Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Field evaluation of flexible support system with radial gap (FSRG) under a squeezing rock condition in a coal mine development

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A wide range of alternatives is available to design a support system to stabilize an underground opening under squeezing conditions. An underground mine development was selected for the research where the underground openings reach to a depth of 1000 m and weak geological formations are present. The operational concerns in the mine development led to a shaft support design having a thick reinforced concrete with very high early strength while the decline was supported by a traditional support system in the squeezing ground. The rigid support in the shaft was typically capable of sustaining high ground pressure and stabilized the opening within negligible radial displacements. It should be noted that the design of the rigid system was straightforward and high early strength concrete had key importance in this case, however, it could only be applied in the shaft. The traditional support system for the decline was a light and conventional system, consisting of thin shotcrete layer, cable bolts and steel arches suffered excessive deformation as high as 60 cm or more. A light-flexible support system with a radial gap was developed for the decline in the same geological unit, allowed substantial ground deformation to occur in a controlled manner, eventually, the opening was stabilized. The newly adopted radial gap allowed improved ground relaxation and reduction of the ground pressure acting on the secondary support layer. The design and application of the yielding support system with a radial deformation gap was effortful, hence the system can be used where available equipment and operational factors force practitioner to use a light and flexible system. The significance of the new system arises from keeping the ground support elements and the operation cycle the same while modifying the support design and installation procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

modified from Öge (2017) and MTA

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig.7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barla G (2001) Tunnelling under squeezing rock conditions. Eurosummer-school in tunnel mechanics, Innsbruck, pp 169–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Barla G, Bonini M, Semeraro M (2011) Analysis of the behaviour of a yield-control support system in squeezing rock. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26(1):146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 6(4):189–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard SE (1998) Flexural behaviour in square steel fibre reinforced concrete slabs. In: Proceedings of CONSEC’98 conference, Tromso, Norway

  • Bieniawski Z (1989) Engineering rock mass classifications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann and Feist (1970) Soma dağlarının jeolojisi. Bull Miner Res Explor 74(74) (in Turkish)

  • Cantieni L, Anagnostou G (2009) The interaction between yielding supports and squeezing ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24(3):309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao C, Shi C, Lei M, Yang W, Liu J (2018) Squeezing failure of tunnels: a case study. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 77:188–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carranza-Torres C (2004) Elasto-plastic solution of tunnel problems using the generalized form of the Hoek–Brown failure criterion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(SUPPL. 1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Cengiz O, Turanli L (2004) Comparative evaluation of steel mesh, steel fibre and high-performance polypropylene fibre reinforced shotcrete in panel test. Cem Concr Res 34(8):1357–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Federation of Producers and Applications of Specialist Products for Structures (1996) European specification for sprayed concrete, EFNARC, Loughborough University, pp 8–10

  • Goel RK, Jethwa JL, Paithankar AG (1995) Indian experiences with Q and RMR systems. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 10(1):97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan K, Zhu W, Wei J, Liu X, Niu L, Wang X (2018) A finite strain numerical procedure for a circular tunnel in strain-softening rock mass with large deformation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 112:266–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (2001) Big tunnels in bad rock. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(9):726–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (2007) Practical rock engineering—chapter 12: Tunnels in weak rock

  • Hoek E, Diederichs MS (2006) Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(2):203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition. Proc NARMS-Tac 1(1):267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Høien AH, Nilsen B, Olsson R (2019) Main aspects of deformation and rock support in Norwegian road tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 86:262–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez R, Recio D (2011) A linear classifier for probabilistic prediction of squeezing conditions in Himalayan tunnels. Eng Geol 121(3–4):101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman S, Aloglu AS, Aydin B, Saygin E (2019) The needle penetration index to estimate the performance of an axial type roadheader used in a coal mine. Geomech Geophys Geo-Energy Geo-Resour 5(1):37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsten HAD (1993) Equivalence of mesh-and fibre-reinforced shotcrete at large deflections. Can Geotech J 30(3):418–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowson AR, Bieniawski ZT (2013) Critical assessment of RMR based tunnel design practices: a practical engineer’s approach. In: Proceedings of the SME, Rapid excavation and tunnelling conference, Washington, DC, USA, pp 23–26

