Skip to main content
Log in

On the significance of sulphuric acid dissociation in the modelling of vanadium redox flow batteries

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recent asymptotic model for the operation of a vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB) is extended to include the dissociation of sulphuric acid—a bulk chemical reaction that occurs in the battery’s porous flow-through electrodes, but which is often omitted from VRFB models. Using asymptotic methods and time-dependent two-dimensional numerical simulations, we show that the charge–discharge curve for the model with the dissociation reaction is almost identical to that for the model without, even though the concentrations of the ionic species in the recirculating tanks, although not the state of charge, are considerably different in the two models. The ability of the asymptotic model to extract both the qualitative and quantitative behaviour of the considerably more time-consuming numerical simulations correctly indicates that it should be possible to add further physical phenomena to the model without incurring significant computational expense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shah AA, Watt-Smith MJ, Walsh FC (2008) A dynamic performance model for redox-flow batteries involving soluble species. Electrochim Acta 53:8087–8100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Fetlawi A, Shah AA, Walsh FC (2009) Non-isothermal modelling of the all-vanadium redox-flow battery. Electrochim Acta 55:78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. You D, Zhang H, Chen J (2009) A simple model for the vanadium redox battery. Electrochim Acta 54:6827–6836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Fetlawi A, Shah AA, Walsh FC (2010) Modelling the effects of oxygen evolution in the all-vanadium redox flow battery. Electrochim Acta 55:3192–3205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shah AA, Al-Fetlawi H, Walsh FC (2010) Dynamic modelling of hydrogen evolution effects in the all-vanadium redox flow battery. Electrochim Acta 55:1125–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah AA, Tangirala R, Singh R, Wills RGA, Walsh FC (2011) A dynamic unit cell model for the all-vanadium flow battery. J Electrochem Soc 158(6):A671–A677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Knehr K, Kumbur EC (2011) Open circuit voltage of vanadium redox flow batteries: discrepancy between models and experiments. Electrochem Commun 13:342–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma X, Zhang H, Xing F (2011) A three-dimensional model for negative half cell of the vanadium redox flow battery. Electrochim Acta 58:238–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Knehr KW, Agar E, Dennison CR, Kalidindi AR, Kumbur EC (2012) A transient vanadium flow battery model incorporating vanadium crossover and water transport through the membrane. J Electrochem Soc 159(9):A1446–A1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tang A, Bao J, Skyllas-Kazacos M (2012) Thermal modelling of battery configuration and self-discharge reactions in vanadium redox flow battery. J Power Sources 216:489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen CL, Yeoh HK, Chakrabarti MH (2014) An enhancement to Vynnycky’s model for the all-vanadium redox flow battery. Electrochim Acta 120:167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng Q, Zhang H, Xing F, Ma X, Li X, Ning G (2014) A three-dimensional model for thermal analysis in a vanadium flow battery. Appl Energy 113:1675–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oh K, Yoo H, Ko J, Won S, Ju H (2015) Three-dimensional, transient, nonisothermal model of all-vanadium redox flow batteries. Energy 81:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu Q, Zhao TS, Zhang C (2014) Effects of SOC-dependent electrolyte viscosity on performance of vanadium redox flow batteries. Appl Energy 130:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu Q, Zhao TS (2015) Fundamental models for flow batteries. Prog Energy Combust Sci 49:40–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vynnycky M, Assunção M (2019) The vanadium redox flow battery: an asymptotic perspective. SIAM J Appl Math 79:1147–1172

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Gattrell M, Park J, MacDougall B, Apte J, McCarthy S, Wu CM (2004) Study of the mechanism of the vanadium \({4}{+}{/}5+\) redox reaction in acidic solutions. J Electrochem Soc 151:A123–A130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma AK, Vynnycky M, Ling CY, Birgersson E, Han M (2014) The quasi-steady state of all-vanadium redox flow batteries: a scale analysis. Electrochim Acta 147:657–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma AK, Ling CY, Birgersson E, Vynnycky M, Han M (2015) Verified reduction of dimensionality for an all-vanadium redox flow battery model. J Power Sources 279:345–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Comsol Multiphysics 5.4

  21. Vynnycky M (2011) Analysis of a model for the operation of a vanadium redox battery. Energy 36:2242–2256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Assunção M (2015) Mathematical modelling of vanadium redox batteries. Master’s thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

  23. Bernardi DM, Verbrugge MW (1991) Mathematical model of a gas diffusion electrode bonded to a polymer electrolyte. AIChE J 37:1151–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pourbaix M (1974) Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions, 2nd edn. NACE, Houston, TX

    Google Scholar 

  25. Knopf DA, Luo BP, Krieger UK, Koop T (2003) Thermodynamic dissociation constant of the bisulfate ion from Raman and ion interaction modeling studies of aqueous sulfuric acid at low temperatures. J Phys Chem A 107(21):4322–4332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Newman JS, Thomas-Alyea KE (2004) Electrochemical Syst, 3rd edn. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lide DR (2003) Handbook of chemistry and physics, 84th edn. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yamamura T, Watanabe N, Yano T, Shiokawa Y (2005) Electron transfer kinetics of Np\(^{3+}\)/Np\(^{4+}\), NpO\(_2^{+}\)/NpO\(_2^{2+}\), V\(^{2+}\)/V\(^{3+}\), and VO\(^{2+}\)/VO\(_2^{+}\) at carbon electrodes. J Electrochem Soc 152:A830–A836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vynnycky M, Ipek N (2009) Supporting electrolyte asymptotics and the electrochemical pickling of steel. Proc R Soc A 465:3771–3797

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Vynnycky M (2011) Correction to: Supporting electrolyte asymptotics and the electrochemical pickling of steel (Proc. R. Soc. A, 465 (2009) 3771–3797). Proc R Soc A 467:3035–3037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vynnycky M, Ipek N (2011) Reaction-layer asymptotics and the electrochemical pickling of steel. Proc R Soc A 467:2534–2560

  32. Vynnycky M, Ipek N (2013) Multiple bulk-reaction asymptotics and the electrochemical pickling of steel. J Eng Math 80:105–128

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The second author acknowledges the financial support of FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) for the researcher grant [Grant Number 2016/12678-0].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Vynnycky.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Model validation against experimental data from [3]

Appendix A: Model validation against experimental data from [3]

For the purposes of validating our model, we use experimental data from You et al. [3], who provide the cell potential as a function of state of charge for charging and discharging at 400 and 800 Am\(^{-2};\) the comparison is shown in Fig. 10. The agreement is very good for the charging phase, although less so for the discharging phase, where it is in line with the comparison against this experimental data made by Chen et al. [11], albeit it only at 400 Am\(^{-2}\). It can be noted that You et al. [3] also presented a model which gave the best agreement of all at both 400 and 800 Am\(^{-2}\), although a shift in cell potential of 140 mV was required to achieve it; here, we have not employed any shift. Note also that we have used the same model data as in [3], although with the value for active surface area—A in equations (2.11) and (2.12)—given in [9].

Fig. 10
figure 10

Cell potential, \(E_{\text {cell}}\), as a function of state of charge, SOC, during charge and discharge from experiments [3], the 2D transient model and the 2-term reduced asymptotic model at a current density, \(i_{{\mathrm {app}}}\), of: a 400 \(\hbox {Am}^{-2}\); b 800 \(\hbox {Am}^{-2}\)

Lastly, we point out that, even though the model is now being used for a completely different set of parameter values, and in particular for a much higher applied current density, the agreement between the results of the 2D transient model and the reduced asymptotic model remains very good.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vynnycky, M., Assunção, M. On the significance of sulphuric acid dissociation in the modelling of vanadium redox flow batteries. J Eng Math 123, 173–203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-020-10061-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-020-10061-8

Keywords

Navigation