Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative risk assessment of an amine-based CO2 capture process

  • Process Systems Engineering, Process Safety
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents a risk assessment study on an amine-based CO2 capture process. Based on the critical risks identified by a hazard and operability study (HAZOP) conducted in our previous work, we performed detailed quantitative risk assessment, including frequency estimation using fault tree analysis (FTA) and consequence estimation using the process hazard analysis software tool (PHAST). As a result of our FTA study on explosion accidents in the absorber column as a top event, we identified 25 basic events and eight intermediate events that lead to the top event. The probability of a T-102 explosion was estimated to approximately 3.55E-03 per year, which satisfies international safety regulations. Additionally, we performed consequence estimation for three types of accidents in an absorber, namely toxic substance leakage, explosions, and fireballs, under two different weather conditions, namely modest and worst conditions. It was determined that in the event of a toxic substance leakage accident, the effect zone of acid gas with high toxic substance content is approximately four-times larger than that of raw gas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. G. Olivier, K. Schure and J. Peters, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 5 (2017).

  2. N. Abas and N. Khan, Journal of CO2 Utilization, 8, 39 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Energy, IEA (International Energy Agency), Paris, France (2019).

  4. V. Marjanović, M. Milovančević and I. Mladenović, Journal of CO2 Utilization, 16, 212 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Kim, D. Ko, J. Mun, T. Kim and J. Kim, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 35(4), 941 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Schakel, G. Oreggioni, B. Singh, A. Stromman and A. Ramirez, Journal of CO2 Utilization, 16, 138 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Kim and J. Kim, Chem. Eng. Res. Design, 132, 853 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. B. P. Spigarelli and S. K. Kawatra, Journal of CO2 Utilization, 1, 69 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Global, Institute (2013): The Global Status of CCS: 2013 Melbourne (2013).

  10. Z. Zhang, S. Pan, H. Li, J. Cai, A. G. Olabi, E. J. Anthony and V. Manovic, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 125, 109799 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Vega, F. Baena-Moreno, L. M. G. Fernández, E. Portillo, B. Navarrete and Z. Zhang, Appl. Energy, 260, 114313 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Krzemień, A. Więckol-Ryk, A. Duda and A. Koteras, Journal of Sustainable Mining, 12(4), 18 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Krzemień, A. Więckol-Ryk, A. Smoliński, A. Koteras and L. Więcław-Solny, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 43, 189 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. A. ten Veldhuis, F. H. Clemens and P. H. van Gelder, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7(11), 809 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Christou and S. Porter, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, EUR, 18695 (1999).

  16. C. You and J. Kim, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 56(3), 335 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Kim, J. Kim, Y. Lee and I. Moon, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(6), 1429 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. CCPS, “Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedure with worked examples”, CCPS of the AIChE (1992).

  19. CCPS, “Guidelines on technical planning for on-site emergencies”, CCPS of the AIChE (1995).

  20. S. Lee, K. Kim and T. Kim, J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind., 25(6), 1085 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Hyun, S. Min, H. Choi, J. Park and I. Lee, Tunnel. Underground Space Technol., 49, 121 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Z. Han and W. Weng, J. Hazard. Mater., 189(1–2), 509 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. DNV software, PHAST version 6.7 software (2012).

  24. CCPS, Layer of protection analysis: Simplified process risk assessment, New York (2001).

  25. N. Khakzad, F. Khan and P. Amyotte, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 96(8), 925 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. F. Lees, Loss prevention in the process industries, Butterworths, USA (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Sam, Lees loss prevention in the process industries (third edition), Butterworths, USA (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  28. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory, Fault Tree Handbook, USA (1981).

  29. O. A. Rosyid, D. Jablonski and U. Hauptmanns, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32(15), 3194 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory, Reactor safety study: An assessment of accident risks in US commercial nuclear power plants (1975).

  31. KOSHA GUIDE P-102-2012 (2012).

  32. KOSHA GUIDE P-107-2016 (2016).

  33. Korean Statistical Information Service, Statics Korea (2013).

  34. American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), AIHA Guideline Foundation, ERPG/WEEL Handbook (2015).

  35. P. J. Kayes, World Bank Manual of Industrial Hazard Assessment Techniques, Technica Ltd., London (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  36. KOSHA CODE P-73-2001 (2001).

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Incheon National University (International Cooperative) Research Grant in 2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiyong Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

You, C., Kim, J. Quantitative risk assessment of an amine-based CO2 capture process. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 37, 1649–1659 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-020-0567-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-020-0567-5

Keywords

Navigation