Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sulfur analysis in bulk samples using a DD portable neutron generator based PGNAA setup

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prompt gamma ray analysis of sulfur-contaminated soil samples was carried out using a Genie 16 DD portable neutron generator and a 12.7 cm × 12.7 cm (diameter × height) BGO detector. The minimum detectable concentration MDC ± \(\sigma_{\text{MDC}}\) was measured from soil samples containing 4.4, 7.1, 9.6, and 13.47 wt% sulfur using the 5.42 MeV sulfur capture gamma rays. The measured value of MDC ± \(\sigma_{\text{MDC}}\) for sulfur, which was 1.30 ± 0.40 wt%, is in good agreement with the corresponding values reported earlier with intense 252Cf source-based PGNAA setups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lindstrom RM (2018) Nuclear analysis at NBS and NIST. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 318(3):1465–1471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miceli A, Festa G, Gorini G, Senesi R, Andreani C (2013) Pulsed neutron gamma-ray logging in archaeological site survey. Meas Sci Technol 24(12):125903–125908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shypailo RJ, Ellis KJ (2008) Prompt-gamma neutron activation analysis system design: effects of d-T versus D-D neutron generator source selection. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 276(1):71–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marchese N, Cannuli A, Caccamo MT, Pace C (2017) New generation non-stationary portable neutron generators for biophysical applications of Neutron Activation Analysis. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1861:3661–3670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Borsarua M, Berrya M, Biggs M, Rojca A (2004) In situ determination of sulphur in coal seams and overburden rock by PGNAA. Nuclear Instrum Methods Phys Res B 213:530–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Prompt Gamma Neutron Activation Analysis in Borehole Logging and Industrial Process Control, IAEA-TECDOC-537. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1990)

  7. Marshall JH III, Zumberge JF (1990) On-line measurements of bulk coal using prompt gamma neutron activation, IAEA-TECDOC-537. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, p 27

  8. Herzog W (1990) Prompt gamma neutron activation analysis of hard coal, raw lignite and raw glass mixture, IAEA-TECDOC-537. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, p 57

  9. Da-Qian H, Wen-Bao J, Zhou J, Can C, Jia-Tong L, Hong-Tao W (2016) Heavy metals detection in sediments using PGNAA method. Appl Radiat Isot 112:50–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Bahi AM, Soliman AY, Mohamed NMA (2018) Detection of illicit material using neutron activation: weakness and solutions. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 315:557–564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Prompt Gamma Neutron Activation Analysis in Borehole Logging and Industrial Process Control, IAEA-TECDOC-537. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Section 2, p 8 (1990)

  12. Skarsvag K, Bergheim K (1963) Energy and angular distributions of prompt neutrons from slow neutron fission of 235U. Nucl Phys 45:72–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown KA (1982) Sulphur in the environment: a review. Environm Pollut Ser B Chem Phys 3(1):47–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kan H, Wong CM, Vichit-Vadakan N, Qian Z (2010) Short-term association between sulfur dioxide and daily mortality: the Public Health and Air Pollution in Asia (PAPA) study. Environ Res 110(3):258–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Neutron Generators for Analytical Purposes. International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna, 2012 (IAEA radiation technology reports series, ISSN 2225-8833; no. 1) STI/PUB/1535; ISBN 978-92-0-125110-7

  16. Chichester DL, Simpson JD, Lemchak M (2007) Advanced compact accelerator neutron generator technology for active neutron interrogation field work. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 271(3):629–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Genie 16 Neutron Generator. NRC; https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1408/ML14085A270.pdf. Accessed 2013

  18. Chichester DL, Simpson JD (2003) Compact accelerator neutron generators. Ind Physicist 9(6):22–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Naqvi AA, Kalakada Z, Al-Matouq FA, Maslehuddin M, Al-Amoudi OSB, Ur-Rehman K (2012) Prompt gamma ray analysis of chlorine in superpozz cement concrete. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 693:67–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Naqvi AA, Khiari FZ, Maslehuddin M, Gondal MA, Al-Amoudi OSB, Ukashat MS, Ilyas AM, Liadi FA, Isab AA, Rehman Kjateeb-ur, Raashid M, Dastageer MA (2015) Pulse height tests of a large diameter fast LaBr 3:Ce scintillation detector. Appl Radiat Isot 104:224–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Knoll GF (2000) Radiation detection and measurement, 4th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 349–356 (Chapter 10)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Choi HD, Firestone RB, Lindstrom RM, Molnar GL, Mughabghab SF, Paviotti-Corcuera R, Revay Z, Trkov A, Zhou CM (2007) Database of prompt gamma-rays from slow neutron capture for elemental analysis. Compiled by International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, report number (STI/PUB/1263)

  23. Naqvi AA, Khiari FZ, Liadi FA, Khateeb-ur-Rehman, Raashid MA, Isab AH (2016) Moisture effect in prompt gamma measurements from soil samples. Appl Radiat Isot 115:61–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gedcke DA (2001) How counting statistics controls detection limits and peak precision. ORTEC Application Notes AN59. www.ortec-online.com

  25. Bevington PR, Robinson DK (2002) Data reduction and error analysis, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 98–104 (Chapter 6)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is a part of project # SR171019 funded by King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. The support provided by the Department of Physics and Chemistry, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

    T. Al-Abdullah, A. A. Naqvi, F. Z. Khiari & M. Raashid

  2. Department of Chemistry, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

    A. H. Isab

Authors
  1. T. Al-Abdullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. A. Naqvi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Z. Khiari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Raashid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. H. Isab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Al-Abdullah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Abdullah, T., Naqvi, A.A., Khiari, F.Z. et al. Sulfur analysis in bulk samples using a DD portable neutron generator based PGNAA setup. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 326, 555–561 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07329-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07329-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation