Anodizing of AA6082-T5 by conventional and innovative treatments: Microstructural characterization and dry sliding behaviour
Introduction
Aluminium alloys are used for an increasing range of engineering applications, due to their many advantages (high strength-to-weight ratio, high electrical and thermal conductivity, good formability and, last but not least, recyclability [1]). Even though these alloys are attracting a growing interest in sectors such as the packaging industry, their unsatisfactory tribological behaviour still remains a critical issue for many applications. Several surface engineering techniques, such as physical vapour deposition (PVD), plating/electroplating, anodizing, thermal spraying and laser-based surface treatments [2,3] are available to improve the tribological behaviour of aluminium alloys. For many decades, the conventional and most cost-effective solution to wear problems has been Hard Anodizing (HA). However, since the beginning of this century, Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO) has become an attractive alternative to conventional anodizing. PEO is an electrochemical conversion treatment, based on the modification of the growing anodic oxide by micro-discharges, initiated at potentials above the breakdown voltage [4], sometimes also termed Micro-Arc Oxidation (MAO). Several comparative studies have been published on PEO and HA [[5], [6], [7], [8]] and the main advantages of PEO over HA can be summarized as follows: (i) use of dilute alkaline electrolytic baths instead of concentrated acidic solutions; (ii) higher thickness, hardness, practical adhesion and wear resistance of PEO layers, with possible incorporation of anions from the bath; (iii) higher tolerance towards alloying elements such as Cu and Si than the conventional hard anodizing process. All these features are related to specific PEO treatment conditions, derived from conventional anodizing but involving higher voltages (above dielectric breakdown of the anodic oxide) so as to generate micro-arc discharges which assist and enhance the growth of oxide-based layers. However, from a tribological point of view, also PEO has a few disadvantages: (i) heterogeneous microstructure with micropores and cracks, mostly in the outer “technological” layer, which may induce micro-crack driven damage and coating removal in the form of flakes [9] (ii) a high roughness in the as-treated condition, generating relatively high friction against steel counterparts in dry sliding conditions [10], therefore requiring a grinding/polishing post-treatment, applicable only when part geometry is not too complex.
The microstructure of anodic layers grown by PEO can be optimised by controlling electrolyte composition, concentration, pH and temperature as well as electrical parameters (power source, current regime) [9]. The use of AC and DC-pulsed sources remarkably contributed to the development of PEO layers with improved tribological behaviour. In particular, bipolar pulse sources are able to produce dense and compact coatings, whilst when only positive pulses are applied, the oxide-based layer displays a porous morphology [11]. Based on the above considerations, a novel anodizing treatment has been developed in an industrial environment. The treatment, termed Electro-Chemical Oxidation (ECO), derives from PEO but minimises or avoids its disruptive plasma discharge effects (UK Patent [GB2497063], Cambridge Nanolitic Ltd). It was achieved by (1) using short (microseconds) electrical pulses with trapezoidal shape to reduce the electrical current peaks during pulse switching and (2) maintaining cathodic current at a level that secures cathodic etching and building oxide layer with a fine nanopore structure to facilitate charge and ion transfer to the oxidation zone and to avoid breakdown discharge.
Although ECO coatings have already found application in a number of industries such as textile, packaging and automotive, their properties have not been published yet: this work focuses on the comparison of microstructure and tribological behaviour of ECO, PEO and HA coatings produced on the wrought AA6082-T5 aluminium alloy. The main aim of this work is therefore to provide a comparison of the anodic layers obtained by these industrial anodizing processes, which will help in process selection for a given industrial application. It will also allow a deeper understanding of microstructural features and tribological behaviour of the layers produced by each investigated process.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The wrought AA6082 alloy, used as substrate for all the investigated anodizing treatments was provided in the T5 condition, in the form of small bars (10 × 10 × 70 mm3). The T5 heat treatment consisted of (i) extrusion at 527 °C, (ii) quenching in water and (iii) aging at 177 °C for 8 h. The chemical composition of AA6082, determined by Glow Discharge Optical Emission Spectroscopy (GDOES), is reported in Table 1. No deviations from nominal composition data [12] were observed.
Before each
Surface morphology, microstructure and roughness
Fig. 1 shows the free surface morphology (a-c) and the polished cross-sections of all anodized samples (d-n), whilst Table 4 reports surface roughness parameters according to ISO 4278 [17] for the AA6082 substrate and for anodized samples, together with average thickness values of anodic oxides.
The free surfaces of HA (Fig. 1a) showed the typical morphology of hard-anodized layers, with substrate surface features (such as grinding grooves) being closely replicated, as well as the presence of
Conclusions
Microstructural and micro-mechanical characterization of anodic layers grown on the wrought AA6082-T5 alloy by industrial processes (hard anodizing (HA), plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) and electro-chemical oxidation (ECO), derived from PEO minimising its disruptive plasma discharge) was carried out and related to dry sliding behaviour (vs. 100Cr6 steel). The following conclusions can be drawn from this work:
- •
PEO and HA do not decrease the coefficient of friction of AA6082, whilst ECO does
CRediT authorship contribution statement
R. Sola: Writing - original draft. L. Tonelli: Validation. P. Shashkov: Methodology. T.H. Bogdanoff: Methodology. C. Martini: Project administration.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References (34)
- et al.
Plasma electrolytic oxidation and anodising of aluminium alloys for spacecraft applications
- et al.
Plasma electrolysis for surface engineering
Surf. Coating. Technol.
(1999) - et al.
An investigation into the mechanical and tribological properties of plasma electrolytic oxidation and hard-anodized coatings on 6082 aluminum alloy
Mater. Sci. Eng.
(2011) - et al.
Microstructure and multi-scale mechanical behavior of hard anodized and plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) coatings on aluminum alloy 5052
Surf. Coating. Technol.
(2012) - et al.
Plasma electrolytic oxidation treatment of aluminium and titanium alloys
- et al.
A study of the interactive effects of hybrid current modes on the tribological properties of a PEO (plasma electrolytic oxidation) coated AM60B Mg-alloy
Surf. Coating. Technol.
(2013) - et al.
Role of cathodic current in plasma electrolytic oxidation of Al: a quantitative approach to in-situ evaluation of cathodically induced effects
Electrochim. Acta
(2019) - et al.
A duplex treatment to improve the sliding behavior of AISI 316L: low-temperature carburizing with a DLC (a-C: H) topcoat
Wear
(2013) - et al.
Thermo-physical properties of plasma electrolytic oxide coatings on aluminium
Surf. Coating. Technol.
(2005) Development of a theory for the determination of the composition of the anodizing solution inside the pores during the growth of porous anodic Al2O3 films on aluminium by a transport phenomenon analysis
J. Electroanal. Chem.
(1998)
Mechanisms underlying the formation of thick alumina coatings through the MAO coating technology
Surf. Coating. Technol.
Characterization and wear behaviour of PEO coatings on 6082-T6 aluminium alloy with incorporated α-Al2O3 particles
Surf. Coating. Technol.
Control of the γ-alumina to α -alumina phase transformation for an optimized alumina densification
Bol. Soc. Espanola Ceram. Vidr.
Thickness effects on the mechanical properties of micro-arc discharge oxide coatings on aluminium alloys
Surf. Coating. Technol.
Characterization and evolution of the coefficient of friction during pin on disc tribotest: comparison between C10200Cu, AA6082-T6 Al and C36000 brass pins under varying normal loads
Tribol. Int.
Influence of surface texture and roughness parameters on friction and transfer layer formation during sliding of aluminium pin on steel plate
Wear
Friction and wear behavior of surface nanocrystallized aluminium alloy under dry sliding condition
Mater. Sci. Eng. B
Cited by (13)
Investigation on the effect and growth mechanism of two-stage MAO coating
2023, Tribology InternationalEffect of SiC and borosilicate glass particles on the corrosion and tribological behavior of AZ91D magnesium alloy after PEO process
2021, Surface and Coatings TechnologyCitation Excerpt :The corrosion and wear resistance of the PEO-treated samples is strongly influenced by several process parameters such as: current density, voltage, treatment time and electrolyte composition [8]. The PEO-treated surfaces are generally characterized by improved corrosion and wear resistance [11] or possess particular functional properties such as antifouling [12] or fungicidal [13] properties. One of the characteristics of PEO coatings is the possibility to incorporate compounds and particles from the electrolyte, thanks to the mechanism of coating growth and, in detail, to the formation of micro-discharges on the surface during the treatment [9].
Toward rational design of ceramic coatings generated on valve metals by plasma electrolytic oxidation: The role of cathodic polarisation
2021, Ceramics InternationalCitation Excerpt :Therefore, the well-known soft sparking PEO process (iii’) operating in alkaline solutions and anodic voltage reduced due to application of pulsed bipolar polarisation – can be considered as the first step towards a ‘non-sparking’ process. Furthermore, Sola et al. [99] have recently compared anodising, PEO and its variant termed ‘electrochemical oxidation’ employing a specially designed electrical regime with potentiostatic positive and galvanostatic negative pulse control to suppress discharging activity [100]. However, such ultra-soft regimes still require relatively high potentials (>400V) to operate and show similar energy consumption to the conventional PEO processes.
Wear resistance of hard anodic coatings fabricated on 5005 and 6061 aluminum alloys
2024, Archives of Civil and Mechanical EngineeringEffect of pulse current on surface properties of aluminum oxide coating containing graphite
2023, Surface and Interface AnalysisWear Resistance of Aluminum Alloy A356 After Thorough Anodic Oxidation
2023, Metal Science and Heat Treatment