Skip to main content
Log in

PSEUDOCHARACTERS OF HOMOMORPHISMS INTO CLASSICAL GROUPS

  • Published:
Transformation Groups Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A GLd-pseudocharacter is a function from a group Γ to a ring k satisfying polynomial relations that make it “look like” the character of a representation. When k is an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0, Taylor proved that GLd-pseudocharacters of Γ are the same as degree-d characters of Γ with values in k, hence are in bijection with equivalence classes of semisimple representations Γ → GLd(k). Recently, V. Lafforgue generalized this result by showing that, for any connected reductive group H over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic 0 and for any group Γ, there exists an infinite collection of functions and relations which are naturally in bijection with H(k)-conjugacy classes of semisimple homomorphisms Γ→ H(k). In this paper, we reformulate Lafforgue's result in terms of a new algebraic object called an FFG algebra. We then define generating sets and generating relations for these objects and show that, for all H as above, the corresponding FFG-algebra is finitely presented up to radical. Hence one can always define H-pseudocharacters consisting of finitely many functions satisfying finitely many relations. Next, we use invariant theory to give explicit finite presentations up to radical of the FFG-algebras for (general) orthogonal groups, (general) symplectic groups, and special orthogonal groups. Finally, we use our pseudocharacters to answer questions about conjugacy vs. element-conjugacy of homomorphisms, following Larsen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Aslaksen, E.-C. Tan, C. Zhu, Invariant theory of special orthogonal groups, Pacific J. Math. 168 (1995), no. 2, 207–215.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Church, J. S. Ellenberg, B. Farb, FI-modules and stability for representations of symmetric groups, Duke Math. J. 164 (2015), no. 9, 1833–1910.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Fang, G. Han, B. Sun, Conjugacy and element-conjugacy of homomorphisms of compact Lie groups, Pacific J. Math. 283 (2016), no. 1, 75–83.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Hochschild, Basic Theory of Algebraic Groups and Lie Algebras, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Lafforgue, Chtoucas pour les groupes réductifs et paramétrisation de Langlands globale, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 31 (2018), no. 3, 719–891.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Larsen, On the conjugacy of element-conjugate homomorphisms, Israel J. Math. 88 (1994), no. 1, 253–277.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Larsen, On the conjugacy of element-conjugate homomorphisms II, Quarterly J. Math. 47 (1996), no. 1, 73–85.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. U. Nagel, T. Römer, FI- and OI-modules with varying coefficients, J. Algebra 535 (2019), 286–322.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. V. L. Popov, E. B. Vinberg, Invariant Theory, in: Algebraic Geometry IV, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 55, Springer, Berlin, 1994, pp. 123–278.

  10. C. Procesi, Lie Groups: An Approach through Invariants and Representations, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2007.

  11. C. Procesi, The invariant theory of n × n matrices, Advances in Math. 19 (1976), no. 3, 306–381.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. R. W. Richardson, Affine coset spaces of reductive algebraic groups, Bull. London Math. Soc. 9 (1977), 38–41.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. R. W. Richardson, Conjugacy classes of n-tuples in Lie algebras and algebraic groups, Duke Math. J. 57 (1988), no. 1, 1–35.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. E. Rogora, A basic relation between invariants of matrices under the action of the special orthogonal group, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 55 (2006), no. 1, 82–94.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. G. W. Schwarz, On classical invariant theory and binary cubics, Ann. de l’Inst. Fourier 37 (1987), no. 3, 191–216.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Taylor, Galois representations associated to Siegel modular forms of low weight, Duke Math. J. 63 (1991), no. 2, 281–332.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. E. B. Vinberg, On invariants of a set of matrices, J. Lie Theory 6 (1996), 249–269.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Wiles, On ordinary ⋋-adic representations associated to modular forms, Invent. Math. 94 (1988), no. 3, 529–573.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Yu, Acceptable compact Lie groups, arXiv:1806.06316 (2018).

  20. J. Yu, Invariants and pseudo-characters, Private communication, August 2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. WEIDNER.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

M. WEIDNER is partially supported by Caltech’s Samuel P. and Frances Krown SURF Fellowship and a Churchill Scholarship from the Winston Churchill Foundation of the USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

WEIDNER, M. PSEUDOCHARACTERS OF HOMOMORPHISMS INTO CLASSICAL GROUPS. Transformation Groups 25, 1345–1370 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00031-020-09603-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00031-020-09603-2

Navigation