  • Maden Tetkik Arama Genel Müdürlüğü (General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration), Earth Sciences Map Viewer and drawing tool. Website: https://yerbilimleri.mta.gov.tr/anasayfa.aspx Online acces: 12.05.2020

  • Majumder D, Viladkar MN, Singh M (2017) A multiple-graph technique for preliminary assessment of ground conditions for tunneling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 100:278–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezger F, Ramoni M, Anagnostou G, Dimitrakopoulos A, Meystre N (2017) Evaluation of higher capacity segmental lining systems when tunnelling in squeezing rock. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 65:200–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezger F, Ramoni M, Anagnostou G (2018) Options for deformable segmental lining systems for tunnelling in squeezing rock. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 76:64–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nebert K (1978) Lignite-bearing Soma Neogene area, western Turkey. Bull Direct Min Res Explor 90:20–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Öge İF (2017) Prediction of cementitious grout take for a mine shaft permeation by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and multiple regression. Eng Geol 228:238–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öge İF (2018) Prediction of top coal cavability character of a deep coal mine by empirical and numerical methods. J Min Sci 54(5):793–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öge İF, Yazar R, Yazar MA, Hür A, Tarhan Ş, Göle M (2019) The implementation of a multi-layer support system in an excessively deformed roadway. In: Proceedings of International Mining Congress and Exhibition of Turkey, 16–19 April 2019, Antalya/Turkey, pp 239–246

  • Perera MSA, Ranjith PG, Choi SK, Bouazza A, Kodikara J, Airey D (2011) A review of coal properties pertinent to carbon dioxide sequestration in coal seams: with special reference to Victorian brown coals. Environ Earth Sci 64(1):223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocscience Inc., Phase2 Software v.8.0, (2011).

  • Shen B (2014) Coal mine roadway stability in soft rock: a case study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(6):2225–2238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey TR, OrtIepp WD, Kirsten HAD (1995) Energy-absorbing capacity of reinforced shotcrete, with reference to the containment of rockburst damage. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 95(3):137–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Stille H, Palmström A (2008) Ground behaviour and rock mass composition in underground excavations. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23(1):46–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian H, Chen W, Yang D, Wu G, Tan X (2016) Numerical analysis on the interaction of shotcrete liner with rock for yielding supports. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 54:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulusay R, Hudson JA (2007) The Blue Book-The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. ISRM and Turkish National Group of ISRM, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishwakarma AK, Behera T, Rai R et al (2020) Impact assessment of coal mining induced subsidence on native soil of South Eastern Coal Fields: India. Geomech Geophys Geo-energ Geo-resour 6:31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-020-00156-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachopoulos N, Diederichs MS (2009) Improved longitudinal displacement profiles for convergence confinement analysis of deep tunnels. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42(2):131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasantha PLP, Ranjith PG, Zhao J, Shao SS, Permata G (2015) Strain rate effect on the mechanical behaviour of sandstones with different grain sizes. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(5):1883–1895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JZ, Zhou XP (2017) Time-dependent jamming mechanism for Single-Shield TBM tunneling in squeezing rock. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 69:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Elsworth D, Wan Z (2018) Failure response of composite rock-coal samples. Geomech Geophys Geo-energ Geo-resour 4:175–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-018-0082-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the management personnel of Polyak Eynez Energy Mining A.Ş. and Fina Energy for granting permission to use necessary data. The author presents his gratitudes to the engineering team of Polyak Eynez, for providing extensive data on the study area. The author exclusively thanks to Survey Engineer Mehmet Sarıtaş for his additional care of during data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mining Engineering, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey

    İbrahim Ferid Öge

Authors
  1. İbrahim Ferid Öge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to İbrahim Ferid Öge.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Öge, İ.F. Field evaluation of flexible support system with radial gap (FSRG) under a squeezing rock condition in a coal mine development. Geomech. Geophys. Geo-energ. Geo-resour. 6, 52 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-020-00175-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-020-00175-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation