Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The trend of soil organic carbon fractions related to the successions of different vegetation types on the tableland of the Loess Plateau of China

  • Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Different growth stages of vegetation are vital factors controlling soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration on the tableland of the Loess Plateau. To ascertain the SOC sequestration process and direction, we studied the changes in SOC fractions and the relationships with enzyme activities in different stages of restoration with different vegetation types.

Materials and methods

Soils from different stages of farmland conversion into grassland or forestland were selected, in which the space sequence and sampling time were combined to replace time series. SOC, particulate OC (POC), light fraction OC (LFOC), dissolved OC (DOC), and soil enzyme activities of catalase, urease, alkali-phosphatase, and inverse were measured. The change process of labile organic carbon (LOC) was performed to study the direction of SOC in the succession of different vegetation types. The effect of SOC–soil enzyme activity interactions was evaluated by RDA variance decomposition to illustrate the role of soil enzyme activity in SOC sequestration.

Results and discussion

With the extension of the planting time, the SOC fractions and total nitrogen under Hippophae rhamnoides (HR) increased rapidly from 0 to 16 and 16 to 21 years and decreased rapidly from 21 to 30 years, while LOC showed greater variation. LOC under Pinus tabulaeformis (PT) changed more slowly than that under HR. The sensitivity of different LOC to land use varied. From the change rate of soil LOC, we concluded the DOC changed the fastest, followed by the LFOC, the CPOC in POC was the slowest in the extension of vegetation growth time. By RDA variance decomposition, fine POC was mainly affected by urease; coarse POC in POC was mainly affected by alkaline phosphatase, which was promoted by invertase; LFOC was mainly promoted by catalase; DOC was mainly affected by alkaline phosphatase. Therefore, during the progression of SOC change, the initial stage was obviously affected by alkaline phosphatase. Catalase played a leading role during the gradual decrease in SOC activity. When SOC became stable, it was instead mainly affected by urease.

Conclusions

Land use changes and different growth stages of vegetation altered the SOC sequestration process and direction. The long-term return of farmland to grassland would greatly promote the concentrations of SOC fractions, and the short-term return of farmland to PT or HR would also encourage an increase in these fractions, while the long-term would have the opposite effect. Therefore, in order to effectively improve SOC concentrations, during vegetation restoration, it should be properly matched in vegetation species and stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bolinder MA, Angers DA, Gregorich EG, Carter MR (1999) The response of soil quality indicators to conservation management. Can J Soil Sci 79:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongiorno G, Bünemann EK, Oguejiofor CU, Meier J, Gort G, Comans R, Mäder P, Brussaard L, Goede R (2019) Sensitivity of labile carbon fractions to tillage and organic matter management and their potential as comprehensive soil quality indicators across pedoclimatic conditions in Europe. Ecol Indic 99:38–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boone RD (1994) Light fraction soil organic matter: origin and contribution to net nitrogen mineralization. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1459–1468

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bremner JM (1996) Nitrogen total. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis part 3: chemical methods, SSSA Book Series 5. Soil Sci Soc of Am, Madison, pp 1085–1122

    Google Scholar 

  • Camberdella CA, Elliott ET (1993) Methods for physical separation and characterization of soil organic fractions. Geoderma 56:449–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadell JG, Raupach MR (2008) Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320:1456–1457. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter MR, Gregorich EG, Angers DA, Donald RG, Bolinder MA (1998) Organic C and N storage, and organic C fractions, in adjacent cultivated and forested soils of eastern Canada. Soil Tillage Res 47:253–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng SL, Fang HJ, Zhu TH, Zheng JJ, Yang XM, Zhang XP, Yu GR (2010) Effects of soil erosion and deposition on soil organic carbon dynamics at a sloping field in Black Soil region, Northeast China. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 56(4):521–529

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Ackeman IL (1993) Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils. Biogeochemistry -US 20:161–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deng CL, Vidic NJ, Verosub KL, Singer MJ, Liu QS, Shaw J, Zhu RX (2005) Mineral magnetic variation of the Jiaodao Chinese loess/paleosol sequence and its bearing on long-term climatic variability. J Geophys Res 110:B 03103

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayez R, Soroosh SG (2018) The potential activity of soil extracellular enzymes as an indicator for ecological restoration of rangeland soils after agricultural abandonment. Appl Soil Ecol 126:140–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes TF, Broek MV, Govers G, Silva RWC, Moraes JM, Camargo PB, Mazzi EA, Martinelli LA (2019) Runoff, soil loss, and sources of particulate organic carbon delivered to streams by sugarcane and riparian areas: an isotopic approach. Catena 181:104083

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregorich EG, Ellert BH (1993) Light fraction and macroorganic matter in mineral soils. Lewis Publishers, Division of CRC Press, Florida, pp 397–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregorich EG, Janzen HH (1996) Storage of soil carbon in the light fraction and macro organic matter. In: Carter MR, Stewart BA (eds) Adv Soil Sci: structure and organic matter storage in agricultural soils. CRC Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 167–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan SY, Zhang Z (1986) Soil enzyme and its research methods. Agricultural Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RJ (2005) Labile organic matter fractions as central components of the quality of agricultural soils: an overview. Adv Agron 85:221–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu CJ, Fu BJ, Jin TT, Liu GH (2009) Effects of vegetation restoration on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in hilly areas of Loess Plateau. Chin J Appl Ecol 20(1):45–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen HH, Campell CA, Ellert BH, Bremer EB (1997) Soil organic matter dynamics and their relationship to soil quality. In: Gregorich EG, Carter MR (eds) Soil quality for crop production and ecosystem health. Elservier, Amsterdam, pp 277–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia GM, Cao JJ, Wang G (2005) Influence of land management on soil nutrients and microbial biomass in the central Loess Plateau, northwest China. Land Degrad Dev 16:455–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia XX, Wei XR, Shao MA, Li XZ (2012) Distribution of soil carbon and nitrogen along a revegetational succession on the Loess Plateau of China. Catena 95:160–168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang MH, Lü MK, Lin WS, Xie JS, Yang YS (2018) Effects of ecological restoration on soil organic carbon components and stability in a red soil erosion area. Acta Ecol Sin 38(13):4861–4868

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R, Follett R, Kimble JM, Cole CV (1999) Management U.S. cropland to sequester carbon in soil. J Soil Water Conserv 54(1):374–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifeld J, Bassin S, Fuhrer J (2005) Carbon stocks in Swiss agricultural soils predicted by land-use, soil characteristics, and altitude. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105(1–2):255–266

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu QS, Deng CL, Torrent J, Zhu RX (2007) Review of recent development in mineral magnetism of the Chinese loess. Quat Sci Rev 26:368–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu MY, Chang QR, Qi YB, Sun N (2010) Soil organic carbon and particulate organic carbon under different land use types on the Loess plateau. J Nat Resour 25(2):218–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu WG, Yan Y, Wang DX, Ma W (2018a) Integrate carbon dynamics models for assessing the impact of land use intervention on carbon sequestration ecosystem service. Ecol Indic 91:268–277

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HF, Zhang JY, Ai ZM, Wu Y, Xu HW, Li Q, Xue S, Liu GB (2018b) 16-Year fertilization changes the dynamics of soil oxidizable organic carbon fractions and the stability of soil organic carbon in soybean-corn agroecosystem. Agric Ecosyst Environ 265:320–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu N, Liski J, Chang RY, Akujrvi A, Wu X, Jin TT, Wang YF, Fu BJ (2013) Soil organic carbon dynamics of black locust plantations in the middle Loess Plateau area of China. Biogeosciences 10:7053–7063

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal B, Majumder B, Bandopadhyay PK, Hazra GC, Gangopadhyay A, Samantaroy RN, Misra AK, Chowdhuri J, Saha M, Kundu S (2007) The potential of cropping systems and soil amendments for carbon sequestration in soils under long-term experiments in subtropical India. Glob Chang Biol 13:357–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuel SA, Yasuo MN, Minerva GC, Francisco JMG, Francisco JMP (2019) The role of organic amendment in soils affected by residual pollution of potentially harmful elements. Chemosphere 237:124549

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin MP, Wattenbach M, Smith P, Meersmans J, Jolivet C, Boulonne L, Arrouays D (2011) Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stocks in France. Biogeosciences 8(5):1053–1065

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meersmans J, De Ridder F, Canters F, De Baets S, Van Molle M (2008) A multiple regression approach to assess the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) at the regional scale (Flanders, Belgium). Geoderma 143(1–2):1–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mi WH, Sun Y, Zhao C, Wu LH (2019) Soil organic carbon and its labile fractions in paddy soil as influenced by water regimes and straw management. Agric Water Manag 224:105752

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael RN, Robert WJ, William JFM (2011) Restoration of ecosystems for biodiversity and carbon sequestration: simulating growth dynamics of brigalow vegetation communities in Australia. Ecol Model 222:785–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GA, Rees RM, Griffiths BS, Ball B, Cloy JM (2019) The sensitivity of soil organic carbon pools to land management varies depending on former tillage practices. Soil Tillage Res 194:104299

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata T, Goh KM (1997) Effects of cropping systems on soil organic matter in a pair of conventional and biodynamic mixed cropping farms in Canterbury, New Zealand. Biol Fertil Soils 25:372–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P (2010) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1.17-3. http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org/

  • Pang DB, Cui M, Liu YG, Wang GZ, Cao J, Wang XR, Dan XQ, Zhou JX (2019) Responses of soil labile organic carbon fractions and stocks to different vegetation restoration strategies in degraded karst ecosystems of southwest China. Ecol Eng 138:391–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Poeplau C, Don A, Vesterdal L, Leifeld J, Wesemael BV, Schumacher J, Gensior A (2011) Temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon after land-use change in the temperate zone - carbon response functions as a model approach. Glob Chang Biol 17(7):2415–2427

    Google Scholar 

  • Pu YL, Ye C, Zhang SR, Long GF, Yang LR, Jia YL, Xu XX, Li Y (2017) Effects of different ecological restoration patterns on labile organic carbon and carbon pool management index of desertification grassland soil in zoige. Acta Ecol Sin 37(2):367–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin YB, Xin ZB, Yu XX, Xiao YL (2014) Influence of vegetation restoration on topsoil organic carbon in a small catchment of the loess hilly region, China. PLoS One 9(6):e94489

    Google Scholar 

  • SFA (China State Forestry Administration) (2002) Sloping land conversion program plan (2001–2010). State Forestry Administration, Beijing

  • Six J, Feller C, Denef K, Ogle SM, Moraes Sa JC, Albrecht A (2002) Soil organic matter, biota and aggregation in temperate and tropical soils—effects of no-tillage. Agronomie 22:755–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson G, Freedman B (2001) Potential for carbon sequestration in Canadian forests and agroecosystems. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 6:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun S, Badgley DB (2019) Changes in microbial functional genes within the soil metagenome during forest ecosystem restoration. Soil Biol Biochem 135:163–172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang GM, Xu WL, Sheng JD, Liang Z, Zhou B, Zhu M (2010) The variation of soil organic carbon and soil particle-size in Xinjiang oasis farmland of different years. Acta Pedol Sin 47(2):279–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An Examination of the Degtijarett method of determining soil matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci Soc Am J 37:29–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wander MM, Traina SJ, Stinner BR, Peters SE (1994) Organic and conventional management effects on biologically active soil organic matter pools. Soil Sci Soc Am 58:1130–1139

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang XL, Guo SL, Ma Y, Huang DY, Wu JS (2007) Effects of land use type on soil organic C and total N in a small watershed in loess hilly-gully region. Chin J Appl Ecol 18(6):1281–1285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei XR, Shao MA, Gale W, Li LH (2014) Global pattern of soil carbon losses due to the conversion of forests to agricultural land. Sci Rep 4(4062)

  • Yang YS, Liu YL, Chen GS, Li L, Xie JS, Lin P (2004) Content and distribution of unprotected soil organic carbon in natural and monoculture plantation forests of Castanopsis kawakamiiin subtropical China. Acta Ecol Sin 24(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Young LM (2003) Carbon sequestration in agriculture: the U.S. policy in context. Am J Agric Econ 85:1164–1170

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YW, Shangguan ZP (2016) The coupling interaction of soil water and organic carbon storage in the long vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau. Ecol Eng 91:574–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MM, Liu MY, Chang QR, Liu J, Liu H, Zhang J, Yang JH, Cao RS (2019) Effects of topsoil organic carbon on the dynamic change in cultivated land in the tableland of the Loess Plateau in Shaanxi over the last thirty years. Acta Ecol Sin 39(18):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao SW, Zhao YG, Wu JS (2010) Quantitative analysis of soil pores under natural vegetation successions on the Loess Plateau. Sci Earth Sci 53:617–625

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Program on Key Research Project (2016YFC0501703) and Basic Research program of Natural Science in Shaanxi (2017JZ008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China

    Mengyun Liu, Peng Li, Mengmeng Liu, Jing Wang & Qingrui Chang

  2. Scientific Laboratory of Heyang Agricultural Environment and Farmland Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Northwest A&F University, Heyang, 714000, Shaanxi, China

    Mengyun Liu, Peng Li, Mengmeng Liu, Jing Wang & Qingrui Chang

Authors
  1. Mengyun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mengmeng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qingrui Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingrui Chang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Jianming Xue

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, M., Li, P., Liu, M. et al. The trend of soil organic carbon fractions related to the successions of different vegetation types on the tableland of the Loess Plateau of China. J Soils Sediments 21, 203–214 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02710-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02710-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation