Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of ambient temperature on regulated gaseous and particulate emissions from gasoline-, E10- and M15-fueled vehicles

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ambient temperature has substantial impacts on vehicle emissions, but the impacts may differ between traditional and alcohol gasolines. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of temperature on gaseous and particulate emissions with both traditional and alcohol gasoline. Regulated gaseous, particle mass (PM), particle number (PN) and black carbon (BC) emissions from typical passenger vehicles were separately quantified with gasoline, E10 (10% ethanol and 90% gasoline by volume) and M15 (15% methanol and 85% gasoline by volume) at both 30°C and −7°C. The particulate emissions with all fuels increased significantly with decreased temperature. The PM emissions with E10 were only 48.0%–50.7% of those with gasoline at 30°C but increased to 59.2%–79.4% at −7°C. The PM emissions with M15 were comparable to those with gasoline at 30°C, but at −7°C, the average PM emissions were higher than those with gasoline. The variation trend of PN emissions was similar to that of PM emissions with changes in the fuel and temperature. At 30°C, the BC emissions were lower with E10 and M15 than with gasoline in most cases, but E10 and M15 might emit more BC than gasoline at −7°C, especially M15. The results of the transient PN and BC emission rates show that particulate emissions were dominated mainly by those emitted during the cold-start moment. Overall, the particulate emissions with E10 and M15 were more easily affected by ambient temperature, and the advantages of E10 and M15 in controlling particulate emissions declined as the ambient temperature decreased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikawa K, Sakurai T, Jetter J J (2010). Development of a predictive model for gasoline vehicle particulate matter emissions. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 3(2): 610–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balabin R M, Syunyaev R Z, Karpov S A (2007). Molar enthalpy of vaporization of ethanol-gasoline mixtures and their colloid state. Fuel, 86(3): 323–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bielaczyc P, Szczotka A, Woodburn J (2014). The impact of fuel ethanol content on particulate emissions from light-duty vehicles featuring spark ignition engines. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 7(1): 224–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan T W, Meloche E, Kubsh J, Brezny R, Rosenblatt D, Rideout G (2013). Impact of ambient temperature on gaseous and particle emissions from a direct injection gasoline vehicle and its implications on particle filtration. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 6(2): 350–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Stone R (2011). Measurement of enthalpies of vaporization of isooctane and ethanol blends and their effects on PM emissions from a GDI engine. Energy & Fuels, 25(3): 1254–1259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Stone R, Richardson D (2012). A study of mixture preparation and PM emissions using a direct injection engine fuelled with stoichiometric gasoline/ethanol blends. Fuel, 96: 120–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Zhou Y, Zhao X (2020). PM2.5 over north China based on MODIS AOD and effect of meteorological elements during 2003–2015. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(2): 23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi K, Kim J, Ko A, Myung C L, Park S, Lee J (2013). Size-resolved engine exhaust aerosol characteristics in a metal foam particulate filter for GDI light-duty vehicle. Journal of Aerosol Science, 57: 1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choi K, Kim J, Myung C L, Lee M, Kwon S, Lee Y, Park S (2012). Effect of the mixture preparation on the nanoparticle characteristics of gasoline direct-injection vehicles. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 226(11): 1514–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui H, Chen W, Dai W, Liu H, Wang X, He K (2015). Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Guangzhou combining observation data analysis and chemical transport model simulation. Atmospheric Environment, 116: 262–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dardiotis C, Fontaras G, Marotta A, Martini G, Manfredi U (2015). Emissions of modern light duty ethanol flex-fuel vehicles over different operating and environmental conditions. Fuel, 140: 531–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dardiotis C, Martini G, Marotta A, Manfredi U (2013). Low-temperature cold-start gaseous emissions of late technology passenger cars. Applied Energy, 111: 468–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doğan B, Erol D, Yaman H, Kodanli E (2017). The effect of ethanolgasoline blends on performance and exhaust emissions of a spark ignition engine through exergy analysis. Applied Thermal Engineering, 120: 433–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furey R L, Perry K L (1991). Composition and Reactivity of Fuel Vapor Emissions from Gasoline-Oxygenate Blends. SAE Technical Paper No. 912429

