Skip to main content
Log in

Extraction of UAV Sound from a Mixture of Different Sounds

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acoustics Australia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of technology of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), security and safety of military and civil infrastructure have been jeopardized. By exploiting the unreliable capabilities of radar to detect low-flying UAVs with small radar cross section, they can be utilized for malicious purposes, e.g., unauthorized surveillance. To detect UAVs, therefore, various other techniques including audio sniffing/analysis of environment have been investigated. It has been shown recently that a UAV can be differentiated from other sound generating objects based on the various features extracted from the sound captured by a single or multiple acoustic sensors. However, features extraction and classification process can only give reliable results if it is fed with a sound generated by a single source. In practice, the captured sound may be a mixture of contribution of two or more different sources. In this paper, we investigate a well-known blind source separation technique, known as projection pursuit, to separate the constituent sounds in a mixture. We have considered a scenario when the different mixed unvoiced sounds are independent and non-Gaussian. The results show that in the given scenario, projection pursuit can be applied successfully to separate UAV sounds from various other unvoiced sounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BBC: Drone in near miss with plane at Edinburgh Airport. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-40019778 (2017)

  2. McKirdy, E., Wang, S.: Drone’s operator detained for flying near Chinese airplane. https://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/17/asia/china-drone-passenger-plane-near-miss/ (2017)

  3. France-Presse, A.: More drones spotted over French nuclear power stations. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/oct/31/ more-drones-spotted-over-french-nuclear-power-stations (2014)

  4. Rozantsev, A., Sinha, S.N., Dey, D., Fua, P.: Flight dynamics-based recovery of a UAV trajectory using ground cameras. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2017)

  5. Anwar, M.Z., Kaleem, Z., Jamalipour, A.: Machine learning inspired sound-based amateur drone detection for public safety applications. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 68, 2526–2534 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeon, S., Shin, J.-W., Lee, Y.-J, Kim, W.-H., Kwon, Y., Yang, H.-Y.: Empirical study of drone sound detection in real-life environment with deep neural networks. In: Proceedings of European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Greece (2017)

  7. Kim, J., Park, C., Ahn, J., Ko, Y., Park, J., Gallagher, J.C.: Real-time UAV sound detection and analysis system. In: IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS) (2017)

  8. Matson, E., Yang, B., Smith, A., Dietz, E., Gallagher, J.: UAV detection system with multiple acoustic nodes using machine learning models (2019)

  9. Shi, L., Ahmad, I., He, Y.J., Chang, K.H.: Hidden Markov model based drone sound recognition using MFCC technique in practical noisy environments. J. Commun. Netw. 20, 509–518 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vilimek, J., Burita, L.: Ways for copter drone acoustic detection. In: International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT). IEEE (2017)

  11. Wang, L., Cavallaro, A.: Acoustic sensing from a multi-rotor drone. IEEE Sens. J. 18, 4570–4582 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen, P., Ravindranatha, M., Nguyen, A., Han, R., Vu, T.: Investigating cost-effective RF-based detection of drones. In: Proceedings of 2nd Workshop on Micro Aerial Vehicle Networks, Systems, and Applications for Civilian Use—DroNet, vol. 16 (2016)

  13. Dedrone: Dedrone. https://www.dedrone.com

  14. DroneFence: UAV Tracker—Dronefence. http://www.dronefence.de/#Features

  15. DroneShield: DroneShield: Drone Detection and Response. https://www.droneshield.com/view-all-products/

  16. Altaf, M., Uzair, M., Naeem, M., Ahmad, A., Badshah, S., Shah, J.A., Anjum, A.: Automatic and efficient fault detection in rotating machinery using sound signals. Acoust. Aust. 47, 125–139 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Phung, Q.V., Ahmad, I., Habibi, D., Hinckley, S.: Automated insect detection using acoustic features based on sound generated from insect activities. Acoust. Aust. 45, 445–451 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mezei, J., Fiaska, V., Molnar, A.: Drone sound detection. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI) (2015)

  19. Al-Emadi, S., Al-Ali, A., Mohammad, A., Al-Ali, A.: Audio based drone detection and identification using deep learning. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC). IEEE (2019)

  20. Wold, S., Esbensen, K., Geladi, P.: Principal component analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2, 37–52 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Comon, P.: Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal Process. 36, 287–314 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hrault, J., Jutten, C., Ans, B.: Adaptive neural architectures: detection of primitives. In: COGNITIVA’85 (1985)

  23. Tichavský, P., Koldovský, Z.: Fast and accurate methods of independent component analysis: a Survey. Kybernetika 47, 426–438 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Friedman, J.H., Tukey, J.W.: A projection pursuit algorithm for exploratory data analysis. IEEE Trans. Comput. 23, 881–890 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Friedman, J.H.: Exploratory projection pursuit. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82, 249–266 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Huber, P.J.: Projection pursuit. Ann. Stat. 13, 435–475 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Le, Q. V., Karpenko, A., Ngiam, J., Ng, A.Y.: ICA with reconstruction cost for efficient overcomplete feature learning. In: Proceedings of NIPS (2011)

  28. Morris, H.: DeGroot: Probability and Statistics, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stone, J.V.: Independent Component Analysis. MIT Press Ltd, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Moon, T.K., Stirling, W.C.: Mathematical Methods and Algorithms for Signal Processing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  31. FreeSounds: FreeSounds. https://freesound.org/people/gdx65/downloaded_sounds

  32. Hirth Engines: Hirth Engines. http://hirthengines.com/wp-content/uploads/4201-brochure-soft-copy.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Waseem Khan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghani, S.H., Khan, W. Extraction of UAV Sound from a Mixture of Different Sounds. Acoust Aust 48, 363–373 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-020-00197-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-020-00197-z

Keywords

Navigation