Elsevier

Fuel Processing Technology

Volume 210, 15 December 2020, 106550
Fuel Processing Technology

CO2 separation from humidified ternary gas mixtures using a polydecylmethylsiloxane composite membrane

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106550Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Polydecylmethylsiloxane composite membrane as a pre-concentrator

  • Permeability close to 1000 barrer and moderate CO2/N2 selectivity of 8.7

  • Membrane behaviour independent of the feed pressure and composition

  • Separation properties unvaried in presence of water vapour

  • Performance maps as tool for separation performance prediction

Abstract

In this work, we investigated the use of a polydecylmethylsiloxane composite membrane as pre-concentrator unit for the separation of CO2 from flue gas streams. The separation properties of the tailor-made membrane were evaluated with both a ternary gas mixture (CO2:N2:O2 = 15:80:5) and pure gases (CO2, N2, O2) at different temperatures (25, 50 °C) and trans-membrane pressure differences (1–6 bar). The membrane exhibited a high permeability close to 1000 barrer, and a moderate CO2/N2 selectivity of 8.7. The results obtained in mixed gas conditions revealed a certain reduction of CO2 and O2 permeability with respect to pure gas, whereas the presence of water vapour did not induce significant changes to mass transport properties.

Performance maps were thus developed for better understanding whether and in which conditions the membrane developed in this work can be suitable to be used as pre-concentrator.

Introduction

Carbon capture and storage is an important strategy that many Countries are pursuing to tackle climate change. The last reports of the International Energy Agency [1] clearly evidences that in 2018, the global CO2 emissions of the energy sector rose up to 33.1 Gt CO2. This was the highest rate of growth since 2013, 70% higher than the average increase since 2010. However, for the first time, in almost a decade, the number of plans to develop large-scale carbon capture, utilization and storage facilities increased significantly, with around 43 projects operating or under construction. In the last 30 years, membrane technologies have done impressive progresses, both in materials and processes development for separating gases, treating water, etc. Today, CO2 separation by using membranes is considered an energy efficient separation process because of its low capital cost [[2], [3], [4]]. Thanks to the limited cost, easy fabrication, and straightforward scale-up, polymer membranes have been confirmed as a good alternative to traditional gas separation processes in large-scale industrial applications. The development of polymer membranes for CO2 separation before emitting in the atmosphere has recently become significant and even if a plethora of new membrane materials has been studied at the bench scale, still today more than 90% of current commercial membranes are manufactured from less than ten polymers, most of which have been in use for decades [5]. A desired aspect for the application of polymeric membranes in CO2 separation, is that they possess high CO2 permeability and high CO2 selectivity, as well as robust mechanical stability. For this purpose, several efforts have focused on identifying such membranes and improving gas separation properties and stability by controlling membrane preparation. Generally, there is a debate among the scientific community about the fact that it could be more convenient to have a membrane with high permeance and low selectivity, or vice versa [6]. A high CO2 permeance minimizes membrane area requirements, whilst high CO2/i selectivity improves the CO2 permeate concentration. The benefits of higher selectivity are accentuated at higher feed-to-permeate pressure ratios, at the expense of increased energy cost, whereas the advantages of higher permeance are most pronounced at lower pressure ratios. Usually, for gaseous streams such as flue-gas, where the CO2 concentration is relatively low (<15%), it has been demonstrated [2] how it is more convenient to have a first membrane stage highly permeable operating as pre-concentrator for retentate and permeate streams, which will be then purified in the successive stages, where much more selective membranes can be used. This approach has been recently proved by the pilot tests of the MTR's full-scale Polaris™ modules for the capture of 1 ton day−1 of CO2 from the flue gas of the coal-fired power plant at the National Carbon Capture Center in Wilsonville (Alabama, USA) [7]. As already done by MTR with the membranes used in Polaris™ modules, a strategy for having highly permeable membranes, that in the meantime are mechanically stable is to produce polymer thin-film composite (TFC) membranes comprising a thin selective layer deposited on a support. The development of TFC membranes has gained much attention owing to their potentiality of increasing flux and hence the energy efficiency for gas separation [[8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]]. The highly permeable PDMS was often used as intermediate acting as a protective coating which prevents the penetration of diluted polymer solution into the porous structure and renders the entire membrane surface smoother [14,15]. Fu et al. [16] developed a class of TFC membranes, based on a high molecular weight amorphous poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(ether-block-amide) selective layer supported on highly permeable polydimethylsiloxane intermediate layer which was pre-coated onto a polyacrylonitrile microporous support, obtaining outstanding CO2 separation performance. Borisov et al. [17] prepared TFC membranes with high CO2 permeance and superior CO2/N2 selectivity coupling a thin layer (0.29–0.42 μm) of PIM-1 with a cross-linked PTMSP intermediate layer (2.07–3.44 μm) on a porous backing material.

However, the selective layer of such membranes is quite often based on the glassy polymers that exhibit the reduction of their free volume fraction owing to polymer chains relaxation and internal fouling by different components from the feed stream during the long-term operation resulting in the drop of gas transport characteristics. Bearing this in mind, the rubber polymers can be considered as more robust membrane materials especially for the treatment of flue gas stream.

Usually, TFC membranes are prepared using ultrafiltration porous supports. A thin (<300 nm) polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) film is generally used as an intermediate layer between the support and the selective layer. This PDMS layer, also called gutter layer, is highly permeable to gases and it acts as a protective coating, for avoiding the penetration of polymer solution into the porous structure and makes smoother the entire membrane surface. Recently, Bazhenov et al. [18] developed a preparation procedure that allows to use ultra-permeable microfiltration supports, for TFC membrane. This allows to significantly reduce the high resistance of the porous support to the gas transport.

Earlier, we proposed a simplified one-stage synthesis of polyalkylmethylsiloxanes with the increased hydrocarbon ideal separation selectivity [[19], [20], [21], [22]]. It was allowed to use bulk chemicals for such polymer modifications: 1-decen as a modifying component and 1,7-oc-tadiene as a cross-linking agent. In this work we developed a TFC membrane constituted of a separating layer of polydecylmethylsiloxane deposited on a microfiltration membrane (MFFK-1) used as support. Membranes coated on the MFFK-1 have a higher gas permeability and separation selectivity compared to membranes on an ultrafiltration support [22]. Thus, these membranes can be promising for the removal of CO2 from flue gas. It is well known that flue gas is a mixture of CO2, N2 and O2 in saturated conditions, also containing contaminants such as CO, NOx, SOx. In this work, we analysed the performance of these membranes for separating CO2 from a ternary gas mixture (CO2, N2, O2) in dry and wet conditions, devoting particular attention on the influence of water vapour on the mass transport properties and separation performance, but without considering contaminants.

Experimental results were used as input data of a simulation tool that we developed some year ago [[23], [24], [25]], able to generate performance maps to better understand whether and how the membrane developed in this work can be suitable to be used as pre-concentrator in a multistage gas separation membrane system.

Section snippets

Materials

The synthesis of polydecylmethylsiloxanes (PDecMS) was done starting from polymethylhydrosiloxane (PMHS) with polydecylmethylsiloxanes number-average molecular weight Mn 1700–3200 g/mol (Sigma-Aldrich), a Carsted catalyst (platinum complex of 1,3-divinyl-1,1,3,3-tetramethyldisiloxane in xylene, Aldrich), 1-decene (94%, Sigma-Aldrich), 1,7-octadiene (98%, Sigma-Aldrich), n-hexane (99%, Chimmed, Russia) without further purification.

A microfiltration membrane MFFK-1 (Vladipor, Russia) was used as

Membrane characterization

The conversion in the PMHS modification reaction was controlled by means of FTIR spectroscopy. PDecMS spectra did not evidence any band from the Si-H (2168 cm−1), contrarily to the spectra of pure PHMS (Fig. 3). This confirms the completion of hydrosilylation reaction with the formation of the cross-linked siloxane chains.

An interesting feature of PDecMS/MFFK membrane is the type of porous support. It is not a common practice to use a microfiltration membrane as a porous support for gas

Conclusions

In this work, the mass transport properties of a composite polydecylmethylsiloxane membrane were investigated for CO2 separation. A PDecMS selective layer was coated on a microfiltration membrane used as porous support, allowing to obtain a high CO2 permeability of about 1000 barrer.

Mixed-gas (CO2:N2:O2 = 15:80:5) permeation properties in both dry and humidified conditions were studied in a temperature range of 25–50 °C. At all the investigated conditions, membrane behaviour resulted

Author statement

Adele Brunetti: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing, Reviewing; Pasquale Francesco Zito: Experimental measurements, Simulations; Ilya Borisov: Membrane preparation and characterization, Experimental data analysis, Writing, Reviewing; Evgenia Grushevenko: Membrane preparation and characterization; Vladimir Volkov and Alexey Volkov: Conceptualization and Supervision of membrane preparation and characterization; Giuseppe Barbieri: Conceptualization and Supervision of simulations and

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The National Research Council of Italy in the framework of the Short-Term Mobility program 2019 is gratefully acknowledged for cofounding this work. Dr. A. Brunetti, Dr. G. Barbieri and Dr. P.F. Zito gratefully acknowledge the Regione Calabria for co-funding, in the framework of M-Era.Net call 2018, the project BIOVALUE “Advanced Membranes for biogas upgrading and high added value compounds recovery”.

Dr. I. Borisov and Dr. E. Grushevenko gratefully acknowledge the Russian Science Foundation for

References (31)

Cited by (13)

  • Renewable biomethane production from biogas upgrading via membrane separation: Experimental analysis and multistep configuration design

    2022, Renewable Energy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Since permeance of nitrogen resulted more affected than that of carbon dioxide, ideal CO2/N2 selectivity increased during the time, passing from 26.6 to 29.4. The effect of water vapour presence and the mutual influence of gases during permeation were carried out also on inorganic membranes [30] [,61] [[,66,67,68]. Among that Recently, Brunetti et al. [67], analysed for 183 days of continuous exposure the long-term performance of highly selective carbon hollow fiber membranes for biogas upgrading in the presence of H2S and water vapour.

  • Review of alternative technologies for acetone-butanol-ethanol separation: Principles, state-of-the-art, and development trends

    2022, Separation and Purification Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The typical pervaporation fabrication methods are summarized in Fig. 6. The commonly used hydrophobic polymeric membranes for butanol separation include polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membranes [166-168], poly[1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne] (PTMSP) membranes [169-171], poly(ether block amide) (PEBA) membranes [172-174], poly(octyl methyl siloxane) (POMS) [175] and polydecylmethylsiloxane (PDecMS) [176]. Among them, PDMS is known as the most representative polymeric membrane materials for butanol recovery due to the excellent comprehensive performance in permselectivity and stability [177].

  • Multi-step membrane process for biogas upgrading

    2022, Journal of Membrane Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    To direct the permeate of the “nth” membrane step to the compressor unit, avoiding the diffusion to the “n+1st” step, no-return valves were added on the permeate lines of the various steps except the first one, where the permeate is not recycled to feed. The simulations were carried out by using a dimensionless 1D mathematical model already published and validated [33–35] for the multi-species steady-state permeation in no sweep mode and co-current configuration (see Appendix). CO2 permeability and CO2/CH4 selectivity considered in the simulations were taken from the Robeson plot (Fig. 2) [ [36]].

  • Membranes for Carbon Dioxide Separation on a Small Scale: State of Art, Challenges and Applications

    2021, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    By implementing and modifying the rGAs, the efficacy of the separation increase 20 folds. Further, Polydecylmethylsiloxane composite membrane has been used as a pre-concentrator [41]. For a temperature range of 25–50 °C, permeation capacity is studied for both, dry and humid gas mixtures.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text