  • Gong C M, Li J, Li J K, Li W X, Gao Q, Liu X J (2011). Effects of ambient temperature on firing behavior and unregulated emissions of spark-ignition methanol and liquefied petroleum gas/methanol engines during cold start. Fuel, 90(1): 19–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A, Mishra P (2019). Optimization of emission characteristics of spark ignition engine with chambered straight muffler running in methanol blend: An engine development technique for environmental sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238: 117778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He L, Hu J, Zhang S, Wu Y, Zhu R, Zu L, Bao X, Lai Y, Su S (2018). The impact from the direct injection and multi-port fuel injection technologies for gasoline vehicles on solid particle number and black carbon emissions. Applied Energy, 226: 819–826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karavalakis G, Durbin T D, Shrivastava M, Zheng Z, Villela M, Jung H (2012). Impacts of ethanol fuel level on emissions of regulated and unregulated pollutants from a fleet of gasoline light-duty vehicles. Fuel, 93: 549–558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karavalakis G, Short D, Vu D, Villela M, Asa-Awuku A, Durbin T D (2014). Evaluating the regulated emissions, air toxics, ultrafine particles, and black carbon from SI-PFI and SI-DI vehicles operating on different ethanol and iso-butanol blends. Fuel, 128: 410–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Ge Y, Wang M, Peng Z, Song Y, Zhang L, Yuan W (2015). Exhaust and evaporative emissions from motorcycles fueled with ethanol gasoline blends. Science of the Total Environment, 502: 627–631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang B, Ge Y, Tan J, Han X, Gao L, Hao L, Ye W, Dai P (2013). Comparison of PM emissions from a gasoline direct injected (GDI) vehicle and a port fuel injected (PFI) vehicle measured by electrical low pressure impactor (ELPI) with two fuels: Gasoline and M15 methanol gasoline. Journal of Aerosol Science, 57: 22–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maricq M M, Szente J J, Jahr K (2012). The impact of ethanol fuel blends on PM emissions from a light-duty GDI vehicle. Aerosol Science and Technology, 46(5): 576–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martini G, Paffumi E, De Gennaro M, Mellios G (2014). European type-approval test procedure for evaporative emissions from passenger cars against real-world mobility data from two Italian provinces. Science of the Total Environment, 487: 506–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghinezhad E, Kazi S N, Badarudin A, Togun H, Zubir M N M, Oon C S, Gharehkhani S (2014). Sustainability and environmental impact of ethanol as a biofuel. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 30(1): 51–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahad H A K, Wabdan S K (2015). Effect of operating conditions on pollutants concentration emitted from a spark ignition engine fueled with gasoline bioethanol blends. Journal of Renewable Energy, 2015: 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey J M E, Barone T L, Norman K M, Lewis S A (2010). Ethanol blend effects on direct injection spark-ignition gasoline vehicle particulate matter emissions. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 3(2): 650–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez-Bertoa R, Zardini A A, Keuken H, Astorga C (2015). Impact of ethanol containing gasoline blends on emissions from a flex-fuel vehicle tested over the Worldwide Harmonized Light Duty Test Cycle (WLTC). Fuel, 143: 173–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Überall A, Otte R, Eilts P, Krahl J (2015). A literature research about particle emissions from engines with direct gasoline injection and the potential to reduce these emissions. Fuel, 147: 203–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh M P (2014). PM2.5: Global progress in controlling the motor vehicle contribution. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 8(1): 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Ge Y, Liu L, Peng Z, Hao L, Yin H, Ding Y, Wang J (2015). Evaluation on toxic reduction and fuel economy of a gasoline direct injection-(GDI-) powered passenger car fueled with methanol-gasoline blends with various substitution ratios. Applied Energy, 157: 134–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Zhang S, Guo X, Yang Z, Liu J, He L, Zheng Z, Han L, Liu H, Wu Y (2019). Aseessment of ethanol blended fuels for gasoline vehicles in China: Fuell economy, regulated gaseous pollutants and particulated matter. Environmental Pollution, 253: 731–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yinhui W, Rong Z, Yanhong Q, Jianfei P, Mengren L, Jianrong L, Yusheng W, Min H, Shijin S (2016). The impact of fuel compositions on the particulate emissions of direct injection gasoline engine. Fuel, 166: 543–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng X, Lu S, Yang L, Yan M, Xu G, Wu X, Fu L, Wu Y (2020). Realworld fuel consumption of light-duty passenger vehicles using onboard diagnostic (OBD) systems. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(2): 33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu R, Hu J, Bao X, He L, Lai Y, Zu L, Li Y, Su S (2016). Tailpipe emissions from gasoline direct injection (GDI) and port fuel injection (PFI) vehicles at both low and high ambient temperatures. Environmental Pollution, 216: 223–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu R, Hu J, Bao X, He L, Lai Y, Zu L, Li Y, Su S (2017a). Investigation of tailpipe and evaporative emissions from China IV and Tier 2 passenger vehicles with different gasolines. Transportation Research Part D, Transport and Environment, 50: 305–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu R, Hu J, Bao X, He L, Zu L (2017b). Effects of aromatics, olefins and distillation temperatures (T50 & T90) on particle mass and number emissions from gasoline direct injection (GDI) vehicles. Energy Policy, 101: 185–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21577135 and 51808507), the National Environmental Production Research Projects for Public Welfare of China (Grant No. 201409013), and the National Engineering Laboratory for Mobile Source Emission Control Technology (Grant No. NELMS2018A16). The authors would like to acknowledge Mr. Jiajun Xu, Mr. Jianyi Ji and Mr. Yingnan Liu for their contributions in conducting the emissions tests for this study. The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the sponsors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Ecology and Environment, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China

    Rencheng Zhu

  2. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China

    Jingnan Hu, Liqiang He, Lei Zu & Xiaofeng Bao

  3. National Joint Research Center for Tracking Key Problems in Air Pollution Control, Beijing, 100012, China

    Jingnan Hu

  4. Xiamen Environment Protection Vehicle Emission Control Technology Center, Xiamen, 361023, China

    Yitu Lai & Sheng Su

Authors
  1. Rencheng Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingnan Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liqiang He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lei Zu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaofeng Bao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yitu Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sheng Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingnan Hu.

Additional information

Highlights

• Emissions from two sedans were tested with gasoline, E10 and M15 at 30°C and −7°C.

• As the temperature decreased, the PM, PN and BC emissions increased with all fuels.

• Particulate emissions with E10 and M15 were more sensitive to the temperature.

• The PN and BC generated during cold start-up dominated those over the WLTC.

Supplementary Materials

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, R., Hu, J., He, L. et al. Effects of ambient temperature on regulated gaseous and particulate emissions from gasoline-, E10- and M15-fueled vehicles. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 15, 14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1306-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1306-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation