Skip to main content
Log in

Surgeons’ experience of venous risk with CPA surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study aims to systematize neurosurgeons’ practical knowledge of venous sacrifice as applied to the posterior fossa region and to analyze the collected data to present and preserve relevant experience and expert knowledge for current and future practicing neurosurgeons. The venous structures assessed were the superior petrosal vein (SPV), sigmoid sinus (SS), and the tentorial veins (TV). The survey is constructed to obtain surgeons’ idea of assessed risk when sacrificing specific venous structures during posterior fossa surgery. They were asked how they prep for surgery, number of operations conducted, and their basis of knowledge. Collected data were mainly qualitative and analyzed with a mixed-method approach. A mean absolute deviation was calculated measuring rate of disagreement for a given substructure. Consensus existed among the participating surgeons that sacrificing the SPV and the TV was considered safe. Although, the risk of death when occluding major structures like the main trunk of the SPV, one of the SS’ and or a total occlusion of all TV yielded high risk of death. The risk of infarction was often too apparent to discredit even with low risk of death among an experienced class of surgeons. Our findings provide an overview of surgical risk associated with venous sacrifice. This will minimize cases where indispensable practical knowledge on safe handling veins in the cerebellopontine angle is either to be lost or taught among few when the neurosurgeons retire. This will lower the disagreement regarding risks and increase the quality of surgical decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

See Appendix.

References

  1. Adachi K, Hayakawa M, Ishihara K, Ganaha T, Nagahisa S, Hasegawa M, Hirose Y (2016) Study of changing intracranial venous drainage patterns in petroclival meningioma. World Neurosurg 92:339–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anichini G, Iqbal M, Rafiq NM, Ironside JW, Kamel M (2016) Sacrificing the superior petrosal vein during microvascular decompression. Is it safe? Learning the hard way. Case report and review of literature. Surg Neurol Int 7:S415–S420. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.183520

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng L (2016) Complications after obliteration of the superior petrosal vein: are they rare or just underreported? J Clin Neurosci 31:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.11.033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dumot C, Sindou M (2018) Veins of the cerebellopontine angle and specific complications of sacrifice, with special emphasis on microvascular decompression surgery. A review. World Neurosurg 117:422–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hernesniemi J, Romani R, Albayrak BS, Lehto H, Dashti R, Ramsey C 3rd, Karatas A, Cardia A, Navratil O, Piippo A, Fujiki M, Toninelli S, Niemela M (2008) Microsurgical management of pineal region lesions: personal experience with 119 patients. Surg Neurol 70:576–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2008.07.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hollon TC, Savastano LE, Argersinger DP, Quint DJ, Thompson BG (2018) Microvascular brainstem ischemia after vestibular schwannoma surgery: a clinical and microanatomic study. World Neurosurg 112:e415–e424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ivy AC (1948) The history and ethics of the use of human subjects in medical experiments. Science 108:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jakola AS, Bartek J Jr, Mathiesen T (2013) Venous complications in supracerebellar infratentorial approach. Acta Neurochir 155:477–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1614-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jannetta PJ (2007) Arterial compression of the trigeminal nerve at the pons in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. 1967. J Neurosurg 107:216–219. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns-07/07/0216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koerbel A, Gharabaghi A, Safavi-Abbasi S, Samii A, Ebner FH, Samii M, Tatagiba M (2009) Venous complications following petrosal vein sectioning in surgery of petrous apex meningiomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:773–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2008.02.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Krogager ME, Jakola AS, Poulsgaard L, Couldwell W, Mathiesen T (2019) Safe handling of veins in the pineal region-a mixed method study. Neurosurg Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01189-y

