Pad-printed Prussian blue doped carbon ink for real-time peroxide sensing in cell culture

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114537Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Prussian blue mediated printed carbon electrodes allows in-situ determination of peroxide.

  • Pad-printed Prussian blue electrodes demonstrate capacity to monitor both the exogenous production of peroxide and elimination via Fenton-like processes.

  • Capable of linearly detecting peroxide found below, across and above cellular concentrations of peroxide.

  • Constructed electrodes proven capable of reliably determining peroxide in complex cell culture media

Abstract

Hydrogen peroxide has important roles within cellular functions, as a prevalent form of Reactive Oxygen Species, detection within mammalian cells is of metabolic importance; typically requiring cell lysis or fluorescence-based methods to quantify.

Herein, we explore the novel use of Prussian blue mediated, pad printed carbon electrodes to allow the indirect detection of cellular peroxides in bulk culture media, which facilitates non-invasive, real-time detection.

Electrodes demonstrated capacity to detect H2O2 with a linear range of 1-200 μM in CMEM (R2 = 0.9988), enabling detection of peroxides found in culture media and lysate. Developed electrodes had a Limit of Detection (LOD) of 0.41 μM H2O2 in Britton-Robinson Buffer (BRB), 0.38 μM in Eagle's Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) and 9.19 μM in Dulbecco's Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM). Electrodes were tested in a conventional 5% serum supplemented EMEM (CMEM) and demonstrated an LOD of 0.5 μM and LOQ of 0.9 μM.

The results demonstrate proof of concept for monitoring H2O2 in complex culture media with potential long-term use and reusability using simple, pad printed Prussian Blue / Carbon electrodes. The lack of further modification, and cost-effectiveness of these disposable electrodes could offer great advancement to monitoring of peroxides in complex media.

Introduction

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) has well-established roles in cell signalling [1] and cell death [2]; its presence can be an indicator of intracellular and extracellular responses to potentially damaging stimuli, such as direct or indirect reactive oxygen species (ROS) inducing agents [3]. In biological systems, H2O2 is utilised and generated through several biochemical reactions, such as those catalysed by oxidase enzymes and superoxide dismutases, and as such are a vital component of cell metabolism [1]. Whilst H2O2 is necessary for cellular function, fluctuations in concentration can induce cell dysfunction, upregulate the antioxidant response of the cell and/or cause cell death/ mutation [4].

As such, the ability to detect H2O2 continuously in real-time within cell culture media holds significance for academic, industrial, and pharmacological application/ purposes [5]. Electrochemical methods using non-modified metal electrodes for the measurement of H2O2 are limited by the high over-potential required for oxidation (~0.7 V versus Ag/AgCl), and several biologically relevant electroactive substances, such as glucose, ascorbic acid, uric acid, tryptophan and tyrosine are typically oxidised at similar potentials.

Whilst the measurement of H2O2 itself is well established as a fundamental unpinning of many biosensors either as analytical target or product of an immobilised enzyme, they still require mediating compounds to effectively shuttle electrons. A challenge to using enzyme-based biosensors arises due to potential issues with stability, complexity and cost. Therefore, the use of non-enzymatic methods for electrochemical detection of hydrogen peroxide is particularly advantageous and has been previously facilitated through a range of electrode modifiers, such as: metal hexacyanoferrates (e.g. iron, copper, nickel, cobalt, chromium, vanadium, manganese and ruthenium [6,7]), carbon nanotubes and graphene [[8], [9], [10], [11], [12]], and various nanoparticles (e.g. AgO, ZnO,Fe3O4 and CuO [[13], [14], [15], [16]]).

Prussian Blue (PB) and its analogues have commonly been exploited to allow peroxide sensing through deposition onto various carbon electrode surfaces via electropolymerisation in a highly concentrated acidic solution (such as H2SO4 or HCl) or drop casting [17]. Reduced PB is capable of reducing H2O2 to various forms, literature cites either hydroxyl ions, water or a combination. This process oxidises PB, which is then in turn reduced by the electrode, mechanism shown in Fig. 1.

Though PB can be polymerised or solvent cast onto the electrode surface easily, desorption occurs rapidly and therefore requires binding agents/ co-polymers to assist with electrode adhesion [18]. Hence, the semi-conductive polymer poly(O-phenylenediamine)(PoPD) has been widely used as a supporting polymer [19], as has Nafion [20], and pyrrole [21].

However, due to the increase in popularity of printed electrodes, ink/paste formulations with incorporated mediators have previously been developed with results comparable to modified electrodes [22]. Prussian blue has widespread use in H2O2 sensing with a redox window between −0.2 to 0.4 V, with several studies utilising ~0.0 V for amperometric measurements [20,23,24].

H2O2 detection via PB has been utilised in combination with additional modifiers in an attempt to enhance sensitivity and selectivity towards H2O2, including pyrrole [25], Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) [26], Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) [27], nanoparticles [28], and various polymers [18]. Commonly, modifiers are utilised to form polymers or as a supporting matrix for PB, deposited onto the electrode surface through electropolymerisation or solvent evaporation.

Table 1 outlines a selection of carbon electrodes modified with PB for H2O2 detection. Linear ranges vary between electrodes, with most demonstrating a limit of detection (LOD) of ~0.1–1.0 μM and a limit of quantification (LOQ) of ~0.5–2 μM. This sensitivity illustrates the potential for this sensing approach to be developed towards the detection of low concentrations of H2O2 released from cells into the surrounding medium – either through cell lysates or bulk culture media analysis (i.e. without sampling or preparation).

Bulk analysis of culture media would allow for the non-invasive detection of specific markers associated to changes in cellular behaviour/ metabolism. Hence, a system with the sensitivity to detect these small changes in-situ would be advantages in long term monitoring of cell metabolism. The bulk solution, in this context, relates to the whole aqueous environment that both supplies the cells with essential nutrition, environmental protection (from dehydration and heating), and allows for the exocytosis of waste materials, which can be compared to similar biological behaviours found In-vivo. The bulk medium cells are grown in is a complex mixture of salts, amino acids, proteins, sugars and a few additional components that assist with pH balance (NaHCO3) and as an indicator (phenol red). Two of the most common media used for this application are Eagle's minimum essential medium (EMEM) and Dulbecco's minimal essential medium (DMEM), the latter of which is an adaption to original EMEM recipe by increasing glucose concentration and amino acids, which presents issues for detection via electrochemical means. As such, the implementation of an electrode capable of accurately and reliably detecting and quantifying the concentration of H2O2 offers great advantage over conventional methods, such as chromatography or assays.

The research presented herein documents the characterisation of pad-printed commercially-available Prussian Blue doped Carbon ink to simply fabricate disposable electrodes, and their potential use for H2O2 quantification and monitoring was assessed. This emerging technology may be useful to help understand and study the role of H2O2 in cell culture and offer novel means to monitor stress induction/ fluctuation in bulk media in real-time.

Section snippets

Reagents and solutions

All chemicals used were of analytical/ cell culture grade and were used as received without any further purification (unless stated), and were acquired from Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MO, USA), Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), Biowest (Rue de la Caille, Nuaillé, FR) and Lonza (Muenchensteinerstrasse, Basel, CH). All solutions were prepared with ultrapure water with resistivity of 18.2MΩ cm. Stock buffer solutions were prepared at x10 concentration and made to a working buffer concentration on

Molecular assay of media peroxides

Cell lysates and culture media was assessed to determine typical concentrations of aqueous and lipid peroxides found at the end of a 48 h growth period (typical interval between media exchange [48]). As shown in Fig. 4, cell lysate and culture media demonstrated similar concentrations of aqueous and lipid peroxides; the overall agreement between the two sampling methods suggests that culture media analysis can act as a good proxy for the more time consuming cell lysate analysis and provides the

Conclusion

The research presented here outlines the simple fabrication and characterisation of a pad-printed Prussian blue carbon electrode which, without further modification, has proven capable of reliably quantifying hydrogen peroxide in buffered solutions and cell culture media.

Electrodes demonstrated a LOD of 0.41 μM in BRB, 0.38 μM in EMEM and 9.19 μM DMEM for hydrogen peroxide sensing, and LOQ of 1.55 μM, 1.31 μM and 12.09 μM in BRB, EMEM and DMEM, respectively. Electrodes were tested in a

Credit author statement

Craig McBeth, Andrew Paterson, and Duncan Sharp were responsible for the conceptualisation of the work undertaken.

Craig McBeth, Andrew Paterson, and Duncan Sharp were responsible for the methodology of the work undertaken. Andrew Paterson is an expert of cell culture who supported Craig McBeth in the method design and implementation of cell-based investigation. Duncan Sharp is an expert in electrochemistry and carbon electrode fabrication who supported Craig Mcbeth in design and fabrication of

Declaration of Competing Interest

We have no conflicts of interest with other groups and are happy for any referees to review the paper. None of the work in the paper has been published and it is not being considered for publication elsewhere. I can be contacted by email ([email protected]).

References (66)

  • E.A. Veal et al.

    Mol. Cell

    (2007)
  • V. Pifferi et al.

    Electrochim

    Acta

    (2014)
  • C. Boero et al.

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2014)
  • C. Karuppiah et al.

    Sensors Actuators B Chem.

    (2014)
  • C. Batchelor-McAuley et al.

    Sensors Actuators B Chem.

    (2008)
  • M. Asif et al.

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2017)
  • A.V. Mokrushina et al.

    Electrochem. commun.

    (2013)
  • J. Ping et al.

    Food Chem.

    (2011)
  • B. Haghighi et al.

    Sensors Actuators B Chem.

    (2010)
  • J. Zhao et al.

    Sensors Actuators B Chem.

    (2017)
  • M.P. O’Halloran et al.

    Talanta

    (2001)
  • A.M. Farah et al.

    Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.

    (2012)
  • P.C. Pandey et al.

    Electrochim

    Acta

    (2013)
  • A. Malinauskas et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng

    C

    (2004)
  • B. Haghighi et al.

    Talanta

    (2004)
  • T.S.T. Balamurugan et al.

    Sensors Actuators, B Chem.

    (2018)
  • P. Salazar et al.

    Electrochim

    Acta

    (2010)
  • F. Ricci et al.

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2003)
  • S. Husmann et al.

    Sensors Actuators B Chem.

    (2014)
  • D. Banerjee et al.

    Clin. Chim

    Acta

    (2003)
  • J. Nourooz-Zadeh

    Methods in enzymology

    (1999)
  • C. McBeth et al.

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2018)
  • D. Sharp

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2013)
  • M.S. Al Okail et al.

    Soc.

    (2010)
  • D.E.B. Swinson et al.

    Clin

    Lung Cancer

    (2006)
  • M. Valko et al.

    Chem. Biol. Interact.

    (2006)
  • A. Sanjuán-Pla et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (2005)
  • D.R. Gough et al.

    Cell Death Dis.

    (2011)
  • M. Giorgio et al.

    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol

    (2007)
  • G. Waris et al.

    J. Carcinog.

    (2006)
  • C. Calas-Blanchard et al.

    Electroanalysis

    (2014)
  • R. Pauliukaite et al.

    Electroanalysis

    (2008)
  • B. Çeken et al.

    Phthalocyanines

    (2012)
  • View full text