Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Efficient Dynamic Aeroelasticity Model for High Fidelity Pointing Accuracy Assessment of VLBI Earth-Based Radio Antennas

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern Earth-based radio antennas of very-long-baseline interferometry system are furnished with robust control systems for their pointing control. Their pointing accuracy is critical to the quality of the radio wave-front captured. External disturbances, particularly those of wind gusts, produce a non-negligible dynamic aeroelastic response that degrades its pointing accuracy, and yet are not mitigated by the antenna’s control system. In this paper, a high fidelity and efficient dynamic aeroelastic model of an earth-based antenna is developed which is used to study the effects of wind gusts on the antenna’s pointing accuracy. Model order reduction of the antenna structural model is carried out using Craig–Bampton method taking into consideration the dominant modal characteristics of the antenna. The aerodynamic forces are approximated using the 2D Doublet-Lattice Method. The Davenport Spectrum is used to model aerodynamic turbulences near the earth surface. The developed dynamic aeroelastic model is employed to investigate the effects of discrete and random gusts on the pointing accuracy of the antenna. It is found that the deviation in the pointing angle is more prominent in the z (azimuth) direction and it displays a quadratic dependency with respect to the mean wind speed. This behavior is attributed to the inertial component of the aeroelastic response solution represented by the gravitational field acting on the center of gravity of the main reflector and the counterweights. The developed efficient aeroelastic model can be integrated into the antenna control system for its response prediction and mitigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Inoue M, Algaba-Marcos JC, Asada K, Blundell R, Brisken W, Burgos R, Chang C-C, Chen M-T, Doeleman SS, Fish V, Grimes P, Han J, Hirashita H, Ho PTP, Hsieh S-N, Huang T, Jiang H, Keto E, Koch PM, Kubo DY, Kuo C-Y, Liu B, Martin-Cocher P, Matsushita S, Meyer-Zhao Z, Nakamura M, Napier P, Nishioka H, Nystrom G, Paine S, Patel N, Pradel N, Pu H-Y, Raffin PA, Shen H-Y, Snow W, Srinivasan R, Wei T-S (2014) Greenland telescope project: direct confirmation of black hole with sub-millimeter VLBI. Radio Sci 49(7):564–571

    Google Scholar 

  2. Giovannini G, Cotton WD, Feretti L, Lara L, Venturi T (2001) VLBI observations of a complete sample of radio galaxies: 10 years later. Astrophys J 552(2):508

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hobiger T, Kondo T, Schuh H (2006) Very long baseline interferometry as a tool to probe the ionosphere. Radio Sci 41(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brunthaler A, Reid MJ, Menten KM, Zheng X-W, Bartkiewicz A, Choi YK, Dame T, Hachisuka K, Immer K, Moellenbrock G, Moscadelli L, Rygl KLJ, Sanna A, Sato M, Wu Y, Xu Y, Zhang B (2012) The bar and spiral structure legacy (BeSSeL) survey: mapping the milky way with VLBI astrometry. In: Reviews in modern astronomy

  5. Ward SN (2018) Constraints on the seismotectonics of the central Mediterranean from very long baseline interferometry. Geophys J Int 117(2):441–452

    Google Scholar 

  6. Greenhill LJ, Gwinn CR (1997) VLBI imaging of water maser emission from a nuclear disk in NGC 1068. Astrophys Space Sci 248(1–2):261–267

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abbondanza C, Chin TM, Gross RS, Heflin MB, Parker JW, Soja BS, van Dam T, Wu X (2017) JTRF2014, the JPL Kalman filter and smoother realization of the International Terrestrial Reference System. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 122(10):8474–8510

    Google Scholar 

  8. Balidakis K, Nilsson T, Zus F, Glaser S, Heinkelmann R, Deng Z, Schuh H (2018) Estimating integrated water vapor trends from VLBI, GPS, and numerical weather models: sensitivity to tropospheric parameterization. J Geophys Res Atmos 123(12):6356–6372

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zarraoa N, Rius A, Sardón E, Ryan JW (2018) Relative motions in Europe studied with a geodetic VLBI network. Geophys J Int 117(3):763–768

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carter WE, Robertson DS, Pyle TE, Diamante J (2018) The application of geodetic radio interferometric surveying to the monitoring of sea-level. Geophys J R Astron Soc 87(1):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beasley AJ, Conway JE, VLBI PR (1995) Very Long baseline Interferometry and the VLBA. In: ASP conference Series, vol 82, p 328

  12. Meeks M, Ball J, Hull A (1968) The pointing calibration of the Haystack antenna. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 16(6):746–751

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guiar CN, Lansing FL, Riggs R (1987) Antenna pointing systematic error model derivations

  14. Kong D-Q, Wang S-G, Wang J-Q, Wang M, Zhang H-B (2014) A new calibration model for pointing a radio telescope that considers nonlinear errors in the azimuth axis. Res Astron Astrophys 14(6):733

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gawronski W, Baher F, Gama E (2006) Track level compensation look-up table improves antenna pointing precision, vol 627316, p 627316

  16. Eisentraeger P, Suess M (2000) Verification of the active deformation compensation system of the LMT/GTM by end-to-end simulations. In: Astronomical telescopes and instrumentation, vol 4015, pp 488–497

  17. Cullum MJ, Spyromilio J (2000) Thermal and wind control of the VLT. In: Astronomical telescopes and instrumentation, pp 194–201

  18. Schüler T, Kronschnabl G, Plötz C, Neidhardt A, Bertarini A, Bernhart S, la Porta L, Halsig S, Nothnagel A (2015) Initial results obtained with the first TWIN VLBI radio telescope at the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell. Sensors 15(8):18767–18800

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gawronski W, Souccar K (2005) Control systems of the large millimeter telescope. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 47(4):41–49

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li S, Yang X, Yang D (2009) Active disturbance rejection control for high pointing accuracy and rotation speed. Automatica 45(8):1854–1860

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Gawronski W (2004) Control and pointing challenges of antennas and (radio) telescopes. Am Control Conf 06:3758–3769

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gawronski W (2001) Antenna control systems: from PI to H. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 43(1):52–60

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gawronski W, Bienkiewicz B, Hill RE (1992) Pointing-error simulations of the DSS-13 antenna due to wind disturbances. In: TDA Progress Report 42-108

  24. Massoudi M (1978) Tracking error of 100-m antenna due to wind gust. TDA Progress Report 42–48, 94–101

  25. Gawronski W (2004) Modeling wind-gust disturbances for the analysis of antenna pointing accuracy. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 46(1):50–58

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Y, Qian H, Fan F (2017) Reflector wind load characteristics of the large all-movable antenna and its effect on reflector surface precision. Adv STEEL Constr 13(1):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  27. Davenport AG (1961) The spectrum of horizontal gustiness near the ground in high winds. Q J R Meteorol Soc 87(372):194–211

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hou G, Wang J, Layton A (2012) Numerical methods for fluid-structure interaction—a review. Commun Comput Phys 12(2):337–377

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Rodden WP (1959) Aerodynamic influence coefficients from strip theory. J Aerosp Sci 26(12):833–834

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liu D et al (1991) Further studies of harmonic gradient method for supersonic aeroelastic applications. J Aircr 28(9):598–605

    Google Scholar 

  31. Albano E, Rodden WP (1969) A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flows. AIAA J 7(2):279–285

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Edward LC (1974) A quasi-vortex-lattice method in thin wing theory. J Aircr 11(9):518–527

    Google Scholar 

  33. MacNeal R (1972) The NASTRAN theoretical manual. MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation

  34. Thomas PV, ElSayed MSA, Walch D (2018) Review of model order reduction methods and their applications in aeroelasticity loads analysis for design optimization of complex airframes. J Aerosp Eng 32(2):04018156

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hurty W (1965) Dynamic analysis of structural systems using component modes. AIAA J 3(4):678–685

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bampton RRCJMC (1968) Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. AIAA J 6(7):1313–1319

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Craig AJKRR (2006) Fundamentals of structural dynamics. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Harder RN, Desmarais RL (1972) Interpolation using surface splines. J Aircr 9(2):189–191

    Google Scholar 

  39. Morfiadakis EE, Glinou GL, Koulouvari MJ (1996) The suitability of the von Karman spectrum for the structure of turbulence in a complex terrain wind farm. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 62(2-3):237–257

    Google Scholar 

  40. MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release (2019) The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States

  41. Pastor M, Binda M, Harčarik T (2012) Modal assurance criterion. Proc Eng 48:543–548

    Google Scholar 

  42. Allemang RJ (2003) The modal assurance criterion–twenty years of use and abuse. Sound Vib 37(8):14–23

    Google Scholar 

  43. Boivin A, Boilard F, Messier PL, Tremblay P, (2014) MAYA HTT, “12 m VLBI antenna structural simulation”, Internal Report, Intertronics Solutions Inc

Download references

Acknowledgements

Professor Mostafa S.A. ElSayed acknowledges the financial support provided by The Natural Sciences and Engineering research Council of Canada (Grant Number CRDPJ 530880—18) in collaboration with Intertronic Solutions Inc. and The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The authors would like to extend their acknowledgements to the engineers of the Goddard Space Flight Center of NASA for their guidance and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mostafa S. A. ElSayed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nieto, M.G., Thomas, P.V., ElSayed, M.S.A. et al. Development of Efficient Dynamic Aeroelasticity Model for High Fidelity Pointing Accuracy Assessment of VLBI Earth-Based Radio Antennas. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 21, 693–706 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-019-00238-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-019-00238-6

Keywords

Navigation