Skip to main content
Log in

In the Iron Tricarbonyl Mediated Electrocyclic Ring Opening of 3-Heterocyclobutenes—Does Iron or Heteroatom Decide the Pathway?

  • THEORETICAL INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effect of heteroatoms in manipulating irontricarbonyl assisted ring openings in heterosubstituted cyclobutenes (HCB) has been studied using DFT. Iron tricarbonyl facilitates the ring cleavage when X = O, S and Se but retards when X = NH, PH. Iron tripod promotes the Hin pathway to Hout in the oxa/thia/selena HCBs. The dominance of iron in bond cleavage is evident through the NLMO study. The case is not very simple in the aza and phospha analog, there are not only a poisoning behavior of iron tripod by enhancing the barrier but also competition prevailing between the catalyst and the hetero lone pairs to determine the torque/regio selective pathways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. D. J. Tantillo and R. Hoffmann, Helv. Chim. Acta 84, 1396 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0107935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Prathipa and L. Akilandeswari, J. Mol. Model. 22, 266 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-016-3125-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Rousseau and S. Robin, Four-Membered Heterocycles: Structure and Reactivity, inModern Heterocyclic Chemistry, Ed. by J. Alvarez-Builla, J. J. Vaquero, and J. Barluenga, (Wiley-VCH, 2011), p 163.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Four-Membered Heterocycles together with All Fused Systems Containing a Four-Membered Heterocyclic Ring in Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry III, Ed. by A. R. Katritzky, C. A. Ramsden, E. F. V. Scriven, and R. J. K. Taylor, (Elsevier, 2008), Vol. 2, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. P. Synder, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 45, 1344 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1021/jo01295a046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. E. Fredrich and G. B. Schuster, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93, 4602 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00747a049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Yu, W. Chan and J. D. Goddard, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 7529 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00177a012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. W. Krimse, N. G. Rondon, and K. N. Houk, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 7989 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00337a067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Rodolf, D. C. Spellmeyer, and K. N. Houk, J. Org. Chem. 52, 3708 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00392a046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Niwayami, E. A. Kallel, D. C. Spellmeyer, and K. N. Houk, J. Org. Chem. 61, 2813 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1021/jo950884i

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Jaccob, I. Sheeba Jem, S. Giri, et al., J. Phys. Org. Chem. 24, 460 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/Poc.1785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. E. Kuehne And P. J. Sheeran, J. Org. Chem. 33, 4406 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1021/jo01276a021

  13. M . Walker, B. N. Hietbrink, B. E. Thomas Iv, et al., J. Org. Chem. 66, 6669 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1021/jo010466f

  14. S. Mangelinck, V. V. Speybroeck, P. Vansteenkiste, et al., J. Org. Chem. 73, 5481 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/jo800522b

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. E. Jung and Y. M. Choi, J. Org. Chem. 56, 6729 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1021/Jo00024a001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. P. Marchand, D. Rajagopal, S. G. Bott, et al., J. Org. Chem. 59, 1608 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00086a008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. J. Frisch et al., Gaussian 98, revision A.9 (Gaussian, Pittsburgh, 1998).

  18. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98 1372 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37, 785 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. P. C. Hariharan and J. A. Pople, Theor. Chim. Acta. 28, 213(1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00533485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. J. Hay and W. R. Wadt, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 299 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.448975

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Gonzalez and H. B. Schlegel, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 2154 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.456010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. J. P. Foster and F. Weinhold, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102, 7211(1980). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00544a007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. A. D. Reed, L. A. Curtiss, and F. Weinhold, Chem. Rev. 88, 899 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00088a005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. E. D. Glendening, A. E. Reed, J. E. Carpenter, and F. Weinhold, NBO 3.1 Program Manual (Theoretical Chemistry Institute and Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. Cooper and W. D. Walters, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 4220 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01549a025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. K. B. Wiberg and R. A. Fenoglio, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90, 3395 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01015a017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Iranpour, R. Fazaeli, M. S. Sadjadi, et al. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 64, 472 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023619040107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

L. A. thanks the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, for the financial assistance through minor research project (no. F-MRP6409/16(SERO/UGC)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Akilandeswari.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prathipa, C., Akilandeswari, L. In the Iron Tricarbonyl Mediated Electrocyclic Ring Opening of 3-Heterocyclobutenes—Does Iron or Heteroatom Decide the Pathway?. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 65, 1025–1031 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023620070165

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023620070165

Keywords:

Navigation