Combining fast magic angle spinning dynamic nuclear polarization with indirect detection to further enhance the sensitivity of solid-state NMR spectroscopy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssnmr.2020.101685Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) and fast magic angle spinning are jointly used to boost sensitivity of solid-state NMR.

  • Proton-detected 2D heteronuclear correlation (idHETCOR) DNP experiments on 13C, 113Cd, 15N, and 89Y nuclei are reported.

  • For 15N and 89Y these experiments provide better absolute sensitivities than the DNP-enhanced 2D HETCOR experiments.

Abstract

Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) and indirect detection are two commonly applied approaches for enhancing the sensitivity of solid-state NMR spectroscopy. However, their use in tandem has not yet been investigated. With the advent of low-temperature fast magic angle spinning (MAS) probes with 1.3-mm diameter rotors capable of MAS at 40 ​kHz it becomes feasible to combine these two techniques. In this study, we performed DNP-enhanced 2D indirectly detected heteronuclear correlation (idHETCOR) experiments on 13C, 15N, 113Cd and 89Y nuclei in functionalized mesoporous silica, CdS nanoparticles, and Y2O3 nanoparticles. The sensitivity of the 2D idHETCOR experiments was compared with those of DNP-enhanced directly-detected 1D cross polarization (CP) and 2D HETCOR experiments performed with a standard 3.2-mm rotor. Due to low CP polarization transfer efficiencies and large proton linewidth, the sensitivity gains achieved by indirect detection alone were lower than in conventional (non-DNP) experiments. Nevertheless, despite the smaller sample volume the 2D idHETCOR experiments showed better absolute sensitivities than 2D HETCOR experiments for nuclei with the lowest gyromagnetic ratios. For 89Y, 2D idHETCOR provided 8.2 times better sensitivity than the 1 D89Y-detected CP experiment performed with a 3.2-mm rotor.

Introduction

Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) spectroscopy is a powerful technique for the atomic level characterization of organic, inorganic, biological, and hybrid materials. SSNMR, however, suffers from an intrinsically low sensitivity which derives from the small gyromagnetic ratios of nuclei, low natural isotopic abundance, large anisotropic interactions and unfavorable relaxation times. This drawback is further exacerbated in samples with dilute sites, such as functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), semiconductor nanoparticles, and biological macromolecules. Researchers have devoted a tremendous effort to overcome this issue. Over the past two decades, two techniques have emerged to improve the sensitivity of SSNMR spectroscopy: the indirect detection, commonly through protons, performed with fast magic angle spinning (MAS) [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]] and high-field MAS dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) [[9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]].

The two-dimensional (2D) heteronuclear correlation experiments with indirect detection (idHETCOR) in SSNMR were inspired by heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) [1,2,4,18] and heteronuclear multiple quantum correlation (HMQC) experiments [19,20] in solution NMR. In idHETCOR, polarization transfers can be achieved either through-space, usually with cross-polarization (CP) [1,2,4,21], or through-bond, via INEPT [5,18]. CP-based idHETCOR experiments are more routine and generally provide better sensitivity. In 2000, Ishii and Tycko first demonstrated that under fast MAS condition the CP idHETCOR experiment provided better sensitivity than the established HETCOR experiment with direct detection of 13C and 15N [1]. In 2003, Paulson et al. illustrated a modified version of this experiment in which the constant time concept was introduced to better suppress water peaks and reduce the t1-noise [21]. In subsequent work, HORROR saturation pulses were combined with a z-filter to eliminate the uncorrelated 1H magnetization remaining after the evolution period and further diminish the t1-noise [2,4]. In 2009, Mao and Pruski replaced the second CP transfer with refocused INEPT, which resulted in through-bond correlation spectra [18]. In 2014, with the advent of ultrafast MAS probeheads, Nishiyama et al. extended the dimensionality of indirect detection experiment to three [22]. In 2018, Venkatesh et al. demonstrated that idHETCOR experiments could be applied to nuclei with very low gyromagnetic ratio, like 89Y, 103Rh, 109Ag and 183W [8].

DNP enhances the sensitivity by transferring the much larger spin polarization of unpaired electron spins to nearby nuclei under microwave (MW) irradiation [11]. In high field DNP experiments under MAS, the unpaired electron spins are most commonly supplied by wetting the sample or dissolving it within a glass-forming solution of nitroxide biradicals [23,24]. To improve the sensitivity gains from DNP, researchers have devoted great efforts to design and synthesize new radicals [[25], [26], [27]], optimize the sample preparation procedures [[28], [29], [30], [31], [32]], construct cryogenic hardware [[33], [34], [35], [36]], and develop dedicated pulse sequences [[37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]]. This progress led to many spectacular applications of DNP to the studies of various classes of organic and inorganic solids in chemistry, materials science, and biochemistry [28,[43], [44], [45]]. Until recently, DNP SSNMR experiments were performed with low MAS frequencies of 20 ​kHz or less. However, the development of a commercial 1.3-mm probe capable of 40 ​kHz MAS at ~100 ​K has opened new opportunities for DNP SSNMR [16,46,47]. Chaudhari et al. observed the enhancement factor in such a probe to be roughly constant in the MAS frequency range of 10–40 ​kHz, for a 60:30:10 glycerol-d8/D2O/H2O sample, but that an increase in MAS frequency led to a reduced contribution factor (θ) and longer DNP build-up times [16]. Similarly, Perras and Pruski observed a monotonic decrease of sensitivity in the same range of MAS frequencies for protonated, and partially-deuterated, 1,1,2,2-tetrachoroethane (TCE) solutions as well as for crystalline sucrose [48], which is in agreement with theoretical models of CE DNP with nitroxide biradicals [[49], [50], [51]]. Importantly, the advent of fast MAS DNP probes offers the possibility for combining indirect detection with DNP; however, the feasibility and potential benefits of DNP idHETCOR have not been broadly assessed.

To determine the utility of combining 1H-detection with DNP, HETCOR and idHETCOR experiments were performed on nuclei with a wide range of gyromagnetic ratios (13C, 15N, 113Cd, 89Y). The materials involved are functionalized MSNs, cadmium sulfide nanoparticles (CdS NPs), and yttrium oxide NPs. Note that the terms 1H-detection and indirect detection are used interchangeably throughout the manuscript. The sensitivities of indirectly detected experiments with a 1.3-mm probe were systematically compared to their directly detected counterpart acquired using a 3.2-mm probe under DNP conditions to account for the reduced sample size in the 1.3-mm rotor.

Section snippets

Theory

The sensitivity of an NMR experiment is best characterized by the signal to noise ratio (SNR) measured in the frequency domain per square root of the total experimental time [52]. In this study, we will compare the sensitivities of the following DNP-enhanced CPMAS experiments involving 1H and the lower-γ X nuclei: (1) one-dimensional (1D) X{1H} CPMAS performed with 3.2-mm and 1.3-mm probes, whose sensitivities are denoted as ζ3.2(1.3)CPMAS, (2) 2D X{1H} HETCOR performed with a 3.2-mm probe

Experimental

DNP-enhanced SSNMR experiments were performed on a Bruker Avance III 400 ​MHz spectrometer equipped with a 264 ​GHz gyrotron MW source. Two MAS DNP probes are available for this instrument, in which 3.2-mm and 1.3-mm zirconia rotors can be stably spun at ~100 ​K with MAS rates of 10 ​kHz and up to 36 ​kHz, respectively. The experiments included 1D X{1H} CPMAS, 2D X{1H} HETCOR and 2D 1H{X} idHETCOR, where X ​= ​13C, 113Cd, 15N and 89Y. For experiments with 113Cd detection, a

Results and discussion

The key results of our experiments are summarized in Table 1, where sensitivities of CPMAS (ζ1.3CPMAS) and idHETCOR (ζ1.3H) experiments performed using a 1.3-mm probe are compared with those of CPMAS (ζ3.2CPMAS) and HETCOR (ζ3.2X) experiments performed using a 3.2-mm probe. To simplify the analysis, for each nucleus we normalized the results to the 1D CPMAS experiment performed using the 1.3-mm probe. The raw data are given in Table S2 in the Supporting Information. Based on the data in Table 1

Conclusion

In this study, we assessed the feasibility of combining the sensitivity enhancements offered by DNP and indirect detection. The sensitivity of DNP-enhanced idHETCOR experiments is influenced by the factors which determine the performance of idHETCOR in conventional SSNMR, including the polarization transfer efficiency, the gyromagnetic ratio of X nuclei, and the relative line widths and quality factors, as well as those inherent to DNP, including the enhancement factor, contribution factor and

Declaration of competing interest

ZW, MPH, TK, FAP, YC, AJR, and MP declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. FE, CR, and AP work for the Bruker Biospin Corporation which has developed and commercialized the fast-MAS probehead investigated in this study. This relationship has not impacted the analysis of the work presented here.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Igor I. Slowing for preparing the PUP-MSN material. This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Science and Engineering Division (SSNMR of CdS and Y2O3 nanoparticles) and Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences (SSNMR of functionalized mesoporous silica). The Ames Laboratory is operated for the DOE by Iowa State University under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11358.

References (75)

  • Y. Nishiyama et al.

    3D 15N/15N/1H chemical shift correlation experiment utilizing an rfdr-based 1H/1H mixing period at 100kHz MAS

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2014)
  • K.-N. Hu

    Polarizing agents and mechanisms for high-field dynamic nuclear polarization of frozen dielectric solids

    Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson.

    (2011)
  • F.A. Perras et al.

    Optimal sample formulations for DNP SENS: the importance of radical-surface interactions

    Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2018)
  • D. Lee et al.

    Is solid-state NMR enhanced by dynamic nuclear polarization?

    Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson.

    (2015)
  • Y. Matsuki et al.

    Helium-cooling and -spinning dynamic nuclear polarization for sensitivity-enhanced solid-state NMR at 14 T and 30 K

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2012)
  • K.R. Thurber et al.

    Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance with magic-angle spinning and dynamic nuclear polarization below 25 K

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2013)
  • D. Lee et al.

    Ultra-low temperature MAS-DNP

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2016)
  • E.L. Sesti et al.

    Magic angle spinning NMR below 6 K with a computational fluid dynamics analysis of fluid flow and temperature gradients

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2018)
  • D. Lee et al.

    Solvent signal suppression for high-resolution MAS-DNP

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2017)
  • S. Bjorgvinsdottir et al.

    DNP enhanced NMR with flip-back recovery

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2018)
  • S. Bjorgvinsdottir et al.

    Maximizing nuclear hyperpolarization in pulse cooling under MAS

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2019)
  • I. Schnell et al.

    Inverse detection and heteronuclear editing in H-1-N-15 correlation and H-1-H-1 double-quantum NMR spectroscopy in the solid state under fast MAS

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2001)
  • Y. Nishiyama et al.

    Studies of minute quantities of natural abundance molecules using 2D heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy under 100 kHz MAS

    Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson.

    (2015)
  • D.I. Hoult et al.

    The signal-to-noise ratio of the nuclear magnetic resonance experiment

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1976)
  • A. Purea et al.

    Improved waveguide coupling for 1.3 mm MAS DNP probes at 263 GHz

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2019)
  • A. Bielecki et al.

    Frequency-switched pulse sequences - homonuclear decoupling and dilute spin NMR in solids

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1989)
  • D. Sakellariou et al.

    Homonuclear dipolar decoupling in solid-state NMR using continuous phase modulation

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (2000)
  • M. Bak et al.

    A general simulation program for solid-state NMR spectroscopy

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2000)
  • P.H. Chen et al.

    Perspectives on microwave coupling into cylindrical and spherical rotors with dielectric lenses for magic angle spinning dynamic nuclear polarization

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2019)
  • Y. Ishii et al.

    Sensitivity enhancement in solid-state 13C NMR of synthetic polymers and biopolymers by 1H NMR detection with high-speed magic angle spinning

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2001)
  • J.W. Wiench et al.

    Chemical shift correlation NMR spectroscopy with indirect detection in fast rotating solids: studies of organically functionalized mesoporous silicas

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2007)
  • A. Venkatesh et al.

    Enhancing the sensitivity of solid-state NMR experiments with very low gyromagnetic ratio nuclei with fast magic angle spinning and proton detection

    J. Phys. Chem. A

    (2018)
  • D.A. Hall et al.

    Polarization-enhanced NMR spectroscopy of biomolecules in frozen solution

    Science

    (1997)
  • T. Maly et al.

    Dynamic nuclear polarization at high magnetic fields

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (2008)
  • R.G. Griffin et al.

    High field dynamic nuclear polarization-the renaissance

    Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.

    (2010)
  • A.J. Rossini et al.

    Dynamic nuclear polarization NMR spectroscopy of microcrystalline solids

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2012)
  • M. Rosay et al.

    Two-dimensional 13C−13C correlation spectroscopy with magic angle spinning and dynamic nuclear polarization

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (20)

    • Fast magic angle spinning for the characterization of milligram quantities of organic and biological solids at natural isotopic abundance by <sup>13</sup>C–<sup>13</sup>C correlation DNP-enhanced NMR

      2023, Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
      Citation Excerpt :

      Two major axes of methodological development have focused on fast MAS (i.e. sample rotation frequencies >25 kHz) [3,4] and sensitivity enhancement through dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) [5–11]. With the recent development of both cryogenic fast MAS probes and DNP technologies, these two axes are now combined [12–16]. Faster MAS rates provide numerous experimental benefits, including more efficient averaging of anisotropic interactions (which is particularly important for high magnetic fields), longer coherence lifetimes, and larger and more homogenous radiofrequency field strengths (i.e. B1) as a result of the smaller coil dimension [4].

    • Recent progress in nuclear magnetic resonance strategies for time-resolved atomic-level investigation of crystallization from solution

      2023, Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Of course, efforts must also be realized in identifying the best NMR protocols for analysing these complex physical systems, where multiple species with very similar chemical identity (but structurally different) can be simultaneously present. In this respect, the unique versatility of MAS DNP can provide a large number of tools, including, among others, the use of relaxation filters, the development of indirect acquisition methods in MAS DNP [55] (increasing both sensitivity and spectral resolution of the analysis) and the analysis of spin diffusion [56,57]. As previously mentioned, glycine is used as an archetypal system for the development of methodologies to study crystallisation and polymorphism and therefore most of this review focuses on glycine/water systems.

    • NMR of nanoparticles

      2023, Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry III, Third Edition
    • High field solid-state nmr of challenging nuclei in inorganic systems

      2023, Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry III, Third Edition
    • Advances in the characterization of inorganic solids using NMR correlation experiments

      2023, Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry III, Third Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text