Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of varieties, curing of tubers and extraction methods on functional characteristics of potato starch

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The investigation was conducted to study the effects of variations in quality and functional properties of starch isolated from fresh and cured tubers of potato, different varieties and extraction methods. The starch was extracted from four white flesh varieties (Kufri Chipsona-4, Kufri Badshah, Kufri Pushkar, Kufri Bahar) and one pink flesh variety (Kufri Sindhuri). Among the different starch extraction methods tried, the results have been reported for water extraction method (control) and combined method (extraction with ambient water 30 °C + 0.25% NaOH + 2% SDS-ME + 5.25% NaOCl + 0.15% cellulase enzyme). The starch extracted was analysed for its quality and functional characteristics. Starch extracted from potato variety Kufri Chipsona-4 showed higher water absorption capacity (258%), swelling power (38.4 g/g), solubility (35.8%) and light transmittance (22.7%) as compared to other varieties. Syneresis was minimum in the starch of Kufri Pushkar (20.3%) followed by Kufri Bahar (22.5%), Kufri Sindhuri (35.6%), Kufri Badshah (41.7%) and it was maximum in Kufri Chipsona-4 (47.8%). For all the varieties, curing of tubers resulted in lower yield, amylose content, swelling power and solubility; but higher amylopectin, phosphorus, WAC and light transmittance of extracted starch. The combined method of starch extraction was found better than control, as the starch extracted had higher yield, amylopectin content, water absorption capacity, swelling power, solubility and light transmittance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Singh, A. Kaur, S. Khetan, R. Ezekeil, P. Kaur, I. Naoto, T. Noda, Starch 70(3–4), 170–183 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201700130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Kaur, N. Singh, R. Ezekiel, S.H. Guraya, Food Chem. 101, 643–651 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.01.054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A.J. Aina, K.O. Falade, J.O. Akingbala, P. Titus, Food Bioprocess Technol. 5(2), 576–583 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-009-0316-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Singh, J. Singh, N.S. Sodhi, B.S. Gill, Food Chem. 81(2), 219–231 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00416-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. R.Y. Avula, R.K. Singh, Potato IV. Food. 3, 105–112 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. S.A.S. Craig, C.C. Maningat, P.A. Seib, R.C. Hoseney, Cereal Chem. 66, 173–182 (1989)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. L.G. Thygesen, A. Blennow, S.B. Engelsen, Starch 55(6), 241–249 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/star.200390062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Noda, S. Tsuda, M. Mori, S. Takigawa, J. Appl. Glycosci. 51, 241–246 (2004). https://doi.org/10.5458/jag.51.241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Singh, N. Singh, S.K. Saxena, J. Food Eng. 52, 9–16 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(01)00078-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J.O. Smith, in: Potato Processing, ed. by W.F. Talburt, and O. Smith (eds.) (4 ed.). (Van Nostrand, Reinhold, New York, 1987) p. 796

  11. J. Singh, O.J. Mccarthy, H. Singh, P.J. Moughan, Food Chem. 106, 583–596 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.06.041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Q. Liu, E. Weber, V. Currie, R. Yada, Carbohydr. Polym. 51, 213–221 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(02)00138-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Neeraj, Studies on starch isolated from potato subjected to various storage conditions, Ph.D. thesis, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India (2017) https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810031951.

  14. A. Peshin, Characterization of starch isolated from potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.). J. Food Sci. Technol. 38(5), 447–449 (2001)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. P.C. Williams, F.D. Kuzina, I. Hlynka, Cereal Chem. 47, 417–420 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Koenig, C. Johnson, Colorimetric determination of phosphorus in biological materials. Ind. Eng. Chem. Anal. Ed. 14(2), 155–156 (1942). https://doi.org/10.1021/i560102a026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Kaur, N. Singh, J. Singh, Carbohydr. Polym. 55, 211–223 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2003.09.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. K.N. Waliszewski, A.A. Maria, L.A. Bello, J.A. Monroy, Carbohydr. Polym. 52, 237–242 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(02)00270-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. L.R. Beuchat, J. Agric. Food Chem. 25, 258–265 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60210a044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. O.P. Sheoran, D.S. Tonk, L.S. Kaushik, R.C. Hasija, R.S. Pannu, Recent advances in information theory, statistics & computer applications by D.S. Hooda & R.C. Hasija. 139–143 (1998) https://14.139.232.166/opstat/default.asp.

  21. Ø. Hammer, D.A. Harper, P.D. Ryan, Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1), 9 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Gray, J.C. Hughes, Tuber quality, in The Potato Crop, ed. by P.M. Harris (Chapman and Hall, London, 1978), pp. 504–544

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. I.A. Wani, D.S. Sogi, B.S. Gill, J. Food Sci. Technol. 52(7), 4078–4089 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1480-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. N. Singh, L. Kaur, J. Singh, J. Sci. Food Agric. 84, 714–720 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. T. Noda, S. Tsuda, M. Mori, S. Takigawa, C.M. Endo, K. Saito, Food Chem. 86, 119–125 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.09.035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. N.M. Nadiha, A. Fazilah, R. Bhat, A.A. Karim, Food Chem. 121, 1053–1059 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.01.048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. U. Uthumporn, Y. Shariffa, A. Fazilah, A. Karim, Colloid Polym. Sci. 290(15), 1481–1491 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-012-2674-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. M.J. Van Der Maarel, B. Van Der Veen, J.C. Uitdehaag, H. Leemhuis, L. Dijkhuizen, J. Biotechnol. 94(2), 137–155 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(01)00407-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. M.R. Debet, M.J. Gidley, Carbohydr. Polym. 64, 452–465 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.12.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. E. Perez, M. Lares, Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 60, 113–116 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-005-6838-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Y. Zhang, K. Zhu, S. He, L. Tan, X. Kong, Food Hydrocoll. 52, 785–794 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.07.037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. P.L. Soni, H.W. Sharma, S.S. Bisen, H.C. Srivastava, M.M. Gharia, Starch 39(12), 411–413 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19870391202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. F. Xie, L. Yu, B. Su, L. Chen, J. Cereal Sci. 49(3), 371–377 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2009.01.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. E. Nuwamanya, Y. Baguma, N. Emambux, J. Taylor, P. Rubaihayo, J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 2(1), 1–11 (2010)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. S.K. Bhupender, B. Rajneesh, S.Y. Baljeet, Int. Food Res. J. 20, 1555–1561 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  36. N. Lindebooma, P.R. Chang, R.T. Tylera, Starch 56, 89–99 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/star.200300218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. M.Z. Sitohy, S.S. El-Saadany, S.M. Labib, M.F. Ramadan, Starch 52, 101–105 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. R.G.F. Visser, L.C.J.M. Suurs, P.M. Bruinenberg, I. Bleeker, E. Jacobsen, Starch 49, 438–443 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19970491103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. P. Ambigaipalan, R. Hoover, E. Donner, Q. Liu, Food Chem. 143, 175–184 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. A.A. Karim, M.H. Norziah, C.C. Seow, Food Chem. 71, 9–36 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00130-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Y. Wu, Z. Chen, X. Li, Z. Wang, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 43(3), 492–497 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.09.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. R.L. Whistler, J.N. BeMiller, Starch, in Carbohydrate Chemistry for Food Scientists, ed. by R.L. Whistler, J.N. BeMiller (Eagan Press, St. Paul, 1996), pp. 117–151

    Google Scholar 

  43. F.F. Yamin, M. Lee, L.M. Pollak, P.J. White, Cereal Chem. 76, 175–181 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.1999.76.2.175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. L. Kaur, N. Singh, N.S. Sodhi, Food Chem. 79, 183–192 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00130-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. O. Abegunde, T. Mu, J. Chen, F. Deng, Food Hydrocoll. 33(2), 169–177 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.03.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. D. Kuakpetoon, Y.J. Wang, Carbohydr. Res. 341, 1896–1915 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2006.04.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. T. Noda, N. Kottearachchi, S. Tsuda, M. Mori, S. Takigawa, C. Matsuura-Endo, Carbohydr. Polym. 68(4), 793–796 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.08.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre of Food Science and Technology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125 004, India

    Neeraj Phogat, Saleem Siddiqui, Nidhi Dalal & Anuradha Srivastva

  2. School of Agricultural Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida, 201310, U.P, India

    Saleem Siddiqui

  3. ICAR-Directorate of Mushroom Research, Solan, India

    Anuradha Srivastva

  4. Department of Food Nutrition and Food Technology, Lady Irwin College, New Delhi, India

    Bindu Bindu

Authors
  1. Neeraj Phogat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saleem Siddiqui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nidhi Dalal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anuradha Srivastva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bindu Bindu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neeraj Phogat.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phogat, N., Siddiqui, S., Dalal, N. et al. Effects of varieties, curing of tubers and extraction methods on functional characteristics of potato starch. Food Measure 14, 3434–3444 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00579-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00579-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation