Spatiotemporal patterns in a diffusive predator-prey model with protection zone and predator harvesting
Introduction
The ecosystems becomes one of the most important tools to understand the interaction between species [4], [30], [33], [47]. The predator-prey model is one of the most used model in ecosystems. It has been considered as the dominant theme in mathematical ecology for a long time [4], [30], [33], [47]. The big part of the recent papers in mathematic ecology are devoted to study the interaction between the predator and the prey for the subject of conserving the studied species. In terms of modeling, the total dynamics of a predator-prey system can be affected by many factors such as predator efficiency of their attack, birth, death, mature delay, so on. It is well known that the functional response is the crucial component to describe the relationship between the prey and the predator populations. In the last few decades, many functional responses appears to study and describe a particular relationship between the studied species. It is the main reason for having many functional responses such as Holling functional response [27], Beddington-DeAngelis functional response [9], ratio-dependent functional response, Crowley-Martin functional response [45], [59], Hassell-Varley functional response, so on.
Now, introducing a prototypical predator-prey model with the following structurewhere U, V are respectively the populations sizes of the prey and the predator at the time t, f(U) is the net growth rate for the prey population in the absence of the predator population, is the prey consuming rate of a predator to a prey, is the natural death rate of the predator.
In the real world, the prey population has a fast reproduction comparing with the predator population. It is wise to choose a reproduction functional f(U) to model the crowding effect of the prey. The most known one is the logistic form:where r is the net growth rate of the prey population; K is the carrying capacity of the space for the prey population. Besides, the functional g(U, V) represents the interaction functional. As we said, it models the quality of interaction between the prey and the predator.
In nature, an important part of savanna preys lives in packs such as zebras, buffalos and elephants. This behavior can affect the availability of some prey to the predator. This behavior can make a huge benefit to the prey population, where the pack can give an improvement to the protection of the prey from the predator. It can be seen in the partition of the herd where the weakest prey will be inserted in the inside herd and the strongest ones on the outer corridor of the herd. Recently, this case of the interaction between the prey and the predator populations has been modeled using the functional response (where a is real positive constant) due to the paper presented by Ventorino et al [2]. The main reason for proposing such as functional response is based on the non availability of the inside prey of the herd to the predator. More precisely, the predator hunt only on the confines of the prey pack. The number of consumed prey by one predator will be the proportional to the density on the borders of the herd. This case of prey behavior entice many researchers. We refer readers to the papers [2], [8], [12], [14], [15], [24], [46], [48]. In this paper, we will investigate with the functional response the system (1.1) becomes
On the other hand the case of herd behavior for the prey population can affect the availability of the prey to the predator, and using the fact that the most part of the predator population put their focus on hunting the weakest one (the weakest prey located in inside of the pack) which can make perturbation on the predator population, where will push the predator to fight with each other for a small quantity of resources, this behavior is known by harvesting. Also, it can be seen on the competition between the predators for the hunting zones for the exclusivity of reproduction. The most famous predator that can exhibit this behavior is the lions, where the solitary males enter into hunting zone of other lions and fight the their leader for the exclusivity of reproduction. The harvest has a strong influence on the dynamic evolution of a population, this phenomenon is common in the fields of forestry, fishing and wildlife management. It is well know that these predators in a huge danger due to the human intervention and disappearance of many zones of living for these living being. The interest of this paper is to study the effect of the herd behavior and the predator harvesting in the existence of the considered species. During the few last years, several forms of harvest have been proposed and studied, mainly consisting of constant harvest [31], [60], [61], proportional harvesting [29] and nonlinear harvesting [25], [59]. Here, we are instead to investigate a model that considers a quadratic harvesting which can be modeled by (). This case of predator has been widely investigates we cite for instance the papers [1], [3], [4], [5], [52], [53]. Based on the best knowledge there is no results on its effect on the interaction predator-prey in the presence of herd behavior where in this case the predator has two difficulties, the hunting from the herd, which is dangerous and protecting the zone of hunting from a predator of it gender. Further, in [40], it has been given a comparative analysis between the linear mortality and quadratic one, where two models have been investigated, but in the real world, the predator can exhibits the two types of mortality, where the previous example (lions example) is the simplest one that can hold the two types of mortality. The harvesting can hold for the smaller lions and the bigger males, and the natural mortality can insured for the females, where it has been noticed that in the savanna, the males never attacks their females (also in [56] it has been considered that the predator exhibits quadratic mortality only). Based on the above discussion we formulate the following systemBesides, the predator and the prey are in different spatial locations, there exist many reasons for moving such as search for resources, currents and turbulent diffusion. The movement of the prey and predator can be modeled by the presence of spatial diffusion on the system (1.3). The biological reaction diffusion systems becomes the one of the most dominant themes in mathematical biology we give as example the papers [38], [41], [42], [43], [55], [56], [57]. Naturally, the presence of spatial diffusion leads to the following predator-prey modelwhere Ω is a bounded domain in with a smooth boundary and is the unit outward unit normal vector of the boundary ∂Ω. The homogeneous zero flux boundary conditions describes isolated patches of the two populations. For the goal of reducing the number of parameters we set the following change of variables
Then the system (1.4) becomesThe most interesting about the presence of predator harvesting and the spatial diffusion on predator prey model with herd behavior is its effect on the existence of species (more precisely the harvesting). For the reason of the novelty of the prey herd behavior it is interesting to study the effect of the variable c on the spatiotemporal behavior of solution of the system (1.5). In the environment, the predator harvesting affect hugely on the existence of species, where for the small competition between the predators (which means that the predator are compatible) this can affect negatively the prey population and positively the predator, and the opposite for the bigger competitions. More examples on predator-prey models with prey herd behavior see [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [37] and for more reading we cite the papers [6], [7], [10], [11], [13], [23], [28], [32], [34], [36], [39], [44], [49], [50], [51], [54], [58], [59]
For the purpose of achieving the cited goals, we organize the paper in the following form
In Section 2, the existence of a positive solution and it bounders for the system (1.5) are proved. Section 3, is devoted to study the existence of the equilibrium states for the system (1.5). In Section 4, the global stability of the semi trivial equilibrium state (1,0) is successfully established under a suitable condition on the model parameters. In Section 5, the spatiotemporal dynamics of the system (1.5) near the unique non trivial equilibrium state (u*, v*) is investigated, where the existence of Hopf bifurcation is discussed. On the other hand, the presence of Turing driven instability, Turing-Hopf bifurcation have been also discussed. For the stability of the homogeneous and nonhomogeneous periodic solutions generated by the presence of Hopf bifurcation are studied using the normal form on the center of manifold. The obtained results were checked using numerical simulations. A discussion section ends the paper.
Section snippets
Existence of a positive solution, a priori bound of solution and some estimations of solution
In this section, we study the existence and uniqueness of positive solution of the system (1.5). Further, a priori bound of solution is given. The following theorem summarizes the obtained results Theorem 2.1 Assume that 0 < m < 1, β > 0, u0(x) ≥ 0, v0(x) ≥ 0 and with a smooth boundary is a bounded domain in . Then The system (1.5) has a unique solution (u(x, t), v(x, t)) satisfyingwhere (u*(t), v*(t)) is the unique solution of the ordinary differential
Existence and uniqueness of positive equilibrium state for system (1.5)
In this section, we shall prove the existence and uniqueness of the positive equilibrium state for system (1.5). Obviously the investigated system has two boundary equilibrium states . Now we focus on proving the existence of positive equilibrium state E*. The obtained results are summarized in the following theorem. Theorem 3.1 Assume that m < 1. The system (1.5) has a unique positive equilibrium state with 0 < u* < 1. Further when m ≥ 1 the positive homogeneous steady state
Global stability of the semi trivial equilibrium state E1
In this section, we analyze the global stability of the semi trivial equilibrium state where the positive equilibrium state does not exists (means that m > 1), We have the following theorem Theorem 4.1 For m > 1, the semi-trivial equilibrium state of the system (1.5) is globally asymptotically stable. Proof LettingDefining the Jacobian matrix of the system (1.3) in the absence of diffusion as followswith the domain where
Bifurcation analysis, turing instability
In this context, we shall analyze the dynamics of the system (1.5) near the non trivial equilibrium state E*, the existence of Hopf bifurcation, and Turing instability at the non trivial equilibrium state E*. Throughout the rest part of this paper, we assume that the conditions of the Theorem 3.1 holds. Choosing β as a bifurcation parameter then, obviously u* is independent on the parameter β. The system (1.5) can be rewritten in the following formewith
Normal form on the center of manifold for hopf bifurcation:
In this context, we shall study the direction and stability of Hopf bifurcations the normal form of Hopf bifurcation on the center manifold. From Theorem 5.5, we know that the using system (1.5) undergoes Hopf bifurcation near the interior equilibrium state when the parameter β across the curve . Thanks to the paper [26] we will compute the normal form on the center manifold associated to the Hopf bifurcation and we mainly focus on the existence of spatially homogeneous
Discussion and conclusion
In this paper, the dynamical behavior of a diffusive predator-prey model (1.5) with protection zone and quadratic predator harvesting subject to the zero flux boundary conditions has been investigated. First, we showed the existence of a positive solution and it bounders. Then, we discussed the existence of the equilibrium states and the effects of the predator harvesting on the prey density equilibrium, by Fig. 1 where it has been noticed that the predator harvesting affect positively the
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Fethi Souna: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Abdelkader Lakmeche: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing -
Declaration of Competing Interest
I declare that this manuscript is original, has not been previously published, is not currently submitted for review to any other journal, and will not be submitted elsewhere before a decision is made by this journal. I wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
Acknowledgment
S. Djilali is partially supported by the DGRSDT of Algeria.
References (61)
- et al.
The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio-dependent or neither?
Trend Ecol Evolut
(2000) - et al.
Modeling herd behavior in population systems
Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl
(2011) - et al.
Ratio-dependent prediction: an abstraction that works
Ecology
(1995) - et al.
Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: ratio-dependence
J Theor Biol
(1989) Dynamics of generalized time dependentpredator prey model with nonlinear harvesting
Int J Math Anal
(2009)The origin and evolution of predator-prey theory
Ecol Soc Am
(1992)Nonlinear dynamics of interacting populations
World scientific series on nonlinear science, series A
(1998)Predator-prey dynamics with square root functional responses
Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl
(2012)- et al.
On the dynamics of predator-prey models with the beddington-deangelis functional response
J Math Anal Appl
(2001) Applications of center manifold theory
(1981)
Bifurcations in a predator-prey model with memory and diffusion
I: Andronov-hopf bifurcations, Acta Math Hungar
Ecoepidemics with infected prey in herd defense: the harmless and toxic cases
Int J Comput Math
Methods of bifurcation theory
Impact of prey herd shape on the predator-prey interaction
Chaos Solitons Fractals
Herd behavior in a predator-prey model with spatial diffusion: bifurcation analysis and turing instability
J Appl Math Comp
Herd behaviour in a predator-prey model with spatial diffusion: bifurcation analysis and turing instability
J Appl Math Compu
Effect of herd shape in a diffusive predator-prey model with time delay
J Appl Anal Comput
Spatiotemporal patterns in a diffusive predator-prey model with prey social behavior
Acta Appl Math
Pattern formation of a diffusive predator-prey model with herd behavior and nonlocal prey competition
Math Meth Appl Scien
A heroin epidemic model: very general non linear incidence, treat-age, and global stability
Acta Appl Math
Spatiotemporal patterns induced by cross-diffusion in predator-prey model with prey herd shape effect
Int J Biomath
Mathematical and numerical analysis of a three-species in predator-prey model with herd behavior and time fractional-order derivative
Math Meth Appl Scien
Normal forms and hopf bifurcation for partial differential equations with delay
Trans Am Math Soc
Ecoepidemic models with prey group defense and feeding saturation
Ecol Complex
Bifurcation analysis and control of leslie-gower predator-prey model with michaelis-menten type prey-harvesting
Dif- fer Eq Dyn Syst
Theory and applications of hopf bifurcation
Stability analysis of a prey-predator model with holling type III response function incorporating a prey refuge
Appl Math Comput
Global analysis of the michaelis-menten-type ratio-dependent predator-prey system
J Math Biol
Nonconstant predator harvesting on ratio-dependent predator-prey models
Appl Math Sci
Relation between birth rates and death rates
Science
Cited by (47)
Complex pattern formations induced by the presence of cross-diffusion in a generalized predator–prey model incorporating the Holling type functional response and generalization of habitat complexity effect
2023, Mathematics and Computers in SimulationCitation Excerpt :Besides, all species may move for different reasons, such as resources, turbulent diffusion, and currents. So, it is more appropriate to include the spatial distribution of individuals in the mathematical modeling of predator–prey interaction [1,9,42]. The concept of cross-diffusion was founded for the first time by Kerner [20], and then projected to the biological models by Shigesada et al. [38].
Dynamical analysis of tumor model with obesity and immunosuppression
2022, Alexandria Engineering JournalCitation Excerpt :For more researches see [23–26,35,36]. For more mathematical techniques for life problems analysis see [27–34]. The main objective of this study is to investigate the effect of time delay on the behavior of tumor cells in the absence of an immune response.
Complex spatiotemporal dynamics of a harvested prey–predator model with Crowley–Martin response function
2021, Results in Control and OptimizationA class of natural pinus koraiensis population system with time delay and diffusion term
2024, International Journal of BiomathematicsResponse of Prey-Predator-Scavenger Interactions with the Inclusion of Prey Harvesting
2024, Journal of Applied Nonlinear Dynamics