Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring Housing Stability With Consumer Reference Data

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

Housing instability for low-income renters has drawn greater attention recently, but measurement has limited research on policies to stabilize housing. Address histories from consumer reference data can be used to increase the quantity and quality of research on low-income renters. Consumer data track housing moves throughout the entire United States for most of the adult population. In this article, I show that such data can measure housing stability for groups with very low income and extreme instability. For example, the data can track housing moves during natural disasters, at demolition of public housing, for households at high risk of homelessness, and during gentrification. Consumer data can track housing instability outcomes that are more common than shelter entry and less expensive to collect than surveys. Relative to existing administrative address histories, consumer data allow researchers to track housing moves to exact addresses and across jurisdictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The raw data used for this study are proprietary and owned by Infutor Data Solutions, Inc. from whom it can be purchased.

Notes

  1. See https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/hdx/pit-hic/.

  2. See Evans et al. (2019b) for a more complete review of popular policy responses and the existing evidence base.

  3. Public-use microdata areas are those that contain 100,000 to 200,000 residents within a state.

  4. In that case, a population with an overall move rate of 12% should have about 1.4% moving more than once because .014 = .122.

  5. The soundex of a word removes all vowels, treats consonants that can have the same sound as identical, and removes consecutively repeated letters. For example, “PHILLIPS,” “PHILIPS,” “PALEFACE,” and “PLAYOFFS” all have the same soundex.

  6. This study was conducted entirely in STATA 15 on a server with 256GB RAM, dual 12-core Intel Xeon CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz Haswell processors, and a 1.4TB solid-state drive. Because STATA rather inefficiently stores entire large data sets in working memory, the large amount of available RAM was important for the completion of this study using that tool.

References

  • Aliprantis, D., & Hartley, D. (2015). Blowing it up and knocking it down: The local and city-wide effects of demolishing high concentration public housing on crime. Journal of Urban Economics, 88, 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, J. (2018). Crime and public housing: A general equilibrium analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston, MA.

  • Chyn, E. (2018). Moved to opportunity: The long-run effects of public housing demolition on children. American Economic Review, 108, 3028–3056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, R., & Reed, D. (2018). The effects of evictions on low-income households (Working paper). New York: New York University, Wagner School.

  • Corinth, K. (2017). The impact of permanent supportive housing on homeless populations. Journal of Housing Economics, 35, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, M. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American city. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, M., Gromis, A., Edmonds, L., Hendrickson, J., Krywokulski, K., Leung, L., & Porton, A. (2018). Eviction Lab national database: Version 1.0 [Data set]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, Eviction Lab. Available from www.evictionlab.org

  • Diamond, R., McQuade, T., & Qian, Q. (2018). The effects of rent control expansion on tenants, landlords, and inequality: Evidence from San Francisco (NBER Working Paper No. 24181). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Diamond, R., McQuade, T., & Qian, F. (2019). The effects of rent control expansion on tenants, landlords, and inequality: Evidence from San Francisco. American Economic Review, 109, 3365–3394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W. N., Kroeger, S., Palmer, C., & Pohl, E. (2019a). Housing and Urban Development–Veterans Affairs supportive housing vouchers and veterans’ homelessness, 2007–2017. American Journal of Public Health, 109, 1440–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W. N., Philips, D. C., & Ruffini, K. J. (2019b). Reducing and preventing homelessness: A review of the evidence and charting a research agenda (NBER Working Paper No. 26232). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Evans, W. N., Sullivan, J. X., & Wallskog, M. (2016). The impact of homelessness prevention programs on homelessness. Science, 353, 694–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, T. J., Chwalek, M., Hughes, J., Karabanow, J., & Kidd, S. (2014). How stable is stable? Defining and measuring housing stability. Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 964–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garza, M. M. (1999, September 10). 9 high-rises at Taylor Homes slated to close. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1999-09-10-9909100269-story.html

  • Goodman, S., Messeri, P., & O’Flaherty, B. (2016). Homelessness prevention in New York City: On average, it works. Journal of Housing Economics, 31, 14–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubits, D., Shinn, M., Wood, M., Brown, S. R., Dastrup, S. R., & Bell, S. H. (2018). What interventions work best for families who experience homelessness? Impact estimates from the Family Options Study. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 37, 835–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, J. E., Mader, N., Tannenbaum, D., & van Dijk, W. (2019). Does eviction cause poverty? Quasi-experimental evidence from Cook County, IL (NBER Working Paper No. 26139). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Jacob, B. A. (2004). Public housing, housing vouchers, and student achievement: Evidence from public housing demolitions in Chicago. American Economic Review, 94, 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, D. S. (2017). The impact of federal homelessness funding on homelessness. Southern Economic Journal, 84, 548–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., Gennetian, L. A., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., Kling, J. R., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2013). Long-term neighborhood effects on low-income families: Evidence from moving to opportunity. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 103, 226–231.

  • Mills, A., & Giambrone, A. (2017, February 2). Life is hell for tenants of giant DC slumlord Sanford Capital. Washington City Paper. Retrieved from https://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/news/article/20850914/life-is-hell-for-tenants-of-giant-dc-slumlord-sanford-capital

  • Palmer, C., Phillips, D. C., & Sullivan, J. X. (2019). Does emergency financial assistance reduce crime? Journal of Public Economics, 169, 34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, N. (2000, February 17). Kicking and screaming. Chicago Reader. Retrieved from https://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/kicking-and-screaming/Content?oid=901463

  • Popov, I. (2016). Homelessness programs and social insurance. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

  • Rolston, H., Geyer, J., Locke, G., Metraux, S., & Treglia, D. (2013). Evaluation of Homebase Community Prevention Program (Final report). Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates Inc.

  • Sandler, D. H. (2017). Externalities of public housing: The effect of public housing demolitions on local crime. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 62, 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., Brisson, D., & Burnes, D. (2016). Do we really know how many are homeless?: An analysis of the point-in-time homelessness count. Families in Society, 97, 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stergiopoulos, V., Hwang, S. W., Gozdzik, A., Nisenbaum, R., Latimer, E., Rabouin, D., . . . Goering, P. N. (2015). Effect of scattered-site housing using rent supplements and intensive case management on housing stability among homeless adults with mental illness: A randomized trial. JAMA, 313, 905–915.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the editors, three anonymous referees, Rebecca Diamond, Ingrid Gould Ellen, Bill Evans, Gary Painter, Jim Sullivan, and participants in the Notre Dame applied micro brownbag and the APPAM Fall Research Conference for comments and questions that have improved this article. Thanks to Dan Hartley for providing the Robert Taylor Homes move dates. Tessa Bonomo and Becca Brough provided excellent research assistance. This project received financial support from the Wilson-Sheehan Lab for Economic Opportunities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David C. Phillips.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethics and Consent

This study was approved under University of Notre Dame IRB 18-05-4712.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 339 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phillips, D.C. Measuring Housing Stability With Consumer Reference Data. Demography 57, 1323–1344 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00893-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00893-5

Keywords

Navigation