An insight in bacteriophage based biosensors with focus on their detection methods and recent advancements

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101081Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Effective detection of pathogenic bacteria is possible through Bacteriophage biosensors.

  • Different types of bio-probes associate with the biosensors for promising results.

  • Bacteriophage-based biosensor systems are efficient under different environment conditions.

  • Phage-based biosensors overcome the downsides of conventional pathogen detection strategies.

Abstract

Pathogenic bacteria have become a global issue and has affected various sectors like food, health and environmental monitoring, which has made the detection and identification of these pathogenic bacteria of utmost importance. Bacterial infections are the leading cause of most fatalities, often due to delay in diagnosis or misdiagnosis. Therefore, pathogenicity assessment of these bacteria has become crucial in understanding the disease dynamics. Although, conventional bacterial identification and characterization techniques like microscopic and molecular methods are available, being cost-intensive, time-consuming and tedious, makes it unsuitable for rapid analysis. There are raising concern about bacterial detection and pathogenicity assessment, which has prompted the researchers to exploit and develop biosensors derived from diverse bio-probes like enzymes, RNA, DNA, antibodies etc. However, bacteriophage-based biosensor system offers numerous advantages like cost-effectiveness, high affinity, high specificity, more stability and resistance towards various environmental factors like ion concentrations, pH and temperature. Therefore, the current review intends to highlight different bacterial detection techniques and facilitate with the basics of the biosensor. Additionally, it also discusses the different bio-probes used for biosensor development. Furthermore, it will also discuss the different types of phage-based biosensors and their importance.

Introduction

Bacterial contamination has become the global issue as it has obstructed the socio-economic stability of environment, food and healthcare system (LeJeune and Rajala-Schultz, 2009, Mead et al., 1999, Roca et al., 2015). The conventional approaches have been found to show ineffective results in a complex mixture of microbes and underline the lack of enrichment step in environmental conditions (Kumar Awasthi et al., 2020). The conventional approaches behold plating techniques and antibodies-based assays, which makes it clear why these methods are inefficient, less sensitive to distinct the targeted microbes from the environmental sample (Ezem, 2007). Whereas, methods like enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have sensitivity in determining the target microbes from the sample but are unable to distinguish that the cells are viable or not (Daly et al., 2002). Therefore, it demands the up-gradation for sensitivity and specificity but in return, makes it expensive and laborious. All these challenges could be resolved with the development of biosensor (Balasubramanian et al., 2007). For developing biosensor, sensitivity and specificity of bio-probe are of utmost importance, so that it could withstand at high temperature, extreme pH and remains active in harsh environment (Pandey et al., 2014).

Recently, bacteriophage has gained the significant attention due to its specificity as well as sensitivity towards the targeted microbes and remains active in diverse conditions makes it the potential candidate for developing biosensor for bacterial detection (Koskella and Meaden, 2013). Phages naturally possess the ability to specifically recognize the specific bacterial strain for its attachment. Therefore, rapid-recognition offered by these bacteriophages can be used in developing a biosensor to improve their ability to trace and remediate bacterial contamination. Bacteriophage based biosensors have also been developed for wide range of applications in environmental remediation and contamination detection such as toxins, environmental pollutants and pathogens. Recent development in the field of genetic engineering, engineered phages are used for tracking the source of pollution in various environmental conditions and the analysis is based on identification of unique sequence and plaque assay (Daniell et al., 2000). They have emerged as important key elements in governing the function and structure of microbial communities (Kauffman et al., 2018).

Bacteriophages based biosensor has also been used for the identification of foodborne pathogens. In addition, magnetoelastic biosensors (multiple phage-based) have been used in the detection of various biological pathogens in real samples or complex analytes (Farooq et al., 2019). The major obstruction which comes into the picture is the active and oriented phages immobilization of the phages on the substrate surface (Maniatis et al., 1975). The major benefit of immobilizing the bacteriophage on the substrate surface of the biosensor is that phages remain functioning for a long period of time, have high bacterial capturing efficacy and sustain physiological activities at high densities. Hence, highlighting its detection limit and promoting the development of a phage-based biosensor for robust and precise bacterial detection (Stewart et al., 1998). The hypothesis for the current study was to focus on phage-based biosensor having exclusive approaches including (a) Assessment of phage like particle release during lytic cycle along with host bacterium, (b) Monitoring of lysed cell component release during phage intermediated lysis of host bacterium, (c) Assessment of inhibition of bacterial growth in the presence of particular phage, (d) Assessment of bacterial capture via stained phages and (e) Monitoring of expression of reporter gene cloned in genetically modified phage which expresses on the bacterial infection. The present review summarizes the current status of knowledge in the direction related to bacterial detection techniques and elaborate understanding along with the basics of the biosensor. Additionally, it also discusses the use of different bio-probes in biosensor development. Furthermore, it will also discuss the different types of phage-based biosensor, their advantages and their limitations.

Section snippets

Traditional methods for detection of pathogenic bacteria and their drawbacks

Till date, several traditional methods (quantitative as well as qualitative) are utilized for detection of pathogenic bacteria in various sectors depending on the type of bacteria and pathogenicity related to it such as colony counting, immunological assays (ELISA), biochemical tests (IMVIC test, urease test etc.), PCR etc. (Coburn and Gill, 1991). Nonetheless, these techniques have emerged as highly time-consuming, labour intensive and tedious. To overcome the limitations posed by conventional

Bacteriophage based bio-probes

Bio-probes are substantially significant constituents of biosensors owing to their ability to identify and bind the target molecules. Two prominent attributes of the bio-probes towards the analytes are high affinity and specificity. Diagnostic sensors majorly used in healthcare system employ the use of bio-probes such as proteins/enzymes, antibodies, carbohydrates and DNA/RNA (Bhalla et al., 2016). However, they pose certain implications like they are prone to fluctuations in environmental

Bacteriophages-based biosensors

Based on the guidelines given by IUPAC, a biosensor is a self-controlled imitated device, which comprises of a receptor for bio-recognition, connected to a transducer to translate the biological signal to a computer-readable signal and is then presented on a computer for analysis (Ackermann, 2007, Casey et al., 2019). In general, biosensors are comprised of a detection agent called a bio-probe. These bio-probes can be bacteriophages, enzymes, cells, DNA/RNA and antibodies. An electrochemical

Pro and cons of bacteriophage biosensor

In this approach, phages are employed as the bio-probes to identify the pathogens. Phages being highly specific to their host and have unique characteristics, involving that they can be easily amplified and are resistant to pH, temperature and organic solvent degradation (Shabani et al., 2013b). Additionally, the easy amendment of the phages allows us to construct the new phage as per our demand so that it can interact with the moiety on the surface of the targeted host. This makes it a

Conclusions

Biosensors have already gained significant attention and are growing as an emerging field, and is used for detecting disease in patients, food pathogens and viruses. However, many of the biosensors are under evaluation, and their transition to commercial level is still on hold. The major challenge is the signal-to-noise ratio induced by the unwanted signal termed as “noise” from the sample. Furthermore, reproducibility and sensitivity are also challenges during biosensor development.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Simranjeet Singh: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing - original draft preparation, Writing - review and editing. Daljeet Singh Dhanjal: Methodology, Investigation. Sonali: Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft preparation, Writing - review and editing. Siddharth Thotapalli: Methodology, Investigation. Vijay Kumar: Validation, Resources, Writing - original draft preparation. Shivika Datta: Validation, Writing - original draft preparation. Vineet Kumar: Writing - original draft

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

Authors are profoundly grateful to the Head, Department of Microbiology, School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, India , for providing necessary research facilities.

Compliance with ethical requirements

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References (134)

  • AckermannH.W.

    5500 Phages examined in the electron microscope

    Arch. Virol.

    (2007)
  • AhmedA. et al.

    Biosensors for whole-cell bacterial detection

    Clin. Microbiol. Rev.

    (2014)
  • AlcaineS.D. et al.

    Bioengineering bacteriophages to enhance the sensitivity of phage amplification-based paper fluidic detection of bacteria

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2016)
  • AryaS.K. et al.

    Chemically immobilized T4-bacteriophage for specific Escherichia coli detection using surface plasmon resonance

    Analyst

    (2011)
  • AshrafiA.M. et al.

    Application of the enzymatic electrochemical biosensors for monitoring non-competitive inhibition of enzyme activity by heavy metals

    Sensors (Switzerland)

    (2019)
  • AydinS.

    A short history, principles, and types of ELISA, and our laboratory experience with peptide/protein analyses using ELISA

    Peptides

    (2015)
  • AzzazyH.M.E. et al.

    Phage display technology: Clinical applications and recent innovations

    Clin. Biochem.

    (2002)
  • BaccarH. et al.

    Surface plasmon resonance immunosensor for bacteria detection

    Talanta

    (2010)
  • BalasubramanianS. et al.

    Lytic phage as a specific and selective probe for detection of Staphylococcus aureus-A surface plasmon resonance spectroscopic study

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2007)
  • BárdyP. et al.

    Genetically modified bacteriophages in applied microbiology

    J. Appl. Microbiol.

    (2016)
  • BazanJ. et al.

    Phage display a powerful technique for immunotherapy: 1. Introduction and potential of therapeutic applications

    Hum. Vaccines Immunother.

    (2012)
  • BhallaN. et al.

    Introduction to biosensors

    Essays Biochem.

    (2016)
  • BhardwajN. et al.

    Bacteriophage immobilized graphene electrodes for impedimetric sensing of bacteria (Staphylococcus arlettae)

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2016)
  • BolleA. et al.

    Transcription during bacteriophage T4 development: Synthesis and relative stability of early and late RNA

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1968)
  • BraunA. et al.

    The effect of culture age and extrinsic factors on T4 Bacteriophage Progeny Production in Recovered Stationary Phase Escherichia coli ZK126

    J. Exp. Microbiol. Immunol.

    (2006)
  • BurnhamS. et al.

    Towards rapid on-site phage-mediated detection of generic Escherichia coli in water using luminescent and visual readout

    Anal. Bioanal. Chem.

    (2014)
  • ByrneB. et al.

    Antibody-based sensors: Principles, problems and potential for detection of pathogens and associated toxins

    Sensors (Switzerland)

    (2009)
  • CaseyA. et al.

    The Evolution of Bacteriophage Genomes and Genomic Research

    (2019)
  • ChaiY. et al.

    A surface-scanning coil detector for real-time, in-situ detection of bacteria on fresh food surfaces

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2013)
  • ChenJ. et al.

    Detection of Escherichia coli in drinking water using T7 Bacteriophage-Conjugated Magnetic Probe

    Anal. Chem.

    (2015)
  • ChuY.F. et al.

    Immobilization of bioluminescent Escherichia coli cells using natural and artificial fibers treated with polyethyleneimine

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2009)
  • ChuangT.L. et al.

    A polycarbonate based surface plasmon resonance sensing cartridge for high sensitivity HBV loop-mediated isothermal amplification

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2012)
  • CintiS. et al.

    Electrochemical biosensors for Rapid Detection of Foodborne Salmonella: A Critical Overview

    Sensors

    (2017)
  • CoburnJ. et al.

    ADP-ribosylation of p21(ras) and related proteins by pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme S

    Infect. Immun.

    (1991)
  • CoxC.R. et al.

    Rapid detection of Bacillus anthracis by γ phage amplification and lateral flow immunochromatography

    J. Microbiol. Methods

    (2015)
  • DadarwalR. et al.

    Organic conducting polymer electrode based sensors for detection of Salmonella infecting bacteriophages

    Mater. Sci. Eng. C

    (2009)
  • DalyP. et al.

    PCR-ELISA detection of escherichia coli in milk

    Lett. Appl. Microbiol.

    (2002)
  • DaniellT.J. et al.

    Development of a genetically modified bacteriophage for use in tracing sources of pollution

    J. App. Microbiol.

    (2000)
  • De PlanoL.M. et al.

    Phage-based assay for rapid detection of bacterial pathogens in blood by Raman spectroscopy

    J. Immunol. Methods

    (2019)
  • De PlanoL.M. et al.

    One-step production of phage–silicon nanoparticles by PLAL as fluorescent nanoprobes for cell identification

    Appl. Phys. A

    (2018)
  • DossJ. et al.

    A review of phage therapy against bacterial pathogens of aquatic and terrestrial organisms

    Viruses

    (2017)
  • Drulis-KawaZ. et al.

    Bacteriophages and Phage-Derived Proteins – Application Approaches

    Curr. Med. Chem.

    (2015)
  • Drulis-KawaZ. et al.

    Learning from Bacteriophages - advantages and limitations of Phage and Phage-Encoded Protein Applications

    Curr. Protein Pept. Sci.

    (2013)
  • DuY. et al.

    Nucleic acid biosensors: Recent advances and perspectives

    Anal. Chem.

    (2017)
  • DussoixD. et al.

    Host specificity of DNA produced by Escherichia coli: IV. Host specificity of infectious DNA from bacteriophage lambda

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1965)
  • EdgarR. et al.

    High-sensitivity bacterial detection using biotin-tagged phage and quantum-dot nanocomplexes

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2006)
  • ErzingerG.S. et al.

    Bioluminescence systems in environmental biosensors

  • EzemB.

    Awareness and uptake of cervical cancer screening in Owerri, South-Eastern Nigeria

    Ann. Afr. Med.

    (2007)
  • FanX. et al.

    Sensitive optical biosensors for unlabeled targets: A review

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2008)
  • FarooqU. et al.

    Principle and development of phage-based biosensors

  • GaribyanL. et al.

    Polymerase chain reaction

    J. Invest. Dermatol.

    (2013)
  • GervaisL. et al.

    Immobilization of biotinylated bacteriophages on biosensor surfaces

    Sensors Actuators B

    (2007)
  • GoldmanE.R. et al.

    Selection of phage displayed peptides for the detection of 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene in seawater

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2002)
  • GoldmanE.R. et al.

    Phage-displayed peptides as biosensor reagents

    J. Mol. Recognit.

    (2000)
  • GoodridgeL. et al.

    The use of a fluorescent bacteriophage assay for detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in inoculated ground beef and raw milk

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (1999)
  • GuoY. et al.

    Construction of bifunctional phage display for biological analysis and immunoassay

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2010)
  • HameedS. et al.

    Conventional and emerging detection techniques for pathogenic bacteria in food science: A review

    Trends Food Sci. Technol.

    (2018)
  • HammersC.M. et al.

    Antibody phage display: Technique and applications

    J. Invest. Dermatol.

    (2014)
  • HaradaL.K. et al.

    Biotechnological applications of bacteriophages: State of the art

    Microbiol. Res.

    (2018)
  • HidalgoD. et al.

    Electrochemical and impedance characterization of Microbial Fuel Cells based on 2D and 3D anodic electrodes working with seawater microorganisms under continuous operation

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2015)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Equal Contribution.

    2

    All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    View full text