Automated Characterization of Non-Newtonian Fluids Using Laboratory Setup

References

[1] Dakhil H and Wierschem A. Measurement low viscosities and high shear rates with a rotational rheometer in a thin-gap parallel-disk configuration. Applied Rheology, 24(6):1–6, 2014. doi: 10.3933/applrheol-24-63795.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Duffy JJ, Hill AJ, and Murphy SH. Simple method for determining stress and strain constants for non-standard measuring systems on a rotational rheometer. Applied Rheology, 25(4):1–6, 2015. doi: 10.3933/applrheol-25-42670.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Marchesini FH, Naccache MF, Abdu A, Alicke AA, and Mendes P RS. Rheological characterization of yield-stress materials: Flow pattern and apparent wall slip. Applied Rheology, 25(5):1–10, 2015. doi: 10.3933/applrheol-25-53883.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Takeh A and Shanbhag S. A computer program to extract the continuous and discrete relaxation spectra from dynamic viscoelastic measurements. Applied Rheology, 23(2):1–10, 2012. doi: 10.3933/applrheol-23-24628.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Borg T and Paakkonen EJ. Linear viscoelastic model for different flows based on control theory. Applied Rheology, 24(6):1–6, 2015. doi: 10.3933/applrheol-25-64304.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Saasen A and Hodne H. Influence of vibrations on the rheological properties of drilling fluids and its consequence on solids control. Applied Rheology, 26(2):1–6, 2016. doi: 10.3933/applrheol-26-25349.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Hernandez JC, Ramirez AG, Duran JDG, Caballero FG, Zubarev AY, and Lopez MTL. On the effect of wall slip on the determination of the yield stress of magnetorheological fluids. Applied Rheology, 27(1):1–8, 2016. doi: 10.3933/applrheol-27-15001.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Carmona JA, Calero N, Ramirez P, and Munoz J. Rheology and structural recovery kinetics of an advanced performance xanthan gum with industrial application. Applied Rheology, 27(2):1–9, 2017. doi: 10.3933/applrheol-27-25555.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Saasen A and Ytrehus JD. Rheological properties of drilling fluids: Use of dimensionless shear rate in herschel-bulkley and power-law models. Applied Rheology, 28(5):1–6, 2018. doi: 10.3933/applrheol-28-54515.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Skadsem HJ and Saasen A. Concentric cylinder viscometer flows of herschel-bulkley fluids. Applied Rheology, 29(1):173–181, 2019. doi: 10.1515/arh-2019-0015.10.1515/arh-2019-0015Search in Google Scholar

[11] Saasen A, Omland TH, Ekrene SJ, and Breviere J et al. Automated measurement of drilling fluid and drill-cutting properties. IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, 2009. doi: 10.2118/112687-PA.10.2118/112687-PASearch in Google Scholar

[12] Vajargah AK, Sullivan G, and Van Oort E. Automated fluid rheology and ecd management. SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completions Conference, Galveston, Texas, USA, 2016. doi: 10.2118/180331-MS.10.2118/180331-MSSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Skadsem HJ, Leulseged A, and Cayeux E. Measurement of drilling fluid rheology and modeling of thixotropic behavior. Applied Rheology, 29(1):1–11, 2019. doi: 10.1515/arh-2019-0001.10.1515/arh-2019-0001Search in Google Scholar

[14] Stock T, Ronaes E, Fossdal T, and Bjerkaas J. The development and successful application of an automated real-time drilling fluids measurement system. SPE Intelligent Energy International held in Netherlands, 2012. doi: 10.2118/150439-MS.10.2118/150439-MSSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Carisen L, Rolland NL, Nygaard G, and Time RW. Simultaneous continuous monitoring of the drilling fluid friction factor and density. SPE Drilling and Completion, 28:34–44, 2013. doi: 10.2118/84175-PA.10.2118/84175-PASearch in Google Scholar

[16] Cimpan E and Nygaard G. Design and simulation of a small-scale experimental facility for drilling operations. SIMS, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Sui D, Sukhoboka O, and Aadnoy BS. Improvement of wired drill pipe data quality via data validation and reconciliation. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 15:625-636, 2017. doi: 10.1007/s11633-017-1068-9.10.1007/s11633-017-1068-9Search in Google Scholar

[18] Madlener K, Frey B, and Ciezki HK. Generalized reynolds number for non-newtonian fluids. EDP Sciences, 2009. doi: 10.1051/eucass/200901237.10.1051/eucass/200901237Search in Google Scholar

[19] Nguyen QH and Nguyen ND. Incompressible non-newtonian fluid flows, continuum mechanics - progress in fundamentals and engineering applications. InTech, pages 47–72, 2012. doi: 10.5772/26091.10.5772/26091Search in Google Scholar

[20] Trinh KT. The instantaneous wall viscosity in pipe flow of power law fluids: Case study for a theory of turbulence in time-independent non-newtonian fluids. Institute of Food Nutrition and Human Health Massey University, New Zealand, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Khalifa HE Kestin J and Correia RJ. Tables of the dynamic and kinematic viscosity of aqueous nacl solutions in the temperature range 20-150°C and the pressure range 0.1-35 mpa. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 10, 71. Division of Engineering, Brown University, 10(1):71–88, 1981. doi: 10.1063/1.555641.10.1063/1.555641Search in Google Scholar

[22] Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, and Flannery BP. The shooting method in the art of scientific computing. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Metzner AB and Reed J. Flow of non-newtonian fluids – correlation of the laminar, transition and turbulent-flow regions. AIChE Journal, 1(4):434–440, 1955. doi: 10.1002/aic.690010409.10.1002/aic.690010409Search in Google Scholar