Skip to main content
Log in

Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Normal Hovering Foil with Synthetic Jet Actuation

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aerodynamic characteristics of a normal hovering foil with Synthetic Jet (SJ) actuation are numerically studied in this work. An elliptic foil with ratio of 4 undergoes the imposed translation and rotation synchronously. A pair of SJs with the same frequency and strength is placed on the upper and lower surfaces of the foil. Thus, the local flow field around the foil would be influenced. At the Reynolds number of 100 and the rotating axis position of half chord, the effects of the inclined angle between the jet direction and the chord line, the phase angle between the SJs and the translation as well as the SJ location on the aerodynamic characteristics are systematically examined. Compared with the oscillating foil without SJ actuation, it is illustrated that the enhancement of mean lift force and hovering efficiency can be obtained by using the SJs with suitable working parameters. Based on the numerical analysis, it is found that the jet flow on the foil surfaces, which changes the local pressure distribution, can benefit the aerodynamic performance of the hovering foil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maxworthy T. The fluid dynamics of insect flight. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1981, 13, 329–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sane S P. The aerodynamics of insect flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2003, 206, 4191–4208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun M. Insect flight dynamics: Stability and control. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2014, 86, 615–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellington C P, van den Berg C, Willmott A P, Thomas A L R. Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature, 1996, 384, 626–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dickinson M H, Lehmann F O, Sane S P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 1999, 284, 1954–1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lehmann F O, Pick S. The aerodynamic benefit of wing-wing interaction depends on stroke trajectory in flapping insect wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2007, 210, 1362–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim D, Gharib M. Experimental study of three-dimensional vortex structures in translating and rotating plates. Experiments in Fluids, 2010, 49, 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen A T, Tran N D, Vu T T, Pham T D, Vu Q T, Han J H. A neutral-network-based approach to study the energy-optimal hovering wing kinematics of a bionic hawkmoth model. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2019, 16, 904–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kang C-K, Aono H, Cesnik C E S, Shyy W. Effects of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 689, 32–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Quinn D B, Lauder G V, Smits A J. Maximizing the efficiency of a flexible propulsor using experimental optimization. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 767, 430–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Molina J, Zhang X. Aerodynamics of a heaving airfoil in ground effect. AIAA Journal, 2011, 49, 1168–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin X J, Guo S H, Wu J, Nan J W. Aerodynamic performance of a flapping foil with asymmetric heaving motion near a wall. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2018, 15, 636–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Z J, Russell D. Effect of forewing and hindwing interactions on aerodynamic forces and power in hovering dragonfly flight. Physical Review Letters, 2007, 99, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gao T, Lu X Y. Insect normal hovering flight in ground effect. Physics of Fluids, 2008, 20, 087101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu H, Lua K B, Lee Y J, Lim T T, Yeo K S. Ground effect on the aerodynamics of three-dimensional hovering wings. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2016, 11, 066003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang L, Yeung R W. Investigation of full and partial ground effects on a flapping foil hovering above a finite-sized platform. Physics of Fluids, 2016, 28, 071902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yin B, Yang G, Prapamonthon P. Finite obstacle effect on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing. Physics of Fluids, 2019, 31, 101902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu J, Liu C, Yang S C, Zhao N. Influence of a flexible tail on the performance of a foil hovering near the ground: Numerical investigation. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 2015, 52, 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith B L, Glezer A. The formation and evolution of synthetic jets. Physics of Fluids, 1998, 10, 2281–2297.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Cattafesta L N, Sheplak M. Actuators for active flow control. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 43, 247–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Amitay M, Smith D R, Kibens V, Parekh D E, Glezer A. Aerodynamic flow control over an unconventional airfoil using synthetic jet actuators. AIAA Journal, 2001, 39, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim S H, Kim C. Separation control on NACA23012 using synthetic jet. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2009, 13, 172–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zong H H, van Pelt T, Kotsonis M. Airfoil flow separation control with plasma synthetic jets at moderate Reynolds number. Experiments in Fluids, 2018, 59, 169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rehman A, Kontis K. Synthetic jet control effectiveness on stationary and pitching airfoils. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43, 1782–1789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yen J, Ahmed N A. Parametric study of dynamic stall flow field with synthetic jet actuation. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2012, 134, 071106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tadjfar M, Asgari E. The role of frequency and phase difference between the flow and the actuation signal of a tangential synthetic jet on dynamic stall flow control. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2018, 140, 111203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang C L, Tang H. Enhancement of aerodynamic performance of a heaving airfoil using synthetic-jet based active flow control. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2018, 13, 046005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu J, Shu C. Implicit velocity correction-based immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method and its applications. Journal of Computational Physics, 2009, 228, 1963–1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin X J, Wu J, Zhang T W. Performance investigation of a self-propelled foil with combined oscillating motion in stationary fluid. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 175, 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Jie We acknowledges the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11622219) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20191271). This work is also supported by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, J., Jiang, L. & Lin, X. Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Normal Hovering Foil with Synthetic Jet Actuation. J Bionic Eng 17, 978–988 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-020-0075-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-020-0075-7

Keywords

Navigation