Next Article in Journal
Quantification of the Effect of the Cattle Breed on Milk Cheese Yield: Comparison between Italian Brown Swiss and Italian Friesian
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Copra Meal Inclusion Level in Growing-Finishing Pig Diets Containing β-Mannanase on Growth Performance, Apparent Total Tract Digestibility, Blood Urea Nitrogen Concentrations and Pork Quality
Previous Article in Journal
Validation of the Turkey Semen Cryopreservation by Evaluating the Effect of Two Diluents and the Inseminating Doses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Review: Practical Use of n-3 Fatty Acids to Improve Reproduction Parameters in the Context of Modern Sow Nutrition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Replacing Dietary Corn with Broken Rice on Goose Growth Performance, Body Size and Bare Skin Color

College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(8), 1330; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081330
Submission received: 12 May 2020 / Revised: 30 July 2020 / Accepted: 31 July 2020 / Published: 1 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feed Ingredients for Swine and Poultry)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Geese are usually raised in the main rice-growing areas in China. Broken rice (BR) produced from rice processed into refined rice in these places can be applied to goose feed, which not only reduces the dependence on corn but can also reduce the transportation cost of feed raw materials by using local sources. It was found that BR had no negative effects on the growth performance of growing geese.

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of replacing dietary corn with broken rice (BR) on goose growth performance, body size and bare skin color. In total, 240 28-day-old healthy male Yangzhou goslings with similar body weight (BW) were randomly divided into five groups, with six replicates per group and eight geese per replicate. The control group was fed with a corn-soybean meal. The BR25, BR50, BR75 and BR100 groups had 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of corn replaced with BR, respectively (corresponding to 15.95%, 31.88%, 47.63% and 62.92% of BR in the feed, respectively), each with constant metabolizable energy (ME) to crude protein (CP) ratio (ME/CP). At 28, 42, 56 and 70 d, BW and feed intake for each pen were measured. Blood was collected, and body size and bare skin color were evaluated at 70 d. The results showed that different BR replacement proportions had no effect on BW at 42, 56 or 70 d or on average daily feed intake (ADFI) or average daily gain (ADG) from 28 to 42 d (p > 0.05) but BR50 and BR75 decreased the feed/gain ratio (F/G) from 28 to 42 d (p < 0.05). From 42 to 56 d, BR75 and BR100 geese had a lower ADFI than the control geese (p < 0.05), and BR75 and BR100 geese had a lower F/G than the BR25 geese (p < 0.05). Group BR50, BR75 and BR100 geese had a lower ADFI from 56 to 70 d than the control geese (p < 0.05). From 28 to 70 d, BR50, BR75 and BR100 groups had a lower ADFI (p < 0.05). Interestingly, the control and BR25 groups had a higher flipper score than the BR50, BR75 and BR100 groups (p < 0.05), and the control group had a higher flipper score than the BR25 group (p < 0.05). All BR groups reduced the bill scoring (p < 0.05). Different BR replacement proportions did not negatively affect serum biochemical variable at 70 d (p > 0.05). Overall, under these conditions, BR can totally replace corn in goose diets, and we recommend 75% replacement of corn with BR from 28 to 70 d.

