Skip to main content
Log in

Surfactant removal from wastewater using photo-cathode microbial fuel cell and laterite-based hybrid treatment system

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) is a widely used anionic surfactant, which finds its way to the receiving water body due to the incapability of conventional wastewater treatment systems to completely remove it. A hybrid treatment system consisting of upflow microbial fuel cell (MFC) with titanium dioxide (TiO2) as a photocathode catalyst was developed for treating synthetic wastewater spiked with SDS (10.00 ± 0.46 mg L−1). Effluent from anodic chamber of MFC was passed through raw laterite soil filter followed by the photo-cathodic chamber with TiO2-coated cathode irradiated with the UV spectrum. This hybrid system was operated under varying hydraulic retention time (HRT) in anodic chamber of MFC. The SDS removal efficiency of more than 96% along with organic matter removal efficiency of more than 71% was obtained by this hybrid system at different HRTs. The MFC having cathode coated with TiO2 could generate a maximum power density of 0.73 W m−3 and 0.46 W m−3 at the HRT of 12 h and 8 h, respectively, showing the adverse effect of increased SDS loading rate on the electrical performance of MFC. This investigation highlighted the importance of HRT in anodic chamber of MFC and offered solution for effective removal of surfactant from wastewater.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Research data will be available by the corresponding author and sent once request is made with a valid reason.

References

  1. Sophocleous M (2004) Global and regional water availability and demand: Prospects for the future. Nat Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NARR.0000032644.16734.f5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wintgens T, Salehi F, Hochstrat R, Melin T (2008) Emerging contaminants and treatment options in water recycling for indirect potable use. Water Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Matamoros V, Rodríguez Y, Bayona JM (2017) Mitigation of emerging contaminants by full-scale horizontal flow constructed wetlands fed with secondary treated wastewater. Ecol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Luo Y, Guo W, Ngo HH et al (2014) A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dereszewska A, Cytawa S, Tomczak-Wandzel R, Medrzycka K (2015) The effect of anionic surfactant concentration on activated sludge condition and phosphate release in biological treatment plant. Polish J Environ Stud. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/28640

  6. Gupta S, Pal A, Kumar Ghosh P, Bandyopadhyay M (2003) Performance of waste activated carbon as a low-cost adsorbent for the removal of anionic surfactant from aquatic environment. J Environ Sci Heal Part A Toxic Hazardous Subst Environ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-120016902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar S, Kirha TJ, Thonger T (2014) Toxicological effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate. J Chem Pharm Res 6(5):1488–1492

    Google Scholar 

  8. Basar CA, Karagunduz A, Cakici A, Keskinler B (2004) Removal of surfactants by powdered activated carbon and microfiltration. Water Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Šostar-Turk S, Petrinić I, Simonič M (2005) Laundry wastewater treatment using coagulation and membrane filtration. Resour Conserv Recycl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fountoulakis MS, Markakis N, Petousi I, Manios T (2016) Single house on-site grey water treatment using a submerged membrane bioreactor for toilet flushing. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Poyatos JM, Muñio MM, Almecija MC et al (2010) Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment: State of the art. Water Air Soil Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0065-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bandala ER, Peláez MA, Salgado MJ, Torres L (2008) Degradation of sodium dodecyl sulphate in water using solar driven Fenton-like advanced oxidation processes. J Hazard Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arslan A, Topkaya E, Bingöl D, Veli S (2018) Removal of anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate from aqueous solutions by O3/UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation process: Process optimization with response surface methodology approach. Sustain Environ Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2017.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Venkata Mohan S, Saravanan R, Raghavulu SV et al (2008) Bioelectricity production from wastewater treatment in dual chambered microbial fuel cell (MFC) using selectively enriched mixed microflora: Effect of catholyte. Bioresour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.12.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim M, Cha J, Yu J, Kim C (2016) Stackable and submergible microbial fuel cell modules for wastewater treatment. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1597-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Köroğlu EO, Ozkaya Bestamin, Çetinkaya AY (2014) Microbial fuel cells for energy recovery from waste. Int J Energy Sci https://doi.org/10.14355/ijes.2014.0401.07

  17. Bhowmick GD, Noori MT, Das I et al (2018) Bismuth doped TiO2 as an excellent photocathode catalyst to enhance the performance of microbial fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhowmick GD, Chakraborty I, Ghangrekar MM, Mitra A (2019) TiO2/Activated carbon photo cathode catalyst exposed to ultraviolet radiation to enhance the efficacy of integrated microbial fuel cell-membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Araña J, Herrera Melián JA, Doña Rodríguez JM et al (2002) TiO2-photocatalysis as a tertiary treatment of naturally treated wastewater. Catal Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00226-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Haroune L, Salaun M, Ménard A et al (2014) Photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine and three derivatives using TiO2 and ZnO: Effect of pH, ionic strength, and natural organic matter. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abboud MM, Khleifat KM, Batarseh M et al (2007) Different optimization conditions required for enhancing the biodegradation of linear alkylbenzosulfonate and sodium dodecyl sulfate surfactants by novel consortium of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Pantoea agglomerans. Enzyme Microb Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roig MG, Pedraz MA, Sanchez JM (1998) Sorption isotherms and kinetics in the primary biodegradation of anionic surfactants by immobilized bacteria I. Pseudomonas C12B. J Mol Catal B Enzym. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-1177(98)00005-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chakraborty I, Sathe SM, Khuman CN, Ghangrekar MM (2020) Bioelectrochemically powered remediation of xenobiotic compounds and heavy metal toxicity using microbial fuel cell and microbial electrolysis cell. Mater Sci Energy Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2019.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stein NE, Hamelers HVM, van Straten G, Keesman KJ (2012) Effect of toxic components on microbial fuel cell-polarization curves and estimation of the type of toxic inhibition. Biosensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios2030255

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Chakraborty I, Khuman CN, Bhowmick GD, Ghangrekar MM (2019) Upflow microbial fuel cell for removal of emerging contaminant from greywater with concomitant energy recovery. In: Proceedings of IWA water and development congress & exibition. International Water Association, Colombo, Srilanka

  26. Ghadge AN, Ghangrekar MM (2015) Development of low cost ceramic separator using mineral cation exchanger to enhance performance of microbial fuel cells. Electrochim Acta. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jadhav GS, Ghangrekar MM (2009) Performance of microbial fuel cell subjected to variation in pH, temperature, external load and substrate concentration. Bioresour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wef APHA (1998) AWWA, 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Amer Pub Heal Assoc Washingt DC

    Google Scholar 

  29. Logan BE, Hamelers B, Rozendal R et al (2006) Microbial fuel cells: Methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0605016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ge Z, Li J, Xiao L et al (2014) Recovery of Electrical Energy in Microbial Fuel Cells. Environ Sci Technol Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/ez4000324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Margesin R, Schinner F (1998) Low-temperature bioremediation of a waste water contaminated with anionic surfactants and fuel oil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shahbazi R, Kasra-Kermanshahi R, Gharavi S et al (2013) Screening of SDS-degrading bacteria from car wash wastewater and study of the alkylsulfatase enzyme activity. Iran J Microbiol. 5(2):153–158

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Thomas O, White G (1989) Metabolic pathway for the biodegradation of sodium dodecyl sulfate by Pseudomonas sp. C12B. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-8744.1989.tb00064.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Franklin BL, Fitzgerald JW (1982) The inducible alkylsulphatase of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Inhibition of induction by excess inducer is related to inducer catabolism. FEMS Microbiol Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1982.tb00013.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jung S, Regan JM (2007) Comparison of anode bacterial communities and performance in microbial fuel cells with different electron donors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-1162-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yu J, Park Y, Kim B, Lee T (2015) Power densities and microbial communities of brewery wastewater-fed microbial fuel cells according to the initial substrates. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1246-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Icgen B, Salik SB, Goksu L et al (2017) Higher alkyl sulfatase activity required by microbial inhabitants to remove anionic surfactants in the contaminated surface waters. Water Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Silva AM, Lima RMF, Leão VA (2012) Mine water treatment with limestone for sulfate removal. J Hazard Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.03.066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sun M, Mu ZX, Chen YP et al (2009) Microbe-assisted sulfide oxidation in the anode of a microbial fuel cell. Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/es802809m

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee DJ, Lee CY, Chang JS (2012) Treatment and electricity harvesting from sulfate/sulfide-containing wastewaters using microbial fuel cell with enriched sulfate-reducing mixed culture. J Hazard Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.09.071

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu H, Ramnarayanan R, Logan BE (2004) Production of electricity during wastewater treatment using a single chamber microbial fuel cell. Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/es034923g

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pham TD, Nguyen HH, Nguyen NV et al (2017) Adsorptive removal of copper by using surfactant modified laterite soil. J Chem. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1986071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kadam AM, Nemade PD, Oza GH, Shankar HS (2009) Treatment of municipal wastewater using laterite-based constructed soil filter. Ecol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee SY, Park SJ (2013) TiO2 photocatalyst for water treatment applications. J Ind Eng Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lea J, Adesina AA (1998) The photo-oxidative degradation of sodium dodecyl sulphate in aerated aqueous TiO2 suspension. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-6030(98)00375-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Song YC, Kim DS, Woo JH et al (2015) Effect of surface modification of anode with surfactant on the performance of microbial fuel cell. Int J Energy Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wen Q, Kong F, Ma F et al (2011) Improved performance of air-cathode microbial fuel cell through additional Tween 80. J Power Sources. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rahimnejad M, Ghoreyshi AA, Najafpour G, Jafary T (2011) Power generation from organic substrate in batch and continuous flow microbial fuel cell operations. Appl Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang JN, Zhao QL, You SJ et al (2008) Continuous electricity production from leachate in a novel upflow air-cathode membrane-free microbial fuel cell. Water Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Huang L, Logan BE (2008) Electricity production from xylose in fed-batch and continuous-flow microbial fuel cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1588-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was financially supported by the ReWater project, Aditya Choubey Center for ReWater Research, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India [Project code: IIT/SRIC/EF/CRW/2018-19/045].

Funding

ReWater project, Aditya Choubey Center for ReWater Research, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. M. Ghangrekar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no confict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 3095 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sathe, S.M., Bhowmick, G.D., Dubey, B.K. et al. Surfactant removal from wastewater using photo-cathode microbial fuel cell and laterite-based hybrid treatment system. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 43, 2075–2084 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02396-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02396-4

Keywords

Navigation