Abstract
Purpose
Heavy metal soil-pollution is of concern due to its adverse effects on the ecosystem and human health. However, conventional ecological risk assessments considering only chemical concentration have limitations because of an increased uncertainty in assessing soil-risk. Therefore, this study applied the Triad approach, using a tier system, for assessing site-specific ecological risk in heavy metal-contaminated soil. In addition, risk-level was determined to analyze the necessity of remediation in a contaminated site.
Materials and methods
Soil samples from six different sites, including heavy metal-contaminated regions (S1–S5) and a control site (C, unpolluted with heavy metals) were collected. Soil properties were assessed based on a tier system to evaluate the ecological risk of each site. The first step tier-1, involved calculating the soil pollution index (SPI) and the second, tier-2, involved assessing site-specific ecological risk based on three lines of evidence (LoEs), viz., chemistry (ChemLoE), ecotoxicology (EcotoxLoE), and ecology (EcoLoE). The total and bioavailable fractions of heavy metals in soil and bio-accumulated heavy metals in earthworms (Eisenia fetida) were measured for ChemLoE. A bioassay involving mortality and weight reduction rates of earthworms, and a root-elongation test of lettuce (Lactuca sativa sp.) was conducted for EcotoxLoE. Soil biological properties, soil basal respiration, and soil enzyme activities, were evaluated for EcoLoE. Final integrated risk (IR) was obtained by combining the risk-values of each LoE, determined using IR values and deviation of each LoE.
Results and discussion
Although three out of the five sampling sites had SPI > 1 in tier-1, all five sampling sites were subjected to tier-2 to evaluate site-specific ecological risk. In tier-2, ChemLoE (0.53–0.99) was higher than EcotoxLoE (0.05–0.43) and EcoLoE (0.00–0.29), indicating that chemical aspects impacted risk evaluation more than the toxicological and ecological aspects. The final IR ranged between 0.24 and 0.85; risk-level was classified as low (S2, S3, S5), moderate (S1), and high (S4) according to the IR value. Based on the risk-level, site S4 could require remediation for agricultural land-use.
Conclusions
The IR of each sampled site varied depending on the impact of heavy metals. Based tier-1 and tier-2 results, a thorough site-specific evaluation is required to understand the adverse effects of heavy metals on soil ecosystems, and the triad approach could be useful for managing heavy metals in soil.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aljahdali MO, Alhassan AB (2020) Ecological risk assessment of heavy metal contamination in mangrove habitats, using biochemical markers and pollution indices: a case study of Avicennia marina L. in the Rabigh lagoon, Red Sea. Saudi J. Biol Sci 27:1174–1184
Brown IC (1943) A rapid method of determining exchangeable hydrogen and total exchangeable bases of soils. Soil Sci 56:353–358
Cachada A, da Silva EF, Duarte AC, Pereira R (2016) Risk assessment of urban soils contamination: the particular case of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Sci Total Environ 551-552:271–284
Chapman PM (1986) Sediment quality criteria from the sediment quality triad: an example. Environ Toxicol Chem 5:957–964
Choi WS, Hong YK, Min KJ, Kim KJ, Km SC (2017) Evaluating soil respiration as indicator of heavy metal pollution in agricultural field. Kor J Soil Sci Fert 50:472–481
Critto A, Torresan S, Semenzin E, Giove S, Mesman M, Schouten AJ, Rutgers M, Marcomini A (2007) Development of a site-specific ecological risk assessment for contaminated sites: part I. A multi-criteria based system for the selection of ecotoxicological tests and ecological observations. Sci Total Environ 379:16–33
Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA (1990) Factors affecting glucosidase and galactosidase activities in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 22:891–897
Fajana HO, Jegede OO, James K, Hogan NS, Siciliano SD (2020) Uptake, toxicity, and maternal transfer of cadmium in the oribatid soil mite, Oppia nitens: implication in the risk assessment of cadmium to soil invertebrates. Environ Pollut 259:113912
Gomez-Gutierrez A, Garnacho E, Bayona JM, Albaiges J (2007) Screening ecological risk assessment of persistent organic pollutants in Mediterranean Sea sediments. Environ Int 33:867–876
González V, Díez-Ortiz M, Simón M, van Gestel CAM (2011) Application of bioassays with Enchytraeus crypticus and Folsomia candida to evaluate the toxicity of a metal-contaminated soil, before and after remediation. J Soils Sediments 11:1199–1208
Grayston SJ, Griffith GS, Mawdsley JL, Campbell CD, Bardgett RD (2001) Accounting for variability in soil microbial communities of temperate upland grassland ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 33:533–551
Gutierrez L, Garbisu C, Ciprian E, Becerril JM, Soto M, Etxebarria J, Madariaga JM, Antiguedad I, Epelde L (2015) Application of ecological risk assessment based on a novel TRIAD-tiered approach to contaminated soil surrounding a closed non-sealed landfill. Sci Total Environ 514:49–59
Han Q, Wang M, Cao J, Gui C, Liu Y, He X, He Y, Liu Y (2020) Health risk assessment and bioaccessibilities of heavy metals for children in soil and dust from urban parks and schools of Jiaozuo, China. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 191:110157
Hobbelen PH, Koolhaas JE, van Gestel CA (2006) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in the earthworms Lumbricus rubellus and Aporrectodea caliginosa in relation to total and available metal concentrations in field soils. Environ Pollut 144:639–646
Jensen J, Mesman M, Rutgers M, Breemen LD, Sorokin N, Laak TL, Bierkens J, Loibner AP, Eriacher E, Ehlers GAC, Bogolte BT, Celis R, Harnik T (2006) Ecological risk assessment of contaminated land: decision support for site specific investigations
Jiang R, Wang M, Chen W, Li X, Balseiro-Romero M, Baveye PC (2019) Ecological risk of combined pollution on soil ecosystem functions: insight from the functional sensitivity and stability. Environ Pollut 255:113184
Karjalainen A-M, Kilpi-Koski J, Väisänen AO, Penttinen S, van Gestel CA, Penttinen O-P (2009) Ecological risks of an old wood impregnation mill: application of the triad approach. Integr Environ Assess Manag 5:379–389
Kaurin A, Lestan D (2018) Multi-substrate induced microbial respiration, nitrification potential and enzyme activities in metal-polluted, EDTA-washed soils. Environ Pollut 243:238–245
Kilic GA (2011) Histopathological and biochemical alterations of the earthworm (Lumbricus Terrestris) as biomarker of soil pollution along Porsuk River Basin (Turkey). Chemosphere 83:1175–1180
Klimkowicz-Pawlas A, Maliszewska-Kordybach B, Smreczak B (2019) Triad-based screening risk assessment of the agricultural area exposed to the long-term PAHs contamination. Environ Geochem Health 41:1369–1385
Leveque T, Capowiez Y, Schreck E, Mazzia C, Auffan M, Foucault Y, Austruy A, Dumat C (2013) Assessing ecotoxicity and uptake of metals and metalloids in relation to two different earthworm species (Eiseina hortensis and Lumbricus terrestris). Environ Pollut 179:232–241
Li LZ, Zhou DM, Wang P, Luo XS (2008) Subcellular distribution of Cd and Pb in earthworm Eisenia fetida as affected by Ca2+ ions and Cd-Pb interaction. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 71:632–637
Liu L, Liu Q, Ma J, Wu H, Qu Y, Gong Y, Yang S, An Y, Zhou Y (2020) Heavy metal(loid)s in the topsoil of urban parks in Beijing, China: concentrations, potential sources, and risk assessment. Environ Pollut 260:114083
Martinez JG, Torres MA, dos Santos G, Moens T (2018) Influence of heavy metals on nematode community structure in deteriorated soil by gold mining activities in Sibutad, southern Philippines. Ecol Indic 91:712–721
Marziali L, Rosignoli F, Drago A, Pascariello S, Valsecchi L, Rossaro B, Guzzella L (2017) Toxicity risk assessment of mercury, DDT and arsenic legacy pollution in sediments: a triad approach under low concentration conditions. Sci Total Environ 593-594:809–821
Moreira LB, Leite PRBD, Dias ML, Martins CC, Abessa DMS (2019) Sediment quality assessment as potential tool for the management of tropical estuarine protected areas in SW Atlantic, Brazil. Ecol Indic 101:238–248
Niemeyer JC, Moreira-Santos M, Nogueira MA, Carvalho GM, Ribeiro R, Da Silva EM, Sousa JP (2010) Environmental risk assessment of a metal-contaminated area in the tropics. Tier I: screening phase. J Soils Sediments 10:1557–1571
Niemeyer JC, Moreira-Santos M, Ribeiro R, Rutgers M, Nogueira MA, da Silva EM, Sousa JP (2015) Ecological risk assessment of a metal-contaminated area in the tropics. Tier II: detailed assessment. PLoS One 10:e0141772
Renaud M, Chelinho S, Alvarenga P, Mourinha C, Palma P, Sousa JP, Natal-da-Luz T (2017) Organic wastes as soil amendments - effects assessment towards soil invertebrates. J Hazard Mater 330:149–156
Ribe V, Aulenius E, Nehrenheim E, Martell U, Odlare M (2012) Applying the triad method in a risk assessment of a former surface treatment and metal industry site. J Hazard Mater 207-208:15–20
Semenzin E, Critto A, Rutgers M, Marcomini A (2008) Integration of bioavailability, ecology and ecotoxicology by three lines of evidence into ecological risk indexes for contaminated soil assessment. Sci Total Environ 389:71–86
Son J, Kim JG, Hyun S, Cho K (2019) Screening level ecological risk assessment of abandoned metal mines using chemical and ecotoxicological lines of evidence. Environ Pollut 249:1081–1090
Song J, Shen Q, Wang L, Qiu G, Shi J, Xu J, Brookes PC, Liu X (2018) Effects of Cd, Cu, Zn and their combined action on microbial biomass and bacterial community structure. Environ Pollut 243:510–518
Sorvari J, Schultz E, Haimi J (2013) Assessment of ecological risks at former landfill site using TRIAD procedure and multicriteria analysis. Risk Anal 33:203–219
Turan V (2019) Confident performance of chitosan and pistachio shell biochar on reducing Ni bioavailability in soil and plant plus improved the soil enzymatic activities, antioxidant defense system and nutritional quality of lettuce. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 183:109594
Vašíčková J, Maňáková B, Šudoma M, Hofman J (2016) Ecotoxicity of arsenic contaminated sludge after mixing with soils and addition into composting and vermicomposting processes. J Hazard Mater 317:585–592
Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38
Wyszkowska J, Kucharski J, Lajszner W (2006) The effects of copper on soil biochemical properties and its interaction with other heavy metals. Pol J Environ Stud 15:927–934
Xian Y, Wang M, Chen W (2015) Quantitative assessment on soil enzyme activities of heavy metal contaminated soils with various soil properties. Chemosphere 139:604–608
Yang Z-x, S-q L, Zheng D-w, S-d F (2006) Effects of cadium, zinc and lead on soil enzyme activities. J Environ Sci 18:1135–1141
Yang J, Yang F, Yang Y, Xing G, Deng C, Shen Y, Luo L, Li B, Yuan H (2016) A proposal of “core enzyme” bioindicator in long-term Pb-Zn ore pollution areas based on topsoil property analysis. Environ Pollut 213:760–769
Zhang R, Chen T, Zhang Y, Hou Y, Chang Q (2020) Health risk assessment of heavy metals in agricultural soils and identification of main influencing factors in a typical industrial park in northwest China. Chemosphere 252:126591
Zhou Z, Yang Z, Sun Z, Liao Q, Guo Y, Chen J (2019) Multidimensional pollution and potential ecological and health risk assessments of radionuclides and metals in the surface soils of a uranium mine in East China. J Soils Sediments 20:775–791
Acknowledgments
This study is supported by Rural Development Administration as "Monitoring on trace metal around industrial area in Chungbuk and Chungnam province” projects (PJ0125052020).
Funding
This study is supported by Rural Development Administration as “Monitoring on trace metal around industrial area in Chungbuk and Chungnam province” projects (PJ0125052020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YK was the first author who mainly wrote this manuscript. DH and JW organized the experiment, collected a data, and summarized a main finding for the manuscript. MJ and BK interpreted a data and gave a comment for improving the manuscript. SC managed and organized a full manuscript as a corresponding author. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Daniel Alessi
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hong, Y.K., Yoon, D.H., Kim, J.W. et al. Ecological risk assessment of heavy metal-contaminated soil using the triad approach. J Soils Sediments 21, 2732–2743 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02750-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02750-9