Abstract
Ependymomas occurring in the upper cervical spinal cord (above the level of the C4 segment) are rare entities with great therapeutic challenges. This study was aimed to investigate the clinicoradiological characteristics and the prognosis in a large cohort of upper cervical ependymomas from a single institution. This retrospective study enrolled 155 patients with primary ependymomas in the upper cervical spinal cord. The pre- and post-operative clinical and magnetic resonance imaging profiles were collected. The neurological outcomes and survival events were evaluated, and potential independent risk factors were analyzed. There were 82 females and 73 males, with an average age of 43.1 ± 11.3 years. Immediately post-operatively, 118 (76.1%) patients experienced neurological deterioration and 32 (20.7%) patients remained unchanged. Three months after surgery, 61 (39.4%) patients showed deteriorated neurological functions compared to the pre-operative baseline levels. After an average follow-up period of 56.0 ± 24.7 months, the neurological functions were worse than the baseline status in 37 (23.9%) patients and improved in 33 (21.3%) patients, respectively. Logistic regression analysis identified that lower age (≤ 42 years) and lower pre-operative MMS (I–II) were independent protective factors for predicting favorable neurological functions. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that incomplete resection was the only independent risk factor associated with a shorter progression-free survival. Age and pre-operative functional status affect the long-term neurological outcomes, and incomplete resection was associated with a shorter survival. Our findings indicate that gross total resection should be the goal of surgical treatment of upper cervical ependymomas.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alizada O, Kemerdere R, Ulu MO, Akgun MY, Isler C, Kizilkilic O, Hanci MM (2020) Surgical management of spinal intramedullary tumors: ten-year experience in a single institution. J Clin Neurosci 73:201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2019.12.054
Amirian ES, Armstrong TS, Aldape KD, Gilbert MR, Scheurer ME (2012) Predictors of survival among pediatric and adult ependymoma cases: a study using surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data from 1973 to 2007. Neuroepidemiology 39:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339320
Behmanesh B, Gessler F, Won SY, Dubinski D, Quick-Weller J, Imoehl L, Seifert V, Marquardt G (2020) Return to work and clinical outcome after surgical treatment and conservative management of patients with intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma. Sci Rep 10:2335. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59328-1
Bostrom A, von Lehe M, Hartmann W, Pietsch T, Feuss M, Bostrom JP, Schramm J, Simon M (2011) Surgery for spinal cord ependymomas: outcome and prognostic factors. Neurosurgery 68:302–308; discussion 309. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182004c1e
Brotchi J, Fischer G (1998) Spinal cord ependymomas. Neurosurg Focus 4:e2. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.1998.4.5.5
Brotchi J, Bruneau M, Lefranc F, Baleriaux D (2006) Surgery of intraspinal cord tumors. Clin Neurosurg 53:209–216
Epstein FJ, Farmer JP, Freed D (1993) Adult intramedullary spinal cord ependymomas: the result of surgery in 38 patients. J Neurosurg 79:204–209. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1993.79.2.0204
Eroes CA, Zausinger S, Kreth FW, Goldbrunner R, Tonn JC (2010) Intramedullary low grade astrocytoma and ependymoma. Surgical results and predicting factors for clinical outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152:611–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0577-x
Klekamp J (2015) Spinal ependymomas. Part 1: intramedullary ependymomas. Neurosurg Focus 39:E6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.5.FOCUS15161
Kopelson G, Linggood RM, Kleinman GM, Doucette J, Wang CC (1980) Management of intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Radiology 135:473–479. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.135.2.7367644
Kutty RK, Ohmori K, Yamada Y, Kato Y (2020) Cervicomedullary ependymoma with hemorrhage: a case report and review of literature. Asian J Neurosurg 15:190–193. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_233_19
Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW (2016) The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131:803–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
McCormick PC, Stein BM (1990) Intramedullary tumors in adults. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1:609–630
McCormick PC, Torres R, Post KD, Stein BM (1990) Intramedullary ependymoma of the spinal cord. J Neurosurg 72:523–532. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1990.72.4.0523
Peker S, Ozgen S, Ozek MM, Pamir MN (2004) Surgical treatment of intramedullary spinal cord ependymomas: can outcome be predicted by tumor parameters? J Spinal Disord Tech 17:516–521. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000129585.91599.5c
Prokopienko M, Kunert P, Podgorska A, Marchel A (2017) Surgical treatment of intramedullary ependymomas. Neurol Neurochir Pol 51:439–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pjnns.2017.06.008
Sun XY, Wang W, Zhang TT, Kong C, Sun SY, Guo MC, Ding JZ, Lu SB (2019) Factors associated with postoperative outcomes in patients with intramedullary Grade II ependymomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 98:e16185. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016185
Svoboda N, Bradac O, de Lacy P, Benes V (2018) Intramedullary ependymoma: long-term outcome after surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 160:439–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3430-7
Symonds CP, Meadows SP, Julian T (1937) Compression of the spinal cord in the neighbourhood of the foramen magnum: with a note on the surgical approach. Brain 60:52–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/60.1.52%JBrain
Tsutsumi S, Higo T, Kondo A, Abe Y, Yasumoto Y, Ito M (2007) Atypical cervical astrocytoma manifesting as occipitalgia. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 47:371–374. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.47.371
Wang X, Gao J, Wang T, Li Z, Li Y (2018) The long-term outcome after resection of upper cervical spinal cord tumors: report of 51 consecutive cases. Sci Rep 8:14831. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33263-8
Watanabe M, Sakai D, Yamamoto Y, Iwashina T, Sato M, Mochida J (2009) Upper cervical spinal cord tumors: review of 13 cases. J Orthop Sci 14:175–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-008-1309-4
Whitaker SJ, Bessell EM, Ashley SE, Bloom HJ, Bell BA, Brada M (1991) Postoperative radiotherapy in the management of spinal cord ependymoma. J Neurosurg 74:720–728. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.74.5.0720
Wostrack M, Ringel F, Eicker SO, Jagersberg M, Schaller K, Kerschbaumer J, Thome C, Shiban E, Stoffel M, Friedrich B, Kehl V, Vajkoczy P, Meyer B, Onken J (2018) Spinal ependymoma in adults: a multicenter investigation of surgical outcome and progression-free survival. J Neurosurg Spine 28:654–662. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.9.SPINE17494
Yang C, Li G, Fang J, Wu L, Yang T, Deng X, Xu Y (2014) Intramedullary gangliogliomas: clinical features, surgical outcomes, and neuropathic scoliosis. J Neurooncol 116:135–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1267-3
Yasuoka S, Okazaki H, Daube JR, MacCarty CS (1978) Foramen magnum tumors. Analysis of 57 cases of benign extramedullary tumors. J Neurosurg 49:828–838. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1978.49.6.0828
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
The work was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Tiantan Hospital.
Informed consent
Informed consent was not sought as a retrospective design was used.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fei, X., Jia, W., Gao, H. et al. Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of ependymomas in the upper cervical spinal cord: a single-center experience of 155 consecutive patients. Neurosurg Rev 44, 1665–1673 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01363-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01363-7