Skip to main content
Research Trends

Wiser Reasoning and Less Disgust Have the Potential to Better Achieve Suicide Prevention

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000709

Abstract.Background: High school and university teachers need to advise students against attempting suicide, the second leading cause of death among 15–29-year-olds. Aims: To investigate the role of reasoning and emotion in advising against suicide. Method: We conducted a study with 130 students at a university that specializes in teachers' education. Participants sat in front of a camera, videotaping their advising against suicide. Three raters scored their transcribed advice on "wise reasoning" (i.e., expert forms of reasoning: considering a variety of conditions, awareness of the limitation of one's knowledge, taking others' perspectives). Four registered psychologists experienced in suicide prevention techniques rated the transcripts on the potential for suicide prevention. Finally, using the software Facereader 7.1, we analyzed participants' micro-facial expressions during advice-giving. Results: Wiser reasoning and less disgust predicted higher potential for suicide prevention. Moreover, higher potential for suicide prevention was associated with more surprise. Limitations: The actual efficacy of suicide prevention was not assessed. Conclusion: Wise reasoning and counter-stereotypic ideas that trigger surprise probably contribute to the potential for suicide prevention. This advising paradigm may help train teachers in advising students against suicide, measuring wise reasoning, and monitoring a harmful emotional reaction, that is, disgust.

References

  • Arendt, F., Scherr, S., Niederkrotenthaler, T., Krallmann, S., & Till, B. (2017). Effects of awareness material on suicide-related knowledge and the intention to provide adequate help to suicidal individuals. Crisis, 39(1), 47–54. 10.1027/0227-5910/a000474 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Baltes, P. B., & Smith, J. (2008). The fascination of wisdom: Its nature, ontogeny, and function. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 56–64. 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00062.x First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122–136. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.122 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., Maercker, A., & Smith, J. (1995). People nominated as wise: A comparative study of wisdom-related knowledge. Psychology and Aging, 10(2), 155–166. 10.1037/0882-7974.10.2.155 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Chentsova-Dutton, Y. E., & Tsai, J. L. (2010). Self-focused attention and emotional reactivity: The role of culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 507. 10.1037/a0018534 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Dong, X. Q., Chang, E. S., Zeng, P., & Simon, M. A. (2015). Suicide in the global Chinese aging population: A review of risk and protective factors, consequences, and interventions. Aging and Disease, 6(2), 121. 10.14336/AD.2014.0223 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Ekman, P., & Rosenberg, E. (1997). What the face reveals: Basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression using the facial action coding system (FACS). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Glück, J. (2017). Measuring wisdom: Existing approaches, continuing challenges, and new developments. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73, 1393–1403. 10.1093/geronb/gbx140 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grossmann, I. (2012). Wise reasoning: Technical manual. Waterloo, Canada: University of Waterloo. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Grossmann, I., & Brienza, J. (2018). The strengths of wisdom provide unique contributions to improved leadership, sustainability, inequality, gross national happiness, and civic discourse in the face of contemporary world problems. Journal of Intelligence, 6(2), 22. 10.3390/jintelligence6020022 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grossmann, I., & Kross, E. (2014). Exploring Solomon's Paradox: Self-distancing eliminates the self-other asymmetry in wise reasoning about close relationships in younger and older adults. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1571–1580. ​10.1177/0956797614535400 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Grossmann, I., Na, J., Varnum, M. E. W., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2012). A route to well-being: Intelligence versus wise reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 944–953. 10.1037/a0029560 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Grossmann, I., Na, J., Varnum, M. E. W., Park, D. C., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2010). Reasoning about social conflicts improves into old age. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(16), 7246–7250. 10.1073/pnas.1001715107 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Grossmann, I., Oakes, H., & Santos, H. C. (2019). Wise reasoning benefits from emodiversity, irrespective of emotional intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 148, 805–823. 10.1037/xge0000543 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(5), 701–713. 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, C. S., Ferrari, M., Liu, R.-D., Gao, Q., & Weare, E. (2018). Mainland Chinese implicit theory of wisdom: Generational and cultural differences. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73(8), 1416–1424. 10.1093/geronb/gbw157 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, C. S., Huang, J., Ferrari, M., Wang, Q., Xie, D., & Zhang, H. (2018). Sadder but wiser: Emotional reactions and wisdom in a simulated suicide intervention. International Journal of Psychology, 54(6). 10.1002/ijop.12536 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Kelley, N. J., Crowell, A. L., Tang, D., Harmon-Jones, E., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2015). Disgust sensitivity predicts defensive responding to mortality salience. Emotion, 15(5), 590–602. 10.1037/a0038915 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Li, F., Lu, X., & Yip, P. S. F. (2019). A study of the characteristics of suicide notes in China. Crisis, 41(1), 32-38. 10.1027/0227-5910/a000601 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Michel, K., & Jobes, D. A. (2011). Building a therapeutic alliance with the suicidal patient. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/12303-000 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ministry of Education in China. (2013). Chinese. Beijing, China: People's Education Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Osafo, J., Knizek, B. L., Akotia, C. S., & Hjelmeland, H. (2012). Attitudes of psychologists and nurses toward suicide and suicide prevention in Ghana: A qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(6), 691–700. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.11.010 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Prati, F., Crisp, R. J., & Rubini, M. (2015). Counter-stereotypes reduce emotional intergroup bias by eliciting surprise in the face of unexpected category combinations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 31–43. 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.06.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rottman, J., Kelemen, D., & Young, L. (2014). Tainting the soul: Purity concerns predict moral judgments of suicide. Cognition, 130(2), 217–226. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.007 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Russel, B. (2009). Autobiography. London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Touroutoglou, A., & Efklides, A. (2010). Cognitive interruption as an object of metacognitive monitoring: Feeling of difficulty and surprise. In A. EfklidesP. Misailidi (Eds.), Trends and prospects in metacognition research (pp. 171–208). New York, NY: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/​10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_9 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Webster, J. D. (2003). An exploratory analysis of a self-assessed wisdom scale. Journal of Adult Development, 10(1), 13–22. 10.1023/A:1020782619051 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Werbeloff, N., Dohrenwend, B. P., Levav, I., Haklai, Z., Yoffe, R., Large, M., … Weiser, M. (2015). Demographic, behavioral, and psychiatric risk factors for suicide. Crisis, 37(2), 104–111. 10.1027/0227-5910/a000359 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Weststrate, N. M., & Glück, J. (2017). Hard-earned wisdom: Exploratory processing of difficult life experience is positively associated with wisdom. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 800–814. 10.1037/dev0000286 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • World Health Organization. (2017). Depression and other common mental disorders: Global health estimates. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar