Skip to main content
Log in

Profound Changes in Terrestrial Ecosystems in Russia in the 21st Century

  • On the Rostrum of the RAS Presidium
  • Published:
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today, changes in terrestrial ecosystems—forests, marshes, tundras, meadows, steppes—as a result of increasing anthropogenic pressures and climate warming, transform the evolutionary structure of Russia’s vegetation cover on a large scale, which increases environmental and economic risks. A comprehensive study of all the components and mechanisms of the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems will allow us to develop an approach to managing natural resources under conditions of their intensive exploitation, preserve the gene pool and biodiversity, and determine a nature management strategy. Under the current climate changes, it is the condition and normal functioning of land ecosystems that have become strategically important factors of stability, providing the human environment with basic resources (air, water, food), and of Russia’s economic growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Researchers can easily access model calculations of climate change, formed in 2013–2014 as part of the international project CMIP5 in preparation for the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The CMIP5 project provides representative concentration pathway (RCP) scenarios, suggesting climatic changes in the near (up to 2035) and long term (up to 2100). Based on the forecasts, the scenarios received standardized notation: RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5.

REFERENCES

  1. P. V. Krestov, A. M. Omelko, and Y. Nakamura, “Phytogeography of higher units of forests and krummholz in North Asia and formation of vegetation complex in the Holocene,” Phytocoenologia 40 (1), 41–56 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Sheingauz, S. Nilsson, and A. Shvidenko, “Russian forest legislation,” IIASA Working Paper (WP-95-45). (Int. Inst. for Applied Systems Analysis, Luxemburg, 1995), pp. 1–26.

  3. C. Hobohm, M. Janiš ová, M. Steinbauer, et al., “Global endemics-area relationships of vascular plants,” Perspectives Ecol. Cons. 17 (2), 41–49 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. V. Krestov, “Forest vegetation of Easternmost Russia (Russian Far East),” in Forest Vegetation of Northeast Asia (Academic, Dordrecht, 2003), pp. 93–180.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Gauthier, P. Bernier, T. Kuuluvainen, et al., “Boreal forest health and global change,” Science 349 (6250), 819–822 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Bukvareva, D. Zamolodchikov, and K. Grunewald, “National assessment of ecosystem services in Russia: Methodology and main problems,” Sci. Total Environ. 665, 1181–1196 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. P. Newell and J. Simeone, “Russia’s forests in a global economy: How consumption drives environmental change,” Euras. Geogr. Econ. 55 (1), 37–70 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. J. Lade, W. Steffen, W. de Vries, et al., “Human impacts on planetary boundaries amplified by Earth system interactions,” Nature Sustainability 3, 119–128 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Rockström, W. Steffen, K. Noone, et al., “A safe operating space for humanity,” Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. J. Hijmans, S. E. Cameron, J. L. Parra, et al., “Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas,” Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Kadambari, T. L. Morelli, and S. Tenan, “Multi-species occupancy models: Review, roadmap, and recommendations,” Ecography 43, 1–13 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. W. D. Collins, V. Ramaswamy, M. D. Schwarzkopf, et al., “Radiative forcing by well-mixed greenhouse gases: Estimates from climate models in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4),” J. Geophys. Res. 111, D14317 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. H. Moss, J. A. Edmonds, K. A. Hibbard, et al., “The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment,” Nature 463, 747–756 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Di Paola, R. Valentini, and M. Santini, “An overview of available crop growth and yield models for studies and assessments in agriculture,” Sci. Food Agric. 96 (3), 709–714 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. C. E. Edwards and P. W. Jackson, “The development of plant conservation in botanic gardens and the current and future role of conservation genetics for enhancing those conservation efforts,” Molecular Frontiers J. 3 (1), 44–65 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to P. V. Krestov, K. A. Korznikov or D. E. Kislov.

Additional information

On December 10, 2019, the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences held a meeting on the topic “Profound Changes in Terrestrial Ecosystems in Russia in the 21st Century: Challenges and Opportunities.” The main report was made by Pavel V. Krestov, director of the Botanical Garden–Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and the other rapporteurs were Elena K. Khlestkina, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), director of the Vavilov All-Russia Institute of Plant Genetic Resources, and RAS Corresponding Member Natalia V. Lukina, director of the RAS Center for Ecology and Forest Productivity. Krestov began with the famous quote by Leonardo da Vinci: “We know more about the movement of celestial bodies than about the soil underfoot.” A long time has passed since then. Now, of course, we know more about the “soil underfoot.” Terrestrial ecosystems are our home, which today, according to the participants in the meeting, are rapidly changing under the impact of climate and anthropogenic factors, unfortunately, not for the better. To understand the reason for these changes and to propose measures for the conservation and rational use of the richest natural resources that our country has at its disposal is the goal that the meeting participants themselves set.

Herald of the RAS publishes reports presented to the academic audience, as well as discussion materials, with the participation of D.V. Gel’tman, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), RAS Corresponding Member Yu.V. Plugatar’; V.P. Upelniek, Cand. Sci. (Biol.); I.V. Shmakov; E.V. Zhuravleva, Dr. Sci. (Agriculture); A.A. Sirin, Dr. Sci. (Biol.); Yu.O. Lakhtikov; and RAS Academicians A.V. Adrianov, S.V. Rozhnov, Yu.Yu. Dgebuadze, and G.G. Matishov.

Translated by B. Alekseev

RAS Corresponding Member Pavel Vital’evich Krestov is Director of the Botanical Garden–Institute, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (FEB RAS). Kirill Aleksandrovich Korznikov, Cand. Sci. (Biol.), is a Leading Researcher of the Botanical Garden–Institute FEB RAS. Dmitrii Evgen’evich Kislov, Cand. Sci. (Phys.–Math.), is a Senior Researcher of the Botanical Garden–Institute FEB RAS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krestov, P.V., Korznikov, K.A. & Kislov, D.E. Profound Changes in Terrestrial Ecosystems in Russia in the 21st Century. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 90, 291–297 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331620030090

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331620030090

Keywords:

Navigation