1. Introduction

Corn is one of the main energy sources in poultry diets, providing 50–70% of the total energy of poultry. However, corn can also be used as human food and raw material for producing bioethanol. As China and other countries import an increasing amount of corn, the price of corn is also increasing. Under the trend of increasing global demand for corn, poultry producers are being forced to seek local raw materials to replace corn in animal feed. A large number of researchers have investigated the effect of different feed ingredients on the performance of poultry such as rice bran [1,2], defatted rice bran [3,4], paddy rice [5,6,7], whole wheat [8,9,10] and millet [11,12,13]. China is the largest rice producer in the world, accounting for 27.63% of global rice production [14]. When paddy is processed, broken rice (BR) with smaller particles is produced. As rice production and demand increase, the amount of BR produced worldwide also increases. When paddy rice is made into white rice, approximately 15% will be converted into BR or powder due to processes such as defusing and polishing [15]. However, BR is not preferred for human consumption, and it is disposed of for animal feeds because of its lower cost. Studies have shown that corn and rice have differences in starch type and starch particle size. Because rice contains higher amylopectin and smaller starch granules than corn, rice is more easily digested by animals than corn [16]. However, BR contains fewer xanthophylls and carotenoids than corn, which may affect the skin color of poultry when feeding BR. Skin color is a major concern among consumers in the marketplace, especially in China. Broken rice is widely used in pig production. Vicente et al. [17] showed that feeding BR improved dietary component digestibility and ileal morphology in piglets compared with those for corn. Amornthewaphat and Attamangkune [18] reported that pigs fed with BR had greater nutrient digestibility than those fed maize diets. Vicente et al. [19] and Mateos et al. [20] revealed that the inclusion of BR in the diet as a substitution for corn increased nutrient digestibility and growth performance in pig. However, the effect of BR on geese has not been studied yet.
BR replacing corn in feed totally or partly can not only reduce the dependence on corn in the breeding industry and save cost, but also alleviate the conflict between human and animals competing for food. We hypothesize that corn could be replaced by BR with no negative effect on goose performance. Therefore, the effects of various levels of corn replaced by BR on growth performance, serum biochemical variables, body size and bare skin color in geese were investigated in the present study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design and Diets

The Yangzhou University Animal Care and Use Committee approved all bird-handling protocols used in the study, with permit number SYXK (Su) IACUC 2012-0029.
A total of 240 28-d-old healthy male Yangzhou goslings from the same hatch were obtained from a commercial hatchery. The goslings were randomly assigned to five dietary treatments, with six replicate pens per treatment and eight geese per pen. Control group was fed with a corn-soybean meal basal diet; The BR25, BR50, BR75 and BR100 indicate that 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of corn was replaced by broken rice in the basal diet, respectively (15.95%, 31.88%, 47.63% and 62.92% of BR, respectively, was added to the diets). All the groups had a constant metabolizable energy (ME) to crude protein (CP) ratio (ME/CP, 72.68 MJ/kg). In this experiment, a nipple drinker was used to provide drinking water for geese. There are windows around the goose house, so that sunlight can enter. In addition, the goose house has a wet curtain cooling system and a ventilation system to stabilize room temperature and humidity. Water and feed were provided ad libitum. The geese were exposed to natural daylight, and the room temperature was maintained at approximately 24 °C. The size of the replicate pen was 2.7 m2 (1.5 m × 1.8 m).
The chemical composition of the BR and corn in this study are shown in Table 1. The composition and nutrient levels of the experimental diets are shown in Table 2. The experimental diets were formulated mainly according to prior research results from our laboratory [21].

2.2. Sampling and Measurements

Growth performance was evaluated in terms of body weight (BW), average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG) and feed-to-gain ratio (F/G). The BW of the birds in each pen was measured at 28, 42, 56 and 70 d of age. The ADFI, ADG and F/G values for the 28 to 42, 42 to 56 and 56 to 70 d periods were calculated. At 70 d, one goose from each pen with the average BW of the replicate was selected. No goose from any treatment died during the whole period of the experiment. Approximately 2.5 mL of blood was collected via the wing vein and centrifuged at 2000× g for 10 min at 4 °C to harvest serum, which was then stored at −20 °C until analysis of serum biochemical variable. The serum biochemical variable was determined using a UniCel Synchron D × C 800 fully automatic biochemical analysis system (Beckman Coulter, Los Angeles, CA, USA). The serum biochemical variable was performed following the instructions of the corresponding commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). Serum total protein (TP) was assayed by the Biuret method. Serum albumin (ALB) was assayed by the Microplate Assay method. Serum glucose (GLU) was assayed by the GLU Oxidase method. Serum uric acid (UA), cholesterol (CHO) and triglycerides (TGs) were assayed by the Enzyme-colorimetric method. Serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were assayed by the Direct method.
After blood collection was completed, each goose was evaluated for body measurement, and flipper and bill color were given a score. The body size were conducted using a measuring tape calibrated in centimeters (cm) for half-diving length (the distance from the tip of the bill to the midpoint of the hip line), keel length (the distance between the anterior and posterior tips of the keel), shank length (the linear distance from the upper joint of shank to the third and fourth toes) and shank circumference (the circumference of the middle tibia). Measurements were carried out using the method described by the Agricultural Ministry of China (NY/T823-2004) [22]. We selected five geese, which represented five levels of flipper and bill color grades. Standards of color grading were set up with scores from 1 to 5 points corresponding to colors from white to yellow. Then, the flippers and bills were compared among all geese according to the standards of Color Grading.
The dry matter (DM) was determined by drying the samples in a drying oven (DHG-9240A, Shanghai, China). The crude protein (CP) was determined by the Kjeldahl method. The crude fat (EE), calcium (Ca) and total phosphorus were analyzed according to the standard procedures set forth by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 2005) [23]. The amino acids (AA) were analyzed by amino acid analyzer.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

All the data were initially processed using Excel and analyzed using a one-way ANOVA procedure in SPSS 19.0 (SPSS, 2010) [24]. Significant differences among the treatment means were determined at p < 0.05 by Duncan’s multiple range tests.

3. Results

3.1. Growth Performance

The effects of BR on the BW of geese at 28, 42, 56 and 70 d are shown in Table 3. The ADFI, ADG and F/G of geese fed with dietary BR are shown in Table 4. No significant differences were found in BW at 42, 56 and 70 d (p > 0.05). ADFI and ADG were also not affected from 28 to 42 d (p > 0.05), but BR50 and BR75 groups had a lower F/G from 28 to 42 d (p < 0.05). From 42 to 56 d, geese in the BR75 and BR100 groups had a lower ADFI than those in the control group (p < 0.05) and geese in the BR75 and BR100 groups had a lower F/G than those in the BR25 group (p < 0.05). Geese in the BR50, BR75 and BR100 groups had a lower ADFI from 56 to 70 d than those in the control group (p < 0.05). From 28 to 70 d, BR50, BR75 and BR100 groups had a lower ADFI (p < 0.05).

3.2. Body Size and Serum Biochemical Variable

The body size (cm) of geese at 70 d of age are shown in Table 5. The concentrations of dietary BR had no effect on half-diving length, keel length, shank length or shank circumference (p > 0.05).
The effects of BR on the serum biochemical variable of the geese at 70 d are shown in Table 6. The dietary BR had no significant effect on serum concentration of TP, ALB, GLO, A/G, BUN, UA, GLU, TG, HDL or LDL of geese at 70 d (p > 0.05).

3.3. Bare Skin Color

A one-way ANOVA showed that there were effects of dietary BR concentrations on bare skin color score of the flipper (p < 0.01) and bill (p < 0.01) (Figure 1). The higher the color score is, the more yellow the bare skin color; otherwise, the paler the color. The control and BR25 groups had a higher flipper score than the BR50, BR75 and BR100 groups (p < 0.01); and the control group had a higher flipper score than the BR25 group (p < 0.05). Broken rice had a significant effect on bill scoring (p < 0.01).
The flipper and bill scoring were carried out by selecting bird of average BW from each pen. The higher the score, the yellower the flippers and bills. Statistical analysis was carried out with one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range tests. The data are shown as means ± SEM (standard errors of the means, n = 6). Values within a group of columns with no common letters differ significantly (p < 0.05). Control group was fed with a corn-soybean meal basal diet; BR25, BR50, BR75 and BR100 indicate that 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of corn was replaced by broken rice in the basal diet (15.95%, 31.88%, 47.63% and 62.92% of BR, respectively, was added to the diets).

4. Discussion

4.1. Growth Performance

Under the conditions of our experiment, no significant difference was found in BW at 42, 56 and 70 d. No difference was observed in ADFI and ADG from 28 to 42 d. Similar results were reported in meat-type quails by Filgueira et al. [25], who reported that meat-type quails fed with diets that replaced corn with BR did not differ in weight gain or feed intake from 7 to 49 d of age. These results indicated that replacing corn with BR in goose diets did not negatively affect BW (from 25% to 100%). In some major rice-producing areas, corn can be totally replaced with BR in goose diets. In our study, BR50 and BR75 reduced the F/G from 28 to 42 d. The reason may be that rice contains smaller starch granules (3 to 8 vs. 2 to 30 μm) [16], lower amounts of nonstarch polysaccharide [26], less amylose and higher ME and CP than corn. Kermanshahi et al. [27] demonstrated that NSP added to broiler chicken diets reduced the FCR. The mechanism was explained by Smits and Annison [28], who stated that soluble NSP can (1) cover absorption sites in the intestine and prevent nutrient absorption and (2) be consumed by harmful microbiota in the intestine and detrimentally affect host health. In addition, starch with a high amylose content is often less digestible. However, compared with the control group, the BR100 exhibited no significant effect on the F/G from 28 to 70 d. The reasons for this result are not clear, but it may be related to the ratio of amylopectin and amylose. This may be related to the metabolizable energy in diet. It was reported that feed intake can be significantly reduced in broilers fed with diets with high metabolizable energy [29]. Geese in the BR75 and BR100 groups had a lower ADFI than those in the control group; moreover, geese in the BR75 and BR100 groups had a lower F/G than those in the BR25 group from 42 to 56 d. We agreed with Gonzalez-Alvarado et al. [30], who studied the effects of different cereals on 1- to 21-d-old broilers. Their results showed that broilers fed with corn had a poorer F/G than broilers fed with BR (1.37 vs. 1.32). Interestingly, BR had a significant effect on ADFI but not on the F/G from 56 to 70 d of age. Geese in the BR50, BR75 and BR100 groups had a lower ADFI from 56 to 70 d than those in the control group. These results indicated that the best proportion of BR used instead of corn in the goose diet was 75% from 28 to 70 d.

4.2. Body Size and Serum Biochemical Variable

Body-size and serum biochemical variable can reflect the growth performance and health status in geese to a certain extent. Compared with the control geese, geese in the BR groups exhibited no significant effect on body size or serum biochemical variable in geese at 70 d. These results were consistent with the BW result at 70 d. However, there is no literature on the effect of BR on body size and serum biochemical variable of geese. The results provide evidence that replacing corn with BR in the diet had no negative effect of geese at 70 d.

