Abstract
Pulses of whole genome duplications occurred within numerous angiosperm lineages near and subsequent to the K-Pg boundary. These duplications frequently were followed by subtractions in chromosome number within a ploidal level, i,e., dysploidy. Single products of WGD may have generated more than one dysploid species. Such species in turn may have generated other dysploid species through additional chromosomal rearrangements or through processes of divergent evolution. As a consequence, the genesis of initial polyploids within given phylads likely was followed by a wave of dysploid species formation. If polyploids are more tolerant than diploids of environmental change, as they seem to be, then polyploids and their dysploid derivatives are likely to represent an increasing proportion of flowering plant species in the next hundreds of millennia.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aparicio A, Escudero M, Valdés-Florido A, Pachón M, Rubio E, Albaladejo RG, Martín-Hernanz S, Pradillo M (2019) Karyotype evolution in Helianthemum (Cistaceae): dysploidy, achiasmate meiosis and ecological specialization in H. squamatum, a true gypsophile. Bot J Linn Soc 191:484–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boz066
Cai L, Xi Z, Amorim AM, Sugumaran M, Rest JS, Liu L, Davis C (2019) Widespread ancient whole-genome duplications in Malpighiales coincide with Eocene global climatic upheaval. New Phytol 221:565–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15357
Charlesworth B (1992) Evolutionary rates in partially self-fertilizing species. Amer Naturalist 140:126–148. https://doi.org/10.1086/285406
Clark JW, Donoghue PCJ (2018) Whole-genome duplication and plant macroevolution. Trends Pl Sci 23:933–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.07.006
Coughlan JM, Willis JH (2019) Dissecting the role of a large chromosomal inversion in life history divergence throughout the Mimulus guttatus species complex. Molec Ecol 28:1343–1357. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14804
Escudero M, Martın-Bravo S, Mayrose I, Fernandez-Mazuecos M, Fiz-Palacios O, Hipp AL, Pimentel M, Jimenez-Mejıas P, Valcarcel V, Vargas P et al (2014) Karyotypic changes through dysploidy persist longer over evolutionary time than polyploid changes. PLoS ONE 9:e85266. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085266
Escudero M, Balao F, Martın-Bravo S, Valente L, Valcarcel V (2018) Is the diversification of Mediterranean Basin plant lineages coupled to karyotypic changes? Pl Biol 20(Suppl. 1):166–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12563
Estep MC, McKain MR, Diaz DV, Zhong JS et al (2014) Allopolyploidy, diversification, and the Miocene grassland expansion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:15149–15154. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404177111
Fishman L, Stathos A, Beardsley PM, Williams CF, Hill JP (2013) Chromosomal rearrangements and the genetics of reproductive barriers in Mimulus (monkey flowers). Evolution 69:2547–2560
Fuller ZL, Koury SA, Phadnis N, Schaeffer SW (2019) How chromosomal rearrangements shape adaptation and speciation: Case studies in Drosophila pseudoobscura and its sibling species D. persimilis. Molec Ecol 28:1283–1301. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.149
Gitai J, Paule J, Zizka G, Schulte K, Benko-Iseppon AM (2014) Chromosome numbers and DNA content in Bromeliaceae: additional data and critical review. Bot J Linn Soc 176:349–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12211
Guerra M (2008) Chromosome numbers in plant cytotaxonomy. Cytogenet Genome Res 350:339–350. https://doi.org/10.1159/000121083
Hedrick PW, Levin DA (1984) Kin-founding and the fixation of chromosomal variants. Amer Naturalist 124:789–797. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2461301
Huang K, Andrew RL, Owens GL, Ostevik KL, Rieseberg LH (2019) Multiple chromosomal inversions contribute to adaptive divergence of a dune sunflower ecotype. bioRxiv:829622. https://doi.org/10.1101/829622
Jackson B, Butlin R, Navarro A, Fria R (2016) Speciation chromosomal rearrangements and. In: Kliman R (ed) Encyclopedia of evolutionary biology. Elsevier, Cambridge, pp 149–158
Kagale S et al (2014) Polyploid evolution of the Brassicaceae during the Cenozoic era. Pl Cell 26:2777–2791. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.126391
Kirkpatrick M, Barrett B (2015) Chromosome inversions, adaptive cassettes and the evolution of species’ ranges. Molec Evol 24:2046–2055. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13074
Kirkpatrick M, Barton N (2006) Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 173:419–434. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.047985
Lande R (1985) The fixation of chromosomal rearrangements in a subdivided population with local extinction and colonization. Heredity 54:323–332
Lowry DB, Willis JH (2010) A widespread chromosomal inversion polymorphism contributes to a major life-history transition, local adaptation, and reproductive isolation. PLoS Biol 8:e1000500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000500
Luo MC, Deal KR, Akhunov ED, Akhunova AR, Anderson OD, Anderson JA et al (2009) Genome comparisons reveal a dominant mechanism of chromosome number reduction in grasses and accelerated genome evolution in Triticeae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:15780–15785. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908195106
Mandáková T, Lysak MA (2018) Post-polyploid diploidization and diversification through dysploid changes. Curr Opin Pl Biol 42:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2018.03.001
Mandáková T, Joly S, Krzywinski M, Mummenhoff K, Lysak MA (2010) Fastdiploidization in close mesopolyploid relatives of Arabidopsis. Pl Cell 22:2277–2290
Mandáková T, Barker MS, Lysak MA (2017) Diverse genome organization following 13 independent mesopolyploid events in Brassicaceae contrasts with convergent patterns of gene retention. Pl J 91:3–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13553
Mandáková T, Pouch M, Harmanová K, Zhan SH, Mayrose I, Lysak MA (2017) Multispeed genome diploidization and diversification after an ancient allopolyploidization. Molec Ecol 26:6445–6462. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14379
Pimm SL, Joppa LN (2015) How many plant species are there, where are they, and at what rate are theygoing extinct? Ann Mo Bot Gard 100:170–176
Rieseberg LH (2001) Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 16:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02187-5
Salse J, Abrouk M, Bolot S, Guilhot N, Courcelle E, Faraut T et al (2009) Reconstruction of monocotyledoneous proto-chromosomes reveals faster evolution in plants than in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:14908–14913. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902350106
Soltis PS, Marchant DB, Van de Peer Y, Soltis DE (2015) Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Curr Opin Genet Developm 35:119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2015.11.003
Stebbins GL (1950) Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York
Tayalé A, Parisod C (2013) Natural pathways to polyploidy in plants and consequences for genome reorganization. Cytogenet Genome Res 140:79–96. https://doi.org/10.1159/000351318
Twyford AD, Friedman J (2015) Adaptive divergence in the monkey flower Mimulus guttatus is maintained by a chromosomal inversion. Evolution 69:1476–1486. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12663
Van de Peer Y, Mizrachi E, Marchal K (2017) The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat Rev Genet 18:411–424
Vanneste K, Baele G, Maere S, Van de Peer Y (2014) Analysis of 41 plant genomes supports a wave of successful genome duplications in association with the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Genome Res 24:1334–1347. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.168997.113
Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Stuessy TF, Villasenor JL (2009) Chromosome numbers, karyotypes, and evolution in Melampodium (Asteraceae). Intl J Pl Sci 170:1168–1182
Winterfeld G, Schneider J, Becher H, Dickie J, Röser M (2015) Karyosystematics of the Australasian stipoid grass Austrostipa and related genera: chromosome sizes, ploidy, chromosome base numbers, and phylogeny. Austral Syst Bot 28:145–159. https://doi.org/10.1071/SB14029
Winterfeld G, Becher H, Voshell S, Hilu K, Röser M (2018) Karyotype evolution in Phalaris (Poaceae): the role of reductional dysploidy, polyploidy and chromosome alteration in a wide-spread and diverse genus. PLoS ONE 13:e0192869. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192869
Winterfeld G, Ley A, Hoffmann MH, Paule J, Röser M (2020) Dysploidy and polyploidy trigger strong variation of chromosome numbers in the prayer–plant family (Marantaceae). Pl Syst Evol 306:36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01663-x
Wright S (1969) The theory of gene frequencies. Evolution and the genetics of populations: a treatise in three volumes. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Acknowledgements
The author is most grateful to Martin Lysak and to two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful critiques of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
This research did not involve any testing on humans or animals.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Marcus Koch.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levin, D.A. Did dysploid waves follow the pulses of whole genome duplications?. Plant Syst Evol 306, 75 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01704-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01704-5