Abstract
Plant ecologists have long been interested in the effects of fire on vegetation. Thermocouples have been in their proverbial toolbox for decades, despite temperature not being a direct product or measure of wildland fire behaviour or fire effects. To better represent the cumulative impact of high-temperature exposure on organisms, ecologists often use temperature–time curves from thermocouples to calculate residence time—the duration of heat exposure above a threshold temperature—which can be used to calculate another popular metric, degree \(\cdot \)seconds. A systematic literature review of 105 published papers shows that residence time, especially, and degree \(\cdot \) seconds are common metrics derived from raw temperature–time data. While several errors in thermocouple readings have been previously identified and addressed—responsiveness to heating, discrepancy between thermocouple temperature and actual temperature of the medium surrounding the thermocouple—this paper highlights a previously unconsidered source of error that must be reconciled for metrics like residence time to be biologically valid: the disproportionately long time it takes for thermocouples to cool once heat input is complete. Using an array of thermocouples in a fume hood over a Bunsen burner before and after the flame is extinguished, this paper shows that after being exposed to flame, 30-gauge K-type thermocouples require 80–100 s to register ambient temperatures despite taking only about 5 s to respond to heating. The review indicates ecologists give no consideration for this disproportionately slow cooling response. These findings indicate that residence time (and therefore degree \(\cdot \) seconds) have been over-estimated in the fire ecology literature. The proposed solution is to simply truncate temperature–time curves at the point temperature begins to decline, which indicates a shift from the biologically relevant effect of heat input to the biologically irrelevant, physical properties (heat diffusivity) of the thermocouple itself. Conceptual models present these biologically relevant portions of the temperature–time curve and identify parts of the biologically relevant curve that might be useful in quantifying components of flammability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson H (1970) Forest fuel ignitibility. Fire Technol 6(4):312–319
Armour CD, Bunting SC, Neuenschwander LF (1984) Fire intensity effects on the understory in Ponderosa Pine forests. J Range Manag 37(1):44. https://doi.org/10.2307/3898822
Blevins LG, Pitts WM (1999) Modeling of bare and aspirated thermocouples in compartment fires. Fire Saf J 33(4):239–259
Bond W (1983) Dead leaves and fire survival in Southern African tree aloes. Oecologia 58(1):110–114
Bova AS, Dickinson MB (2005) Linking surface-fire behavior, stem heating, and tissue necrosis. Can J For Res 35(4):814–822. https://doi.org/10.1139/x05-004
Bova AS, Dickinson MB (2008) Beyond “fire temperatures”: Calibrating thermocouple probes and modeling their response to surface fires in hardwood fuels. Can J For Res 38(5):1008–1020. https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-204
Bova AS, Dickinson MB (2009) An inverse method to estimate stem surface heat flux in wildland fires. Int J Wildland Fire 18(6):711. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07122
Bradstock RA, Auld TD (1995) Soil temperatures during experimental bushfires in relation to fire intensity: consequences for legume germination and fire management in South-Eastern Australia. J Appl Ecol 32(1):76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404417
Brundage AL, Burl Donaldson A, Gill W, Kearney SP, Nicolette VF, Yilmaz N (2011) Thermocouple response in fires, part 1: considerations in flame temperature measurements by a thermocouple. J Fire Sci 29(3):195–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734904110386187
Busse MD, Shestak CJ, Hubbert KR (2013) Soil heating during burning of forest slash piles and wood piles. Int J Wildland Fire 22(6):786. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF12179
Butler BW, Cohen J, Latham DJ, Schuette RD, Sopko P, Shannon KS, Jimenez D, Bradshaw LS (2004) Measurements of radiant emissive power and temperatures in crown fires. Can J For Res 34(8):1577–1587. https://doi.org/10.1139/x04-060