4.3. Bare Skin Color

Interestingly, we found significant differences in bare skin color among the treatments. Color scores from 1 to 5 points correspond to colors from pale to yellow. The flipper score was significantly decreased in the BR50, BR75 and BR100 groups (31.88% to 62.92% of BR in feed) compared with the flipper score in the control and BR25 groups (0% and 15.95% of BR in feed), whereas the bill skin color turned paler and paler as the BR concentration increased from 0% to 100%. The results of the present study provide evidence that BR in the diet has a significant effect on the bare skin color of geese, especially on the color of bill. However, the effect of BR on the bare skin color of poultry has not yet been reported. Liu et al. [31] reported that adding okra to feed can be used successfully to provide pigment in broiler diets due to its substantial content of xanthophylls and carotenoids. Similarly, lutein diester [32] and marigold [33] can also provide pigment in broiler diets. Poultry cannot synthesize xanthophylls or carotenoids and must obtain these compounds from their diets. These pigments are then transported in the blood to the subcutaneous fat tissues and skin, where they are stored. Our results indicated that BR can reduce the bare skin quality in geese. Further research is needed to study the method to improve bare skin color in geese using pigments in the goose diet with BR.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, replacing corn with BR in goose diets had no adverse effect on the BW of geese from 28 to 70 d. Moreover, 47.63% of BR in feed decreased the F/G. However, the addition of BR reduced the bare skin color on geese at 70 d. Under our experimental conditions, BR can completely replace corn in goose diets, and we recommend that 75% of BR be used instead of corn in goose diets from 28 to 70 d.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.W.; data curation, formal analysis, software and writing—original draft, X.C.; resources, and writing—review and editing, H.Y., L.X., X.W. and Z.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Project of the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-42-11) and the Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund (CX (18)1004).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Ruan, D.; Lin, Y.C.; Chen, W.; Wang, S.; Xia, W.G.; Fouad, A.M.; Zheng, C.T. Effects of rice bran on performance, egg quality, oxidative status, yolk fatty acid composition, and fatty acid metabolism-related gene expression in laying ducks. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 2944–2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sun, W.; Kang, P.; Xie, M.; Hou, S.S.; Wu, T.; Mei, H.M.; Liu, Y.L.; Hou, Y.Q.; Wu, L.Y. Effects of full-fat rice bran inclusion in diets on growth performance and meat quality of Sichuan goose. Br. Poult. Sci. 2016, 57, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Madrigal, S.A.; Watkins, S.E.; Adams, M.H.; Waldroup, P.W. Defatted rice bran to restrict growth rate in broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 1995, 4, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Adrizal; Ohtani, S.; Yayota, M. Ietary energy source and supplements in broiler diets containing defatted rice bran. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2002, 11, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nanto, F.; Kikusato, M.; Ito, C.; Sudo, S.; Toyomizu, M. Effects of dehulled, crushed and untreated whole-grain paddy rice on growth performance in broiler chickens. J. Poult. Sci. 2012, 49, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Yamanaga, M.; Furuse, M. Preference and passage through the gastrointestinal tract of paddy rice in young chicks. J. Poult. Sci. 2014, 51, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sittiya, J.; Yamauchi, K.; Takata, K. Effect of replacing corn with whole-grain paddy rice and brown rice in broiler diets on growth performance and intestinal morphology. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2016, 100, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Plavnik, I.; Macovsky, B.; Sklan, D. Effect of feeding whole wheat on performance of broiler chickens. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2002, 96, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Engberg, R.M.; Hedemann, M.S.; Steenfeldt, S.; Jensen, B.B. Influence of whole wheat and xylanase on broiler Performance and microbial composition and activity in the digestive tract. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 925–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Amerah, A.M.; Ravindran, V. Influence of method of whole-wheat feeding on the performance, digestive tract development and carcass traits of broiler chickens. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2008, 147, 326–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Davis, A.J.; Dale, N.M.; Ferreira, F.J. Pearl millet as an alternative feed ingredient in broiler diets. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2003, 12, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baurhoo, N.; Baurhoo, B.; Mustafa, A.F.; Zhao, X. Comparison of corn-based and Canadian pearl millet-based diets on performance, digestibility, villus morphology, and digestive microbial populations in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 579–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Boroojeni, F.G.; Samie, A.H.; Edriss, M.A.; Khorvash, M.; Sadeghi, G.; Kessel, A.V.; Zentek, J. Replacement of corn in the diet of broiler chickens using foxtail millet produced by 2 different cultivation strategies. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 2817–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations). Crop Production. Food and Agriculture Data. 2017. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed on 1 November 2019).
  15. Buggenhout, J.; Brijs, K.; Celus, I.; Delcour, J.A. The breakage susceptibility of raw and parboiled rice: A review. J. Food Eng. 2013, 117, 304–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tester, R.F.; Kakalas, J.; Qi, X. Starch—composition, fine structure and architecture. J. Cereal Sci. 2004, 39, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vicente, B.; Valencia, D.G.; Serrano, M.P.; Lazaro, R.; Mateos, G.G. Effects of feeding rice and the degree of starch gelatinisation of rice on nutrient digestibility and ileal morphology of young pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 2009, 101, 1278–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Amornthewaphat, N.; Attamangkune, S. Extrusion and animal performance effects of extruded maize quality on digestibility and growth performance in rats and nursery pigs. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2008, 144, 292–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vicente, B.; Valencia, D.G.; Serrano, M.P.; Lazaro, R.; Mateos, G.G. The effects of feeding rice in substitution of corn and the degree of starch gelatinization of rice on the digestibility of dietary components and productive performance of young pigs. J. Anim.Sci. 2008, 86, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mateos, G.G.; Martin, F.; Latorre, M.A.; Vicente, B.; Lazaro, R. Inclusion of oat hulls in diets for young pigs based on cooked maize or cooked rice. Anim. Sci. 2006, 82, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Z.Y.; Yang, H.M.; Lu, J.; Li, W.Z.; Zou, J.M. Influence of whole hulled rice and rice husk feeding on the performance, carcass yield and digestive tract development of geese. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2014, 194, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Agricultural ministry of China. Terminology of Poultry Production Performance and Methods of Measurement with Calculations; Agricultural Ministry of China (NY/T 823-2004): Beijing, China, 2004. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed.; Association of Official Anaytical Chemists: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  24. SPSS. User’s Guide, Base 19.0 for Windows; SPSS Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  25. Filgueira, T.M.B.; Freitas, E.R.; Quevedo Filho, I.B.; Fernandes, D.R.; Watanabe, P.H.; de Oliveira, A.N. Corn replacement by broken rice in meat-type quail diets. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2014, 16, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Choct, M. Feed non-starch polysaccharides for monogastric animals: Classification and function. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2015, 55, 1360–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kermanshahi, H.; Shakouri, M.D.; Daneshmand, A. Effects of non-starch polysaccharides in semi-purified diets on performance, serum metabolites, gastrointestinal morphology, and microbial population of male broiler chickens. Livest. Sci. 2018, 214, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Smits, C.H.M.; Annison, G. Non-starch plant polysaccharides in broiler nutrition towards a physiologically valid approach to their determination. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 1996, 52, 203–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mirzaaghatabar, F.; Saki, A.A.; Zamani, P.; Aliarabi, H.; Matin, H.R.H. Effect of different levels of diet methionine and metabolisable energy on broiler performance and immune system. Food Agric. Immunol. 2011, 22, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gonzalez-Alvarado, J.M.; Jimenez-Moreno, E.; Lazaro, R.; Mateos, G.G. Effect of type of cereal, heat processing of the cereal, and inclusion of fiber in the diet on productive performance and digestive traits of broilers. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 1705–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Liu, G.D.; Hou, G.Y.; Wang, D.J.; Lv, S.J.; Zhang, X.Y.; Sun, W.P.; Yang, Y. Skin pigmentation evaluation in broilers fed different levels of natural okra and synthetic pigments. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2008, 17, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tyczkowski, J.; Hamilton, P.B. Absorption, transport, and deposition in chickens of lutein diester, a carotenoid extracted from marigold (Tagetes erecta) petals. Poult. Sci. 1986, 65, 1526–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rajput, N.; Naeem, M.; Ali, S.; Rui, Y.; Tian, W. Effect of Dietary Supplementation of Marigold Pigment on Immunity, Skin and Meat Color, and Growth Performance of Broiler Chickens. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2012, 14, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effects of broken rice on flipper and bill score of geese at 70 days of age.
Figure 1. Effects of broken rice on flipper and bill score of geese at 70 days of age.
Animals 10 01330 g001
Table 1. Analyzed nutrient content of broken rice (BR) and corn in this study (%).
Table 1. Analyzed nutrient content of broken rice (BR) and corn in this study (%).
Items 1BRCornItemsBRCorn
DM87.5987.04Methionine0.150.10
CP8.137.91Arginine0.650.35
EE1.795.35Threonine0.210.21
Ash0.361.28Histidine0.180.17
Ca0.010.02Isoleucine0.310.21
TP0.070.21Leucine0.700.83
AA Phenylalanine0.410.31
Lysine0.270.22Valine0.400.27
1 DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; EE, crude fat; Ca, calcium; TP, total phosphorus; AA, amino acid.
Table 2. Composition and nutrient levels of experimental diets for days 28 to 70 (as-fed basis).
Table 2. Composition and nutrient levels of experimental diets for days 28 to 70 (as-fed basis).
ItemGroups 1
ControlBR25BR50BR75BR100
Ingredients (%)
Corn65.0047.8631.8815.880.00
Broken rice0.0015.9531.8847.6362.92
Soybean meal23.1822.2621.6120.9220.17
Rice bran0.002.112.673.494.75
Limestone0.891.011.041.111.17
Calcium hydrogen phosphate1.090.930.870.780.68
Salt0.300.300.300.300.30
DL-Methionine0.200.190.180.170.17
Lysine0.070.050.040.020.00
Premix 21.001.001.001.001.00
Rice husk8.278.348.548.718.85
Total100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00
Nutrient composition 3
ME (MJ/kg)11.2911.4211.5711.7111.84
CP (%)15.5315.7215.9216.1116.29
ME/CP (MJ/kg) 472.6872.6872.6872.6872.68
Crude fiber (%)6.066.066.066.066.06
Lysine (%)0.840.840.840.840.84
Methionine (%)0.430.430.430.430.43
Total phosphorus (%)0.580.580.580.580.58
Calcium (%)0.770.770.770.770.77
1 Control group was fed with a corn-soybean meal basal diet; The BR25, BR50, BR75 and BR100 indicate that 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of corn was replaced by broken rice in the basal diet, respectively (15.95%, 31.88%, 47.63% and 62.92% of BR, respectively, was added to the diets). 2 One kilogram of premix contained Vitamin A, 1,200,000 IU; Vitamin D, 400,000 IU; Vitamin E, 1800 IU; Vitamin K, 150 mg; Vitamin B1, 60 mg; Vitamin B2, 600 mg; Vitamin B6, 200 mg; Vitamin B12, 1 mg; nicotinic acid, 3 g; pantothenic acid, 900 mg; folic acid, 50 mg; biotin, 4 mg; choline, 35 mg; Fe (as ferrous sulfate), 6 g; Cu (as copper sulfate),1 g; Mn (as manganese sulfate), 9.5 g; Zn (as zinc sulfate), 9 g; I (as potassium iodide), 50 mg; Se (as sodium selenite), 30 mg. 3 Calculated values. 4 ME/CP, The metabolizable energy: protein ratio.
Table 3. Effects of broken rice on body weight (g) in geese from 28 to 70 days of age 1.
Table 3. Effects of broken rice on body weight (g) in geese from 28 to 70 days of age 1.
AgeGroups 2SEM 3p-Value
ControlBR25BR50BR75BR100
28113911381138113811392.221.00
422344238523952364236534.940.88
563503345834773418348342.040.73
704162405540254020406857.190.45
1 Each value represents the mean of six replicates. 2 Control group was fed with a corn-soybean meal basal diet; BR25, BR50, BR75 and BR100 indicate that 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of corn was replaced by broken rice in the basal diet, respectively (15.95%, 31.88%, 47.63% and 62.92% of BR, respectively, was added to the diets). 3 Standard error of mean.
Table 4. Effects of broken rice on the average daily feed intake (g), average daily gain (g) and the ratio of feed to gain of geese from 28 to 70 days of age 1.
Table 4. Effects of broken rice on the average daily feed intake (g), average daily gain (g) and the ratio of feed to gain of geese from 28 to 70 days of age 1.
Days of AgeItem 2Groups 3SEM 4p-Value
ControlBR25BR50BR75BR100
28–42ADFI2202182162052185.870.44
ADG86.189.089.887.687.62.510.87
F/G2.56 c2.45 abc2.41 ab2.34 a2.49 bc0.050.03
42–56ADFI285 c277 bc265 abc245 a262 ab6.67<0.01
ADG82.876.777.375.379.92.240.21
F/G3.47 ab3.62 b3.44 ab3.25 a3.28 a0.070.03
56–70ADFI313 b300 ab273 a277 a281 a8.540.01
ADG47.042.639.243.041.83.070.53
F/G6.787.217.056.607.020.480.91
28–70ADFI267 c260 bc248 ab237 a249 ab5.15<0.01
ADG72.069.468.768.669.81.360.45
F/G3.723.743.613.463.570.070.08
a–c Values within a row with no common letters differ significantly (p < 0.05). 1 Each value represents the mean of six replicates. 2 ADFI, average daily feed intake; ADG, average daily gain; F/G, the ratio of feed to gain. 3 Control group was fed with a corn-soybean meal basal diet; the BR25, BR50, BR75 and BR100 indicate that 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of corn was replaced by broken rice in the basal diet, respectively (15.95%, 31.88%, 47.63% and 62.92% of BR, respectively, was added to the diets). 4 Standard error of mean.
Table 5. Effects of broken rice on body size (cm) in geese at 70 days of age 1.
Table 5. Effects of broken rice on body size (cm) in geese at 70 days of age 1.
ItemsGroups 2SEM 3p-Value
ControlBR25BR50BR75BR100
Half-diving length72.0872.2571.2572.1771.501.050.96
Keel length15.4215.5815.9215.5816.500.400.38
Shank length12.5512.2512.1512.6212.000.420.85
Shank circumference5.775.836.106.176.130.120.11
1 Each value represents the mean of six replicates. 2 Control group was fed with a corn-soybean meal basal diet; BR25, BR50, BR75 and BR100 indicate that 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of corn was replaced by broken rice in the basal diet, respectively (15.95%, 31.88%, 47.63% and 62.92% of BR, respectively, was added to the diets). 3 Standard error of mean.
Table 6. Effects of broken rice on serum biochemical variables of geese at 70 days of age 1.
Table 6. Effects of broken rice on serum biochemical variables of geese at 70 days of age 1.
Items 2Groups 3SEM 4p-Value
ControlBR25BR50BR75BR100
TP (g/L)47.5745.0245.4045.5648.111.800.68
ALB (g/L)13.9213.6213.6213.0814.480.400.23
GLO (g/L)33.6531.4031.7832.4833.631.480.76
A/G0.420.440.430.410.430.010.43
UA (mmol/L)19524120625124922.490.30
GLU (mmol/L)10.7510.2810.649.4610.930.460.58
CHO (mmol/L)4.324.444.394.485.060.250.30
TG (mmol/L)0.510.460.530.490.640.080.55
HDL (mmol/L)1.952.132.122.022.390.150.37
LDL (mmol/L)1.611.511.511.621.790.100.36
1 Each value represents the mean of six replicates. 2 TP, total protein; ALB, albumin; GLO, globulin; UA, uric acid; GLU, glucose; CHO, cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein. 3 Control group was fed with a corn-soybean meal basal diet; BR25, BR50, BR75 and BR100 indicate that 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of corn was replaced by broken rice in the basal diet, respectively (15.95%, 31.88%, 47.63%, and 62.92% of BR, respectively, was added to the diets). 4 Standard error of mean.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, X.; Yang, H.; Xu, L.; Wan, X.; Wang, Z. Effect of Replacing Dietary Corn with Broken Rice on Goose Growth Performance, Body Size and Bare Skin Color. Animals 2020, 10, 1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081330

AMA Style

Chen X, Yang H, Xu L, Wan X, Wang Z. Effect of Replacing Dietary Corn with Broken Rice on Goose Growth Performance, Body Size and Bare Skin Color. Animals. 2020; 10(8):1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Xiaoshuai, Haiming Yang, Lei Xu, Xiaoli Wan, and Zhiyue Wang. 2020. "Effect of Replacing Dietary Corn with Broken Rice on Goose Growth Performance, Body Size and Bare Skin Color" Animals 10, no. 8: 1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081330

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop