Abstract
Purpose
‘Green’ business models1 have received considerable political and financial support, which for the public is a validation of the sustainability of the business models. The sustainability performance seems, however, often questionable, and the purpose of this paper is to investigate the performance of a specific public support programme for green business models.
Methods
Based on an analytical framework of key elements of life cycle assessment (LCA), 14 business models supported financially by the Danish Fund for Green Business Development were investigated. This included text analysis and interviews with companies receiving funding.
Results and discussion
Results document that despite clear ambitions of improving environmental performance, life cycle assessment and other quantitative methods are rarely applied among supported companies to document the environmental benefits of their green business models. Furthermore, the companies rarely consider substitution and alternatives or apply a holistic perspective in terms of impacts.
Conclusions
There is an urgent need to strengthen credibility of public support programme on the performance of green business models. The LCA community has, as expert community, a special role in pointing at the implications and need of documenting environmental performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ADB, Daniele Ponzi (2019) The Business of Greening. Policy Measures for Green Business Development in Asia. ADB Sustainable Development working paper series, no 59
Bisgaard T, Høgenhaven C, Henriksen K, Bjerre M (2012) Short guide to green business model innovation. Nordic innovation publication, 2012:19. Norden http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:707241/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Bocken N, Evans S, Miller K (2016) Assessing the environmental impacts of new circular business models. Conference “New Business Models” – Exploring a changing view on organizing value creation, Toulouse, France, 2016
Bosco S, Di Bene C, Galli M, Remorini D, Massai R, Bonari E (2013) Soil organic matter accounting in the carbon footprint analysis of the wine chain. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:973
Danish Business Authority (2014) National Operational Programme for the European Regional Development Fund, 2014–2020. Denmark
EC-JRC (2010) ‘International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook -- General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment -- Detailed Guidance. First Edition March 2010. EUR 24708 EN’. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union https://doi.org/10.2788/38479
European Commission (2019) Interreg: European Territorial Co-operation, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/cooperation/european-territorial/. Accessed 2020-06-04
Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq 12(2):219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
FORA (2010) Green business models in the Nordic region: a key to promote sustainable growth, green paper for the Nordic Council of Ministers, FORA, Copenhagen
Fraccascia L, Giannoccaro I, Albino V (2019) Business models for industrial symbiosis: a taxonomy focused on the form of governance. Resour Conserv Recycl 146:114–126
Fund for Green Business Development (2015) Overview of projects supported by the Fund for Green Business Development. Available at: https://groenomstilling.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk/sites/default/files/media/overview_of_projects_supported_by_the_fund_for_green_business_development.pdf [last accessed 03-09-2019]
Gamage BG, Boyle C, McLaren SJ, McLaren J (2008) Life cycle assessment of commercial furniture: a case study of Formway LIFE chair. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:401–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0002-3
Goedkoop M, Mieras E, Gaasbeek A, Contreras S (2015) How to make the life cycle assessment team a business partner, in: Sonnemann and Margni (eds) Life Cycle Management, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7221-1_9
Geerken T, Schmidt J, Boonen K, Christis M, Merciai S (2019) ‘Assessment of the potential of a circular economy in open economies – case of Belgium’. J Clean Prod 227:683–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.120
Haupt M, Zschokke M (2017) How can LCA support the circular economy?—63rd discussion forum on life cycle assessment, Zurich, Switzerland, November 30, 2016. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:832–837
Innovation Fund Denmark (2019) ‘Green growth | Innovationsfonden’. 2019. date accessed: 2020-04-12. https://innovationsfonden.dk/en/programmes/grand-solutions/green-growth
Joyce A, Paquin RL (2016) The triple layered business model canvas: a tool to design more sustainable business models. J Clean Prod 135:1474–1486
Kjaer LL, Pagoropoulos A, Schmidt JH, McAloone TC (2016) Challenges when evaluating product/service-systems through life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 120(1):95–104
Lüdeke-Freund F, Dembek K (2017) Sustainable business model research and practice: emerging field or passing fancy? J Clean Prod 168:1668–1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.093
Lüdeke-Freund F, Carroux S, Joyce A, Massa L, Breuer H (2018) The sustainable business model pattern taxonomy—45 patterns to support sustainability-oriented business model innovation. Sustain Prod Consum 15:145–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.004
Lyhne I, Byriel IP (2013) Environmental assessment of R&D programmes: the case of the Danish ForskEL Programme. JEAPM 15(2):1340002-1–1340002-19
Merli R, Preziosi M, Acampora A (2018) How do scholars approach the circular economy? A Systematic Literature Review. J Clean Prod 178:703–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112
Mieras E (2015) An LCA-based framework to validate sustainable business models, LCM 2015, www.pre-sustainability.com/download/Eric-Mieras-LCA-framework-for-new-business-models.pdf. Accessed 2020-04-04
Morioka SN, Bolis I, de Carvalho MM (2018) From an ideal dream towards reality analysis: proposing sustainable value exchange matrix (SVEM) from systematic literature review on sustainable business models and face validation. J Clean Prod 178:76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.078
OECD (2011) Towards green growth. OECD Publishing, Paris
Olsen SI (2019) Bæredygtigt Bundlinje: Metoder Og Værktøjer | Gate 21. Gate 21:2020 Accessed 2020-02-26. https://www.gate21.dk/baeredygtig-bundlinje-2/baeredygtig-bundlinje-1/metoder-og-vaerktoejer/
Passer A, Lasvaux S, Allacker K, De Lathauwer D, Spirinckx C, Wittstock B, Kellenberger D, Gschösser F, Wall J, Wallbaum H (2015) ‘Environmental product declarations entering the building sector: critical reflections based on 5 to 10 years experience in different european countries’. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 20(9):1199–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0926-3.
Quantis (2017) Measuring business performance in the circular economy. https://quantis-intl.com/measuring-circular-economy/ [Last accessed Sept 3, 2019]
Ramus CA, Montiel I (2005) When are corporate environmental policies a form of greenwashing? Bus Soc 44(4):377–414
Scheepens AE, Vogtländer JG, Brezet JC (2016) ‘Two life cycle assessment (lca) based methods to analyse and design complex (regional) circular economy systems. case: making water tourism more sustainable’. J Clean Prod 114:257–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.075
Schmidt WP (2003) Life cycle costing as part of design for environment environmental business cases. The Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(3):167–174
Singh J, Cooper T (2017) Towards a sustainable business model for plastic shopping bag management in Sweden. Procedia CIRP 61:679–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.268.
Sonnemann G, Gemechu ED, Sala S, Schau EM, Allacker K, Pant R, Adibi N, Valdivia S (2017) Chapter 18: life cycle thinking and the use of LCA in policies around the world. In: Rosenbaum RK, Olsen SI (eds) Hauschild. Life Cycle Assessment, Theory and Practice, pp 429–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_18
Täuscher K, Abdelkafi N (2018) Scalability and robustness of business models for sustainability: a simulation experiment. J Clean Prod 170:654–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.023
Testa F, Nucci B, Tessitore S, Iraldo F, Daddi T (2016) Perceptions on LCA implementation: evidence from a survey on adopters and nonadopters in Italy. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1501–1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1106-9
Funding
This research has not been supported by external research funding. However, the research idea and content has been inspired by participation in the EU-supported project ‘Sustainable Synergies’ on which AAU was the operator. The project was funded by the National Operational Program for the European Regional Development Fund, 2014–2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Adriana Del Borghi
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
1The dominating term in both the public and scientific domain is “sustainable business model”. I.e. a Google-search gives appr. 174.000 vs 3.030.000 results (approx. 1/17) and a Scopus-search gives 42 vs 718 articles (approx. 1/17) (“green business model” vs “sustainable business model”). We maintain the use of the term ‘green’ here as that is the term used in the specific public support program investigated.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Løkke, S., Schmidt, J.H., Lyhne, I. et al. How green are supported ‘green’ business models? Time for the life cycle approach to enter public support programmes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25, 2086–2092 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01806-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01806-9