthase 3

PAK2:

P21 activated kinase 2

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

PCA:

Principal component analysis

RA:

Retinoic acid

RelB:

RelB proto-oncogene

RIG:

Retinoic acid-inducible gene

SCF:

Stem cell factor

SCs:

Sertoli cells

SPAG1:

Sperm associated antigen 1

SSCs:

Spermatogonial stem cells

TLR:

Toll-like receptor

TRAF3:

Tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor 3

References

  1. Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Shinohara T. Spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal and development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2013;29:163–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller MP, Amon A, Unal E. Meiosis I: when chromosomes undergo extreme makeover. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013;25:687–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rathke C, Baarends WM, Awe S, Renkawitz-Pohl R. Chromatin dynamics during spermiogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1839;2014:155–68.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guyonnet B, Dacheux F, Dacheux JL, Gatti JL. The Epididymal Transcriptome and proteome provide some insights into new Epididymal regulations. J Androl. 2011;32:651–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Franca LR, Hess RA, Dufour JM, Hofmann MC, Griswold MD. The Sertoli cell: one hundred fifty years of beauty and plasticity. Andrology. 2016;4:189–212.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Oatley JM, Brinster RL. The germline stem cell niche unit in mammalian testes. Physiol Rev. 2012;92:577–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Oatley MJ, Racicot KE, Oatley JM. Sertoli cells dictate spermatogonial stem cell niches in the mouse testis. Biol Reprod. 2011;84:639–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaur G, Thompson LA, Dufour JM. Sertoli cells - Immunological sentinels of spermatogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:36–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mital P, Hinton BT, Dufour JM. The blood-testis and blood-epididymis barriers are more than just their tight junctions. Biol Reprod. 2011;84:851–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Doyle TJ, Kaur G, Putrevu SM, Dyson EL, Dyson M, McCunniff WT, Pasham MR, Kim KH, Dufour JM. Immunoprotective properties of primary Sertoli cells in mice: potential functional pathways that confer immune privilege. Biol Reprod. 2012;86:1–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chojnacka K, Zarzycka M, Mruk DD. Biology of the Sertoli cell in the fetal, pubertal, and adult mammalian testis. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2016;58:225–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yokonishi T, McKey J, Ide S, Capel B. Sertoli cell ablation and replacement of the spermatogonial niche in mouse. Nat Commun. 2020;11:40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Franca LR, Silva VA Jr, Chiarini-Garcia H, Garcia SK, Debeljuk L. Cell proliferation and hormonal changes during postnatal development of the testis in the pig. Biol Reprod. 2000;63:1629–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharpe RM, McKinnell C, Kivlin C, Fisher JS. Proliferation and functional maturation of Sertoli cells, and their relevance to disorders of testis function in adulthood. Reproduction. 2003;125:769–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meroni SB, Galardo MN, Rindone G, Gorga A, Riera MF, Cigorraga SB. Molecular Mechanisms and Signaling Pathways Involved in Sertoli Cell Proliferation. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019; 10:224.

  16. Procopio MS, de Avelar GF, Costa GMJ, Lacerda SMSN, Resende RR, de Franca LR. MicroRNAs in Sertoli cells: implications for spermatogenesis and fertility. Cell Tissue Res. 2017;370:335–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yao C, Sun M, Yuan Q, Niu M, Chen Z, Hou J, et al. MiRNA-133b promotes the proliferation of human Sertoli cells through targeting GLI3. Oncotarget. 2016;7:2201–19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Papaioannou MD, Pitetti JL, Ro S, Park C, Aubry F, Schaad O, et al. Sertoli cell dicer is essential for spermatogenesis in mice. Dev Biol. 2009;326:250–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim GJ, Georg I, Scherthan H, Merkenschlager M, Guillou F, Scherer G, et al. Dicer is required for Sertoli cell function and survival. Int J Dev Biol. 2010;54:867–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Papaioannou MD, Lagarrigue M, Vejnar CE, Rolland AD, Kuhne F, Aubry F, et al. Loss of dicer in Sertoli cells has a Major impact on the testicular proteome of mice. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10.

  21. Jiao ZJ, Yi W, Rong YW, Kee JD, Zhong WX. MicroRNA-1285 regulates 17 beta-estradiol-inhibited immature boar Sertoli cell proliferation via adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase activation. Endocrinology. 2015;156:4059–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ma CP, Song HB, Yu L, Guan KF, Hu PD, Li Y et al. miR-762 promotes porcine immature Sertoli cell growth via the ring finger protein 4 (RNF4) gene. Sci Rep. 2016; 6.

  23. Ran ML, Weng B, Cao R, Li Z, Peng FZ, Luo H, et al. miR-26a inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis in porcine immature Sertoli cells by targeting the PAK2 gene. Reprod Domest Anim. 2018;53:1375–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu PD, Guan KF, Feng Y, Ma CP, Song HB, Li Y, et al. miR-638 inhibits immature Sertoli cell growth by indirectly inactivating PI3K/AKT pathway via SPAG1 gene. Cell Cycle. 2017;16:2290–300.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bao ZQ, Liao TT, Yang WR, Wang Y, Luo HY, Wang XZ. Heat stress-induced autophagy promotes lactate secretion in cultured immature boar Sertoli cells by inhibiting apoptosis and driving SLC2A3, LDHA, and SLC16A1 expression. Theriogenology. 2017;87:339–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen XX, Che DX, Zhang PF, Li XL, Yuan QQ, Liu TT, et al. Profiling of miRNAs in porcine germ cells during spermatogenesis. Reproduction. 2017;154:789–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang LK, Feng ZX, Wang X, Wang XW, Zhang XG. DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:136–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bista P, Zeng W, Ryan S, Bailly V, Browning JL, Lukashev ME. TRAF3 controls activation of the canonical and alternative NFkappaB by the lymphotoxin beta receptor. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:12971–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang Y, Zhang JJ, Yang WR, Luo HY, Zhang JH, Wang XZ. Lipopolysaccharide-induced expression of FAS ligand in cultured immature boar Sertoli cells through the regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and miR-187. Mol Reprod Dev. 2015;82:880–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen X, Li X, Guo J, Zhang P, Zeng W. The roles of microRNAs in regulation of mammalian spermatogenesis. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017;8:35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Luo L, Ye L, Liu G, Shao G, Zheng R, Ren Z, et al. Microarray-based approach identifies differentially expressed microRNAs in porcine sexually immature and mature testes. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11744.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ma C, Song H, Yu L, Guan K, Hu P, Li Y et al. miR-762 promotes porcine immature Sertoli cell growth via the ring finger protein 4 (RNF4) gene. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:32783.

  34. Wainwright EN, Jorgensen JS, Kim Y, Truong V, Bagheri-Fam S, Davidson T, et al. SOX9 regulates microRNA miR-202-5p/3p expression during mouse testis differentiation. Biol Reprod. 2013;89:34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dabaja AA, Mielnik A, Robinson BD, Wosnitzer MS, Schlegel PN, Paduch DA. Possible germ cell-Sertoli cell interactions are critical for establishing appropriate expression levels for the Sertoli cell-specific MicroRNA, miR-202-5p, in human testis. Basic Clin Androl. 2015;25:2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Yuan SQ, Tang C, Zhang Y, Wu JW, Bao JQ, Zheng HL, et al. Mir-34b/c and mir-449a/b/c are required for spermatogenesis, but not for the first cleavage division in mice. Biology Open. 2015;4:212–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Pasquinelli AE, NON-CODING RNA. MicroRNAs and their targets: recognition, regulation and an emerging reciprocal relationship. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:271–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kimmins S, Sassone-Corsi P. Chromatin remodelling and epigenetic features of germ cells. Nature. 2005;434:583–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yao CC, Liu Y, Sun M, Niu MH, Yuan QQ, Hai YA, et al. MicroRNAs and DNA methylation as epigenetic regulators of mitosis, meiosis and spermiogenesis. Reproduction. 2015;150:R25–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Loveland KL, Major AT, Butler R, Young JC, Jans DA, Miyamoto Y. Putting things in place for fertilization: discovering roles for importin proteins in cell fate and spermatogenesis. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2015;17:537–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hogarth C, Itman C, Jans DA, Loveland KL. Regulated nucleocytoplasmic transport in spermatogenesis: a driver of cellular differentiation? Bioessays. 2005;27:1011–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ma DD, Wang DH, Yang WX. Kinesins in spermatogenesis. Biol Reprod. 2017;96:267–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Johnston DS, Wright WW, DiCandeloro P, Wilson E, Kopf GS, Jelinsky SA. Stage-specific gene expression is a fundamental characteristic of rat spermatogenic cells and Sertoli cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:8315–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Toppari J, Kangasniemi M, Kaipia A, Mali P, Huhtaniemi I, Parvinen M. Stage- and cell-specific gene expression and hormone regulation of the seminiferous epithelium. J Electron Microsc Tech. 1991;19:203–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kaipia A, Parvinen M, Shimasaki S, Ling N, Toppari J. Stage-specific cellular regulation of inhibin alpha-subunit mRNA expression in the rat seminiferous epithelium. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1991;82:165–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gill-Sharma MK. Testosterone retention mechanism in Sertoli cells: a biochemical perspective. Open Biochem J. 2018;12:103–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Guazzone VA, Jacobo P, Theas MS, Lustig L. Cytokines and chemokines in testicular inflammation: a brief review. Microsc Res Tech. 2009;72:620–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Meinhardt A, Hedger MP. Immunological, paracrine and endocrine aspects of testicular immune privilege. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011;335:60–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bishop GA, Stunz LL, Hostager BS. TRAF3 as a multifaceted regulator of B lymphocyte survival and activation. Front Immunol. 2018;9.

  50. Kawai T, Akira S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:373–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Saleh M. The machinery of nod-like receptors: refining the paths to immunity and cell death. Immunol Rev. 2011;243:235–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yu M, Levine SJ. Toll-like receptor 3, RIG-I-like receptors and the NLRP3 inflammasome: key modulators of innate immune responses to double-stranded RNA viruses. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2011;22:63–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Starace D, Galli R, Paone A, De Cesaris P, Filippini A, Ziparo E, et al. Toll-like receptor 3 activation induces antiviral immune responses in mouse Sertoli cells. Biol Reprod. 2008;79:766–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wu H, Shi L, Wang Q, Cheng L, Zhao X, Chen Q, et al. Mumps virus-induced innate immune responses in mouse Sertoli and Leydig cells. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19507.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen Q, Yan W, Duan EK. Epigenetic inheritance of acquired traits through sperm RNAs and sperm RNA modifications. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17:733–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen Q, Yan MH, Cao ZH, Li X, Zhang YF, Shi JC, et al. Sperm tsRNAs contribute to intergenerational inheritance of an acquired metabolic disorder. Science. 2016;351:397–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang YF, Zhang XD, Shi JC, Tuorto F, Li X, Liu YS, et al. Dnmt2 mediates intergenerational transmission of paternally acquired metabolic disorders through sperm small non-coding RNAs. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20:535–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Chu C, Yu L, Wu B, Ma L, Gou LT, He M, et al. A sequence of 28S rRNA-derived small RNAs is enriched in mature sperm and various somatic tissues and possibly associates with inflammation. J Mol Cell Biol. 2017;9:256–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Ligang Wu at Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology for small RNA Sequencing. We thank Dr. Huayan Wang for polishing the revised manuscript and Besun farm for providing the samples of testes.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31572401, 31772605) to W.Z.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong, 723001, China

    Xiaoxu Chen & Hongzhao Lu

  2. Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China

    Xiaoxu Chen, Yi Zheng, Xueliang Li, Qiang Gao, Tongying Feng, Pengfei Zhang, Xiu’e Tian & Wenxian Zeng

  3. College of Life Science, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China

    Mingzhi Liao

Authors
  1. Xiaoxu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xueliang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qiang Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tongying Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pengfei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mingzhi Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiu’e Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hongzhao Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Wenxian Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The experiments were conceived and designed by X.C. and W.Z. The experiments were performed by X.C., X.L., P.Z., T.F., Q.G. Bioinformatic analysis was conducted by X.C. and M.L. The paper was written by X.C., Y.Z. and W.Z., and was revised by H.L. All read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hongzhao Lu or Wenxian Zeng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

List of primers used in this study.

Additional file 2.

List of differentially expressed miRNAs.

Additional file 3.

List of SC enriched or germ cell enriched miRNA targets.

Additional file 4.

List of SC enriched miRNA targets.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Zheng, Y., Li, X. et al. Profiling of miRNAs in porcine Sertoli cells. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 11, 85 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00487-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00487-6

Keywords

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

ISSN: 2049-1891