Butler BW, Jimenez D, Forthofer J, Shannon K, Sopko P (2010) A portable system for characterizing wildland fire behavior. In: Viegas DX (ed) Proceedings of the VI International Conference on Forest Fire Research, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, p 13
Byram G (1959) Combustion of forest fuels. Forest fire: control and use. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 61–89
Carrington ME (2010) Effects of soil temperature during fire on seed survival in Florida sand pine scrub. Int J For Res 2010:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/402346
Clements FE (1936) Nature and structure of the climax. J Ecol 24(1):252–284
Coates TA, Chow AT, Hagan DL, Waldrop TA, Wang GG, Bridges WC, Rogers MF, Dozier JH (2018) Thermocouple probe orientation affects prescribed fire behavior estimation. J Environ Qual 47(1):170. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2017.02.0055
Daniell JW, Chappell WE, Couch HB (1969) Effect of sublethal and lethal temperatures on plant cells. Plant Physiol 44:1684–1689
Davies GM, Legg CJ, Smith AA, MacDonald AJ (2009) Rate of spread of fires in Calluna vulgaris-dominated moorlands. J Appl Ecol 46(5):1054–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01681.x
Davies KW, Boyd CS, Bates JD, Hulet A (2015) Winter grazing can reduce wildfire size, intensity and behaviour in a shrub-grassland. Int J Wildland Fire
DeBano L (2000) The role of fire and soil heating on water repellency in wildland environments: a review. J Hydrol 231–232:195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00194-3
DeBano LF, Rice RM, Eugene CC (1979) Soil heating in chaparral fires: Effects on soil properties, plant nutrients, erosion, and runoff. Research Paper PSW-RP-145, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley
Dickinson M, Johnson E (2001) Fire effects on trees. In: Johnson E, Miyanishi K (eds) Forest fires: behavior and ecological effects. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 477–525
Dickinson MB, Johnson EA (2004) Temperature-dependent rate models of vascular cambium cell mortality. Can J For Res 34(3):546–559. https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-223
Engle D, Bidwell T, Ewing A, Williams J (1989) A technique for quantifying fire behavior in grassland fire ecology studies. Southwest Nat 34(1):79–84
Fernandes PM, Cruz MG (2012) Plant flammability experiments offer limited insight into vegetation-fire dynamics interactions. New Phytol 194(3):606–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04065.x
Fidelis A, Delgado-Cartay MD, Blanco CC, Müller SC, Pillar VD, Pfadenhauer J (2010) Fire intensity and severity in Brazilian campos grasslands. Interciencia 35:739–745
Finney MA, Cohen JD, McAllister SS, Jolly WM (2013) On the need for a theory of wildland fire spread. Int J Wildland Fire 22(1):25–36. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF11117
Fons WL (1946) Analysis of fire spread in light forest fuels. J Agric Res 72(3):93–121
Frandsen WH, Ryan KC (1986) Soil moisture reduces belowground heat flux and soil temperatures under a burning fuel pile. Can J For Res 16(2):244–248. https://doi.org/10.1139/x86-043
Frankman D, Webb BW, Butler BW, Jimenez D, Forthofer JM, Sopko P, Shannon KS, Hiers JK, Ottmar RD (2013) Measurements of convective and radiative heating in wildland fires. Int J Wildland Fire 22(2):157. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF11097
Gao X, Schwilk D (2018) Grass canopy architecture influences temperature exposure at soil surface. Fire 1(3):35
Grootemaat S, Wright IJ, van Bodegom PM, Cornelissen JHC (2017) Scaling up flammability from individual leaves to fuel beds. Oikos 126(10):1428–1438. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.03886
Hartford RA, Frandsen WH (1992) When it’s hot, it’s hot... Or maybe it’s not! (surface flaming may not portend extensive soil heating). Int J Wildland Fire 2(3):139–144. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF9920139
Iverson LR, Yaussy DA, Rebbeck J, Hutchinson TF, Long RP, Prasad AM (2004) A comparison of thermocouples and temperature paints to monitor spatial and temporal characteristics of landscape-scale prescribed fires. Int J Wildland Fire 13:311–322
Jacoby PW, Ansley RJ, Trevino BA (1992) An improved method for measuring temperatures during range fires. J Range Manag 45(2):216–220
Kral KC, Limb RF, Hovick TJ, McGranahan DA, Field AL, O’Brien PL (2015) Simulating grassland prescribed fires using experimental approaches. Fire Ecol 11(3):34–44
Kral K, Limb R, Ganguli A, Hovick T, Sedivec K (2018) Seasonal prescribed fire variation decreases inhibitory ability of Poa pratensis L. and promotes native plant diversity. J Environ Manag 223:908–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.096
Kremens RL, Smith AM, Dickinson MB (2010) Fire metrology: current and future directions in physics-based measurements. Fire Ecol 6(1):13–35. https://doi.org/10.4996/fireecology.0601013
Kremens RL, Dickinson MB, Bova AS (2012) Radiant flux density, energy density and fuel consumption in mixed-oak forest surface fires. Int J Wildland Fire 21(6):722. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF10143
Lawes MJ, Richards A, Dathe J, Midgley JJ (2011) Bark thickness determines fire resistance of selected tree species from fire-prone tropical savanna in north Australia. Plant Ecol 212(12):2057–2069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9954-7
Lemaire R, Menanteau S (2017) Assessment of radiation correction methods for bare bead thermocouples in a combustion environment. Int J Therm Sci 122:186–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2017.08.014
Luo M (1997) Effects of radiation on temperature measurement in a fire environment. J Fire Sci 15(6):443–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/073490419701500602
Mutch RW (1970) Wildland fires and ecosystems—a hypothesis. Ecology 51(6):1046–1051. https://doi.org/10.2307/1933631
Nelson RM (1952) Observations on heat tolerance of southern pine needles. Station Paper 14, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville
O’Brien JJ, Hiers JK, Varner JM, Hoffman CM, Dickinson MB, Michaletz ST, Loudermilk EL, Butler BW (2018) Advances in mechanistic approaches to quantifying biophysical fire effects. Curr Forestry Rep 4(4):161–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-018-0082-7
Odion DC, Davis FW (2000) Fire, soil heating, and the formation of vegetation patterns in chaparral. Ecol Monogr 70(1):149–169. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2000)070[0149:FSHATF]2.0.CO;2
Pausas JG, Moreira B (2012) Flammability as a biological concept. New Phytol 194(3):610–613
Pausas JG, Keeley JE, Schwilk DW (2017) Flammability as an ecological and evolutionary driver. J Ecol 105(2):289–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12691
Pavlasek P, Elliott CJ, Pearce JV, Duris S, Palencar R, Koval M, Machin G (2015) Hysteresis effects and strain-induced homogeneity effects in base metal thermocouples. Int J Thermophys 36(2–3):467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-015-1841-3
Pingree MR, Kobziar LN (2019) The myth of the biological threshold: A review of biological responses to soil heating associated with wildland fire. For Ecol Manag 432:1022–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.032
Ramírez Trejo MdR, Pérez-García B, Pérez-Salicrup DR, Orozco-Segovia A (2010) Effect of fire on the germination of spores of Pteridium caudatum, an invasive fern. J Trop Ecol 26(04):457–465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467410000118
Roberts I, Coney J, Gibbs B (2011) Estimation of radiation losses from sheathed thermocouples. Appl Therm Eng 31(14–15):2262–2270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.03.020
Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. Research Paper INT-115, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT, p 49
Rothermel RC (1983) How to predict the spread and intensity of forest and range fires. General Technical Report INT-143, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT, p 161
Rothermel RC, Deeming JE (1980) Measuring and interpreting fire behavior for correlation with fire effects. General Technical Report INT-93, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT
Rudz S, Chetehouna K, Séro-Guillaume O, Pastor E, Planas E (2009) Comparison of two methods for estimating fire positions and the rate of spread of linear flame fronts. Meas Sci Technol 20(11):115501. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/20/11/115501
Russell M, Vermeire L, Dufek N, Strong D (2013) Fire, defoliation, and competing species alter Aristida purpurea biomass, tiller, and axillary bud production. Rangeland Ecol Manag 66(3):290–296. https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-12-00143.1
Russell ML, Vermeire LT, Ganguli AC, Hendrickson JR (2015) Season of fire manipulates bud bank dynamics in northern mixed-grass prairie. Plant Ecol 216(6):835–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-015-0471-y
Ryan CM, Williams M (2011) How does fire intensity and frequency affect miombo woodland tree populations and biomass? Ecol Appl 21(1):48–60
Schwilk DW (2015) Dimensions of plant flammability. New Phytol 206(2):486–488
Shannon KS, Butler BW (2003) A review of error associated with thermocouple temperature measurement in fire environments. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Fire Ecology Congress, American Meteorological Society, Orlando, FL, p 3
Simard AJ, Deacon AG, Adams KB (1982) Nondirectional sampling of wildland fire spread. Fire Technol 18(3):221–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473134
Simpson KJ, Ripley BS, Christin PA, Belcher CM, Lehmann CER, Thomas GH, Osborne CP (2016) Determinants of flammability in savanna grass species. J Ecol 104(1):138–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12503
Smith AM, Talhelm AF, Kolden CA, Newingham BA, Adams HD, Cohen JD, Yedinak KM, Kremens RL (2016) The ability of winter grazing to reduce wildfire size and fire-induced plant mortality was not demonstrated: A comment on Davies, et al. (2015) The ability of winter grazing to reduce wildfire size and fire-induced plant mortality was not demonstarted: a comment on Davies, et al. Int J Wildland Fire 25(4):484–488
Strong DJ, Ganguli AC, Vermeire LT (2013) Fire Effects on Basal Area, Tiller Production, and Mortality of the C4 Bunchgrass. Purple Threeawn. Fire Ecol 9(3):89–99. https://doi.org/10.4996/fireecology.0903089
Trollope W (1978) Fire behaviour—a preliminary study. Proc Annu Cong Grassl Soc S Afr 13(1):123–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00725560.1978.9648846
Vaartaja O (1949) High surface soil temperatures on methods of investigation, and thermocouple observations on a wooded heath in the South of Finland. Oikos 1(1):6. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565034
Vermeire LT, Roth AD (2011) Plains prickly pear response to fire: effects of fuel load, heat, fire weather, and donor site soil. Rangeland Ecol Manag 64(4):404–413. https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-10-00172.1
Walker J, Stocks B (1968) Thermocouple errors in forest fire research. Fire Technol 4(1):59–62
Weir JR, Scasta JD (2014) Ignition and fire behaviour of Juniperus virginiana in response to live fuel moisture and fire temperature in the southern Great Plains. Int J Wildland Fire 23(6):839–844. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF13147
Whittaker E (1961) Temperatures in heath fires. J Ecol 49(3):709. https://doi.org/10.2307/2257233
Wotton BM, Gould JS, McCaw WL, Cheney NP, Taylor SW (2012) Flame temperature and residence time of fires in dry eucalypt forest. Int J Wildland Fire 21(3):270. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF10127
Wright HA (1970) A method to determine heat-caused mortality in bunchgrasses. Ecology 51(4):582–587. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934038
Zopfi ME (2020) Characteristics and spatial heterogeneity of prescribed fire behavior in North Dakota grasslands. M.S. thesis, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project 1009910 and the North Dakota State Agricultural Experiment Station. Dr. Aaron Daigh helped explain the original observations in thermocouple responses. Brittany Poling conducted the thermocouple trials and created the line drawing of the experimental array.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Michael John Lawes.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McGranahan, D.A. An inconvenient truth about temperature–time data from thermocouples. Plant Ecol 221, 1091–1104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-020-01064-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-020-01064-7