Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neurosurgical Evaluation for Patients with Chronic Lower Back Pain

  • Anesthetic Techniques in Pain Management (D Wang, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Pain and Headache Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a major cause of disability in the USA, and it affects approximately 1 in 4 Americans. CLBP patients are commonly referred to or seek out neurosurgical evaluations and opinions for treatment and management.

Recent Findings

Literature shows that only a minority of patients with CLBP may benefit from a surgical procedure. These patients that present to clinic often have been ailing for a considerable amount of time and are eager for effective treatment to alleviate pain. However, determining if a patient with CLBP is a surgical candidate is predicated upon having no success of pain relief with non-operative management. Patients with CLBP require thorough and adequate imaging, clinical exam, and diagnostic evaluation.

Summary

When adequate non-operative management was provided, and proven fruitless, the patient may be considered an operative candidate. In this manuscript, a framework is presented for workup and evaluation of patients with CLBP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. •• Murray CJL, Atkinson C, Bhalla K, Birbeck G, Burstein R, Chou D, et al. The state of US health, 1990–2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA. 2013;310:591–608. This study highlights how burdensome CLBP is to the American healthcare system.

  2. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI. Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002. Spine. 2006;31:2724–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carey TS, Evans AT, Hadler NM, Lieberman G, Kalsbeek WD, Jackman AM, et al. Acute severe low back pain. A population-based study of prevalence and care-seeking. Spine. 1996;21:339–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, Comstock BA, Hollingworth W, et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008;299(6):656–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S, et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2356–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet, 388 (2016), pp. 1545–1602.

  7. Chetty L. A critical review of low back pain guidelines. Workplace Health Safety. 2017;65(9):388–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain. 2000;84:95–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mercadante S. Malignant bone pain: pathophysiology and treatment. Pain. 1997;69(1–2):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(96)03267-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Atlas SJ, Deyo RA. Evaluating and managing acute low back pain in the primary care setting. J Gen Intern Med, Springer. 2001;16:120–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:363–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bogduk N. On the definitions and physiology of back pain, referred pain, and radicular pain. Pain. 2009;147:17–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pincus T, Vlaeyen JWS, Kendall NAS, Von Korff MR, Kalauokalani DA, Reis S. Cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychosocial factors in low back pain: directions for the future. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27:E133–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Deyo RA, Rainville J, Kent DL. What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA, J Am Med Assoc, Am Med Assoc. 1992;268:760–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ito M, Incorvaia KM, Yu SF, Fredrickson BE, Yuan HA, Rosenbaum AE. Predictive signs of discogenic lumbar pain on magnetic resonance imaging with discography correlation. Spine. 1998;23:1252–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aprill C, Bogduk N. High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol. 1992;65:361–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Carragee EJ, Paragioudakis SJ, Khurana S. 2000 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems. Spine. 2000;25:2987–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gilbert FJ, Grant AM, Gillan MG, Vale LD, Campbell MK, Scott NW, et al. Low back pain: influence of early MR imaging or CT on treatment and outcome -- multicenter randomized trial. Radiology. 2004;231:343–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Carragee EJ, Chen Y, Tanner CM, Truong T, Lau E, Brito JL. Provocative discography in patients after limited lumbar discectomy: a controlled, randomized study of pain response in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. Spine. 2000;25:3065–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Khurana S, Hayward C, Welsh J, Date E, et al. The rates of false-positive lumbar discography in select patients without low back symptoms. Spine. 2000;25:1373–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nafissi S, Niknam S, Hosseini SS. Electrophysiological evaluation in lumbosacral radiculopathy. Iran J Neurol. 2012;11(3):83–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chung T, Prasad K, Lloyd TE. Peripheral neuropathy: clinical and electrophysiological considerations. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014;24(1):49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rubinstein SM, van Tulder M. A best-evidence review of diagnostic procedures for neck and low-back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008;22:471–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2007.12.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boswell MV, Trescot AM, Datta S, Schultz DM, Hansen HC, Abdi S, et al. Interventional techniques: evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2007;10:7–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beynon R, Elwenspoek MMC, Sheppard A, et al. The utility of diagnostic selective nerve root blocks in the management of patients with lumbar radiculopathy: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4):e025790. Published 2019 Apr 20. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025790.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Zaina F et al. “Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.” Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1 2016.

  27. Chan AK, Sharma V, Robinson LC, Mummaneni PV. Summary of guidelines for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Clin. 2019;30(3):353–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Goldstein CL, Macwan K, Sundararajan K, Rampersaud YR. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(3):416–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ames CP, Smith JS, Scheer JK, Bess S, Bederman SS, Deviren V, et al. Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(6):547–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy J-P, Lafage V. Adult spinal deformity—postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine. 2010;35(25):2224–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Franco.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Daniel Franco, Aria Mahtabfar, Kevin Hines, Victor Sabourin, Anthony Stefanelli, and James Harrop declare no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Anesthetic Techniques in Pain Management

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franco, D., Mahtabfar, A., Hines, K. et al. Neurosurgical Evaluation for Patients with Chronic Lower Back Pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 24, 58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-020-00894-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-020-00894-4

Keywords

Navigation