Abstract
The research on the seismic assessment of pipe racks accounting for coupling and soil-structure interaction effects is still scarce. Common industrial practice overlooks critical design aspects due to the insufficiency of current codes that might result in over-conservative or unsafe design. This work addresses the nonlinear analysis of a petrochemical plant steel pipe rack accounting for dynamic interaction with horizontal vessels and pipelines. Soil-structure interaction was evaluated both on pipe rack and pipelines in terms of interstorey-drift ratio and stress–strain response. An attempt was made for correlating the ratio with piping strain to make comparisons with common acceptance criteria for building structures, since code provisions do not address currently limit state design concept for pipe racks. Additionally, seismic fragility curves along with 95% confidence intervals were evaluated for different intensity measures and were used as a tool to demonstrate that the soil deformability could act as an isolation mechanism for pipelines. The increase of pipe rack displacements was an additional impact of soil, though, it was not as much profound as on the seismic response of the pipelines. The detailed structural assessment through extensive nonlinear dynamic analyses demonstrated that the return period of exceedance of pipe rack and pipelines limit state, considering the median spectral acceleration as a measure, occurred 1.84 and 2.64 greater than the design one, and this might be an indication that the performance-based concept should be applied for pipe rack systems to achieve a safe, risk-consistent among structural and nonstructural members and cost-effective design.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABAQUS. (2017). ABAQUS/Standard Version 6.17, Documentation, Dassault Systèmes, Providence, RI, USA.
Azizpour, O., & Hosseini, M. (2009). A verification study of ASCE recommended guidelines for seismic evaluation and design of combination structures in petrochemical facilities. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(20), 3609–3628. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2009.3609.3628.
Bakalis, K., & Vamvatsikos, D. (2018). Seismic Fragility Functions via Nonlinear Response History Analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering (United States). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002141.
Baltzopoulos, G., et al. (2017). SPO2FRAG: Software for seismic fragility assessment based on static pushover. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0145-3.
Bhattacharya, K., Dutta, S. C., & Dasgupta, S. (2004). Effect of soil-flexibility on dynamic behaviour of building frames on raft foundation. Journal of Sound and Vibration. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00652-7.
Bursi, O. S., et al. (2015). Performance-based earthquake evaluation of a full-scale petrochemical piping system. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 33, 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2014.11.004.
Bursi, O. S., et al. (2016). Seismic assessment of petrochemical piping systems using a performance-based approach. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Transactions of the ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032111.
Cornell, C. A., et al. (2002). Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(4), 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
DeGrassi, G., Nie, J., & Hofmayer, C. (2008) Seismic analysis of large-scale piping systems for the JNES-NUPEC ultimate strength piping test program. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Seismic+Analysis+of+Large-Scale+Piping+Systems+for+the+Ultimate+Strength+Piping+Test+Program#1. Accessed 5 Dec 2018.
Di Roseto, A. D. L., Palmeri, A., & Gibb, A. G. (2017). Performance-based seismic design of a modular pipe-rack. Procedia Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.519.
Di Sarno, L., & Karagiannakis, G. (2019). Petrochemical steel pipe rack: Critical assessment of existing design code provisions and a case study. International Journal of Steel Structures. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-019-00280-w.
Dutta, S. C., Bhattacharya, K., & Roy, R. (2009). Effect of flexibility of foundations on its seismic stress distribution. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802211974.
Elnashai, A. S., & Di Sarno, L. (2015). Fundamentals of earthquake engineering: From source to fragility. Second: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470024867.fmatter/pdf.
EN13480-3. (2012). EN 13480-3, 2002, Metallic Industrial Piping–Part 3: Design and Calculation, CEN, Brussels.
EN1998-1. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1 : General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, European Committee for Standardization. doi: [Authority: The European Union per Regulation 305/2011, Directive 98/34/EC, Directive 2004/18/EC].
FEMA 356. (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Building, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Gazetas G. (1991). Foundation vibrations. In H. Y. Fang (Ed.), Foundation engineering handbook. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3928-5_15.
HAZUS. (2004). National Institute of Building Sciences. Direct physical damage—general building stock, HAZUS-MH Technical manual, chapter 5. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
Jalayer, F. (2003). Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: implementing non-linear dynamic assessments. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ph.D.
Kazantzi, A. K., Vamvatsikos, D., & Lignos, D. G. (2014). Seismic performance of a steel moment-resisting frame subject to strength and ductility uncertainty. Engineering Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.044.
Minasidis, G., Hatzigeorgiou, G. D., & Beskos, D. E. (2014). SSI in steel frames subjected to near-fault earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.030.
Mylonakis, G., & Gazetas, G. (2000). Seismic soil-structure interaction: Beneficial or detrimental? Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 43, 277–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460009350372.
NTC. (2018). Norme Tecniche per le costruzioni. DM Infrastructure, 14 January. (in Italian).
Raychowdhury, P., & Ray-Chaudhuri, S. (2015). Seismic response of nonstructural components supported by a 4-story SMRF: Effect of nonlinear soil-structure interaction. Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.04.006.
Shang, Q., Wang, T., & Li, J. (2019). Seismic fragility of flexible pipeline connections in a base isolated medical building. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0542-5.
Shome, N. & Cornell, C. A. (1999). Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures. Report No. RMS-35. Reliability of Marine Structures Program, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University.
Vamvatsikos, D., & Allin Cornell, C. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
Vathi, M., et al. (2017). Performance criteria for liquid storage tanks and piping systems subjected to seismic loading. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. doi, 10(1115/1), 4036916.
Wang, X., et al. (2017). Analysis of seismic soil-structure interaction for a nuclear power plant (HTR-10). Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2358403.
Zhang, C., & Jiang, N. (2017). Effects of equipment-structure-soil interaction on seismic response of equipment and structure via real-time dynamic substructuring shaking table testing. Shock and Vibration. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1291265.
Acknowledgements
The work presented herein has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No 721816. This support is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Di Sarno, L., Karagiannakis, G. Seismic Assessment of Pipe Racks Accounting for Soil-Structure Interaction. Int J Steel Struct 20, 1929–1944 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-020-00393-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-020-00393-7