  12. Liebelt BD, Barber SM, Desai VR, Harper R, Zhang J, Parrish R, Baskin DS, Trask T, Britz GW (2017) Superior petrosal vein sacrifice during microvascular decompression: perioperative complication rates and comparison with venous preservation. World Neurosurg 104:788–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Masuoka J, Matsushima T, Hikita T, Inoue E (2009) Cerebellar swelling after sacrifice of the superior petrosal vein during microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. J Clin Neurosci 16:1342–1344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2008.12.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mathiesen T (2013) To operate or not--the impact of a lecture on radical glioblastoma surgery and different treatment options on decision-making for oneself and patients. Acta Neurochir 155:1425–1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1796-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsushima T, Rhoton AL Jr, de Oliveira E, Peace D (1983) Microsurgical anatomy of the veins of the posterior fossa. J Neurosurg 59:63–105. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1983.59.1.0063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsushima K, Matsushima T, Kuga Y, Kodama Y, Inoue K, Ohnishi H, Rhoton AL Jr (2014) Classification of the superior petrosal veins and sinus based on drainage pattern. Neurosurgery 10(Suppl 2):357–367; discussion 367. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000000323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsushima T, Kawashima M, Inoue K, Matsushima K (2014) Anatomy of the superior petrosal veins and their exposure and management during petrous apex meningioma surgery using the lateral suboccipital retrosigmoid approach. Neurosurg Rev 37:535–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-014-0548-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McLaughlin MR, Jannetta PJ, Clyde BL, Subach BR, Comey CH, Resnick DK (1999) Microvascular decompression of cranial nerves: lessons learned after 4400 operations. J Neurosurg 90:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1999.90.1.0001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Milano G (2016) The hierarchy of the evidence-based medicine pyramid: classification beyond ranking. Joints 3:101. https://doi.org/10.11138/jts/2015.3.3.101

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F (2016) New evidence pyramid. Evid Based Med 21:125–127. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Narayan V, Savardekar AR, Patra DP, Mohammed N, Thakur JD, Riaz M, Nanda A (2018) Safety profile of superior petrosal vein (the vein of Dandy) sacrifice in neurosurgical procedures: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 45:E3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.4.Focus18133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Horwitz S, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt M, Landsverk J (2011) Mixed method designs in implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health 38:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel NJ, Bervini D, Eftekhar B, Davidson AS, Walsh DC, Assaad NN, Morgan MK (2019) Results of surgery for low-grade brain arteriovenous malformation resection by early career neurosurgeons: an observational study. Neurosurgery 84:655–661. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pathmanaban ON, O'Brien F, Al-Tamimi YZ, Hammerbeck-Ward CL, Rutherford SA, King AT (2017) Safety of superior petrosal vein sacrifice during microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve. World Neurosurg 103:84–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rawlins M (2008) De Testimonio: on the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions. Clin Med (Lond) 8:579–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rawlins MD (2014) Evidence, values, and decision making. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 30:233–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462314000154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sackett DL (1997) Evidence-based medicine. Semin Perinatol 21:3–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-0005(97)80013-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Seo Y, Kim DG (2018) Contralateral trigeminal neuralgia in a rapidly growing vestibular schwannoma: a case report. J Clin Neurosci 47:132–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.10.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Staudt MD, Hebb MO (2018) Staged multi-modality treatment approaches for giant cerebellopontine angle hemangioblastomas. J Clin Neurosci 53:224–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.04.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Suzuki Y, Endo T, Ikeda H, Ikeda Y, Matsumoto K (2003) Venous infarction resulting from sacrifice of a bridging vein during clipping of a cerebral aneurysm: preoperative evaluation using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography--case report. Neurol Med Chir 43:550–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tahara A, de Santana PA Jr, Calfat Maldaun MV, Panagopoulos AT, da Silva AN, Zicarelli CA, Pires de Aguiar PH (2009) Petroclival meningiomas: surgical management and common complications. J Clin Neurosci 16:655–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2008.08.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor CL, Dutton K, Rappard G, Pride GL, Replogle R, Purdy PD, White J, Giller C, Kopitnik TA Jr, Samson DS (2004) Complications of preoperative embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 100:810–812. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.100.5.0810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tekkok IH, Suzer T, Erbengi A (1992) Non-acoustic tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. Neurosurg Rev 15:117–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ueyama T, Al-Mefty O, Tamaki N (1998) Bridging veins on the tentorial surface of the cerebellum: a microsurgical anatomic study and operative considerations. Neurosurgery 43:1137–1145. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199811000-00068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Watanabe T, Igarashi T, Fukushima T, Yoshino A, Katayama Y (2013) Anatomical variation of superior petrosal vein and its management during surgery for cerebellopontine angle meningiomas. Acta Neurochir 155:1871–1878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1840-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Weindling P (1996) Human guinea pigs and the ethics of experimentation: the BMJ’s correspondent at the Nuremberg medical trial. BMJ 313:1467–1470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang A, Folzenlogen Z, Youssef AS (2018) Minimally invasive endoscopic-assisted approaches to the posterior fossa. J Neurosurg Sci 62:658–666. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0390-5616.18.04474-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zanoletti E, Cazzador D, Faccioli C, Martini A, Mazzoni A (2014) Closure of the sigmoid sinus in lateral skull base surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 34:184–188

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank the following neurosurgeons, who contributed with their surgical knowledge and experience to the survey that formed the basis of this paper:

  • Tiit Mathiesen, MD, Chief Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet

  • Jannick Brennum, MD, Chairman of the Neurocenter, Rigshospitalet

  • Jacob Bertram Springborg, MD, Associate professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet

  • Vagn Eksesen, MD, Associate professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet

  • Kåre Fugleholm, MD, Dr. Med, PhD, Clinical associate professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet

  • Lars Bøgeskov, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet

  • Domenico D’Avella, MD, PhD, Professor, Director, Department of Neurosciences University of Padova Medical School

  • Thomas Santarius, MD PhD, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust (Addenbrooke’s)

  • Marc Sindou, MD and Dumot Chloé MSc, University of Lyon

  • Evandro de Oliveira, MD PhD, Adjunct Professor of Neurological Surgery at the Mayo Clinic

  • Ulrich Sure, MD, Professor at University Hospital of Essen.

  • M. Necmettin Pamir, MD, Professor, President at Acibadem University

  • Andreas Raabe MD, Professor, Chairman of Neurosurgery at Bern University Hospital

  • Henry W. S. Schroeder, MD PhD, Dept. of Neurosurgery at the University Medicine Greifswald

  • Fady T. Charbel MD, Professor and Chief at University of Illinois Hospital

  • Marcos Soares Tatagiba, MD, Professor and Chief at University of Tübingen

  • Veit Rohde, MD, Professor and Chief at University Medical Center Göttingen

  • Jafri Malin Abdullah, MD, Professor and Chief at University of Sciences Malaysia, Dept. of NS

  • Basant Misra, MD, Professor and Head of Dept. of NS. at Hinduja National Hospital

  • William Couldwell, MD PhD, Professor and Chair of Dept. of NS. at University of Utah

  • Ioan Stefan Florian, MD PhD, Professor of Dept. of NS. at University of Cluj-Napoca

  • Peter Nakaji, MD, Dept. of Neurosurgery at Barrow Neurological Institute

  • Vladimir Benes, MD PhD, Professor and Chairman of Dept. of NS. at University Hospital Prague

  • Nejat Akalan, MD PhD, Professor of Dept. of Neurosurgery at Hacettepe University

  • Kazuhiro Hongo, MD, Professor of Department of Neurosurgery at Shinshu University

  • Helmut Bertalanffy, MD, Professor and Dir. for Neurosurgery, Int. Neurosc. Insitute Hannover

  • Takanori Fukushima, MD, Professor of Neurosurgery at Duke University

  • Juha Hernesemi, MD PhD, Professor emeritus in Neurosurgery at University of Helsinki

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the design of the study; Alaoui-Ismaili A and Mathiesen T undertook the literature review; Krogager ME collected and registered the data; Alaoui-Ismaili A and Mathiesen T drafted the paper; all authors contributed to the interpretation of data and revision of the paper; all have approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Alaoui-Ismaili.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable

Informed consent

No patients are directly involved. All questioned surgeons consented.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Disclaimer

This is an expert opinion-based article. We strongly advice surgeons conducting CPA surgery to study venous circulation, keeping in mind the changing nature of these structures.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 6.96 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alaoui-Ismaili, A., Krogager, M.E., Jakola, A.S. et al. Surgeons’ experience of venous risk with CPA surgery. Neurosurg Rev 44, 1675–1685 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01365-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01365-5

Keywords

Navigation