Abstract
The design, implementation and use of wastewater treatment systems (WTS) are fundamental to mitigate hydrological and environmental problems, and to improve population health. Furthermore, the significant advances in treatment systems technology offer, nowadays, several alternatives and provide many combinations of WTS which must be correctly evaluated and constitute a decision problem for public and private investors and decision makers. Thus, this article presents a multi-criteria methodology based on six steps for the evaluation of WTS considering relevant economic, social, technical and environmental criteria. Particularly, forty-eight main criteria were identified and ranked considering their importance based on the previous literature. This methodology was applied in a Brazilian sanitation company in a specific treatment area of approximately five thousand inhabitants and with recurrent environmental problems, such as the contamination and low efficiency of wastewater treatment. Twenty available alternatives were considered and twelve criteria were selected for this application. The AHP and ELECTRE II methods were combined to weight the different criteria and to rank the most suitable WTS. This methodology can be extended and applied in different scenarios to improve the decision-making process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arroyo, P., & Molinos-Senante, M. (2018). Selecting appropriate wastewater treatment technologies using a choosing-by-advantages approach. Science of the Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.331.
Ashley, R., Blackwood, D., Butler, D., Jowitt, P., Davies, J., Smith, H., et al. (2008). Making asset investment decisions for wastewater systems that include sustainability. Journal of Environmental Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:3(200).
Bagheri, A., & Hjorth, P. (2007). A framework for process indicators to monitor for sustainable development: Practice to an urban water system. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-9009-0.
Bao, P. N., Aramaki, T., & Hanaki, K. (2013). Assessment of stakeholders’ preferences towards sustainable sanitation scenarios. Water and Environment Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2012.00327.x.
Castillo, A., Porro, J., Garrido-Baserba, M., Rosso, D., Renzi, D., Fatone, F., et al. (2016). Validation of a decision support tool for wastewater treatment selection. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.087.
Crawford, G. B. (1987). The geometric mean procedure for estimating the scale of a judgement matrix. Mathematical Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90489-1.
Figueira, J., Mousseau, V., & Roy, B. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. In G. Salvatore (Ed.), ELECTRE methods (pp. 133–153). New York: Springer.
Flores-Alsina, X., Rodríguez-Roda, I., Sin, G., & Gernaey, K. V. (2008a). Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.05.029.
Flores-Alsina, F., Rodríguez-Roda, I., Sin, G., & Gernaey, K. G. (2008b). Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.05.029.
Garrido-Baserba, M., Reif, R., Hernández, F., & Poch, M. (2012a). A methodology for cost-risk analysis in the statistical validation of simulation models. Journal of Environmental Management, doi, 10(1145/358598), 358609.
Garrido-Baserba, M., Reif, R., Hernández, F., & Poch, M. (2012b). Implementation of a knowledge-based methodology in a decision support system for the design of suitable wastewater treatment process flow diagrams. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.013.
Garrido-Baserba, M., Reif, R., Molinos-Senante, M., Larrea, L., Castillo, A., Verdaguer, M., et al. (2016). Application of a multi-criteria decision model to select of design choices for WWTPs. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1099-x.
Gbanie, S. P., Tengbe, P. B., Momoh, J. S., Medo, J., & Kabba, V. T. S. (2013). Modelling landfill location using geographic information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA): Case study Bo, Southern Sierra Leone. Applied Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.013.
Goffi, A. S., Trojan, F., De Lima, J. D., Lizot, M., & Thesari, S. S. (2019). Economic feasibility for selecting wastewater treatment systems. Water Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.012.
Hakanen, J., Miettinen, K., & Sahlstedt, K. (2011). Wastewater treatment: New insight provided by interactive multiobjective optimization. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.026.
Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of the Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022.
Jóźwiakowski, K., Mucha, Z., Generowicz, A., Baran, S., Bielińska, J., & Wójcik, W. (2015). The use of multi-criteria analysis for selection of technology for a household WWTP compatible with sustainable development. Archives of Environmental Protection. https://doi.org/10.1515/aep-2015-0033.
