Skip to main content
Log in

Swarm Optimization of Lunar Transfers from Earth Orbit with Operational Constraints

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the frequent launches of primary satellites into geosynchronous transfer orbits, lunar transfer from an initial geosynchronous transfer orbit represents an attractive option for secondary payloads with lunar mission objectives. The development of advanced launch vehicle upper stages with low boil off rates and restartable engines further enhances the potential of geosynchronous transfer orbits to serve as starting points for lunar transfers. Lunar trajectory design from arbitrarily oriented Earth orbits involves complex tradeoffs that can be successfully addressed with particle swarm optimization. An important mission design consideration is radiation dose, since coasting in a geosynchronous transfer orbit involves repeated passes through the Van Allen radiation belts. In this investigation, a mixture density neural network is trained on the state-of-the-art radiation environment models to provide a surrogate model capable of making probabilistic estimates of radiation dosage. The network is combined with the particle swarm method to optimize the coasting and transfer arcs of a lunar trajectory. The end-to-end design of a trajectory from geosynchronous transfer orbit into a specified lunar orbit is demonstrated by modeling the optimized trajectory in a high-fidelity orbit propagator, including B-plane targeting to overfly a desired lunar landing site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Oldenhuis, R.: Robust solver for Lamberts orbital-boundary value problem. Obtained August 15, 2019 from MathWorks: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/26348

References

  1. Crusan, J.C., Smith, R.M., Craig, D.A., Caram, J.M., Guidi, J., Gates, M., Krezel, J.M., Herrmann, N.B.: Deep space gateway concept: Extending human presence into cislunar space. In: 2018 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2018.8396541 (2018)

  2. Woerner, J., Foing, B., Moon Village International Support Group: The “Moon Village” concept and initiative. Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group, vol. 1960 of LPI Contributions, p. 5084 (2016)

  3. LeBar, J., Cady, E.: The advanced cryogenic evolved stage (ACES) a low-cost, low-risk approach to space exploration launch. 2006 AIAA Space Conference & Exposition, No. AIAA-2006-7454, San Jose, CA (2006)

  4. Analytical Graphics Inc., Exton, PA 19341, STK Level 1 and 2 Training Manual, 2019. Version 11.6.1. Obtained August 15, 2019 from: http://help.agi.com/stk/LinkedDocuments/Printed%20Manual%20-%20Comprehensive.pdf

  5. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1942–1945. Perth (1995)

  6. Izzo, D.: Spacecraft trajectory optimization, ch. Global Optimization and Space Pruning for Spacecraft Trajectory Design, pp. 178–199. Cambridge University Press (2010)

  7. Lancaster, E., Blanchard, R.: A unified form of Lambert’s theorem, Technical note TN D-5368 NASA (1969)

  8. Gooding, R.: A procedure for the solution of Lambert’s orbital boundary-value problem. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 48, 145–165 (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Uphoff, C.: Practical aspects of transfer from GTO to lunar orbit. GSFC Flight Mechanics and Estimation Theory Symposium, Greenbelt, MD (1992)

  10. Vallado, D.A.: Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications, ch. General Perturbation Techniques, 4th edn., p 652. Microcosm Press, Hawthorne (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. DeKruif, J.S., Kutter, B.F.: Centaur upperstage applicability for several-day mission durations with minor insulation modifications. In: 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, No. AIAA-2007-5845, Cincinnati, OH AIAA (2007)

  12. Atlas V Launch Services Guide: Tech. Rep Revision 11. United Launch Alliance, Centennial, CO (2010)

  13. Bate, R.R., Mueller, D.D., White, J.E.: Fundamentals of Astrodynamics, p 188. Dover, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xapsos, M.A., Stauffer, C., Phan, A., McClure, S.S., Ladbury, R.L., Pellish, J.A., Campola, M.J., LaBel, K.A.: Inclusion of radiation environment variability in total dose hardness assurance methodology. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 64, 325–331 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ginet, G.P., O’Brien, T.P., Huston, S.L., Johnston, W.R., Guild, T.B., Friedel, R., Lindstrom, C.D., et al.: AE9, AP9 and SPM: New models for specifying the trapped energetic particle and space plasma environment. Space Sci. Revs. 179(1–4), 579–615 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hornik, K.: Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Netw. 4(2), 251–257 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Bishop, M.C.: Mixture Density Networks, Neural Computing Research Group Report NCRG/94/004. Aston University, Birmingham (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nabney, I.T.: Netlab: Algorithms for Pattern Recognition ch. 3, pp 79–110. Springer, London (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Roth, C.: AE9/AP9/SPM Radiation Environment Model: User’s Guide, Tech. Rep. AFRL-RV-PS-TR-2014-0013. Air Force Research Laboratory (2014)

  20. Roy, A.E.: Luni-solar pertubations of an Earth satellite. Astrophys. Space Sci. 4(4), 375–386 (1969)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Sergeyevsky, A.B., Snyder, G.C., Cunniff, R.A.: Interplanetary Mission Design Handbook, vol. 1, Part 2, ch. Earth to Mars Ballistic Mission Opportunities 1990 - 2005. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena (1983)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin R. Mansell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mansell, J.R., Dickmann, S. & Spencer, D.A. Swarm Optimization of Lunar Transfers from Earth Orbit with Operational Constraints. J Astronaut Sci 67, 880–901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-019-00194-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-019-00194-z

Keywords

Navigation