Skip to main content
Log in

Drone Searches in Challenging Conditions

  • Published:
Russian Engineering Research Aims and scope

Abstract

The planning of drone trajectories in the search for ground-level objects is considered, in the case of challenging observation conditions. In existing planning algorithms, a priori data regarding the location of the objects are used in the secondary search, but no account is taken of their local visibility (on account of fog or smoke, say). To improve search productivity in challenging observation conditions, the observability may be taken into account in planning the drone trajectory. Heuristic models are used to assess the observability. The working trajectory is selected by calculating the maximum useful search information obtained from various possible trajectories. To eliminate Shannon indeterminacy in the utility of the information regarding successive points, we introduce an additional utility function. The results obtained by simulation of the search process confirm that this approach is more effective than trajectory planning on the basis of the maximum a priori probability that objects are present and on the basis of search entropy estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Forest fires, ZalaAero Group official website. https://zala.aero/category/applications/emergency/ monitoring-pozharov/. Accessed October 3, 2019.

  2. Kim, N.V. and Mokrova, M.I., Fire monitoring by group of unmanned aerial vehicles, Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii “Tekhnicheskoe zrenie v sistemakh upravleniya-2019,” 12–13 marta 2019, Tezisy dokladov (Proc. All-Russ. Sci.-Tech. Conf. “Technical Vision in Control Systems-2019,” March 12–13, 2019, Abstracts of Papers), Moscow: Inst. Kosm. Issled., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2019.

  3. Kudrin, A.Yu. and Podrezov, Yu.V., Analysis of modern means and methods of prevention of natural fires, Tekhnol. Grazhd. Bezop., 2006, no. 4, pp. 27–32.

  4. Merino, L., Caballero, F., De Dios, J.R.M., et al., An unmanned aircraft system for automatic forest fire monitoring and measurement, J. Intell. Rob. Syst., 2012, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 533–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar, M., Cohen, K., and Chaudhuri, B.H., Cooperative control of multiple uninhabited aerial vehicles for monitoring and fighting wildfires, J. Aerosp. Comput., Inf. Commun., 2011, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, N.V. and Mikhailov, N.A., Drone searches for objects on the ground: an entropy-based approach, Russ. Eng. Res., 2020, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 164–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kogan, I.M., Prikladnaya teoriya informatsii (Applied Theory of Information), Moscow: Radio i Svyaz’, 1981.

  8. Abchuk, V.A. and Suzdal’, V.G., Poisk ob”ektov (Search for Objects), Moscow: Sovetskoe Radio, 1977.

  9. Gorelik, A.L. and Skripkin, V.A., Metody raspoznavaniya (Methods of Recognition), Moscow: Nauka, 2004.

Download references

Funding

Financial support was provided by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project 19-08-00613-а).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Mikhailov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by B. Gilbert

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, N.V., Mikhailov, N.A. & Mokrova, M.I. Drone Searches in Challenging Conditions. Russ. Engin. Res. 40, 583–585 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X20070187

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X20070187

Keywords:

Navigation