Synergistic suppression effects of flame retardant, porous minerals and nitrogen on premixed methane/air explosion

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104263Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The suppression performance of N2-powder inhibitor was investigated.

  • Thermal decomposition and gaseous products of powder inhibitor were studied.

  • Inhibition mechanisms of N2-powder inhibitor were ascertained.

Abstract

A novel composite inhibitor based on porous mineral materials and conventional flame retardant of ammonium polyphosphate (APP) is prepared to suppress the premixed methane/air explosion. Taking advantages of gas and powder inhibitor, N2 and the prepared composite inhibitor are combined to use. The suppression performance of N2-composite inhibitor on methane explosion is investigated on a 20-L spherical experimental explosion apparatus and the characteristic pressure data are obtained. The combined inhibition effects of N2 and the prepared composite inhibitor are greater than either acting alone. Thermal decomposition behavior and gaseous products of composite inhibitor are analyzed with thermogravimetric analysis and thermogravimetric-mass spectrometry, respectively. Based on physical and chemical actions, the inhibition mechanisms of N2-composite inhibitor system are proposed. This work provides a reference to prepare high-performance gas explosion inhibitor based on the synergism of binary or multiple components.

Introduction

Methane gas explosion is one of the most serious disasters in underground coal mining and causes huge property loss and serious casualties. Furthermore, the hazard of gas explosion widely exists in the transportation and utilization processes. To reduce or eliminate the explosion hazard of methane, the development of new and efficient suppression technologies is highly desirable. The inhibitors play an important role in the suppression or mitigation of gas explosion. The explosive chain reactions may be completely terminated by these inhibitors, and then the intensity of gas explosion can be reduced.

Great efforts have been made to develop high-performance inhibitors. Various gas (such as N2 and CO2), liquid (such as water mist) and solid inhibitors have been employed (Du et al., 2014; Jiang et al., 2016; Liang et al., 2013; Pei et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2013; Zhang, B. et al., 2014a, 2014b). N2 and CO2 are two most widely used gas inhibitors (Wang et al., 2014). The inerting effects and mechanisms of N2 and CO2 on gas explosion have been explored. The maximum explosion pressure (Pmax) gradually decreases with increasing the concentration of incombustible gas (Zhang, B. et al., 2014a, 2014b). N2 or CO2 exerts great influence on the explosion limit, limiting oxygen concentration and explosion intensity of methane (Jiang et al., 2016). Mitu et al. found that N2 and CO2 are more efficient than He and Ar (Mitu et al., 2016). Furthermore, ignition delay phenomenon of methane is observed after dilution with N2 and CO2. The dilution effect of gaseous additives can decrease the concentration of O2, and these molecules of diluents may interrupt the chain radical reactions by physical collision with reactive radicals (Pei et al., 2016). Thus, the reactions between methane and O2 are effectively suppressed. Furthermore, NH3 has attracted considerable attention in inhibition of gas explosion (Luo et al., 2017). Luo et al. found that NH3 can diminish the explosion limit range and mitigate the explosion risk (Luo et al., 2017). NH3 possesses a strong tendency to consume HO·, H· and oxygen, thus the radical chain reactions of methane combustion or explosion are greatly retarded (Luo et al., 2017).

Due to the features of eco-friendly and abundant, water mist has been employed for gas explosion suppression (Cao et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2016; Zhang, P. et al., 2014a, 2014b). The widely-acknowledged suppression mechanisms of water mist are heat absorption, blocking thermal radiation and suffocation effects (Cao et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2016; Zhang, P. et al., 2014a, 2014b). Xu et al. found that when the volume flux of water mist is sufficiently large, the explosion of methane/coal dust mixture is completely mitigated (Xu et al., 2013). In order to improve the suppression effects of water mist, some additives, such as alkali salts and NH4H2PO4, are incorporated in the water (Cao et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2016). Cao et al. investigated the suppression effect of water mist containing NaCl on methane/air explosion (Cao et al., 2015). The results indicated that the addition of NaCl can improve the suppression performances of pure water mist. The improved performance is attributed to the aforementioned physical effects of water mist and chemical inhibition effects of NaCl on combustion reactions (Cao et al., 2015). However, the applicability of water mist is limited under both high and low ambient temperature.

Due to the advantages of easy storage and transportation, various powder materials have been employed in the field of explosion suppression. Rock dust is calcium carbonate powder and has been used for about 100 years to inhibit flame propagation and coal dust explosion (Huang and Honaker, 2016a, 2016b; Song et al., 2018; Song and Zhang, 2018). The suppression performance of rock dust is influenced by particle size, dosage and dispersibility. However, rock dust suffers from adverse caking issue, leading to the deteriorated dispersibility (Huang and Honaker, 2016a, 2016b). The physical or (and) chemical suppression explosion effects of NaHCO3, SiO2, Al(OH)3 and NH4H2PO4 have been reported in the literature (Chelliah et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2012, 2017; Wen et al., 2018). Liu et al. studied the suppression effects of NH4H2PO4, SiO2 and rock dust on methane/coal dust/air explosions (Liu et al., 2013). The results indicated that overpressure and propagating velocity of explosion waves are decreased by these suppression agents. NH4H2PO4 exhibits physical effect of endothermic decomposition reaction, which decreases the system temperature. The decomposition products from NH4H2PO4 can interrupt the chain reactions of methane explosion (Jiang et al., 2016; Luo et al., 2014). Among powder inhibitors, porous materials have attracted extensive attention. The porous structure with labyrinth effect and large surface area provides abundant contact area, thus the radicals are readily quenched, and then flame or explosion is inhibited (Luo et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017). Wang et al. prepared NaHCO3/red mud with abundant micropores and investigated its suppression effect on methane explosion (Wang et al., 2017). The free radicals are trapped by the micropores in red mud, and explosion chain reactions are retarded.

In order to obtain high-performance inhibitor, multi-component powder inhibitors are prepared by achieving the synergism. The multi-component inhibitors exhibit better performance than single components (Jiang et al., 2016; Luo et al., 2014; Pei et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2014, 2017). Sun et al. prepared ammonium polyphosphate (APP)-aluminium hydroxide-kaolinite composite inhibitor, which can significantly suppress gas explosion (Sun et al., 2019). Wang et al. studied the suppression effect of NaHCO3/red mud on gas explosion (Wang et al., 2017). After loading of NaHCO3, red mud exhibits enhanced explosion suppression. Furthermore, gas and powder inhibitors have been combined to improve gas explosion suppression. Jiang et al. found that the combination of N2 and ABC powder has an improved suppression effect on explosion overpressure and flame propagation speed (Jiang et al., 2016).

In order to obtain excellent suppression performance, composite inhibitor with porous materials and flame retardant was prepared. Then solid-gas suppression system was designed based on this composite inhibitor and incombustible gas of N2. The suppression performances were studied in a 20-L spherical experimental explosion apparatus. The inhibition mechanisms were concluded by analyzing the possible synergism between N2 and solid-phase materials.

Section snippets

Materials

Porous mineral material containing mica, talc, silica, activated clay and NaHCO3 (approximately 30 wt%) was named as MTSAS, and was provided from CCTEG Fushun Research Institute. APP (type I) was purchased from Jinan Taixing Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd. High purity N2 was supplied by Shenyang Beidu Special Gases Co., Ltd. The particle distribution curves of APP and MTSAS are shown in Fig. 1. The particle size ranges of APP and MTSAS are 3–70 μm and 0.3–150 μm, respectively.

Preparation of powder composite inhibitors

Composite inhibitors with

Explosion suppression results of MTSAS-APP composite powder

The concentration and types of powder inhibitors greatly influence the Pmax values of methane explosion. The effects of APP, MTSAS and their mixtures on the methane explosion are investigated. Pmax value gradually decreases with increasing the concentration of MTSAS, confirming the suppression performance of this porous mineral composite. After adding 0.075 g/L APP, the Pmax is greatly decreased. However, when the loading of APP further increases, increasing trend of explosion pressure is

Conclusions

APP, a widely-used intumescent flame retardant, was mixed with porous mineral materials to prepare composite inhibitor. N2 and the prepared composite inhibitor were combined to suppress methane explosion. The explosion data, including Pmax, (dP/dt)max and tmax, were achieved to evaluate the explosion suppression performance. Due to synergistic inhibition effects, the combination of N2 and composite inhibitor had a better suppression performance than each one of them alone. The optimal composite

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Liancong Wang: Investigation, Software, Writing - original draft. Yuntao Liang: Writing - review & editing. Yuan Hu: Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Weizhao Hu: Methodology, Validation, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51774182), the National Science and Technology Major Project (2016ZX05045006004), the Science and Technology Innovation Fund of CCTEG (2018MS014) and the Opening Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Safety Technology (SKLCMST103).

References (33)

Cited by (28)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text