Kablan, M. M. (2004). Decision support for energy conservation promotion: An analytic hierarchy process approach. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00078-8.
Kalbar, P. P., Karmakar, S., & Asolekar, S. R. (2012). Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: A scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.025.
Karimi, A. R., Mehrdadi, N., Hashemian, S. J., Nabi Bidhendi, G. R., & Tavakkoli Moghadam, R. (2011). Selection of wastewater treatment process based on the analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methods. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326215.
Lacerda, R. T. O., Ensslin, L., & Ensslin, S. R. (2014). Research opportunities in strategic management field: A performance measurement approach. International Journal of Business Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2014.060165.
Lee, E. J., Criddle, C. S., Bobel, P., & Freyberg, D. L. (2013). Assessing the scale of resource recovery for centralized and satellite wastewater treatment. Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401011k.
Markov, Z., Jovanoski, I., & Dimitrovski, D. (2017). Multi-criteria analysis approach for selection of the most appropriate technology for municipal wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 18(1), 289–303.
Massoud, M. A., Tarhini, A., & Nasr, J. A. (2009). Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: Applicability in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.001.
Molinos-Senante, M., Gómez, T., Caballero, R., Hernández-Sancho, F., & Sala-Garrido, R. (2015). Assessment of wastewater treatment alternatives for small communities: An analytic network process approach. Science of the Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.059.
Molinos-Senante, M., Gómez, T., Garrido-Baserba, M., Caballero, R., & Sala-Garrido, R. (2014). Assessing the sustainability of small wastewater treatment systems: A composite indicator approach. Science of the Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.026.
Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., & Roy, B. (2002). Electre Methods. In Annales du Universit´e Paris–Dauphine (pp. 1–35). Paris: Université Paris-Dauphine.
Ouyang, X., Guo, F., Shan, D., Yu, H., & Wang, J. (2015). Development of the integrated fuzzy analytical hierarchy process with multidimensional scaling in selection of natural wastewater treatment alternatives. Ecological Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.006.
Plakas, K. V., Georgiadis, A. A., & Karabelas, A. J. (2015). Sustainability assessment of tertiary wastewater treatment technologies: A multi-criteria analysis. Water Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.630.
Ren, J., Liang, H., & Chan, F. T. S. (2017). Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for Eco-City: Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best-worst method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.070.
Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590.
Srinivas, R., & Singh, A. P. (2018). Impact assessment of industrial wastewater discharge in a river basin using interval-valued fuzzy group decision-making and spatial approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9994-9.
Tan, R. R., Aviso, K. B., Huelgas, A. P., & Promentilla, M. A. B. (2014). Fuzzy AHP approach to selection problems in process engineering involving quantitative and qualitative aspects. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2013.11.005.
Thesari, S. S., Trojan, F., & Batistus, D. (2019). A decision model for municipal resources management. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0500.
Turunen, V., Sorvari, J., & Mikola, A. (2017). A decision support tool for selecting the optimal sewage sludge treatment. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.052.
United Nations. (2019). The sustainable development goals report. Launch of the sustainable development goals report 2019, New York. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2019.pdf.
Zeng, G., Jiang, R., Huang, G., Xu, M., & Li, J. (2007). Optimization of wastewater treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.12.024.
Zhao, Y. W., Qin, Y., Chen, B., Zhao, X., Li, Y., Yin, X. A., et al. (2009). GIS-based optimization for the locations of sewage treatment plants and sewage outfalls: A case study of Nansha District in Guangzhou City, China. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2007.12.016.
Zhong-Wu, L., Guang-Ming, Z., Hua, Z., Bin, Y., & Sheng, J. (2007). The integrated eco-environment assessment of the red soil hilly region based on GIS: A case study in Changsha City, China. Ecological Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.11.014.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brazil (CAPES) for the scholarship as part of the aid for this research - Financial Code 001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lizot, M., Goffi, A.S., Thesari, S.S. et al. Multi-criteria methodology for selection of wastewater treatment systems with economic, social, technical and environmental aspects. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 9827–9851 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00906-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00906-8