Spatiotemporal patterns in a diffusive predator-prey model with protection zone and predator harvesting

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110180Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A predator-prey model with prey protection zone and predator harvesting is investigated.

  • Existence, positivity, uniqueness of solution is shown.

  • The existence and uniqueness of the positive homogeneous steady state is proved.

  • Global stability of the boundary equilibrium steady state is investigated under some value of model parameters.

  • The existence of Hopf, Turing, Turing-Hopf bifurcations is investigated.

  • The stability of the periodic solutions are studied using the normal form.

  • Some numerical simulations are used for discussing the impact of the predator harvesting on the spatiotemporal behavior of solution.

Abstract

In this paper, a diffusive predator-prey model subject to the zero flux boundary conditions is considered, in which the prey population exhibits social behavior and the harvesting functional of the predator population is assumed to be considered in a quadratic form. The existence of a positive solution and its bounders is investigated. The global stability of the semi trivial constant equilibrium state is established. Concerning the non trivial equilibrium state, the local stability, Hopf bifurcation, diffusion driven instability, Turing-Hopf bifurcation are investigated. The direction and the stability of Hopf bifurcation relying on the system parameters is derived. Some numerical simulations are used to extend the analytical results and show the occurrence of the homogeneous and non homogeneous periodic solutions. Further the effect of the rivalry rate on the dynamical behavior of the studied species.

Introduction

The ecosystems becomes one of the most important tools to understand the interaction between species [4], [30], [33], [47]. The predator-prey model is one of the most used model in ecosystems. It has been considered as the dominant theme in mathematical ecology for a long time [4], [30], [33], [47]. The big part of the recent papers in mathematic ecology are devoted to study the interaction between the predator and the prey for the subject of conserving the studied species. In terms of modeling, the total dynamics of a predator-prey system can be affected by many factors such as predator efficiency of their attack, birth, death, mature delay, so on. It is well known that the functional response is the crucial component to describe the relationship between the prey and the predator populations. In the last few decades, many functional responses appears to study and describe a particular relationship between the studied species. It is the main reason for having many functional responses such as Holling IIV functional response [27], Beddington-DeAngelis functional response [9], ratio-dependent functional response, Crowley-Martin functional response [45], [59], Hassell-Varley functional response, so on.

Now, introducing a prototypical predator-prey model with the following structure{dUτ=Uf(U)g(U,V),dVτ=β˜(m˜V+g(U,V)),where U, V are respectively the populations sizes of the prey and the predator at the time t, f(U) is the net growth rate for the prey population in the absence of the predator population, 0<β˜<1 is the prey consuming rate of a predator to a prey, βm˜ is the natural death rate of the predator.

In the real world, the prey population has a fast reproduction comparing with the predator population. It is wise to choose a reproduction functional f(U) to model the crowding effect of the prey. The most known one is the logistic form:f(U)=r(1UK)where r is the net growth rate of the prey population; K is the carrying capacity of the space for the prey population. Besides, the functional g(U, V) represents the interaction functional. As we said, it models the quality of interaction between the prey and the predator.

In nature, an important part of savanna preys lives in packs such as zebras, buffalos and elephants. This behavior can affect the availability of some prey to the predator. This behavior can make a huge benefit to the prey population, where the pack can give an improvement to the protection of the prey from the predator. It can be seen in the partition of the herd where the weakest prey will be inserted in the inside herd and the strongest ones on the outer corridor of the herd. Recently, this case of the interaction between the prey and the predator populations has been modeled using the functional response g(U,V)=aU (where a is real positive constant) due to the paper presented by Ventorino et al [2]. The main reason for proposing such as functional response is based on the non availability of the inside prey of the herd to the predator. More precisely, the predator hunt only on the confines of the prey pack. The number of consumed prey by one predator will be the proportional to the density on the borders of the herd. This case of prey behavior entice many researchers. We refer readers to the papers [2], [8], [12], [14], [15], [24], [46], [48]. In this paper, we will investigate with the functional response g(U,V)=aU, the system (1.1) becomes{dUτ=rU(1UK)aUV,dVτ=β˜V(m˜+aU),

On the other hand the case of herd behavior for the prey population can affect the availability of the prey to the predator, and using the fact that the most part of the predator population put their focus on hunting the weakest one (the weakest prey located in inside of the pack) which can make perturbation on the predator population, where will push the predator to fight with each other for a small quantity of resources, this behavior is known by harvesting. Also, it can be seen on the competition between the predators for the hunting zones for the exclusivity of reproduction. The most famous predator that can exhibit this behavior is the lions, where the solitary males enter into hunting zone of other lions and fight the their leader for the exclusivity of reproduction. The harvest has a strong influence on the dynamic evolution of a population, this phenomenon is common in the fields of forestry, fishing and wildlife management. It is well know that these predators in a huge danger due to the human intervention and disappearance of many zones of living for these living being. The interest of this paper is to study the effect of the herd behavior and the predator harvesting in the existence of the considered species. During the few last years, several forms of harvest have been proposed and studied, mainly consisting of constant harvest [31], [60], [61], proportional harvesting [29] and nonlinear harvesting [25], [59]. Here, we are instead to investigate a model that considers a quadratic harvesting which can be modeled by (β˜γV2). This case of predator has been widely investigates we cite for instance the papers [1], [3], [4], [5], [52], [53]. Based on the best knowledge there is no results on its effect on the interaction predator-prey in the presence of herd behavior where in this case the predator has two difficulties, the hunting from the herd, which is dangerous and protecting the zone of hunting from a predator of it gender. Further, in [40], it has been given a comparative analysis between the linear mortality and quadratic one, where two models have been investigated, but in the real world, the predator can exhibits the two types of mortality, where the previous example (lions example) is the simplest one that can hold the two types of mortality. The harvesting can hold for the smaller lions and the bigger males, and the natural mortality can insured for the females, where it has been noticed that in the savanna, the males never attacks their females (also in [56] it has been considered that the predator exhibits quadratic mortality only). Based on the above discussion we formulate the following system{dUτ=rU(1UK)aUV,dVτ=β˜V(m˜+aUγV),Besides, the predator and the prey are in different spatial locations, there exist many reasons for moving such as search for resources, currents and turbulent diffusion. The movement of the prey and predator can be modeled by the presence of spatial diffusion on the system (1.3). The biological reaction diffusion systems becomes the one of the most dominant themes in mathematical biology we give as example the papers [38], [41], [42], [43], [55], [56], [57]. Naturally, the presence of spatial diffusion leads to the following predator-prey model{Uτ=rU(1UK)aUV+d1ΔU,xΩ,τ>0,Vτ=β˜V(m˜+aUγV)+d2ΔV,xΩ,τ>0,Un=Vn=0,xΩ,τ>0,U(x,0)=U0(x)0,V(x,0)=V0(x)0,xΩ,where Ω is a bounded domain in Rn,n1 with a smooth boundary and n is the unit outward unit normal vector of the boundary ∂Ω. The homogeneous zero flux boundary conditions describes isolated patches of the two populations. For the goal of reducing the number of parameters we set the following change of variablesu=Uk,v=arkV,t=rτ,β=aβ˜kr,c=γra,m=m˜ak.

Then the system (1.4) becomes{ut=u(1u)uv+d1Δu,xΩ,t>0,vt=βv(m+ucv)+d2Δv,xΩ,t>0,un=vn=0,xΩ,t>0,u(x,0)=u0(x)0,v(x,0)=v0(x)0,xΩ,The most interesting about the presence of predator harvesting and the spatial diffusion on predator prey model with herd behavior is its effect on the existence of species (more precisely the harvesting). For the reason of the novelty of the prey herd behavior it is interesting to study the effect of the variable c on the spatiotemporal behavior of solution of the system (1.5). In the environment, the predator harvesting affect hugely on the existence of species, where for the small competition between the predators (which means that the predator are compatible) this can affect negatively the prey population and positively the predator, and the opposite for the bigger competitions. More examples on predator-prey models with prey herd behavior see [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [37] and for more reading we cite the papers [6], [7], [10], [11], [13], [23], [28], [32], [34], [36], [39], [44], [49], [50], [51], [54], [58], [59]

For the purpose of achieving the cited goals, we organize the paper in the following form

In Section 2, the existence of a positive solution and it bounders for the system (1.5) are proved. Section 3, is devoted to study the existence of the equilibrium states for the system (1.5). In Section 4, the global stability of the semi trivial equilibrium state (1,0) is successfully established under a suitable condition on the model parameters. In Section 5, the spatiotemporal dynamics of the system (1.5) near the unique non trivial equilibrium state (u*, v*) is investigated, where the existence of Hopf bifurcation is discussed. On the other hand, the presence of Turing driven instability, Turing-Hopf bifurcation have been also discussed. For the stability of the homogeneous and nonhomogeneous periodic solutions generated by the presence of Hopf bifurcation are studied using the normal form on the center of manifold. The obtained results were checked using numerical simulations. A discussion section ends the paper.

Section snippets

Existence of a positive solution, a priori bound of solution and some estimations of solution

In this section, we study the existence and uniqueness of positive solution of the system (1.5). Further, a priori bound of solution is given. The following theorem summarizes the obtained results

Theorem 2.1

Assume that 0 < m < 1, β > 0, u0(x) ≥ 0, v0(x) ≥ 0 and ΩRm with a smooth boundary is a bounded domain in Rm. Then

  • (i)

    The system (1.5) has a unique solution (u(x, t), v(x, t)) satisfying0<u(x,t)<u*(t),0<v(x,t)<v*(t),fort>0,xΩ.where (u*(t), v*(t)) is the unique solution of the ordinary differential

Existence and uniqueness of positive equilibrium state for system (1.5)

In this section, we shall prove the existence and uniqueness of the positive equilibrium state for system (1.5). Obviously the investigated system has two boundary equilibrium states E0=(0,0), E1=(1,0). Now we focus on proving the existence of positive equilibrium state E*. The obtained results are summarized in the following theorem.

Theorem 3.1

Assume that m < 1. The system (1.5) has a unique positive equilibrium state E*=(u*,v*) with 0 < u* < 1. Further when m ≥ 1 the positive homogeneous steady state

Global stability of the semi trivial equilibrium state E1

In this section, we analyze the global stability of the semi trivial equilibrium state E1=(1,0) where the positive equilibrium state does not exists (means that m > 1), We have the following theorem

Theorem 4.1

For m > 1, the semi-trivial equilibrium state E1=(1,0) of the system (1.5) is globally asymptotically stable.

Proof

Lettingf(u,v)=u(1u)uv,g(u,v)=βv(m+ucv).Defining the Jacobian matrix of the system (1.3) in the absence of diffusion as followsJ|(u,v)=(A(u,v)B(u,v)C(u,v)D(u,v)),with the domain DL=XC, where

Bifurcation analysis, turing instability

In this context, we shall analyze the dynamics of the system (1.5) near the non trivial equilibrium state E*, the existence of Hopf bifurcation, and Turing instability at the non trivial equilibrium state E*. Throughout the rest part of this paper, we assume that the conditions of the Theorem 3.1 holds. Choosing β as a bifurcation parameter then, obviously u* is independent on the parameter β. The system (1.5) can be rewritten in the following formeUt=DΔU+J(β)U+H(U),withJ|(u*,v*)=(A(β)B(β)C(β)

Normal form on the center of manifold for hopf bifurcation:

In this context, we shall study the direction and stability of Hopf bifurcations the normal form of Hopf bifurcation on the center manifold. From Theorem 5.5, we know that the using system (1.5) undergoes Hopf bifurcation near the interior equilibrium state E*=(u*,v*) when the parameter β across the curve d2=d2H(β,n). Thanks to the paper [26] we will compute the normal form on the center manifold associated to the Hopf bifurcation and we mainly focus on the existence of spatially homogeneous

Discussion and conclusion

In this paper, the dynamical behavior of a diffusive predator-prey model (1.5) with protection zone and quadratic predator harvesting subject to the zero flux boundary conditions has been investigated. First, we showed the existence of a positive solution and it bounders. Then, we discussed the existence of the equilibrium states and the effects of the predator harvesting on the prey density equilibrium, by Fig. 1 where it has been noticed that the predator harvesting affect positively the

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Fethi Souna: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Abdelkader Lakmeche: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing -

Declaration of Competing Interest

I declare that this manuscript is original, has not been previously published, is not currently submitted for review to any other journal, and will not be submitted elsewhere before a decision is made by this journal. I wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Acknowledgment

S. Djilali is partially supported by the DGRSDT of Algeria.

References (61)

  • P.A. Abrams et al.

    The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio-dependent or neither?

    Trend Ecol Evolut

    (2000)
  • V. Ajraldi et al.

    Modeling herd behavior in population systems

    Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl

    (2011)
  • H.R. Akcakaya et al.

    Ratio-dependent prediction: an abstraction that works

    Ecology

    (1995)
  • R. Arditi et al.

    Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: ratio-dependence

    J Theor Biol

    (1989)
  • T.M. Asfaw

    Dynamics of generalized time dependentpredator prey model with nonlinear harvesting

    Int J Math Anal

    (2009)
  • A.A. Berryman

    The origin and evolution of predator-prey theory

    Ecol Soc Am

    (1992)
  • A.D. Bazykin

    Nonlinear dynamics of interacting populations

    World scientific series on nonlinear science, series A

    (1998)
  • P.A. Braza

    Predator-prey dynamics with square root functional responses

    Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl

    (2012)
  • R.S. Cantrell et al.

    On the dynamics of predator-prey models with the beddington-deangelis functional response

    J Math Anal Appl

    (2001)
  • J. Carr

    Applications of center manifold theory

    (1981)
  • M. Cavani et al.

    Bifurcations in a predator-prey model with memory and diffusion

    I: Andronov-hopf bifurcations, Acta Math Hungar

    (1994)
  • E. Cagliero et al.

    Ecoepidemics with infected prey in herd defense: the harmless and toxic cases

    Int J Comput Math

    (2016)
  • S.N. Chow et al.

    Methods of bifurcation theory

    (1982)
  • S. Djilali

    Impact of prey herd shape on the predator-prey interaction

    Chaos Solitons Fractals

    (2019)
  • S. Djilali

    Herd behavior in a predator-prey model with spatial diffusion: bifurcation analysis and turing instability

    J Appl Math Comp

    (2017)
  • S. Djilali

    Herd behaviour in a predator-prey model with spatial diffusion: bifurcation analysis and turing instability

    J Appl Math Compu

    (2018)
  • S. Djilali

    Effect of herd shape in a diffusive predator-prey model with time delay

    J Appl Anal Comput

    (2019)
  • S. Djilali et al.

    Spatiotemporal patterns in a diffusive predator-prey model with prey social behavior

    Acta Appl Math

    (2019)
  • S. Djilali

    Pattern formation of a diffusive predator-prey model with herd behavior and nonlocal prey competition

    Math Meth Appl Scien

    (2019)
  • S. Djilali et al.

    A heroin epidemic model: very general non linear incidence, treat-age, and global stability

    Acta Appl Math

    (2017)
  • S. Djilali

    Spatiotemporal patterns induced by cross-diffusion in predator-prey model with prey herd shape effect

    Int J Biomath

    (2020)
  • B. Ghanabri et al.

    Mathematical and numerical analysis of a three-species in predator-prey model with herd behavior and time fractional-order derivative

    Math Meth Appl Scien

    (2019)
  • T. Faria

    Normal forms and hopf bifurcation for partial differential equations with delay

    Trans Am Math Soc

    (2000)
  • G. Gimmelli et al.

    Ecoepidemic models with prey group defense and feeding saturation

    Ecol Complex

    (2015)
  • R.P. Gupta et al.

    Bifurcation analysis and control of leslie-gower predator-prey model with michaelis-menten type prey-harvesting

    Dif- fer Eq Dyn Syst

    (2012)
  • B.D. Hassard et al.

    Theory and applications of hopf bifurcation

    (1981)
  • Y. Huang et al.

    Stability analysis of a prey-predator model with holling type III response function incorporating a prey refuge

    Appl Math Comput

    (2006)
  • S.B. Hsu et al.

    Global analysis of the michaelis-menten-type ratio-dependent predator-prey system

    J Math Biol

    (2001)
  • P. Lenzini et al.

    Nonconstant predator harvesting on ratio-dependent predator-prey models

    Appl Math Sci

    (2010)
  • A.J. Lotka

    Relation between birth rates and death rates

    Science

    (1907)
  • Cited by (47)

    • Complex pattern formations induced by the presence of cross-diffusion in a generalized predator–prey model incorporating the Holling type functional response and generalization of habitat complexity effect

      2023, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Besides, all species may move for different reasons, such as resources, turbulent diffusion, and currents. So, it is more appropriate to include the spatial distribution of individuals in the mathematical modeling of predator–prey interaction [1,9,42]. The concept of cross-diffusion was founded for the first time by Kerner [20], and then projected to the biological models by Shigesada et al. [38].

    • Dynamical analysis of tumor model with obesity and immunosuppression

      2022, Alexandria Engineering Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      For more researches see [23–26,35,36]. For more mathematical techniques for life problems analysis see [27–34]. The main objective of this study is to investigate the effect of time delay on the behavior of tumor cells in the absence of an immune response.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text